Jump to content
IGNORED

2020 Presidential Election 4: How Much Longer?


GreyhoundFan

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Howl said:

Excuse me for a sec.  Ima going to the garage to chew nails for a bit. 

Now those are some big, hanging balls, and some amazing lying and compensation skills.

The "tone overall" from Trump has been that of a greedy maniac, and I'm sure it will continue to be so.

:headdesk:   :head-desk:  :angry-banghead:

  • Upvote 6
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe they are going for that spin.

''Trump got Covid, so he knows what it's like, and Biden doesn't.'' Not only is the Trump campaign a bunch of amateurs, they are also IDIOTS.

I saw a Tweet today that slammed Trump about his ''so-called'' first-hand experience. The man was in a multiroom hospital suite, where is received costly experimental therapies from a team a specialists (that included a pulmonologist from John Hopkins). Sure you dumb*sses, Trump knows what the average American is going through.

:5624797b0697e_headbash:

(I can't find the exact tweet again - mentionning this, just so you know the comment isn't directly from me but I agree with it.)

  • Upvote 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ACTUALLY don't know what's worse....

Bragging about having the life experience of getting Covid and holding that "inexperience" over his opponent's head; or

Saying his life experience of having Covid is similar to the other 35.3M people globally who have gotten it.

  • I Agree 9
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then in that vein of thought, since opiate addiction is a severe crisis in the united states, do we need to have someone who's addicted or used to be addicted to opioids as president because they're the only one who has lived the addiction?

  • Upvote 6
  • I Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Audrey2 said:

So then in that vein of thought, since opiate addiction is a severe crisis in the united states, do we need to have someone who's addicted or used to be addicted to opioids as president because they're the only one who has lived the addiction?

That's where the My Pillow guy comes in...

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Vivi_music said:

I can't believe they are going for that spin.

''Trump got Covid, so he knows what it's like, and Biden doesn't.'' Not only is the Trump campaign a bunch of amateurs, they are also IDIOTS.

I saw a Tweet today that slammed Trump about his ''so-called'' first-hand experience. The man was in a multiroom hospital suite, where is received costly experimental therapies from a team a specialists (that included a pulmonologist from John Hopkins). Sure you dumb*sses, Trump knows what the average American is going through.

:5624797b0697e_headbash:

(I can't find the exact tweet again - mentionning this, just so you know the comment isn't directly from me but I agree with it.)

Was it this one? Accurate, anyway.

 

0F697704-3573-47F7-A138-122733D7DAC8.jpeg

  • Upvote 16
  • WTF 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 :pray:

Article from Texas Monthly about voter suppression in Texas:

Spoiler

Greg Abbott’s Voter Suppression Methods Have Become More Subtle—But They’re Still Transparent

By: Christopher Hooks

As lawsuits by Democrats proceed against Governor Greg Abbott’s order limiting Texas counties to one mail-in ballot collection location, the state’s lawyers will rely on a plausible-sounding justification for the action: to improve the “security” of the mail-in ballot process. The state will also surely argue that the order is limited in scope. Most of Texas’s 254 counties already had only one drop-off location. The rule affects mainly a few populous counties, including Harris, home of Houston, which had set up twelve collection spots for its 2.4 million registered voters. The order doesn’t technically keep anyone from voting—voters are, of course, still ostensibly able to mail in their ballots.

But put Abbott’s order in the proper context—a high-stakes battle for control of the Texas House that might be decided by razor-thin margins in races in large counties such as Harris and Bexar and Dallas, along with other contested races for the U.S. House—and it becomes transparent. Abbott’s long history of imaginative acts of voter suppression means he doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt. And the governor’s order raises the question of what else he might do to limit the vote by the time in-person early voting is scheduled to start on October 13.

Voter suppression comes in many flavors but varies in heavy-handedness. On one side of the spectrum, you have the government using the threat of force or punishment to bar individuals from exercising their rights. Many Americans can identify this kind of behavior as wrong. Call that the “steel-toe boot” school of voter suppression.

Texas still sees plenty of the boot. One of its most vigorous practitioners over the past two decades was Attorney General Greg Abbott, before he became governor, who was happy to give a firm kick in the kidneys to a wide range of folks who set about registering new voters and helping them cast ballots. In 2004, Gloria Meeks, a 69-year-old Black woman from Fort Worth, helped a housebound 79-year-old neighbor fill out a mail-in ballot. Because Meeks didn’t sign the envelope properly, her home was staked out in 2006 by Abbott’s investigators, whom she repeatedly saw peeping through her window at bath time. During the course of Abbott’s investigation, she had a stroke, which her friends blamed partly on the stress. She was never convicted of anything.

Around the time of the Meeks investigation, a PowerPoint presentation Abbott’s office used to brief officeholders on “electoral fraud” included a picture of Black voters in line under the heading “Poll Place Violations.” Fraud detectives, the slideshow said, should look out for “unique stamps” accompanying mail-in ballots. The example given was a 2004 stamp with the words “Test Early for Sickle Cell” over a picture of a Black woman kissing an infant. (Sickle cell anemia is disproportionately common among those of African ancestry.)

A half decade later, in 2010, Abbott’s office sent armed agents to confiscate the equipment and paperwork of a voter registration drive in Harris County called Houston Votes, then the target of a local tea party group, which accused Houston Votes of perpetuating voter fraud. Houston Votes suffocated, unable to raise funds while under investigation. Though Abbott’s office quietly concluded that the group had broken no rules, it destroyed everything it had confiscated, in an episode that would not have been out of place in Belarus.

