Jump to content
IGNORED

Joshley Madison: 2 Sex Scandals and Counting


withaj

Recommended Posts

Hey, you might not realize this but "tranny" is actually considered a very offensive word for transgender people.

This.

Also, I don't think being either transsexual or a transvestite (two very different things btw) is 'bad' or something we should really be concerned about. The way you've phrased this makes it appear as if you believe transgender people or transvestites are bad/odd. That's just not nice or fair.

If you're going to characterise Josh, a turd is a much fairer comparison and it doesn't promote further stigma being attached to an innocent group of people that, by the by, probably can't stand this guy and get twice as much crap on a daily basis for being who they are than Josh does for being him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 823
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I am confused. He said he was addicted to porn and he cheated on his wife. Is Ashley Madison also a porn site or could there be other shoes dropping?

it is not. i suspect since the am stuff came out from his cc, he may be concerned other such things could come to light as well, so he's trying to prevent any additional shock to any subsequent revelations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have this awful picture in my mind of Anna sitting at a wooden table, a bare lightbulb hanging above her (think old movie interrogation rooms) with JB standing over her pounding on the table, veins bulging, yelling "You WILL sign this!"

Is poor Anna even equipped to make a rational choice? Her upbringing would indicate otherwise & the pressure she must be under to comply must be immense. This is a woman who is truly being abused emotionally & psychologically & it's all out there for the rest of the world to watch. This is pretty horrific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know they had a dog named Jazmin at one point, and lived on Johnson Road.

Jazmin Johnson. Ooh, he could be a tranny. ;)

edit - Now I'm picturing him with a green wig and nails like the "Piece of Burger" guy.

I always heard it was your Street Name and City for your skinflick name...... "Johnson Tontitown" just sounds absolutely cringeworthy......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's sad here is that, for most women I think, this would be the proverbial last straw, wouldn't it? We would be able to decide for ourselves if we wanted to leave a husband such as Josh and, likely, many of us would. Does Anna have this freedom? Can she just pack up the kids and go? I don't know if she wants to or not, but, either way, I hope it is HER decision. She must be in absolute turmoil. It's quite a fucked up mess he's made. Simply cannot imagine the conversations taking place within that family right now.

It is her decision, whether she thinks so or not. She may chose to give her agency to the men in her life for her own religious, brainwashed, whatever reasons - but she has the right to leave him, she has the freedom to do what she needs to do for those babies.

She also needs to know that giving up her rights voluntarily doesn't absolve her of her moral obligations to act in her children's best interests, whatever they may be, even if they conflict with her belief system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always heard it was your Street Name and City for your skinflick name...... "Johnson Tontitown" just sounds absolutely cringeworthy......

awkward and cringeworthy, just like him. perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Jim Boob has some skeletons to be revealed

I'm waiting for it to be revealed that Michelle is the one with skeletons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a hypothetical divorce, who gets to continue to use M names for future children? I mean, Anna will have the existing M children, but they were named after Josh's mother. Will Gothard be the one to decide?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One man and several women?

To be fair, that's Biblical marriage.

To be fair, having mistresses was only acceptable when the wife couldn't produce children herself. And, typically, she was the one who produced the mistress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have an actual screenshot of the original statement with the "fortress" in it? We have the actual text posted here, but a screenshot would be awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My heart just breaks for Anna and the Mkids. She doesn't deserve this. I wonder if she knows what an STD is. It is once again playing out in front of the whole world.

Who is her real confidant? She needs someone to talk to. Her sisters.....I don't know.

So, now I am happy for Jana to be quietly single for the time being.....for quite awhile.

I am sad for Anna.

Josh is trash. He should be put on a chain gang in the hot sun. His parents with him. Crazy people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm waiting for it to be revealed that Michelle is the one with skeletons.

I would be laughing so hard. Almost as much as if PP would be caught having an affair with a man.

J'Chelle having a double life would be so hilarious. Even though I would feel sorry for the children, I think such an exposure would be beneficial for them in the long run, as it would give them a real chance to flee fom cult life.

And honestly, I think one of the reasons they won't drop Josh completely is that they are afraid that if they do, he might reveal some other, inconvenient family secrets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm waiting for it to be revealed that Michelle is the one with skeletons.

But we know her skeletons! She kissed before marriage and mowed the grass in a bikini. :roll:

And beat small children with plumbing rods. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Josh has any true friends that can guide and help him? He needs it. I hope at this point he can be unselfish and think of his wife and kids and not go sink into a pity party. He ruined his own life but wow looking at what he brought upon so many people and the legacy he leaves his kids. It's so awful. He doesn't have the intelligence to get past this the way Clinton did.

Anna has some tough decisions ahead of her, I truly hope she has someone in her life who doesn't have an agenda that can guide her. Whether she stays with him or goes, I wouldn't judge it for her. She wouldn't be the first one to stay with a cheater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have an actual screenshot of the original statement with the "fortress" in it? We have the actual text posted here, but a screenshot would be awesome.

Gawker kind of has it.

gawker.com/josh-duggars-apology-i-have-been-the-biggest-hypocrit-1725405629

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Duggars really need to put a filter on the advertisements on their websites. The ad showing for me on their website says "#1 Reason Men Pull Away - The Biggest Mistake Women Make That Kill's A Man's Attraction - Learn More" And there is a picture of a sad woman. It just seems sad and inappropriate considering the circumstances.

(I know the ads are supposed to be based on browsing history. I might be getting this ad due to searches I have done the past few days to find out more info about Ashley Madison. But it seems like they should be able to filter which ads show up or take the ads down.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gawker kind of has it.

gawker.com/josh-duggars-apology-i-have-been-the-biggest-hypocrit-1725405629

I wonder how many more revisions there will be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's on the Duggar Family Official FB page now. Just waiting for the crazy leghumpers to come out and comment. Most of the comments so far seem like people are at a loss of words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Anna does not make a statement. I do not feel that she should. This is gross and horrible for a woman with a newborn and three other young children. I hope she has someone to talk to and comfort her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, having mistresses was only acceptable when the wife couldn't produce children herself. And, typically, she was the one who produced the mistress.

Really? I thought I knew the Bible pretty well, and while that's sometimes the case, it doesn't seem to be the case all the time. Jacob married Leah and Rachel. Rachel was barren (for a while), but since she was the second wife, there is no way that could have been known. And I know David had several wives. I believe several of them had children. Solomon had a bunch of wives, and I can't imagine that all but one were infertile. I could totally be wrong, but from what I know/remember, there are plenty of Biblical men who don't follow that rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.