Jump to content
IGNORED

(Possible CSA Warning) Josh & Anna 36: Waiting for the Trial


Coconut Flan

Recommended Posts

Has JB fled to Mexico yet? I understand he knows several pilots.

Edited by Bluebirdbluebell
  • Haha 39
  • Love 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

If Anna hasn’t left by now, I doubt she ever will. I bet she will visit him in Prison regularly. She will bring him lots of stuff to make his life easier behind bars. And she will welcome him with open arms when he gets out. 

Ugh. She is doing the vapid gaze as they walk up the stairs 

  • Upvote 5
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

If Anna hasn’t left by now, I doubt she ever will. I bet she will visit him in Prison regularly. She will bring him lots of stuff to make his life easier behind bars. And she will welcome him with open arms when he gets out. 

I totally agree. I can see her visiting daily. Nothing, not even if there were photos of him doing what he is accused of watching, would change her mind. 

  • Upvote 7
  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bluebirdbluebell said:

Has JB fled to Mexico yet? I understand he knows several pilots.

Just follow the trail of hairspray 

  • Haha 21
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though they are wearing masks this time, we know they are still smirking. 

Really passes me off that he can't even appear to be polite. Letting her go ahead of him through a door and his hand on her back are just plain polite things to do. I know,  I know. Expecting way too much. For some reason those simple things are so danged wrong.

Can she still believe he won't go to jail? Still believe he's innocent? I hope that when the jury, not the courtroom, are shown the videos, their reactions will maybe register with Anna that this is awful stuff.

I simply do not understand all this crap. Anna standing by. Jim Bob missing. Motion after motion denied. 

Edited by Not that josh's mom
  • Upvote 17
  • I Agree 1
  • Thank You 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mama Mia said:

If you look closely at the video he doesn’t even hold the door open for her, his wife, who gave birth 3 weeks ago, who is there at court to support him despite his disgusting horrifying charges, where it looks like (from her walk) that it’s probably uncomfortable to be sitting for hours, who is probably hoping she’s not leaking through various places or her boobs don’t explode —- and he’s not showing her the least bit of common courtesy. She is utterly dick whipped. Vile. Those poor kids. 

I think he’s always treated her pretty horribly. He’s always treated her as less than him. It’s sad that she accepts it. If she hadn’t been raised to be a fundie doormat, maybe things would be different. 

  • Upvote 17
  • Sad 1
  • I Agree 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bluebirdbluebell said:

The fact that JB was dumb enough to run for office right now.....

 

did he think this would be distracting? 

1 minute ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

I think he’s always treated her pretty horribly. He’s always treated her as less than him. It’s sad that she accepts it. If she hadn’t been raised to be a fundie doormat, maybe things would be different. 

If she hadn't she might have a husband who truly loves and respects her and so much more. 

  • Upvote 7
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bluebirdbluebell said:

The fact that JB was dumb enough to run for office right now.....

 

So is Jim Blob is a cold and calculating viper who has some kind of master plan or does he have the intelligence of a moldy dish rag?  
I figure he is a little bit of both. He knew how to market (pimp) his children for money while at the same time he is so arrogant he thinks he and his family (well only himself and Josh) are untouchable 

10 minutes ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

I think he’s always treated her pretty horribly. He’s always treated her as less than him. It’s sad that she accepts it. If she hadn’t been raised to be a fundie doormat, maybe things would be different. 

I don’t think she knows any different. It is her role to keep sweet no matter what he does to her.

ETA; Her not knowing any different still does not give her a pass for not protecting her kids. 

Edited by onekidanddone
  • Upvote 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Howl said:

A long ago housemate had an older relative named Fredabelle, because when you think you are going to have a boy and name him Fred...this was in rural Texas. 

In my profession I have run across all kinds of names and this "Fredabelle" post reminded me of a name I saw a year or two back...a woman named "Frankzella".  I assume the parents wanted "Frank" for a boy and somehow came up with this name.  For the life of me I don't know why they didn't use "Frankie", "Frances", "Francesca" or "Francine".     

