Jump to content
IGNORED

United States Senate 2


GreyhoundFan

Recommended Posts

Cotton and the rest of the GQP are such assholes:

 

  • Eyeroll 4
  • I Agree 1
  • Thank You 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again, the repugs are taking the US hostage: "Leaderless Republicans rush headlong toward default"

Quote

“Unfortunately, Congress consistently brings the government to the edge of default before facing its responsibility. This brinkmanship threatens the holders of government bonds and those who rely on Social Security and veterans benefits. Interest rates would skyrocket, instability would occur in financial markets, and the federal deficit would soar. The United States has a special responsibility to itself and the world to meet its obligations.”

— President Ronald Reagan, Sept. 26, 1987

This is not Ronald Reagan’s Republican Party.

Neither is it the party of the Republican Revolution of ’94, the tea-party-infused GOP of 2010, nor even the Republican Party that surrendered to Donald Trump in 2016.

No, this new version of the GOP is at once so radical and so lacking in responsible leadership that it is plunging headlong and unified toward forcing default on the full faith and credit of the United States. Congressional Republicans are inviting economic calamity.

Reagan presided over 18 increases in the debt ceiling during his presidency. George W. Bush’s treasury secretary, Paul O’Neill, compared those who opposed raising the limit to “terrorists.” Former Republican House speaker John Boehner called it “insanity” to hold the debt limit hostage — and those who did it “crazies.”

There have been squabbles over the debt limit for decades, including some near misses, but the United States has never defaulted on the debt its two parties have jointly accumulated. Though crazies threatened default, grown-ups in the GOP — Bob Dole, Boehner, an earlier incarnation of Mitch McConnell — pulled them back from the abyss.

Until now. The crazies are in charge. McConnell, the Senate GOP leader, says flatly that he won’t vote to increase the debt ceiling, and he isn’t even negotiating. “That’s their problem,” he says of the Democrats. And Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) has threatened to filibuster any debt-ceiling increase, which means Democrats can’t avoid default unless 10 Republican senators agree.

If Republicans don’t budge, they would leave the U.S. economy hanging by a thread, potentially forcing Democrats to raise the ceiling by rewriting and passing a massive (and filibuster-immune) budget reconciliation package in a matter of days. It’s the legislative equivalent of passing a camel through the eye of a needle.

As The Post’s venerable congressional correspondent Paul Kane notes, Republicans have entirely invented this new standard that Democrats alone are responsible for increasing the limit: “Almost every time the debt ceiling has been lifted, it has been done in bipartisan fashion under the regular Senate order that requires at least 60 votes to end debate on the legislation.”

The hypocrisy is stunning. McConnell has voted to increase or suspend the debt limit 32 times, including thrice under Trump, who added $7.8 trillion to the debt, The Post’s Jeff Stein reported. About 97 percent of the current debt existed before Joe Biden’s presidency; McConnell and his GOP colleagues are refusing to finance the debt they already incurred because they object to other spending that has merely been proposed.

How did Republicans get to this sorry state?

It began with Newt Gingrich, who as House speaker in 1995 led his party to suspend the “Gephardt Rule,” which automatically increased the debt limit with each year’s budget. Gingrich threatened default if President Bill Clinton didn’t agree to spending cuts. “I don’t care if we have no executive offices and no bonds for 60 days,” he said. But ultimately, he settled for relatively minor concessions.

When Republicans regained power in the House in 2011, they repealed the Gephardt Rule for good, guaranteeing perpetual debt-limit brinkmanship. Boehner pleaded with Republicans to be “adults” and told them to “get your ass in line,” but his crazies refused to budge, and finally, on the cusp of default and after a downgrading of the U.S. debt rating, President Barack Obama agreed to Republicans’ spending cuts. McConnell concluded he enjoyed playing chicken with the nation’s credit. “It’s a hostage that’s worth ransoming,” he said then.

So Republicans held the debt limit hostage again in 2013. Then, newbie senator Cruz forced a government shutdown in a doomed attempt to get Obama to agree to a repeal of Obamacare. It was a political disaster for Republicans, and as the shuttered federal government approached a default deadline, Boehner ordered Republicans to surrender. The following year, only some last-minute arm twisting by McConnell thwarted another Cruz attempt to block yet another debt-limit increase.

“Nobody was proud of the fact that we had to keep voting to raise the ceiling,” Boehner later wrote in his memoir. “But not voting to raise the ceiling meant that government would stop running. The country wouldn’t be able to pay its bills and would risk going into default on the money we owed.”

Now, Boehner is long gone, and McConnell rivals Cruz in his reckless handling of default. With the government now teetering on the edge of default and shutdown, there is simply nobody left to stop Republican crazies from sabotaging Americans’ prosperity.

I thought the Gingrich GQP was bad, the McTurtle version is worse.

  • Upvote 6
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GreyhoundFan said:

I thought the Gingrich GQP was bad, the McTurtle version is worse.

The McConnell version is pure evil.

He is single-handedly responsible for the destruction of democracy in the US. His malicious intent cannot be overstated and should not be underestimated -- but I'm afraid it is.

