We're Always Learning New Things with Ken Alexander: Part 2

[Koala]

what did she allegedly teach?

She's never been really clear on what exactly she taught, but she makes reference to it fairly often. The fact that Lori has a college education completely blows my mind :evil-eye:

[Koala]

I am the type who likes to hear hard words. I like to be challenged.

Meanwhile, in another post:

I feel like you are the one woman in the class who always has to raise her hand and disagree with me.

[Coconut Flan]

Has Lori ever said where she went to college?

[SoybeanQueen]

"Maybe if I could shine the love of Christ more, my words would be better received by others."

Well, we agree there, Lori. If your words were more Christ-like, instead of judgmental and hateful, they probably would be received better. People are not so stupid to not see your contempt for anyone who doesn't believe exactly as you do. Speaking hate and calling it love is not Christ-like.

[DutchMommy]

Has Lori ever said where she went to college?

In the post from the 27th of this month, she says she first went to Westmont College. After that, she got her teaching credential at CSUN. That is Cal State, right?

She says she was a teacher for three years, but no mention as to what she taught.

[cindyluvs24]

We have rules here Ken. The members stay within them or they have consequences. The fact that you don't seem to like the standards, yet are a member and have made more posts than some folks that have been members for years, seems to be escaping you. If people were actually doing any of the bold, it would be an issue and we would take action, but they are not. You are trying to spin it that way because you don't like what people are saying, but that doesn't mean it's actually happening.

On the other hand, I can point out several instances where YOU have done a couple of those things yourself. I've asked you nicely to stop and yet here we are again.

Some people are in the thread just to say mean things rather than have an actual conversation. That's not against our rules. It's not my way and I personally don't think it makes those people look good, but that's their choice. If you don't want to see those kinds of things, you can put the person on your foe list and then you won't see it.

To the bold: um..I don't even know how to address this because it's such a weird statement. The whole purpose of the internet is to share information. The reason the site is PUBLIC is so that the information we have here will be ON the internet. If we didn't want it out in the world at large, the site would be private. I can't decide if you *really* have no understanding of how the internet works and what it's purpose is or you are being willfully obtuse when it comes to this stuff because the stuff you say is so bizarre.

As I told you previously, I didn't "allow" you to join. Pretty much anyone is allowed to join Free Jinger (unless they have been banned, are a spammer or are under age). There was no special consideration given to you in your membership here.

For the umpteenth time Ken:

Everything said about you and Lori was backed up by direct quotes from your blogs. What about that don't you understand? It's like, legal to quote people, in case you were absent that day in law school. Truth is a bar to a libel suit (FYI: Libel refers to the written word, slander is for the spoken word - just thought I'd clear that up for you).

Therefore, you may come here and express how hurt you are but you've been refuted by YOUR OWN QUOTES. Deal with it.

If you are flouncing, then flounce already. And don't let the door hit you or your wife on the way out. Don't hit any more children either. One day, they may decide to hit back.

[GolightlyGrrl]

My mom used to make those!!!! Beef patties, with cubed potatoes and onions wrapped in foil and baked? That's how we made them! I loved those things :D

I call this meal "pocket stew" and I learned how to make this fine meal in Girl Scouts (when I wasn't going to lesbian orgies, abortion parties and foisting ebil Thin Mints on innocent Americans). Only I added carrots to the mix and instead of chopped onions I used onion soup mix. Delish!

On-topic: Lori doesn't like to be challenged, but she is challenged.

[cindyluvs24]

My son made things like that in Boy Scouts. They wrap all sorts of strange things in foil and cook them in a campfire.

[proverbial1]

"Maybe if I could shine the love of Christ more, my words would be better received by others."

Well, we agree there, Lori. If your words were more Christ-like, instead of judgmental and hateful, they probably would be received better. People are not so stupid to not see your contempt for anyone who doesn't believe exactly as you do. Speaking hate and calling it love is not Christ-like.

This is what I have observed about people with Lori's mindset. They believe that a wife should respect her husband. However, they don't believe, value or promote that a husband should respect his wife very much, if at all. Women with Lori's mindset (who obsessively promote wifely submission and respect) usually don't really value, promote or express respect for their fellow woman. In other words, women with Lori's mindset usually strive to respect their husbands with their actions and words but could care less about respecting others, especially other women.

They usually believe that women (no matter how much Ken speaks of equality) are inferior to men, innately rebellious, gullible, silly and misguided. Therefore, women (unlike men) need constant and strict discipline from older women and men in general. Therefore, it matters how women speak to and approach men as to show respect, but it's not really necessary to show respect to your fellow woman just correction, disciple, rebuke and even slut-shaming if necessary.