Another unique choice I came across was a set of male twins named "Michelin" and "Michelob".  Guess the parents liked tires and beer.   

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh and Anna holding hands, supporting him, could very well be at the direction of and orchestrated by Josh's legal team.  It's a way to influence perceptions of Josh prior to the trial.  Like, "Yes, it's a terrible crime, but he's a family man whose wife still loves him!"

I've been casually following the Elizabeth Holmes trial. Each day as she walks up to the courthouse, she's ALWAYS accompanied by her mother, her partner, or both.  They are ALWAYS holding hands, clearly supporting her.  This is staged, of course, but it is meant to specifically influence the public's perception of her, and perhaps any juror who happens to get a glimpse of it. 

  • Upvote 15
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Laura2730 said:

Yep the witnesses are Jim Bob Duggar and Bobye Holt (wife of senator Jim Holt)! The latter has been subpoenaed but apparently the former is proving impossible to find and thus serve. 

https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2021/nov/18/prosecutors-accuse-duggar-of-past-sexual-assault/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_ArkansasR2K

https://www.nwahomepage.com/news/judge-calls-for-evidentiary-hearing-during-josh-duggar-child-porn-pretrial-conference/

Okay so I read this as being different from the earlier prosecution notification that if Josh tried to paint himself as not interested in children the prosecution would call his two youngest (known) victims.  Am I right?

It sounds as if now the prosecution is proposing to make the molestation a part of their case (that is, will they bring it up to establish Josh’s proclivities) regardless of whether or not Josh claims that he has never had any sexual interest in children.  

In either case, this time the potential witnesses would not be the victims, which is good.  

I am wondering if the subpoena to Jim Bob will be the catalyst for Josh taking a plea.  I can’t  imagine that JB wants to have to testify, and it’s not like he can lie under oath when there is so much other evidence of what really happened.

  • Upvote 12
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if subpoenaing JimBob and Bobye (never will I not read her name as Bob-eye) is a move to try to corner Josh into taking a plea deal? 

  • Upvote 15
  • I Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bal maiden said:

I wonder if subpoenaing JimBob and Bobye (never will I not read her name as Bob-eye) is a move to try to corner Josh into taking a plea deal? 

I read her name like Kanye. 
 

Bob Yay

  • Upvote 12
  • Haha 14
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, EmCatlyn said:

Okay so I read this as being different from the earlier prosecution notification that if Josh tried to paint himself as not interested in children the prosecution would call his two youngest (known) victims.  Am I right?

It sounds as if now the prosecution is proposing to make the molestation a part of their case (that is, will they bring it up to establish Josh’s proclivities) regardless of whether or not Josh claims that he has never had any sexual interest in children.  

In either case, this time the potential witnesses would not be the victims, which is good.  

I am wondering if the subpoena to Jim Bob will be the catalyst for Josh taking a plea.  I can’t  imagine that JB wants to have to testify, and it’s not like he can lie under oath when there is so much other evidence of what really happened.

From what I gather from Emily Baker's latest Josh Duggar Youtube video she basically said that if the defence (& Josh) try to claim that it wasn't him but someone else who is responsible for the charges etc, then it opens the door for the prosecution to bring up the molestation allegations in the police report to point to motive etc as to why they think its Josh and not any others who might work at the car lot. If you look at one of the defence's motions (which they won today), the defence has opened that door. 

The prosecution is saying that Josh Duggar confessed that he assaulted a girl in 2003 to the two witnesses it has named (Jim Bob Duggar and Bobye Holt). Jim Bob has not been served, i.e. they cannot locate him currently, but Bobye Holt (wife of senator Jim Holt) has been successfully subpoenaed. The prosecution have not detailed any more witnesses at this point regarded the motion regarding the molestations.

Edited by Laura2730
  • Upvote 8
  • Thank You 14
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Laura2730 said:

From what I gather from Emily Baker's latest Josh Duggar Youtube video she basically said that if the defence (& Josh) try to claim that it wasn't him but someone else who is responsible for the charges etc, then it opens the door for the prosecution to bring up the molestation allegations in the police report to point to motive etc as to why they think its Josh and not any others who might work at the car lot. If you look at one of the defence's motions (which they one today), the defence has opened that very door. 

