Trump 29: Divider In Chief or Liar In Chief? WHY NOT BOTH?

[GreyhoundFan]

"“Trump Truly Doesn’t Understand Any of This:” White House Confirms Idiotic Stock-Market Stance"

Spoiler

Donald Trump, a historical anomaly in more ways than one, has made it a habit to rhapsodize the ballooning market, despite the fact that, according to experts, he has almost nothing to do with it. But on Monday afternoon, a market plunge laid bare the idiocy of that strategy: following a global sell-off, the the Dow ended down 1,175 points, or 4.6 percent, at 24,346. On Tuesday, after a wild day in which the Dow opened down 568 points, the index more or less recovered, vacillating between a low of 23,778.74 points and a high of 24,946.23, before closing at 24,912.77.

The roller-coaster ride spooked traders—and highlighted why the president was insane to take ownership of the market in the first place. “Trump’s claims all along that the stock market is reflecting his presidency are as ridiculous as blaming him when the market goes down,” Dan Alpert, managing partner at Westwood Capital, told me. “At the end of the day, the markets would not have risen if not for fairly good corporate earnings and improvement in employment stats and everything that goes along with that. But Trump truly doesn’t understand any of this. He does not understand what’s going on in the financial markets.”

Greg Valliere, chief strategist for Horizon Investments, added that though the ex-real-estate mogul may “fancy himself a great expert” on all things financial, “the markets are . . . tricky and they’re really humbling. Not to be cliché, but you live by the sword and you die by the sword,” he added. “You can’t have it both ways.”

What comes next is a matter of debate. Strategas head of policy research Dan Clifton thinks that issues ranging from a potential trade war with China to the Mueller investigation to the midterm elections could “add further strain at a time of volatile markets.” Goldman Sachs remains bullish on stocks, telling clients, “we believe the fundamental drivers of the equity market remain intact and reiterate our S&P 500 year-end 2018 forecast of 2,850.” Legendary curmudgeon Carl Icahn opined to CNBC today that while the market will “probably bounce back” in the near-term, the current volatility is a “warning,” and “one day this thing is just going to implode . . . maybe eventually worse than 1929.” So, a lot of potential scenarios! The one thing we can know for certain? Both Trump and his advisers will keep their wagons hitched to the market, like the village idiots they are.

Another president may have been humbled by Monday’s proceedings, which not only made Trump look dumb, but cut into his press time (about the meanest thing you can do to the guy short of dropping his daughter’s shoe and purse line). But Trump is no ordinary commander in chief. During a hearing on Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin told the House Financial Services Committee that the administration will “still claim credit for the fact that [the market] is up over 30 percent since the election.” (As an aside, the answer is yes: it is a medical miracle that Mnuchin can manage to sit for hearings on the Hill with his head lodged inside his boss’s ass.)

“It’s surely not a good thing that Trump got rid of one of the most distinguished Federal Reserve chairs in history just before markets started to flash some warning signs,” Kruggles writes in his Times column today. “Jerome Powell, Janet Yellen’s replacement, seems like a reasonable guy. But we have no idea how well he would handle a crisis if one developed. Meanwhile, the current secretary of the Treasury . . . may be the least distinguished, least informed individual ever to hold that position.” Ouch.

...

Instead of finding the village that is missing its idiot, we need to find the group of villages that are all missing their idiots, that's the only explanation for the nimrods in this administration.

[JMarie]

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2018/02/06/john-kelly-treats-trump-like-a-mushroom/23354807/

Quote

According to a source Vanity Fair describes as “Republican close to the White House,” things are not, in fact, okay.

That individual rather colorfully summed up the situation, telling the publication, “It’s like Kelly views Trump as a mushroom. He wants to keep him in the dark and feed him a bunch of s**t.”

A mushroom!

[GreyhoundFan]

"Who Said It: Pepé Le Pew or Donald Trump?"

Spoiler

He grabs pussies. He kisses females without concern for the revulsion and horror they feel for him. Does he ever experience rejection? He does not. “Most men would get discouraged,” he says, referring to those he comes on to. “Fortunately for her, I am not most men.”

He is Pepé Le Pew. Does he remind us of anyone else?

