Jump to content
IGNORED

[CW: Child Sex Abuse] Josh & Anna 32: So There Was this Cat Who Knew A Squirrel Who Knows Anna...


HerNameIsBuffy

Recommended Posts

@Cults-r-us - Could you shove any more victim blaming in that post? No, really. Just save us all the secondhand embarrassment and ask for it to be removed. Jesus Christ.

  • Upvote 42
  • Love 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, church_of_dog said:

Re Josiah having access to the car lot computer:

Not sure where I read this -- if it wasn't on FJ somewhere it may have been on Websleuths as they have a thread on Josh, but somewhere it was claimed that the day the CSAM was downloaded onto the computer, was the very same day, only about an hour apart, when Lauren gave birth, and Josiah was with her.

So if this is true (I haven't researched it, am just passing along what I read) then he clearly has a solid alibi for the downloading activity.

But cell phone records show Josh was at the car lot texting people and taking pictures while downloading CSAM and adult porn traced to the computer in the car lot office.  I would also imagine the feds checked out everyone who had access to the lot, computers, and Josh's iPhone (what happened to that flip phone of shame he was supposed to have??).  So, it seems to me the feds have evidence that proves Josh was the one downloading that stuff.

  • Upvote 17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RosyDaisy said:

But cell phone records show Josh was at the car lot texting people and taking pictures while downloading CSAM and adult porn traced to the computer in the car lot office.  I would also imagine the feds checked out everyone who had access to the lot, computers, and Josh's iPhone (what happened to that flip phone of shame he was supposed to have??).  So, it seems to me the feds have evidence that proves Josh was the one downloading that stuff.

Agreed.  I was commenting on the claims that Josh had implied that others, namely Josiah, had had access to that car lot computer, and how there was a report on another site about Josiah not being there on a significant day due to Lauren giving birth.  At first I thought that was download day, then I corrected myself that it was FBI raid day that Josiah was known to be absent.  So pretty irrelevant.

I agree that all along there appears to be no doubt who actually did the downloading. 

  • Upvote 10
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cults-r-us said:

Interestingly, I read an interview with her sister (who probably has her own issues) who said that while yes, they had sex, Danica made up the rest because she thought it would help her career.

 

I'm sorry, I have to press 'X' to doubt that this woman told her sister that she made up a story about Josh Duggar raping her to further her porn career. Like maybe, maybe, I could possibly see if she tried to get clout by latching onto the Josh/Ashley Madison scandal and revealing that she participated in wild orgies with him and a bunch of other strippers. But that's not what she said. And frankly, whether or not the encounter happened at the precise time alleged, Josh does not get the benefit of the doubt from me. Danica Dillon does.

7 hours ago, HerNameIsBuffy said:

I don't.  If she feels unsafe because someone approached someone with a question on a public road then she could have used her legal rights as an adult and told the judge she would not agree to have him in her home.  She chose to "support my husbands decision" and now she has a pedophile in her guest room.

 

She did at least express her discomfort, iirc. The "support my husband's decision" thing came across as tepid support, and she even said she was uncomfortable with the idea of having a man in the house with her and her daughter. We don't know what this LaCount guy is like behind closed doors. I would wager he's not that great given that he's okay with letting a pedophile hang out in his spare room. I understand your perspective, but for me personally, I feel a little bad for her. 

  • Upvote 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Anna Bolinas said:

And frankly, whether or not the encounter happened at the precise time alleged, Josh does not get the benefit of the doubt from me. Danica Dillon does.

 

I haven't read much about Danica Dillon, but I believe her. I would imagine she just had her dates wrong, unfortunately, and that made her chance of justice unravel.

  • Upvote 15
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NancyDrewFan1989 said:

I do believe a cancellation is likely if the ratings take a hit. TLC did make it very, very clear and have gone as far as to edit Josh out of episodes. I don't believe we will know whether or not Counting On will be cancelled for a few more months. Also, I do believe that they will have to confront Josh's arrest some how in an episode. Whether it is interviewing the sisters, having a brutal scripted sit down with the family, etc. they are probably going to have to do something. There is no way TLC, in my opinion, will be able to continue Counting On (if they really do hope to) without having a "special episode" showing the Duggars confronting Josh's crimes head on. 

