Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, if Lori is so concerned about Precious Josh's future, maybe Ken Alexander should invite him to come work as a consultant-- sure he has no experience in dentistry, but Ken's scheduling system should be easy enough to teach to Josh, and he's honed his speaking at FRC, so maybe he can jump in and do a few presentations at dental conferences.

IF they are so worried about Joshie, they should reach out and help. or they should quit using his name as click bait.

It is possible even with this "setback" he's wealthier than the Lorken....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 994
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Why is ken so involved with her blog, anyway? He's super creepy.

Lori is a terrible person, a shitty mother, a bad wife, and probably like the worst lay ever. She should stop giving advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lori once said sooper sekritly that the only reason a man OR a woman could possibly want to have oral sex is if they saw it in porn.

That's all I have to add to this discussion.

At least now we know why they're both so crabby.

Now if we could just figure out why they're so hateful. (Or is it just jealousy that everyone else is having so much more fun than they are?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least now we know why they're both so crabby.

Now if we could just figure out why they're so hateful. (Or is it just jealousy that everyone else is having so much more fun than they are?)

Lori seems so aghast at the idea that women enjoy and desire sex that I doubt she's jealous. Or maybe she is. The Alexanders' monstrosity is the 8th wonder of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lori seems so aghast at the idea that women enjoy and desire sex that I doubt she's jealous. Or maybe she is. The Alexanders' monstrosity is the 8th wonder of the world.

If she were a bit smarter, I'd say she might be the type who doesn't want to enjoy sex because they she might begin to truly like her husband instead of just loving him because the bible makes her do so. And that would put her at risk of actually doing things for him out of love/caring instead of out of duty-- which would put her at a disadvantage in the marriage game she is playing.

But I don't think she is that smart. So to me, it boils down to her being a virgin who married someone who is not worth shit in bed and thus Poor Lori has never really had passionate sex -- for her it is part of what she has to trade for her lifestyle. I suspect the most excited she ever, sexually, was the excitement she felt poking the hole in the diaphragm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could kind sorta agree with parts of his message, if he wasn't delivering it in the creepiest way possible.

I don't believe that thoughts are the same as deeds (and don't follow the New Testament, so the statement suggesting that they are the same is irrelevant to me). I don't think that all porn is the same either. Porn/sex addictions do exist, and can be quite harmful, but it's possible to see a naked image and not be a porn addict. I also think that demonizing ALL sexual thoughts actually creates problems in marriages, and in the discussion of genuinely harmful sexual actions (like, say, repeatedly assaulting underage girls), because it focuses on lust rather than lack of consent as the problem.

Unfortunately, Lori and Ken still won't say that whacking off is not big deal, or that men may get horny sometimes but controlling themselves and refraining from sexually assaulting anyone (including a wife) is important.

Also, Lori's busy trying to argue that breastfeeding in public is the same as porn and is totally sinful. Um, where is all that lovely nuance? The Bible has precisely zero passages that refer to breastfeeding in public as something that is forbidden, and a number of passages that speak about breastfeeding in very open, positive terms. http://www.openbible.info/topics/breastfeeding

I also get the feeling from the previous day's comments that Josh's actions can be minimized because the victims were girls. He doesn't waste any time reminding us of the evils of gay sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could kind sorta agree with parts of his message, if he wasn't delivering it in the creepiest way possible.

I don't believe that thoughts are the same as deeds (and don't follow the New Testament, so the statement suggesting that they are the same is irrelevant to me). I don't think that all porn is the same either. Porn/sex addictions do exist, and can be quite harmful, but it's possible to see a naked image and not be a porn addict. I also think that demonizing ALL sexual thoughts actually creates problems in marriages, and in the discussion of genuinely harmful sexual actions (like, say, repeatedly assaulting underage girls), because it focuses on lust rather than lack of consent as the problem.

Unfortunately, Lori and Ken still won't say that whacking off is not big deal, or that men may get horny sometimes but controlling themselves and refraining from sexually assaulting anyone (including a wife) is important.

Also, Lori's busy trying to argue that breastfeeding in public is the same as porn and is totally sinful. Um, where is all that lovely nuance? The Bible has precisely zero passages that refer to breastfeeding in public as something that is forbidden, and a number of passages that speak about breastfeeding in very open, positive terms. http://www.openbible.info/topics/breastfeeding

I also get the feeling from the previous day's comments that Josh's actions can be minimized because the victims were girls. He doesn't waste any time reminding us of the evils of gay sex.

RE: the bolded ... I want to clarify that I don't think that looking at porn is the same as actually cheating (emotionally or physically). I was simply using the verse to point out his monumental ignorance and hypocrisy.

Women are supposed to submit because of one or two verses. But looking at porn isn't cheating even though another verse clearly says it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Creepy Ken uses these sex posts for his own prurient amusement.