In advance of Valentine’s Day, and to better understand the inner workings of a man who appears to have no inner workings, I bypassed last week’s State of the Union address and spent the evening watching all 17 Pepé Le Pew cartoons, from his 1945 debut in “Odor-able Kitty” to 1962’s “Louvre Come Back to Me!” And I can now share what I have learned — about love, the French, narcissistic personality disorder, men, women, the president of the United States and the smell of Limburger cheese.

But first, for younger readers: Pepé Le Pew is a Warner Bros. cartoon character, part of the Looney Tunes stable during the golden age of American animation, alongside Bugs Bunny, the Road Runner, Daffy Duck and Porky Pig.

He was never a marquee star of the same magnitude of, say, Bugs Bunny or the Road Runner. He appeared in just 17 stand-alone cartoons, virtually all of them directed by Chuck Jones. Still, he made a fragrant impression: “For Scent-imental Reasons” (1949) won the Academy Award for best animated short film.

If it seems surprising that there were only 17 Pepé Le Pew cartoons, it may be because they seem so similar. Each begins with a cat, usually but (interestingly) not always female, getting a stripe of white paint on its back, usually (but not always) by accident. This makes our hero, Pepé, mistake the cat for one of his own kind — and his response to those of his own kind is always deep and passionate love.

He has a curious way of expressing it, though. Even though he is French (which in the Looney Tunes world is shorthand for relentless amour), his terrible smell repulses the objects of his affection, who struggle valiantly to get away, sometimes successfully, sometimes not. “Odor-able Kitty” ends with Pepé with a chain around his ankle. “Now we are inseparable, are we not, darling?” he says. The shot follows the chain across the room to the cat, whose leg is also bound. The last we see of the pussy, she is desperately hacking away at the chain, trying to get free.

That’s all, folks.

It is fair to say these cartoons have not aged well (not a rare quality; see also Disney’s “Song of the South”). But in the #MeToo era, Pepé Le Pew’s antics make you want to cover your face with your paws. Virtually his whole oeuvre is a series of jokes about males who — no matter how clearly the point is made — cannot possibly comprehend the magnitude of their own disgustingness.

Which leads us back to the president, who is kind of like Pepé Le Pew with neither French nor stench. This inspires me to ask you to join me in a game, which we’ll call Who Said It — Donald Trump or Pepé Le Pew?

“You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful.”

“She thinks that by running away she can make herself more attractive to me. How right she is!”

“I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet.”

“I am stupid, no?”

“I’m like, smart!”

Answers below, if you actually need them.

There is one thing that I did not know about Pepé Le Pew before watching his collected works: He’s not really French. In his very first appearance, Pepé’s lovemaking is interrupted by his wife, who calls out his name, “Henry!” Behind her are Pepé’s two little children. He tries to explain himself, and as he does, he speaks in his real voice, which has an American accent. His wife responds — not by taking a plane alone to West Palm Beach but by whacking him on the head with an umbrella.

Pepé’s entire persona — the French accent, the image of a carefree bachelor, his very name — is a delusion. Just like Donald Trump and his failed university, and his failed steak company, and his failed casinos. Pepé Le Pew is fake meows.

It’s worth noting that Pepé Le Pew isn’t the only Warner Bros. character who provides a model for the looney tunes era we live in now. In “Show Biz Bugs” (1957), Daffy Duck and Bugs Bunny are engaged in a talent competition; all of Bugs’s performances succeed while Daffy’s fail. At the conclusion, in a last-ditch attempt to win over his audience, Daffy swallows gasoline, nitroglycerin, “a goodly amount of gunpowder” and uranium-238. He lights a match and explodes. The crowd goes wild.

Is there a better metaphor for the election of 2016? There we were, mouths agape, as the most craven soul ever to aim at the White House ran, and won. Ratings went through the roof as everything we ever thought we knew about our country’s decency exploded.

But one wonders whether Donald Trump has the same insight on the consequences of this stunt that Daffy does. When Bugs asks him for an encore, Daffy, now a ghost, slowly floats toward heaven.

It’s a great trick, he agrees sadly, “but I can only do it once.”

Answers: Trump; Le Pew; Trump; Le Pew; Trump.

Yeah, it's sad when the president compares unfavorably to a cartoon skunk.