This is a very common attitude among some so called patriarchs, authoritarians and the manosphere. Like someone mentioned earlier, Christianity is not monolithic. Therefore, not all Christians preach, teach or treat others that way. Many Christian believe that spouses should respect one another and that respect is a virtue that should be shown to everyone.

[Coconut Flan]

Cal State Northridge so not a top tier school at all.

Thanks. I can't spend too much time on her blog. It messes with my blood pressure.

[2xx1xy1JD]

Ken wrote:

Ms. Curious Owner of the Defamatory site FreeJinger:

Per your request the following are defaming comments published by thoughtless individuals on your Forum site and allowed to remain on the site for the public to find. Beyond this your members have conspired and achieved the manipulation of Google into placing a hugely libelous and defaming set of links with the header L.ri Al.x.nd.r is a F..king M.nst.r

I have been called Satan, accused of sleeping with our Nanny of years ago, and beating my wife. This statement was made again by member Risy Daisy today or yesterday. The abuse and name calling continues unfettered and uncontrolled by you the Owner of this site. Please take responsibility for your Forum and ask your members to post responsibly and when they do not, delete there comments.

If you need a reminder of the definition of Defame: To damage the good reputation of (someone); slander or libel.

Your site and its comments fit the definition of defaming, so quit playing innocent on this subject. Acknowledge it and please clean it up, This is not Snark, this is purposeful harm to the character of a good godly couple, whos only desire is to please their Lord Jesus. Religious persecution should be stopped.

Lastly, concerning the walls of mischaracterizations, Koala's posts of quotes character's us as bad parents when the reality of things is that we were terrific parents and turned out four godly kids. Even when one posts quotes they can mischaracterize greatly. I have addressed the spanking issues completely, and our modest view of spanking, but she continues to mischarcaterize by taking comments from a four year period, many of them perhaps related to the same spanking incident and mischaracterized the quotes as separate incidents. I will not send my time pointing out a new mischacterization, profanity and spew on every 1-2 pages of your Forum.

There has been some healthy discussion, but your group has defamed us and harmed us. Please stop it in the name of common human decency and your responsibility as the Business Owner.

Sincerely, Ken Alexander

FloraKitty35Robotkin

Posts: 629

Group: Members

Joined: Aug 30, 2012

Lori is a hateful horrible specimen of humanity on Valentine's Day or any other day.

KoalaSister Wife

Posts: 5675

Group: Members

Joined: Jun 12, 2011

As a side note, while there are many questions I would like to ask Lori, I refuse to address them directly with Ken unless he is quoted as well. Lori seems to have a habit of striking out and then rushing behind Ken. I get that he is here to address us, but I refuse to interact with him as if he speaks for Lori.

RosyDaisyPurity Baller

Posts: 2118

Group: Members

Joined: Oct 24, 2012

What a cold-hearted, evil bitch!

Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:03 pm

chaotic lifeHelpmeet

Posts: 1309

Group: Social Media

Joined: Jul 21, 2011

So, you are taking the approach that he really did act as a gentleman with the nanny at all times and merely *sounds* pervy in what he writes. Interesting take on it I rather assumed he is simply a pervert and was as creepy to the nanny as it sounds when he writes it out.

Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:38 pm

MeccaVigorous Leghumper

Posts: 462

Group: Members

Joined: Nov 14, 2011

No. I am not taking that approach at all. Ken is a pervy jerk. It would not surprise me if he did act inappropriately towards this woman. He cannot even respect his wife and daughter. I doubt it would be much different with the nanny. I am simply saying he even sounds like a pervert when talking about simple gallstones on the Internet. He cannot keep his perviness in check when talking about gallbladder health. That is nuts.

salexPurity Baller

Posts: 2159

Group: Members

Joined: Jan 06, 2013

Referring to me and my company: Salex says: “Maybe they all spank their employeesâ€

Salex again: K.n Al.x.nd.r mill.nnium mangt wife spanker

L.ri Al.x.nd.r is a F..king M.nst.r

1 ... 456by GeoBQn » Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:15 am

It begins here and the conspiracy is born with this first post. Many FJers jump on happy to help in the process of moving the defamation/libel up the Google Search Engine.

To Curious again:

Ken says: are you kidding me? Go back and look at the thread again... Curious said: c) we don't control Google search in general and the person who suggested pushing a certain term to up the odds on hits didn't proceed with it.

