Jump to content
IGNORED

Duggars Vs. Bates


singsingsing
 Share

Recommended Posts

People love to speculate about a competition between the Duggars and the Bateses. I tend not to believe that they actually feel like they're in a competition with each other, but it got me thinking: what if it actually were a competition? Who would be winning? And then I made a spreadsheet. Because I'm home sick and I'm insane.

 

This is how I calculate it:

 

-Lose one point for each child 18+ who is single.

-Lose 5 points for each child 25+ who is single.

-Lose 15 points for each child 30+ who is single.

-Lose 50 points if any immediate family member has a scandal (immediate family = the parents and children, grandchildren and sons/daughters-in-law and scandal = anything majorlike adultery, divorce, leaving fundamentalism completely and obviously, that would be a scandal to fundies not necessarily to us, and that isn't criminal - wearing pants or kissing before marriage doesn't cut it).

-Lose 100 points if any immediate family member does something criminal (and gets caught, obviously).

 

-Gain one point for each child.

-Gain 5 points for each set of twins.

-If Michelle or Kelly ever manage to produce #20 that's an automatic 100 points.

-Gain 1 point for each child courting.

-Gain 5 points for each child engaged.

-Gain 10 points for each married daughter.

-Gain 15 points for each married son (because they carry on the name).

-Gain 1 point for each maternal grandchild (i.e. the child of a daughter)

-Gain 2 points for each paternal grandchild (i.e. the child of a son, because they bear the family name)

-Gain 5 points for each set of grandtwins.

 

The results so far: the Duggars are winning by a small margin. The Duggars and the Bateses each have three single children over 18 (but under 25). The Duggars have 2 single children 25+. Each family has 19 kids apiece, but the Duggars have two sets of twins whereas the Bateses have none. The Duggars and the Bateses each have one married son and two married daughters, however the Bateses also have one daughter courting. The Bateses have one grandchild (paternal) to the Duggars' 3 (also paternal).

 

Total points for the Duggars: 57

Total points for the Bateses: 54

 

Jill and Alyssa's upcoming babies won't make a difference because they will both be maternal grandchildren, thus taking each family to 58 points and 55 points respectively. It's Anna's baby that will make a difference, pushing the Duggars a little further ahead. But if Michael gets married this year and no other Duggar does, the Bateses will probably take the lead.

 

It's based almost purely on childbirth and marriage, because those are the main things they're evaluated on by themselves and others. I decided not to give points for pregnancy because it's too iffy and the added points for children who have been born, or the lack of points for fewer children make up for it.

 

This actually took me only a few minutes to put together and is going to consume very little time to keep updated, so I plan to continue the game indefinitely. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is interesting! i love :D i wonder how other fundies with similar beliefs and ideologies would measure up, too. they'd be so far behind the bates and duggars it wouldn't really be a contest, but it would be interesting to see families like the kellers and the paines, and even the arndts and maxwells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the Duggars and Bateses are really easy to do this with because they each have an equal number of kids, their ages line up almost perfectly, and they're both in the spotlight so I'll always know when someone starts courting, gets married, or has a baby. I guess I could add some of the other families we follow and see who winds up in third place, fourth place, etc. but I just don't have enough time to do it! So the Duggars vs. the Bateses it is. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should add something for number of pregnancies. That would change things, because Kelly has been pregnant 23 times (19 successful pregnancies and 4 miscarriages) and Michelle has been pregnant 19 times (17 successful pregnancies and 2 miscarriages) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should add something for number of pregnancies. That would change things, because Kelly has been pregnant 23 times (19 successful pregnancies and 4 miscarriages) and Michelle has been pregnant 19 times (7 successful pregnancies and 2 miscarriages) .

Would successful pregnancies get more points than miscarriages?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really seriously considered adding total number of pregnancies, but ultimately I decided against it because I felt like it was too wonky. Too many variables. I guess what I've done essentially is just given any pregnancy a neutral value until the outcome is known. To be honest I would also feel somewhat callous adding or subtracting points for miscarriages or (God-forbid) still-births - so yeah, I guess pregnancy = 0 (neutral), live birth = +1, because despite all their talk of 'life-begins-at-conception' and Michelle's oath that she would always say from now on that she has 20 kids (no, wait, 21), they don't seem to count their miscarriages toward their total. There's also the issue of the possibility that some of them will have miscarriages and not choose to share that with the world, so the points could end up pretty skewed. The other stuff (births, marriages) is basically impossible to hide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should lose points for twins, but not for grandtwins. Having more pregnancies end successfully outweighs twins. Because more = more and twins could be seen as cheating. Grandtwins are just more numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just about numbers, it's about prestige, and twins = more prestige. I don't know what I'd do with triplets - probably double the points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just about numbers, it's about prestige, and twins = more prestige. I don't know what I'd do with triplets - probably double the points.