[Rosalie]

2 hours ago, fraurosena said:

Before you know it, he’ll be wearing some kind of uniform. It would only be fitting, wouldn’t it, for a Commander in Chief? Of course, it would have to be something designed especially for him, with garish golden embellishments and bedecked with fake medals. He will tell stories of how he earned them by valliantly and without regard for his personal safety storming the tower of Osama bin Laden, and after a bigly shoot out he managed to kill him with a sniper shot from his pistol with his very last bullet. And did you know he was the one who found that hole where Saddam Hussein was hiding? That was after he had routed him from Koowide, you know. Also, you may not know this, but he was also the one who caught Ghadaffi. He would’ve caught Hitler too, if his dad hadn’t thought he was too young and stopped him from going. The generals keep asking him to return to the field, because there is no one now to do all the dangerous stuff as well as he can. But sadly, he as to turn them down. He has to make America great again, you see. Nobody else could do it. Did you know he won he elections in a landslide from that crooked Hillary and her running mate Obama?

I think Gadaffi’s uniform designer is free on the marked...

https://www.google.no/search?rlz=1C9BKJA_enNO764NO764&hl=nb&biw=768&bih=909&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=o3F6WsqTLsybsAH-1YPwAQ&q=gaddafi+uniform&oq=gaddafi+uni&gs_l=mobile-gws-img.1.0.0j0i5i30k1j0i8i30k1l2.27970.28837.0.31233.5.5.0.0.0.0.111.365.3j1.4.0....0...1c.1.64.mobile-gws-img..1.4.364...0i30k1.92.WE_2M2DGF5Y

[Cartmann99]

3 hours ago, GreyhoundFan said:

I guess Agent Orange is jealous of Kim's military parades: "Trump’s ‘marching orders’ to the Pentagon: Plan a grand military parade"

  Reveal hidden contents

President Trump’s vision of soldiers marching and tanks rolling down the boulevards of Washington is moving closer to reality in the Pentagon and White House, where officials say they have begun to plan a grand military parade later this year showcasing the might of America’s armed forces.

Trump has long mused publicly and privately about wanting such a parade, but a Jan. 18 meeting between Trump and top generals in the Pentagon’s tank — a room reserved for top secret discussions — marked a tipping point, according to two officials briefed on the planning.

Surrounded by the military’s highest ranking officials, including Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joe Dunford, Trump’s seemingly abstract desire for a parade was suddenly heard as a presidential directive, the officials said.

“The marching orders were: I want a parade like the one in France,” said a military official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the planning discussions are supposed to remain confidential. “This is being worked at the highest levels of the military.”

American shows of military strength don’t come cheap. The cost of shipping Abrams tanks and high-tech hardware to Washington could run in the millions, and military officials said it was unclear how they would pay for it.

A White House official familiar with the planning described the discussions as “brainstorming” and said nothing is settled. “Right now there’s really no meat on the bones,” said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal discussions.

Still, the official said Trump is determined to have a parade. “The president wants to do something that highlights the service and sacrifice of the military and have a unifying moment for the country,” the official said.

The inspiration for Trump’s push is last year’s Bastille Day celebration in Paris, which the president attended as a guest of French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump was awestruck by the tableau of uniformed French troops marching down Avenue des Champs-Elysees with military tanks, armored vehicles, gun trucks and carriers — complete with F-16 fighter jets flying over the Arc de Triomphe and painting the sky with streaks of blue, white and red smoke for the colors of the French flag.

Aboard Air Force One en route home from Paris last July, aides said Trump told them he was dazzled by the French display and said he wanted one at home.

It was still on his mind two months later when he met with Macron on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

“It was one of the greatest parades I’ve ever seen,” Trump told reporters. “It was two hours on the button, and it was military might, and I think a tremendous thing for France and for the spirit of France.”

Seated next to Macron, Trump added: “We’re going to have to try to top it.”

Several administration officials said the parade planning began in recent weeks and involves White House chief of staff John F. Kelly, but cautioned that it is in the preliminary stages. D.C. officials said they have not been notified of parade plans.

A date has not been selected, although officials said Trump would like to tie the parade to a patriotic holiday. Officials are weighing weather patterns as well as competing events, such as the massive annual Independence Day celebration on the Mall.