No where in the Clear Teaching of Scripture[tm][/tm] does it say men are to mentor to other men's wives regarding their sex lives, or on anything for that matter. Men are suppose to mentor to men (Titus 2). Ken & Lori like to tell people they must slavishly play by "God's rules" but then they choose to ignore the rules whenever it suits them. Talking to strange women about their sex lives obviously suits Creepy Ken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Creepy Ken uses these sex posts for his own prurient amusement.

No where in the Clear Teaching of Scripture[tm][/tm] does it say men are to mentor to other men's wives regarding their sex lives, or on anything for that matter. Men are suppose to mentor to men (Titus 2). Ken & Lori like to tell people they must slavishly play by "God's rules" but then they choose to ignore the rules whenever it suits them. Talking to strange women about their sex lives obviously suits Creepy Ken.

I totally agree with you. A woman in comments just asked Lori a question about not having sex with her husband every single time he wants it, but instead of Lori, Ken replied.

My husband is an Atheist, but I am telling you right now, he would be mortified. There is no way on earth he's have a conversation like that with another woman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally agree with you. A woman in comments just asked Lori a question about not having sex with her husband every single time he wants it, but instead of Lori, Ken replied.

My husband is an Atheist, but I am telling you right now, he would be mortified. There is no way on earth he's have a conversation like that with another woman.

Exactly! Whose SO would think that's normal? I think Ken is fishing for comments like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly! Whose SO would think that's normal? I think Ken is fishing for comments like that.

For all of the deeply conservative, deeply orthodox, Patriarchy-subscribing men I know, not one would ever deign to address what they would consider "women's concerns", as Ken often does. It would be seen as wildly inappropriate and something that should be "left to the women".

Creepy, Ken, creepy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Alexander's School of Sin Ranking (from 10 to 1 with one being the absolute worst sin EVER):

10. Molesting your sisters

9. Rape

8. Nonconsensually touching a woman's breast

7. Watching porn/lusting after a woman/falling in love with a woman not your wife

6. Dressing immodestly according to the Lorken Book of Modesty Rules

5. Criticising the Duggars

4. Working outside the home

3. Dropping raisins on the floor

2. Breastfeeding in public

1. Repeating Ken and Lori's own words, i.e. goggle tactics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck Lori and fuck this commenter

I can guarantee you there are many men out there who did things when they were 14 years old that they shouldn't have done like touch their sisters inappropriately a few times. Josh's sisters publicly admitted they don't remember anything and what the media has done to them is many times worse than what Josh ever did to them.

Renee

· 8 hours ago

Lori,

I first want to say that I love your blog and have been reading it for a while now. It has changed me in so many ways, you have helped me be a better wife and a better christian. I love how you and your husband aren't afraid to stand up for what the bible says. Having said that I just wanted to say that I agree with everything you said about the Duggar's. He was 14 and like you said I dare say most 14 year olds' have done the same thing. As Christians we need to stick together, we are slowly losing our rights and if we don't come together it will only get worse.

Thank you for keeping true to God's word and shining your light!

Renee and Lori FU

I really doubt many 14 year olds are molesting young girls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I've read today's post before. From her. It's weird, because I agree with her - I too hate eating out because I don't know what is in the food, how it was prepared, and unless I'm shelling out the $$$, it's not as good. But I also hate the way she presents her argument so much that I want to argue with her. About something. Anything.

http://imgur.com/a/K13ln

Yeah, I like homemade food, too, but that post pissed me off. I think it's the judgemental tone of it; Lori prefers homemade food in a quiet environment, therefore anyone who prefers differently is secretly suffering at their own hands :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His post on adultery has to be in response to some of her recent posts, such as breastfeeding and seeing a female in a bikini in the park, etc. He must have been leering at other women in public lately (as well as viewing porn). In much of the post, he really seems to be blaming women for men viewing porn, such as him mentioning that women complicate things by defrauding and depriving their husbands (i.e., no 10 minutes and a lube). Everything always boils down to being the wife's fault.

Maybe he ought to ask himself why Lori is 'withholding' sex from him? Could it be that she doesn't really care for him, and that is why she doesn't want to touch him? Or the fact that it is viewed by both of them as her 'obligation' and not just a natural part of loving each other? If people view sex as an obligation and not an act of love (or just fun), I can see where resentment and bitterness would come into play and create a huge wedge in the relationship. I think that they both secretly detest each other. In a more loving marriage, both people generally want to have sex, because it feels good, and to give pleasure to the other person as well. There are times when one person may not be in the mood or capable of participating (it can be the husband as well as the wife) due to circumstances such as child or workplace stress or illness, but people in most good marriages want to be with their spouse. They fact that they have turned it into a wifely obligation speaks volumes.