I would posit that more successful pregnancies has more prestige than twins. After all, Kelly has NINETEEN pregnancies compared to the Milk Dud's SEVENTEEN. :nenner: :nenner: :nenner:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there should be points lost for married kids still living on parental property, points gained for employed sons, employed daughters are neutral, and points gained for sons who's supplied their own homes (Josh gets a point for his DC home, and do any of the Bates boys own their own homes that weren't given by Gil?).

I love all of this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the maxwells would be losing BAD

The Maxwell score is 22. I haven't done the Arndts, but I'm guessing their score would be -5

I wanted to find another family with 8 kids to compete with the Maxwells. The only family I could think of are the Sanders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all have awesome ideas - unfortunately I already have a full time job, so I'm going for the simple and the obvious - the in-your-face things that are the usual yardsticks we use to compare them. ;) So I'm sticking with the marriage-and-babies war, but if someone were truly ambitious they could go into a lot more detail and pit several families against each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can there be extra points on who they marry? The Bates daughter is married to a senators son and moved all the way to a different state. While the Duggar daughters are staying local with homes provided by daddy. Josh married fundie. Jill got a college educated dude. While Jessa got an asshole. Don't know if the Bates kids married fundie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can there be extra points on who they marry? The Bates daughter is married to a senators son and moved all the way to a different state. While the Duggar daughters are staying local with homes provided by daddy. Josh married fundie. Jill got a college educated dude. While Jessa got an asshole. Don't know if the Bates kids married fundie

I don't see how that would be easy to calculate. I mean does Anna count for additional points because she's fundie/ATI or Derrick since he's college educated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's just too subjective. We might think Jill got a better deal because Derick's university educated, but maybe the Bateses think she got a worse deal because he's so 'worldly'. We might think the Duggars should lose points based on how many married children live in Jim Bob funded housing, but for all we know they view that as a great success for the family.

I'm going off what they're generally compared with against each other (# of kids, # of grandkids, # married and so on) - tangible things that are basically indisputable facts. If they're courting, they're courting. If they have a baby, they have a baby. And into the spreadsheet it goes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can there be extra points on who they marry? The Bates daughter is married to a senators son and moved all the way to a different state. While the Duggar daughters are staying local with homes provided by daddy. Josh married fundie. Jill got a college educated dude. While Jessa got an asshole. Don't know if the Bates kids married fundie

Yes, the Bates girls married fundie. In fact, all three married/are marrying ATI royalty. None of the Duggars have caught the ATI chiropractor and Congressman's sons, I am thinking that the Bates win that one. Jessa and Jill married outside ATI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Maxwell score is 22. I haven't done the Arndts, but I'm guessing their score would be -5

I wanted to find another family with 8 kids to compete with the Maxwells. The only family I could think of are the Sanders.

The Staddons have 8 kids. They have only married off 1 kid so far, and like the Maxwells, all their kids are adults. Their oldest is 35, and their youngest is 18, which is pretty close to the Maxwells age range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do broken courtships and/or engagements factor in? Does Zach Bates lose points for the family? Since this is the Fundie Games, I think bonus points should be awarded for teenage marriage and childbearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share




  • Recent Status Updates

    • zee_four

      zee_four  »  onekidanddone

      I just saw your user pic and I love it! Yay Rhode Island!
       
      · 1 reply
    • Jinder Roles

      Jinder Roles

      If you’re looking for a new female rapper may I suggest Doechii. The girl is a genius
      · 3 replies
    • louisa05

      louisa05

      Business teacher discussing ethics in the room next door just told students taking a sick day for mental health reasons or “mild illness” is wrong. 🙄
      · 4 replies
    • SillyDillys

      SillyDillys

      I need Jill Rod to post something stupid right now. I don't want to give birth to Ms. Dilly after reading the description of the material that Josh downloaded
      · 3 replies
    • Cartmann99

      Cartmann99

      It's December and we still haven't had our first freeze of the season.