The prosecution is saying that Josh Duggar confessed that he assaulted a girl in 2003 to the two witnesses it has named (Jim Bob Duggar and Bobye Holt). Jim Bob has not been served, i.e. they cannot locate him currently, but Bobye Holt (wife of senator Jim Holt) has been successfully subpoenaed. The prosecution have not detailed any more witnesses at this point regarded the motion regarding the molestations.

I wonder if JB would lie under oath to protect Josh? 

  • Upvote 7
  • Haha 1
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/17/2021 at 11:01 AM, artdecades said:

She very very likely did not have a student with that name. This stuff comes up every time a baby gets a weird name  

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/funny-names/

Thank you for posting this article. I work in child support and have seen thousands of names. Yes, there are some weird ones like matching or near matching first and last name or girls with variations of their dad's name and some fancy items like coach, porche or mignon but vast majority of names are pretty normal (even with weird spellings). 

37 minutes ago, HideousGreenShirt said:

How can she support him during this trial? It's inexplicable and inexcusable.

Screenshot_20211118_204954_com.twitter.android.thumb.jpg.be18193cd743eeb08b146de57fbed9cf.jpgScreenshot_20211118_205003_com.twitter.android.thumb.jpg.f4e439c623301faec6dd23ffeadbc98d.jpg

Put me in the group who believe Anna will never leave. 

She will never leave. She has been born and bread to worship the ground her husband walks on no matter what. 

31 minutes ago, Mama Mia said:

If you look closely at the video he doesn’t even hold the door open for her, his wife, who gave birth 3 weeks ago, who is there at court to support him despite his disgusting horrifying charges, where it looks like (from her walk) that it’s probably uncomfortable to be sitting for hours, who is probably hoping she’s not leaking through various places or her boobs don’t explode —- and he’s not showing her the least bit of common courtesy. She is utterly dick whipped. Vile. Those poor kids. 

Not shocked, he has been raised that women are property of their dad and then of the husband. He doesn't have to treat her like a partner or with respect because he was raised that women are to do everything the husband asks of her. Even his own mom and her "making a sandwich" story. 

26 minutes ago, Bluebirdbluebell said:

The fact that JB was dumb enough to run for office right now.....

It isn't shocking to me. The fundies, especially the tv fundies, believe they are better than everyone in morality and everyone fawns over them. And the people that call out their double standard and BS they just claim they are hateful non-Christians or fake Christians. 

  • Upvote 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, libgirl2 said:

I wonder if JB would lie under oath to protect Josh? 

I doubt it hence why he's making himself impossible to locate.

  • Upvote 7
  • I Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, libgirl2 said:

I wonder if JB would lie under oath to protect Josh? 

or plead the 5th? 🤷‍♂️

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, libgirl2 said:

I wonder if JB would lie under oath to protect Josh? 

I'd say no.  Perjury is a pretty good way to end up in prison and I'm sure JB has been informed of that. 

  • Upvote 12
  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Howl said:

I'd say no.  Perjury is a pretty good way to end up in prison and I'm sure JB has been informed of that. 

He probably would want to avoid prison at all costs. He would not do well. 

Do they still use a Bible? I know that he would lie if he swore to tell the truth with his hand on one. At least I don't think he would. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have to get Boob to court first. He was in Big Sandy this past weekend at a father/son event, and some Duggars are at Silver Dollar City today. No wonder they can't serve him!

Edited by marmalade
  • Upvote 3
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chickenbutt said:

JB cannot plead the 5th to protect Josh, just as protection from incriminating himself. Right?

 

Yeah I was about to say that. It protects against self-incrimination (i.e. Jim Bob incriminating himself), he cannot plead it to avoid incriminating Josh. Hence why he's made himself impossible to find.

  • Upvote 7
  • I Agree 1
  • Thank You 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • nelliebelle1197 locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.