  • Upvote 4
  • I Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GreyhoundFan said:

Once again, the repugs are taking the US hostage: "Leaderless Republicans rush headlong toward default"

I thought the Gingrich GQP was bad, the McTurtle version is worse.

*raises hand* Since the federal government is currently footing the bill for U.S. citizens to receive Covid vaccines and the Regeneron treatment, does that mean that all vaccinations and antibody infusions will come to a screeching halt if Congress is unable to reach a deal? :tw_grimace:

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GreyhoundFan said:

Once again, the repugs are taking the US hostage: "Leaderless Republicans rush headlong toward default"

I thought the Gingrich GQP was bad, the McTurtle version is worse.

I saw this earlier on Twitter.  It seems appropriate right now concerning the Republican party.

Spoiler

2098202850_Screenshot(6548).png.ebfd5bc0469c609c91cb2c3860eaa086.png

 

  • Upvote 11
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuckles decided to run again for re-election.

Quote

Iowa’s longest serving U.S. senator, Chuck Grassley, announced on Friday he is running for re-election.

In a press release, Grassley, of New Hartford, said he plans to meet with Iowans in a variety of settings to discuss issues important to Iowa’s communities, schools, businesses, farms and families. His schedule includes stops in Marion, Davenport, Dyersville, Des Moines and Waterloo.

“In a time of crisis and polarization, Iowa needs strong, effective leadership,” Grassley said. “I’m focused on serving the people of Iowa as your senator and fighting for policies that will make Iowa an even better place to raise a family and grow a business.”

I hope Iowa Democrats coalesce around a Democratic challenger early and that person fights hard to retire Chuckles.

I think what's going on here is that if Chuckles won he would serve for a short period of time, then decide he's had enough and retire so that if CovidKim was still in office she'd appoint his useless grandson Pat to the office then he'd be running as an incumbent in 2028.  It would not surprise me if a deal was already in the works between Chuckles and CovidKim to that effect.

  • Upvote 3
  • Thank You 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously though, what does censure actually mean in practice? What is it other than ‘putting her on ignore’? Will it stop her from doing whatever she sees fit, and aid in killing democracy? Oh, they might (not shall) leave her without endorsement next year, but how is that hollow ‘threat’ going to prevent her from keeping the filibuster in place?

 

  • Upvote 3
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is an excellent montage. Sadly, Josh cares nothing about the truth, only his own showboating opportunities.

 

  • Sad 1
  • Thank You 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lindsey is about 30 seconds from sporting a t-shirt with TFG's picture on it, just like pre-teen girls wear shirts featuring their favorite pop stars:

 

  • Eyeroll 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, she's American, Chuck.

image.png.93f27ebd775aed6cdc36dd3bebfbbafd.png

  • Eyeroll 6
  • WTF 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Aww, Mittens wants to protect the poor billionaires because they care so much about the rest of us. Oh, please.

 

  • Eyeroll 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He obviously never heard of the underwear section of the Sears catalog.

  • I Agree 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, smittykins said:

He obviously never heard of the underwear section of the Sears catalog.

 I found a website that has scans of old catalogs and they have the Sears Spring-Summer Catalog from 1993. Hawley turned 14 on New Year's Eve of that year, so he should be old enough to have memories of perusing the underwear and swimsuit sections. :fainting:

 

  • I Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say or National Geographic magazine but I kind of doubt anyone in his house was intellectual enough to subscribe to it.

I also don't think he realizes how old Playboy is.

  • Upvote 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Audrey2 said:

I would say or National Geographic magazine but I kind of doubt anyone in his house was intellectual enough to subscribe to it.

I also don't think he realizes how old Playboy is.

I think his head might explode if someone showed him some of the images found on ancient Greek pottery. 😏

  • Haha 8
  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cartmann99 said:

I think his head might explode if someone showed him some of the images found on ancient Greek pottery. 😏

 

  • Haha 8
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, thoughtful said:

 

I had this scene in mind when I was writing that! :laughing-rollingred:

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, thoughtful said:

 

And I came so close to posting this in response as well, that I had it all googled and everything! 💙

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure where to put this so I'm dropping it here.  Sen. Max Cleland died recently.  He was the senator from Georgia and was a triple amputee due to war injuries.  As much as I love what Rick Wilson has done with the Lincoln Project, it's well to remember that Wilson is a political animal who was almost as good a ratf**ker as Karl Rove and Lee Atwater.  Wilson created ads about how Cleland voted against the Homeland Security efforts and was soft on terror.  They worked.  An Army veteran lost to a man who had never served because the public thought Max wasn't patriotic enough.

It's why I don't really trust Rick Wilson.

  • Thank You 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Xan said:

Not sure where to put this so I'm dropping it here.  Sen. Max Cleland died recently.  He was the senator from Georgia and was a triple amputee due to war injuries.  As much as I love what Rick Wilson has done with the Lincoln Project, it's well to remember that Wilson is a political animal who was almost as good a ratf**ker as Karl Rove and Lee Atwater.  Wilson created ads about how Cleland voted against the Homeland Security efforts and was soft on terror.  They worked.  An Army veteran lost to a man who had never served because the public thought Max wasn't patriotic enough.

It's why I don't really trust Rick Wilson.

That's really messed up. 

  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.