      In light of the issues with the electrical grid in Texas, perhaps I should make an appeal to Rufus to continue to keep us above freezing? 🤔
      · 2 replies
    • HerNameIsBuffy

      HerNameIsBuffy

      Advice needed from anyone with experience planning a Catholic wedding
      She's been engaged less than a week and I've got questions.
      Booking a church or venue is done way in advance so we're on that now.   
      Why do churches ask what the date is when they say specifically on the website that you can't set a date until discussing it with the coordinator?  Why can't they ask for a range? Since when have Catholic churches been such pains in the ass about being a member of that parish to get married there?  She's coming in from out of state for the wedding, she doesn't have a parish here.  I'm not religious and my local parish church is ugly.  My childhood parish waived this and said they could marry there, but it's not an ideal location and aesthetically it's fine but she'd prefer older and more cathedralesque if they do the church wedding.   My grandpa's old church is beautiful and she's in love with it....but they're the only one who hasn't gotten back to us.  (St. Hedwig's for anyone familiar with Chicago's Bucktown) Bribes still work, right?  In the old days you could slip the church a "donation" and they'd be a lot more lenient about weddings, annulments, and funerals for non-practicing Catholics.  How are we supposed to figure out the going rate for graft 2021?   I have no problem lying to the administrative staff and claiming to be a practicing Catholic if it helps, does that make me a sociopath?  Although I don't want to lie to a priest directly.  Can you be a sociopath with religious guilt? I've been married twice, both times to Catholics.  First wedding in a Baptist church and second in congregational or community something.  I did that because I suck at planning this kind of thing and fundy-lites will marry anyone with a 20 minute meet and greet, apparently.  I wanted to elope both times and was over ruled both times so I resentfully half-assed it so this is the first time I'm trying to help plan a wedding properly.  
      The church she wants will waive the bride and groom being members if one of their parents are.  I love my daughter so much, but if I have to start actually attending church to make this work I will expect her to pay for the increase in my wine and edible budget.  Member for at least four months.  Driving from the burbs into the city once a week timing it so I get there just in time to toss them an envelope with money I'd rather keep and skedaddle is something I'd rather avoid.
      I know lots of people think what I'm trying to do is awful.  That non-practicing Catholics shouldn't get married in the church, that it's a sin to try and game the system, etc.  That church shopping for the aesthetic is  a sacrilege or such.  I understand how people can feel that way, it's valid.  But people like that would disapprove of me for a million other reasons anyway, so I'm okay with that.
      This is how I'm rationalizing it. 
      I raised her Catholic and while not practicing as an adult she does believe in God, Jesus, giving a shout out to Mary and all that.  They are going to raise their kids Catholic in the sense of sending them to CCD so they have the religious ed and then they can make their own choices as adults.   I spent thousands of dollars on CCD over the years and two out of three of my kids don't know what an apostle is.  They owe me.   Being Catholic is as much a cultural thing as a religious choice and that's the only one we have.   You can't opt out of being Catholic, as my sister once learned when she went fundy-lite, due to the indelible mark of baptism so they keep you on the roster.  If you can't leave the church without a formal declaration then I there should be something in it for us.  One wedding and burial per Catholic no matter how lapsed seems fair to me. When my uncle died in the late 1950s the church wouldn't allow him to be buried in a Catholic cemetery so they put him in a secular one.  Several years later my dad made a sizable "donation" and voila, look who got exhumed and is now buried next to Grandma and Grandpa.  Wish he was here now to handle this.  
       
      · 16 replies
    • indianabones

      indianabones

      I have mice in my attic and need to figure out how to clean my dryer vent. Ah, the joys of home ownership!
      · 3 replies
    • Scrabblemaster

      Scrabblemaster

      When everything will go on as planned, I will marry Mr. S. at the end of the year. But honestly my optimism is fading away (Covid19 and one other fucking annoying issue, that is more likely to get the wedding rescheduled than Covid19) . I wanted to tell it here, just...well...because. You understand? 
      · 3 replies
    • PinkGreyBrown

      PinkGreyBrown

      The world according to James Robert Duggar, patriarch: Keep sweet? Keep secrets.

      · 3 replies
    • 47of74

      47of74

      Decided to go to one of my old MST3K standbys for tonight's entertainment.  Namely Angel's Revenge.
      · 0 replies
  • Recent Blog Entries

×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.