But this is TLC and the Duggars- they will never confront the monstrosity of his crimes- it will be all ‘led astray by Satan’ and fake tear dabbing. 
And anything featuring JB & M or Anna whining about their predicament is a slap in the face to victims of CSA.

  • Upvote 16
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, that post was filled with shaming and victim blaming. 

Sex work is a legitimate form of work. There's no reason to shame sex workers for the profession. Statements like those are the reasons sex workers are unprotected (legally and socially) when they are abused. 

  • Upvote 27
  • I Agree 13
  • Thank You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, HarryPotterFan said:

A cat would never make up such a weird lie.  Lie about their food bowl being empty? Yes. But such a wild conspiracy theory? No.

Cat shmat. Everyone knows it was a squirrel 

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 26
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Idlewild said:

But this is TLC and the Duggars- they will never confront the monstrosity of his crimes- it will be all ‘led astray by Satan’ and fake tear dabbing. 
And anything featuring JB & M or Anna whining about their predicament is a slap in the face to victims of CSA.

Very, very true. TLC does have a history of giving victims of CSA a slap in the face like you said. Knowing TLC they probably won't do anything unless the ratings take a hit. They've given out statements saying they haven't featured Josh on Counting On. I believe Counting On is one of their highest rated programs. So, I really don't see them doing anything unless the ratings do take a hit and/or they lose sponsorship for letting the program continue. I really hope both happen. 

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just read a few pages, and I saw that, but there was also a bit of back-and-forth irritation between a few posters on FJ culture and etiquette. It lead me to a former poster and in a roundabout way to the infamous "I don't even know who you are!" post, so that gave me a chuckle. :pb_lol:

You know, I’ve entirely forgotten the story behind the I don’t even know who you are. Y’all, my memory for drama is shit.
  • Upvote 8
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Danica getting the dates wrong doesn't mean she is lying. Ultimately we don't know what really happened for sure but I could believe Josh treating her that way. Her sister is probably bashing her for media attention too. 

  • Upvote 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, indianabones said:

The evidence was Uber receipts, according to a recent interview she did.

Which is a complete & utter crock. I ordered my inebriated nephew an Uber, on my phone with my app from my home in the suburbs north of the city. He was downtown in the "big city" and needed to be taken to his home in a suburb south of the city. 

I was nowhere near the starting or ending place and did not get in anyone's car,  but I have a receipt. 

  • Upvote 10
  • Love 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, fundiefan said:

Which is a complete & utter crock. I ordered my inebriated nephew an Uber, on my phone with my app from my home in the suburbs north of the city. He was downtown in the "big city" and needed to be taken to his home in a suburb south of the city. 

I was nowhere near the starting or ending place and did not get in anyone's car,  but I have a receipt. 

There was more than that, there was footage of him elsewhere.  There was enough proof that he was not in PA at the time that she dropped the suit and stipulated that his evidence proved her claims were false.

He's a vile person IMO capable of sexual evil, but that doesn't make the uber only thing a fact or mean he was guilty of that particular incident.

 

  • Upvote 6
  • Thank You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it never went to trial we don't know what the evidence was. I will say it's odd for a voluntary dismissal to be with prejudice

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NancyDrewFan1989 said:

Very, very true. TLC does have a history of giving victims of CSA a slap in the face like you said. Knowing TLC they probably won't do anything unless the ratings take a hit. They've given out statements saying they haven't featured Josh on Counting On. I believe Counting On is one of their highest rated programs. So, I really don't see them doing anything unless the ratings do take a hit and/or they lose sponsorship for letting the program continue. I really hope both happen. 

When they first started airing Counting On, they had very few sponsors. Most of the ads were for TLC itself.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, justoneoftwo said:

Because it never went to trial we don't know what the evidence was. I will say it's odd for a voluntary dismissal to be with prejudice

Danica wanted out of the lawsuit.  Josh, through his counsel, would only let her out if she agreed to dismiss with prejudice, which she did.  

The court was very close to dismissing the case anyway as Danica was not producing necessary documentation. Once Josh presented his evidence , her attorney was sufficiently convinced that she didn't have a case.  Curiously, he also indicated that she wasn't paying any of his bills.  

While we never had the full story, I think it's important to remember that her official story is that she made it all up.  She's claimed otherwise in tabloid media, but when she had her chance to present her case, she either couldn't or wouldn't.   Personally, I have no use for people who lie about sexual assaults.  This does tremendous harm to real victims, most of whom never get justice.