Trump officials had discussed Memorial Day on May 28, and July 4, but the Pentagon prefers Veterans Day on Nov. 11 — in part because it would coincide with 100th anniversary of the victorious end of World War I and therefore be less associated with the president and politics. “That’s what everyone is hoping,” said the military official.

It is unclear what role Trump would play, whether he may perhaps serve as a grandmaster or observe the spectacle from a reviewing stand.

The location is still being discussed, though Trump has said that he would like it to proceed along Pennsylvania Avenue, which links the Capitol and the White House. It would be the same route as Trump’s inaugural parade and pass by his family’s show piece: the Trump International Hotel.

Even before he was sworn in as president, Trump was dreaming of America’s war machine on display for the country and the world in front of the White House or Capitol.

“We’re going to show the people as we build up our military,” Trump said in an interview with The Washington Post before his inauguration. “ . . . That military may come marching down Pennsylvania Avenue. That military may be flying over New York City and Washington, D.C., for parades. I mean, we’re going to be showing our military.”

But big military parades — even those launched with the best of intentions — carry some risks and troublesome historical echoes.

With a few exceptions — such as former president George H.W. Bush’s 1991 parade down Constitution Avenue celebrating victory in the Persian Gulf War — presidents have avoided displays of military hardware that are more associated in the American mind with the Soviet Union’s Red Square celebrations or, more recently, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s efforts to show off his Taepodong missiles.

“I don’t think there’s a lack of love and respect for our armed forces in the United States,” said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian at Rice University. “What are they going to do, stand there while Donald Trump waves at them? It smacks of something you see in a totalitarian country — unless there’s a genuine, earnest reason to be doing it.”

The White House official rejected the suggestion that some associate a military parade with strongmen, saying it would be a “celebration of the men and women who give us freedom.”

“That’s the opposite of a totalitarian government,” the official said.

Weaponry on the streets of Washington is not unheard of. President Truman and President Kennedy had military equipment during their inaugural parades, in 1949 and 1963 respectively, during key junctures in the Cold War, said Michael Beschloss, another presidential historian.

“Set against the backdrop of American history, it does seem to hark back to the harsh days of the Cold War,” Beschloss said. “Those parades were a counterpoint to the parades in front of Lenin’s tomb at Red Square . . . One reason the Soviets had those parades was to distract the world from the fact that the Soviet military was actually much weaker than the Soviets were claiming.”

But generally, the United States has shied away from parading its military assets, calculating that doing so was not necessary for the world’s preeminent superpower.

There is no law or regulations preventing Trump from putting on a military parade, but there are plenty of potential complications that military leaders are likely to raise with the president. One worry is practical: that 70-ton tanks built for the battlefield would chew up Pennsylvania Avenue blacktop.

The military might also want to weigh in on the kind of equipment on parade. One concern is that big displays of missile launchers might evoke Pyongyang-style nationalism more than American patriotism.

A parade would likely be interpreted as another stroke of nuclear gamesmanship. Tensions between North Korea and the United States have risen over the past year as Trump and Kim have taunted each other with playground nicknames and threats.

After Kim warned last month that he had a “nuclear button” on his desk, Trump replied: “Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!”

The White House official said a parade would have nothing to do with Trump’s feuds with Kim, but would be designed as a broad show of strength to send a warning to all of America’s adversaries.

Then there are the domestic pitfalls. At a time when Mattis and his top generals have been complaining about the state of military readiness and lobbying Congress for more money, pulling equipment off line for a costly parade could send the wrong signal.

There are personal risks for Trump as well. Though he attended a military high school, Trump did not serve in the armed forces, avoiding the draft during the Vietnam War by claiming bone spurs. Critics have previously criticized Trump as disingenuous for basking in the military’s glory.

Honoring the troops without politicizing their service has long been a dilemma for presidents. President Obama’s frequent focus on wounded troops fighting to resume their lives struck the wrong chord with some conservatives.

One of George W. Bush’s biggest blunders as president came in 2003 when commander in chief landed on an aircraft carrier bearing a “Mission Accomplished” banner to claim victory in the Iraq War.

Former aides say Bush would have loved a big parade but they recognized a problem: the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan never ended. Such subtleties — the U.S. is currently dropping bombs in seven countries — don’t seem to have factored into Trump’s calculations.