At least be honest about it. Your group purposely manipulated the Google Crawler to defame my wife. Period and have refused my repeated requests to remedy the harm done. Solve the problem. I am not trying to curtail what you all say in the Forum, but it should stay here and not spew all over the Internet. You are the one's wielding the bat and causing harm.

GeoBQnPepsi is My Idol

Posts: 2951

Group: Members

Joined: Jun 15, 2011

ETA: Her full name in the title of the thread, so it will appear if someone searches her name in Google.

noni alabasterSpeshul Snowflake

Posts: 91

Group: Members

Joined: Oct 27, 2011

I suggest we start a " L... Alex….. is a F..king M nst r " campaign, similar to the " D..g Phi..ips is a T.ol, " movement.

I'd love to see that phrase pushed to the top of searches for this hateful, hateful woman.

salexPurity Baller

Posts: 2006

Group: Members

Joined: Jan 06, 2013

Given that L... Alex….. is a F..king M nst r and D..g Phi..ips is a T.ol, there should be no reason not to do this

RowanRobotkin

Posts: 659

Group: Members

Joined: Jun 12, 2011

L... Alex….. is a F..king M nst r.

Wow, 6 words that explain so much!

thoughtfulBuddy Team Captain

Posts: 5432

Group: Bloggers

Joined: Jun 12, 2011

Might I suggest “L... Alex….. is a m.nst.r," so that anyone with profanity filtering still gets to learn that Lori Alexander is a monster.

Such a Thoughtful Bully you are Thoughtful

clarinetpowerGot A Horse from God

Posts: 1289

Group: Members

Joined: Jun 12, 2011

Only one teensy problem: there's a porn star called L.ri And.rson. Apparently, she is F..king a lot of things.

Jeneric DuggarBlanket Trained

Posts: 25

Group: Inactive

Joined: May 30, 2013

I'll bet she'll be really pissed off when she finds out about 'our' L.ri And.rson (who is a monster). Talk about giving someone a bad name.

Ours???

dairyfreelifeMade My Blog Private

Posts: 1794

Group: Members

Joined: Sep 22, 2011

Oh, and someone mentioned above about a porn star named L.ri And.rson. The surnames are different, so no worries.

2xx1xy1JDSleeps With The Purity Bear

Posts: 3865

Group: Members

Joined: Oct 16, 2011

L... Alex….. is a m.nst.r!

I tried it again with another comment. Let's see if it works. I hope I'm using the words right. I actually believe in the gist of what I'm posting, so I think it's legit - it's just that I wouldn't use that language if I wasn't talking to a fundie.

I see that someone still hasn't bothered to read up on the legal definition of defamation.

Opinion is not defamation.

Profanity is not defamation.

Comparison to an imaginary creature is not defamation.

Claiming that someone is Satan is not defamation (and if it was, Lori may want to check what she said about the Democrats)

Mere speculation, where it's clear that it is speculation and not a statement of fact, is not defamation.

Posting a comment in a thread with an insulting title is not defamation.

Posting a direct quote of someone's words is not defamation.

Defamation involves spreading false information as if it was a true fact, for malicious purposes. For example, if it turns out that it's not true that the former head of World Vision said that he never saw a Christian starve, then Lori claiming that she heard this would be defamation.

[Dysfundamental]

What a silly and sad little man he is.

[Koala]

Looks like Ken has retreated to a sandbox that he can actually control. Passive aggressive jab @ FJ: Check!

Ken:

We live in a world that demands tolerance, yet often the voices that demand tolerance the most get most offended at Christian life and teachings.

I try not to get offended at much of what non-christians do or say unless it is illegal or meant to be offensive. I see people's sensibilities offended far too easily, especially with the issue of spanking and submission. It is the loudest outcry's that tend to shape and form our society. Yell fire loud enough and some legislation will be written, not because its truly necessary, but because a small group wants to control others. They know better, and thus they get offended each time someone writes or says something with which they disagree.

Our freedoms are eroding as the voice of the majority often stays silent as the yelling of the offended is so loud that no one wants to get in their cross hairs. Then we wake up one day and wonder what happened to our country, its freedom of religion, and the right to privacy in how one raises their children.

Definitely need privacy when you're leaving bruises on your own kid don't you Ken? Can you imagine what the gov. would do with that kind of information? The probably wouldn't even recognize what terrific parents you and Lori are...might not even entertain the fact that Lori's leather strap is what makes "those perfect Alexanders" perfect. :roll:

We need laws like that because of people like you and Lori, Ken.

[formergothardite]

When other Christians are offended at what you are saying can you really claim that people are offended at the "Christian life and teachings"? I think not.