Why in the world would anyone want to get married in their universe? Complete and utter submission and obligation doesn't sound appealing to me - I would rather be single and happy than to get married under their rules. They are so twisted, especially if they think that they have the knowledge and authority to teach others to live in the same soul-sucking way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's revelation from Lori:

Soda is poison to the human body.

From the National Eating Disorders Association:

Those who have an “unhealthy obsession†with otherwise healthy eating may be suffering from “orthorexia nervosa,†a term which literally means “fixation on righteous eating.†Orthorexia starts out as an innocent attempt to eat more healthfully, but orthorexics become fixated on food quality and purity. They become consumed with what and how much to eat, and how to deal with “slip-ups.†An iron-clad will is needed to maintain this rigid eating style. Every day is a chance to eat right, be “good,†rise above others in dietary prowess, and self-punish if temptation wins (usually through stricter eating, fasts and exercise). Self-esteem becomes wrapped up in the purity of orthorexics’ diet and they sometimes feel superior to others, especially in regard to food intake.

Eventually food choices become so restrictive, in both variety and calories, that health suffers – an ironic twist for a person so completely dedicated to healthy eating. Eventually, the obsession with healthy eating can crowd out other activities and interests, impair relationships, and become physically dangerous.

I'm not an expert, but if it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lemonade is a healthy alternative to soda? Since when? Don't get me wrong -- I love lemons and lemonade, but lemonade will destroy your teeth just as quickly as soda will. Might as well suck on a battery acid popsicle, and as obsessed as she is with health, she should know that poor dental health = poor general health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys need to stop laughing at Lori, OK? She has seen pictures of people in poverty. PICTURES! She knows all about the struggle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His post on adultery has to be in response to some of her recent posts, such as breastfeeding and seeing a female in a bikini in the park, etc. He must have been leering at other women in public lately (as well as viewing porn). In much of the post, he really seems to be blaming women for men viewing porn, such as him mentioning that women complicate things by defrauding and depriving their husbands (i.e., no 10 minutes and a lube). Everything always boils down to being the wife's fault.

Maybe he ought to ask himself why Lori is 'withholding' sex from him? Could it be that she doesn't really care for him, and that is why she doesn't want to touch him? Or the fact that it is viewed by both of them as her 'obligation' and not just a natural part of loving each other? If people view sex as an obligation and not an act of love (or just fun), I can see where resentment and bitterness would come into play and create a huge wedge in the relationship. I think that they both secretly detest each other. In a more loving marriage, both people generally want to have sex, because it feels good, and to give pleasure to the other person as well. There are times when one person may not be in the mood or capable of participating (it can be the husband as well as the wife) due to circumstances such as child or workplace stress or illness, but people in most good marriages want to be with their spouse. They fact that they have turned it into a wifely obligation speaks volumes.

Why in the world would anyone want to get married in their universe? Complete and utter submission and obligation doesn't sound appealing to me - I would rather be single and happy than to get married under their rules. They are so twisted, especially if they think that they have the knowledge and authority to teach others to live in the same soul-sucking way.

Agree with everything you wrote, except for the bolded (mine) - I don't think it's any secret at all that they detest each other!

I would feel sorry for both of them stuck in their sad twisted world if they weren't such toxic excuses for human beings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or perhaps the Willis family drinks water when eating out because it's free? Just a thought, Lori.

I didn't watch the Willis Clan episode, but I agree, that could have been the reason why they had water. Some pizza restaurants also offer iced tea pitcher deals as part of meal deals. We don't know why the Willis family had water and Lori is just guessing. I'm surprised she admits that.

About the comment about pictures of people drinking soda

Lori Alexander

· 19 hours ago

That is sad. I see pictures of those in poverty drinking soda instead of spending the little money they have on nourishing food. It's cheap and widely available, unfortunately.

Lori, maybe the people in the pictures you see aren't regular soda drinkers. Maybe they buy soda once in awhile as a treat. Soda at times isn't cheap and I know many people who don't buy it because of the costs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck Lori and fuck this commenter

Renee and Lori FU

I really doubt many 14 year olds are molesting young girls.

When I see comments on their blog that are so "spot on" and hit every talking point they have so exactly, I can't help but wonder if it's not a sock for one of them. I can't believe there are really that many people out that that actually believe that there are all these 14 year old molesting their sisters and that's a-ok!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lemonade is a healthy alternative to soda? Since when? Don't get me wrong -- I love lemons and lemonade, but lemonade will destroy your teeth just as quickly as soda will. Might as well suck on a battery acid popsicle, and as obsessed as she is with health, she should know that poor dental health = poor general health.

According to my dentist, as long as you don't brush your teeth directly after eating a lemon when the enamel is still very soft, there is no harm in eating lemons.

I may or may not have a small lemon obsession :embarrassed:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.