Jump to content
IGNORED

(CW: CSA) Josh & Anna 43: Defense Rested After an Expert Witness with No Expertise


HerNameIsBuffy

Recommended Posts

I saw people wondering earlier if he would be remanded back to the Rebers before being sentenced. That tiktok lawyer just posted a video saying because of the seriousness of the charges and if found guilty,  it’s far more likely that the judge, who has discretion to do so, will send him immediately to prison to await sentencing.

 

 

  • Upvote 9
  • Rufus Bless 1
  • Thank You 16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MedicineWoman said:

 

IDK, it's working for me. I just saw pickles revealed her name and location for some attention whoring reason. 

With?  But pickles especiallyoves her anonymity .  I haven't seen that ones stuff in a long time.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Beermeet said:

With?  But pickles especiallyoves her anonymity .  I haven't seen that ones stuff in a long time.  

I saw it on reddit. I haven't been on her page in years

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, HerNameIsBuffy said:

How IBLP are they still?  Gil runs the show there and they are very distant for years now.  I know they are still ATI due to the homeschooling, but are they still Gothardites post Gothard?

I was skeptical until I dove into Laura’s Instagram last night. She is all in personally and professionally. All the families, as we know, go way way back, and I believe, are still connected to IBLP and each other - just more savvy about the publicity. I think the Duggars are all still fully in (Duggars attend all family conferences). The younger generation seems to have distanced in some ways, but until I see public disavowing from anyone, I think it is all normal to them - if nothing else the relationships can’t be left behind - they’ve all intermarried. 
 

I don’t know how IBLP leaders feel about Duggars being the well known reps of their brand at this point, but I imagine Duggars still bring people in. I’m only half joking about Laura being a minder. I think she mainly travels around and fellowships with various families and IBLP headquarters for extended periods of time. She seems to be close friends with Duggars for a long time, but she also has strong vested interest in public face of IBLP.

Edited by neuroticcat
Missing words
  • Upvote 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 3KidsAndStopped said:

I checked Twitter, I am assuming any major news would funnel through there if not The Sun. Nothing as yet

My guess is that there isn't going to be another break until it's gone to the Jury.  The defense has 30 minutes to state their case, then the prosecution goes again for final remarks, jury instructions follow.  The Sun won't update until their reporter comes out of the courtroom.  At which point we will be watching the rest of the day for a verdict to come in, sooner the better.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jury is now in deliberations since 12:15.  lets hope they give them lunch early so it's not a factor lol

Edited by HerNameIsBuffy
  • Upvote 15
  • Haha 14
  • Love 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

Quote

 

Seperate question but its something I have been curious about. They mentioned finding adult pornography on some of his devices which is obviously completely legal, BUT they did not mention what type of pornography it was. Hypothetically, if you have a CSAM case like this and the accused accessed other pornography that involved genres such as Teen, Young, Barely 18, incest/taboo etc. would that information be considered relevent? Like technically 18+ explicit material between non-related adults is legal however could it be said that it showed a pattern of seeking out childlike performers and/or roleplaying scenes to establish his sexual preferences? That evidence would more readily bridge the gap between the original molestations to the current CSAM with other material fulfilling those desires for him regardless of their legal technicality? 


 

The reason it is preferable to refer to "child Porn" as images of child sexual assault and abuse is that it is really and truly in a category all on its own in terms of legality/morals/harm caused etc.  I don't think they should be compared in the same breath.  

People can have legitimate arguments about the problematic nature of the pornography industry which are totally valid and involve exploitation, oppression, trauma etc.   However those same arguments may overlap in some ways with CSAM but they are completely different beasts entirely IMO.  It would be terrible for any jury to confuse one with the other or see them as being just two things on a spectrum and a matter of being open minded or whatever.  They are not the same in any way.  Different stratospheres. 

Edited by Magenta
  • Upvote 20
  • I Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MedicineWoman said:

 

IDK, it's working for me. I just saw pickles revealed her name and location for some attention whoring reason. 

I had seen her name a couple of years ago... I think she had inadvertently linked something between her private FB page and the pickles page.  

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Chocolate Lover said:

If it's a hung jury and then a retrial can either side bring in new witnesses (that weren't on their lists for this trial)?  Or introduce evidence that wasn't used in this trial?

States have different rules. My understanding (could be wrong) is that in Federal Court, it rewinds back to the moment before jury selection.  So everything already filed with the court (evidence lists and witness lists) remain, as well as the motions in limine which were ruled on (i.e. the Holt testimony). 

It's also a very short timeline.  Less than 90 days from when the Judge enters the mistrial into the record, I think.  

Also, all witness testimony was made under oath in the first trial. If a witness materially changed their testimony in the second trial, they can be impeached with their prior testimony. 

  • Upvote 6
  • Thank You 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cheetah said:

I had seen her name a couple of years ago... I think she had inadvertently linked something between her private FB page and the pickles page.  

I didn't know Pickles did reddit. I don't keep up with her, she is too much of a dictator. Is there a pickles sub?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, anon710 said:

may the lord Daniel bless the fj servers. 

 

reddit is back

I love how we have our Holy Rufus and they have Lord Daniel. 

Look at us showing Duggars what real religious tolerance is

  • Upvote 5
  • Rufus Bless 1
  • Haha 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, anon710 said:

I didn't know Pickles did reddit. I don't keep up with her, she is too much of a dictator. Is there a pickles sub?

she doesn't, people were just talking about it there

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a meeting starting at 2:00. It is virtual so I have my camera off and my mic muted. I’m refreshing FJ and ready for the verdict. 

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, anon710 said:

I didn't know Pickles did reddit. I don't keep up with her, she is too much of a dictator. Is there a pickles sub?

I was talking about her FB pages.  She outed herself today on her Pickles FB page and I guess someone on reddit made a post about it.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, FleeJanaFree said:

I went on her Facebook page after I saw it on Reddit and saw it there. It still doesn’t make sense to me though 

I don’t know enough about prosecution/defense, but could it mean that whoever was going to press charges dropped the case because the Holts testimony would be damning for the defense? Is she maybe implying the Duggars were powerful enough to get the case to go away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let us bow our heads for prayer.5B7CC27E-7B4D-4489-A4C9-B7A492F8AF5C.thumb.jpeg.d9abc44adcc92f9694a1bf4d435c4b84.jpeg

 

I now come before our Holy Rufus to ask he send Pest to prison and then to the pits of taxidermy hell. 
 

May the Pestilence forever dwell in Satan’s furry armpits. 
 

Rufus Bless and Ramen

Edited by Jinder Roles
  • Upvote 16
  • Rufus Bless 21
  • Haha 12
  • I Agree 2
  • Love 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sun currently peeved because they've had to mention Anna Darling's update, while waiting for their own reporter :)  But they've just given her a lot of publicity, good for her!

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, hoipolloi said:

Here's her About from YT:

She is fucking BLASTING Michelle -- "You went on speaking tours, you wrote stupid books" -- for failing her children.

If she’s a homeschool teacher she could’ve been in the cult or is at least likely familiar with people who were. If nothing else, she probably feels duped. I’m an indifferent homeschooler at best, and it still bothers me that the Duggars are the face of homeschooling for many people.

  • Upvote 9
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gina, from Simply Heart &Home, is amazing! She did such a brilliant job. If she had a German accent she could be my dearly departed grandmother. 
 

 

Edited by Bassett Lady
  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HerNameIsBuffy locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.