With the midterm elections approaching and Trump’s approval ratings at historic lows, the lure of honoring the troops is powerful.

“Who flipped the coin for the Super Bowl on Sunday?” asked Peter Feaver, a former Bush White House official and professor at Duke University. “It was Medal of Honor winners. Why? The military brings us together.”

But Feaver also issued a warning for Trump, who is known for his excesses.

“A military parade,” he said, “is the kind of thing that can easily be overdone.”

So, we are supposed to waste money on a ridiculous parade to make Donnie feel like he has a big dick?

Maybe we could convince Stormy to start seeing him again? Having an affair with a beautiful woman feeds a man's ego quite a bit. I'm in the camp that thinks Melania really doesn't care about his dalliances, she just wants him to be discreet about them.

3 hours ago, GreyhoundFan said:

There is no law or regulations preventing Trump from putting on a military parade, but there are plenty of potential complications that military leaders are likely to raise with the president. One worry is practical: that 70-ton tanks built for the battlefield would chew up Pennsylvania Avenue blacktop.

So, if the parade does happen, then Trump will pay to fix the damage to the road? I kid! We know that American taxpayers will be footing the bill. The only question is which group of taxpayers gets the bill? DC residents? The entire country? Or will DC residents be responsible for a certain percentage, and the rest of the country picks up the remainder? 

[JMarie]

20 minutes ago, Cartmann99 said:

Maybe we could convince Stormy to start seeing him again? Having an affair with a beautiful woman feeds a man's ego quite a bit. I'm in the camp that thinks Melania really doesn't care about his dalliances, she just wants him to be discreet about them.

Well, it seems like Kylie Jenner has revealed the name of her offspring:  Stormi.  So if Trump decides to check out People.com, he's going to see a lot of stories about Stormi, since People is obsessed with everything Kardashian. This is not good, FJers.  He'll read about Stormi and think about Stormy.  He'll be confused.  But wait, maybe it is good, because he'll be so deep in thought that he won't be able to focus on important stuff, and he won't mess up important stuff.

[47of74]

2 hours ago, Cartmann99 said:

Maybe we could convince Stormy to start seeing him again? Having an affair with a beautiful woman feeds a man's ego quite a bit. I'm in the camp that thinks Melania really doesn't care about his dalliances, she just wants him to be discreet about them.

So, if the parade does happen, then Trump will pay to fix the damage to the road? I kid! We know that American taxpayers will be footing the bill. The only question is which group of taxpayers gets the bill? DC residents? The entire country? Or will DC residents be responsible for a certain percentage, and the rest of the country picks up the remainder? 

Makes me fucking sick that Donnie Butt Plugs might be getting a military parade in Washington.  What the fuck is next with this horse's ass?  It's enough to make me wish that I could hibernate until he leaves office.

[AmazonGrace]

Ronald Reagan is an example of somebody who has done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more:

 

[fraurosena]

Vets aren't happy with this military show parade.

[PsyD2013]

According to one of the Yam's spiritual advisors, (who knew the Orange Ass had a soul),  Jesus is the only "flu shot" needed.   

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trump-adviser-says-ignore-flu-shots-inoculate-yourself-104503909--abc-news-topstories.html

 

[fraurosena]

Yesterday, Joe Scarborough goaded the presidunce about his lawyers thinking he is too dumb to testify before Mueller.

Today, CNN has this article.

Trump wants to talk to Mueller despite lawyers' concerns

Quote

President Donald Trump's lawyers have aimed to hit the brakes on a potential sit-down with Robert Mueller, but Trump remains eager to speak with the special counsel, according to his allies.

One person familiar with Trump's thinking said -- in addition to believing he is entirely innocent -- part of what's fueling the President's willingness to participate is his belief that he has experience with lawsuits and testifying under oath from his time in the real estate business.

"He thinks he can work this," this person said. "He doesn't realize how high the stakes are."

Once you're there, there's no turning back, this person said. "You can't get up and walk away. It's not that easy."

"He's basically saying that I'm wide open as a book. I've done absolutely nothing wrong and I'm willing to say so under oath," former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci told CNN's Jake Tapper Tuesday. "So again, I still think that that is on the table."