  • Upvote 21
  • I Agree 3
  • Thank You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JenniferJuniper said:

Danica wanted out of the lawsuit.  Josh, through his counsel, would only let her out if she agreed to dismiss with prejudice, which she did.  

The court was very close to dismissing the case anyway as Danica was not producing necessary documentation. Once Josh presented his evidence , her attorney was sufficiently convinced that she didn't have a case.  Curiously, he also indicated that she wasn't paying any of his bills.  

While we never had the full story, I think it's important to remember that her official story is that she made it all up.  She's claimed otherwise in tabloid media, but when she had her chance to present her case, she either couldn't or wouldn't.   Personally, I have no use for people who lie about sexual assaults.  This does tremendous harm to real victims, most of whom never get justice.

Not following through on a lawsuit or  pursuing legal action at all has no bearing on whether or not an assault actually happened in a justice system that does nothing to help victims. 

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, closetcagebaby said:

Not following through on a lawsuit or  pursuing legal action at all has no bearing on whether or not an assault actually happened in a justice system that does nothing to help victims. 

Not what I said and certainly not what I meant. Her official story is that she made it all up.  Not that she couldn't prove her case or that she couldn't afford to prosecute her case .  She said she lied.  And I have no use for people who lie about sexual assault as this does harm to actual victims. 

  • Upvote 10
  • Thank You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because never in the history of the world has a woman with a history of sex work been threatened or harassed by a man with financial means or social influence to recant a story. 

  • Upvote 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Evil Feminist said:

Homeschoolers Anonymous just posted this link. How awful for Mrs Reber, but her husband is an ASS to make her host Josh. https://www.ksn.com/entertainment/911-call-placed-from-josh-duggars-court-ordered-home/?fbclid=IwAR2YokLKl-0kekodcQGYx9XGztirufvjY83uqt67qQaEe_rhH5fjJrFYZ28

She doesn't sound like the brightest bulb in the box? She blathered on and on, described the car as being "a car, it's a car, it's a grayish car", refused to give them helpful and relevant info like THERE'S A CHILD PREDATOR IN MY HOUSE, refused to explain what "they wanted comments" even meant, had no clearly defined reason for being afraid--This would have all added up to being pretty low on my priority list if I was on the end of the line.

  • Upvote 11
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LilMissMetaphor said:

She doesn't sound like the brightest bulb in the box? She blathered on and on, described the car as being "a car, it's a car, it's a grayish car", refused to give them helpful and relevant info like THERE'S A CHILD PREDATOR IN MY HOUSE, refused to explain what "they wanted comments" even meant, had no clearly defined reason for being afraid--This would have all added up to being pretty low on my priority list if I was on the end of the line.

I'm not defending Mrs. Reber, but it's possible she was projecting her overall anxiety about the situation onto that grayish car. She knows she can't call 911 and say "Get this asshole pedophile out of my house, for God's sake" without running into trouble with her husband and Jim Bob.   So let's blame and fear the media instead. 

  • Upvote 10
  • Sad 1
  • I Agree 7
  • Love 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo? said:

I found it here:

IIRC, a poster who spent most/all of their time in the Duggar threads was being asked by @Curious not to post their opinions as fact. The poster didn't understand why Curious would be involved, and wrote the line, "...and I don't even know who you are!" To which Curious politely replied, "Hi, Let me introduce myself.  I own Free Jinger."

I had forgotten the details, so this side trip down memory lane made me smile. :)

Thanks! In my head that whole thing had to do with the weirdo opera person who was mad that I said thou shalt not tell people how to torrent on FJ. I had forgotten entirely about this whole thing!

  • Upvote 3
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Destiny said:

Thanks! In my head that whole thing had to do with the weirdo opera person who was mad that I said thou shalt not tell people how to torrent on FJ. I had forgotten entirely about this whole thing!

FJ does have an interesting history of dramatic incidents doesn't it? :kitty-wink:

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
  • I Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo? said:

FJ does have an interesting history of dramatic incidents doesn't it? :kitty-wink:

Oh yes! I remembered the I don't know who you are and the introduction part, but the context was ENTIRELY not the same. Good times. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HerNameIsBuffy locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.