[spud]

Ken:

I see people's sensibilities offended far too easily, especially with the issue of spanking and submission. ...because a small group wants to control others. They know better, and thus they get offended each time someone writes or says something with which they disagree.

This is no very striking resemblance of your own character, I am sure, Ken.

[polecat]

When other Christians are offended at what you are saying can you really claim that people are offended at the "Christian life and teachings"? I think not.

Well, that's easy to Kensplain away. The Christians who are offended simply aren't True Christians . Therefore, their opinions don't count.

[Curious]

Looks like Ken has retreated to a sandbox that he can actually control. Passive aggressive jab @ FJ: Check!

Ken:

Definitely need privacy when you're leaving bruises on your own kid don't you Ken? Can you imagine what the gov. would do with that kind of information? The probably wouldn't even recognize what terrific parents you and Lori are...might not even entertain the fact that Lori's leather strap is what makes "those perfect Alexanders" perfect. :roll:

We need laws like that because of people like you and Lori, Ken.

[voice 1] This is Pot calling Kettle, come in Kettle.

[voice 2] Pot, this is Kettle, I read you.

[voice 1] Kettle, you are black, repeat, you are black.

[voice 2] Roger that Pot, over and out.

[Earthshine]

Well, that's easy to Kensplain away. The Christians who are offended simply aren't True Christians . Therefore, their opinions don't count.

Ha! "Kensplain"..Love that word!

[Curious]

Ha! "Kensplain"..Love that word!

I think Boogalou needs to add this one to our dictionary :)

[OkToBeTakei]

[voice 1] This is Pot calling Kettle, come in Kettle.

[voice 2] Pot, this is Kettle, I read you.

[voice 1] Kettle, you are black, repeat, you are black.

[voice 2] Roger that Pot, over and out.

:lol:

Seriously?

I honestly thought Ken was playing at being so stupid and narrow minded. Shocker! He actually is THAT stupid and narrow minded.

HIS type of 'Christian' is by far the minority in the world. He just does not seem to get that. Of course the rest of the world does not exist :roll:

[Koala]

I think it's rather rich coming from someone who no doubt wants to see his version of religion/morality legislated onto others. He doesn't want anyone to interfere with his/Lori's right to hit their children, but he'd probably be the first one in line to prevent gay people from getting married, or women and the medical professional that care for them (read: not politicians who know fuck all about the female reproductive system) from making medical decisions about her body. Hell, his wife claims she wouldn't even care if women lost the right to vote. But they aren't extreme at all...of course not :roll:

**Side note** Today's post is funny:

Submission is ducking so God can hit your husband! This is a cute illustration that shows perfectly how powerful and easy submission truly can be.

She absolutely drips loathing for Ken. Ironically, he doesn't seem to see that this is just a new way for two control freaks to try to control each other. Him via submission, and her via being so godly that god brings a holy smackdown on Ken. :roll:

[OkToBeTakei]

I think it's rather rich coming from someone who no doubt wants to see his version of religion/morality legislated onto others. He doesn't want anyone to interfere with his/Lori's right to hit their children, but he'd probably be the first one in line to prevent gay people from getting married, or women and the medical professional that care for them (read: not politicians who know fuck all about the female reproductive system) from making medical decisions about her body. Hell, his wife claims she wouldn't even care if women lost the right to vote. But they aren't extreme at all...of course not :roll:

**Side note** Today's post is funny:

She absolutely drips loathing for Ken. Ironically, he doesn't seem to see that this is just a new way for two control freaks to try to control each other. Him via submission, and her via being so godly that god brings a holy smackdown on Ken. :roll:

I went for a look. The cat :lol: :lol: :lol:

Trademark Lori. It's only a cat so kick it. Let God whack your husband for you. Oh and feminism is now to blame for abortion as well.

[Coconut Flan]

Just like Ken, she's made her own reality whether it matches the real world and how things really work or not.

[Marianne]

God, Ken, read some books or site about master/slave or dom/sub relationship, pay a suscriptionn at the kink and realspanking, but please, stop saying all this shit.

[SunnyAndrsn]

Just like Ken, she's made her own reality whether it matches the real world and how things really work or not.

Another shining example:

Submission is your greatest evangelistic tool. It is so opposite of what the world teaches or our natural inclination. We want to fight for our rights, get our own way, and we think we are always right. All of these push men away from women. We wonder why so few men want to marry women these days

Hmmm...I thought the Gospel and showing the love of Christ was the greatest evangelistic tool.

Anyone have any idea who these people are who are wondering why so few men want to marry women? Besides Ken & Lori, who is worried about this?