While the President's inclination may be to meet Mueller face to face, he is not ignoring the chorus of people around him -- lawyers, friends and lawmakers -- urging him to avoid a sit-down with Mueller. CNN first reported last week that the President's attorneys were arguing against agreeing to a special counsel interview.

But his lawyers may still be up for negotiating.

The special counsel hasn't formally requested an interview with the President and the President's lawyers don't expect one for another couple of weeks, a source briefed on the matter said. The talks so far have been informal. And while the President's lawyers currently don't advocate granting a voluntary interview to Mueller's team, there is still a chance to reach a deal within certain limits, such as written or a narrow scope of questions.

Multiple people close to Trump have cast any Mueller interview as a risky proposition. While Trump is firm in his belief that there was no collusion with Russian officials, some allies fear that Mueller could ferret something out of Trump that could provide fodder for an obstruction of justice investigation.

White House special counsel Ty Cobb recently made the case the President's lawyers are mindful of the interview being a potential "perjury trap."

The White House had no comment.

How ridiculous is it, that someone can be lead around by the nose this way?

[WiseGirl]

12 hours ago, fraurosena said:

Also, you may not know this, but he was also the one who caught Ghadaffi

Okay, I need more coffee, I read this as Gandalf when skimming. Maybe I'm just hoping a heroic wizard will overtake the dark, idiotic, orange one.

For fucks sake a parade? Government shutdown,  bad DOW, and tantrum boy wants a fucking parade. Like in old Cold War days? What an absolute ass. Save the money idiot to build your useless fucking wall.

Why, why do people think he is so great? I don't get it.  

*stomps off to once again fill the swear jar*

10 hours ago, Cartmann99 said:

The only question is which group of taxpayers gets the bill? 

Blue states.....

[onekidanddone]

2 minutes ago, WiseGirl said:

Okay, I need more coffee, I read this as Gandalf when skimming. Maybe I'm just hoping a white wizard will overtake the dark, idiotic, orange one.

I know you meant white wizard in a good way, but my nerves are especially raw these days since the election all the time, and I saw it as White Wizard. As in Grand Wizard Jeff or Grand Wizard Kelly.

[JMarie]

2 hours ago, PsyD2013 said:

According to one of the Yam's spiritual advisors, (who knew the Orange Ass had a soul),  Jesus is the only "flu shot" needed.   

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trump-adviser-says-ignore-flu-shots-inoculate-yourself-104503909--abc-news-topstories.html

 

Great, just great.  Now all the evangelicals who scream about aborted baby parts as the reason for avoiding vaccines now have more ammunition.

[AmazonGrace]

Donald Trump: We are making the world respect us again.

The world:

 

[fraurosena]

Oh my blessed Rufus, his (fake) hair is glued onto his head!

 

[Audrey2]

So let me get this straight. When we were looking at a government shutdown a couple of weeks ago, the military wasn't going to get paid. Now another deadline is imminent, and Donnie Dummkopf is asking these same, soon to be unpaid, military personnel to plan a parade in his honor? 

I'm without words...

[AmazonGrace]

The failing stock market is bad, very very bad. Losers and haters!

[onekidanddone]

1 minute ago, AmazonGrace said:

The failing stock market is bad, very very bad. Losers and haters!

What does he mean by 'mistake'? Who made the mistake? The stock market is not a person and can't just make a 'mistake'. 

[AmazonGrace]

4 minutes ago, onekidanddone said:

What does he mean by 'mistake'? Who made the mistake? The stock market is not a person and can't just make a 'mistake'. 

Lyin' Mr Dow Jones...

 

[GreyhoundFan]

17 minutes ago, AmazonGrace said:

Lyin' Mr Dow Jones...

But, people are saying, Dow is a good person...a tremendous person...

 

Isn't this the truth?

[fraurosena]

Not only is his hair glued to his head, but apparently his phone is glued to his tiny hands. He's even tweeting during his intelligence briefing. 

I wonder what he's been told that's a bombshell...

[onekidanddone]

1 hour ago, AmazonGrace said:

Lyin' Mr Dow Jones...

Have you ever seen Dow and Hillary in the same room at the same time? Yea, didn't think so. Hannity will have "exclusive" coverage that will blow you out of the water. The Jones and Clinton the untold story.

[GreyhoundFan]

[GreyhoundFan]