On the other side of the spectrum, you have the “calculator” school of voter suppression, whose adoptees don’t try to bar voters from casting ballots with the threat of force but rather change rules and tweak the way elections are conducted in ways that give themselves advantages that accumulate. Some of these rule changes are large and easily recognizable, as when elected officials draw districts in ways that favor their party. But many tweaks are small, and their impact can be hard to define or easy to dismiss, not least because they come with the perfectly sensible-sounding justification of promoting election security. (Never mind that Republicans who raise alarms about such security, often by hyping simple clerical errors, have never presented evidence, including in court cases, that it’s a significant problem.)

The key to this strategy is that the constituencies of the Democratic party—the young, the working class, racial minorities—are, generally speaking, harder to register and to turn out to vote. So rules that make it just a little harder and more inconvenient to cast a ballot can usually be counted on to benefit the Republican party. The “calculator” vote suppressors enact laws such as voter ID and changes to the election code, which make lines longer at polling places. They might, say, gum up the postal system so that fewer mail-in ballots are delivered in time to be counted—as President Trump has stated he is working to do, or tighten rules that allow elections clerks to throw out more mail-in ballots from those who didn’t follow an arcane and unnecessary set of rules, as in the case of Gloria Meeks.

Changes like these might not make the difference in a high-profile statewide race, but they have potentially enormous impacts on smaller ones, including elections for the state House, which can be decided by dozens of votes. It’s the state House that Republican leaders like Abbott care the most about right now. They’re laser-focused on it. In 2018 Democrats won 67 seats in the Lege’s lower body. They need 9 more to win the majority this year, giving them some influence over the redistricting process and the drawing of legislative districts.

Democrats may well win a majority with 76 or 77 seats, which means there’s a huge incentive to pull just 1 or 2 seats over into the R column. In 2018 fourteen state House races were decided by margins of fewer than 5 percentage points. Two state House races in Harris County were decided by a margin of 0.2 percent or less: Republican Dwayne Bohac won reelection by 72 votes, and Democrat Gina Calanni beat a Republican incumbent by 97 votes.

Calanni lives in Katy, which is on the western border of Harris County. Because of Abbott’s order, there is now only one ballot collection place in the county, at NRG Stadium, which is a 45-minute drive from parts of Katy in clear traffic—of course a rare sight in Houston. That means some of Calanni’s constituents now face a drive of one and a half hours to turn in a mail-in ballot to the proper officials if they don’t want to give it to a postal service that has been intentionally slowed down by political appointees favorable to the president.

It’s easy to imagine a couple dozen Harris County residents putting off the drive until it’s too late. Maybe they drop their ballot in the mail instead, and maybe they miss that deadline too. It’s likewise easy to imagine that the margin of Calanni’s reelection, or loss, is a few dozen votes. And when you add the impact of Abbott’s order to the many other small ways state leaders have fought to make voting harder than it needs to be in this state—and add to that the impact of the general sense of confusion and demoralization that many Texans feel about the integrity of the Democratic process—you have considerably more than a few dozen votes.

Republicans have done this kind of “calculator” vote suppression for many years, including those in which they were far ahead in the polls and didn’t need the help at all. But this year, the incentive to peel away Democratic margins a few dozen votes at a time is much higher. And with weeks left before the election, it’s safe to assume there are more changes coming.

Remember the name Greg Abbott, because he will try to run for president one day. :pb_sad:

  • Upvote 5
  • Rufus Bless 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Cartmann99 said:

 :pray:

The Biden campaign apparently has a 5 million ad campaign blitz planned for Texas. Biden is within striking distance too. 

Act Blue has raised HALF A BILLION dollars since RBG's death. Not only is that a lot of money for down ballot races, it really shows Dems are on the kind of warpath that will make Republicans in 2010 look like the teddy bears' picnic. 

Biden's numbers with independents are looking really good too, especially after Trump's latest stunts. 

  • Upvote 8
  • Thank You 3
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

About this one ballot box per county: how often will the box be emptied? How many ballots will they hold? What will a voter do if the box is stuffed to overflowing?

  • Upvote 4
  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, fransalley said:

Whenever I see notifications of this topic, and the title “How much longer,” I end up thinking, “Too long!”

Yeah now that I voted my tolerance for political ads is very low. If they can target ads individually then people should be able to opt out of political ads once they voted. 

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, 47of74 said:

Yeah now that I voted my tolerance for political ads is very low. If they can target ads individually then people should be able to opt out of political ads once they voted. 

I change the channel when political ads come on. 

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still get texts/notifications saying “Are you registered to vote?  Apply for an absentee ballot today!”

Done and done.

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, smittykins said:

I still get texts/notifications saying “Are you registered to vote?  Apply for an absentee ballot today!”

Done and done.

I am registered to vote.  Early voting begins next week and I am going to go then and vote.

  • Upvote 8
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My USPS preview email tells me I have political ads waiting in my mailbox.  Ummm - but my ballot was turned in yesterday.

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clueliss said:

My USPS preview email tells me I have political ads waiting in my mailbox.  Ummm - but my ballot was turned in yesterday.

I kind of wish we could attach shredders to our mailboxes and just tell the mail carriers just to stick em in there. 

I had family who worked as carriers for the USPS.  They were not all that thrilled about having to haul political ads and other junk mail around. They said it’d make their lives easier if they didn’t have all that crap.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My apartment complex's recycle bin is near the mailboxes.  Needless to say I walk this stuff right on over and toss it in before going to my car.

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The next debate is going to be virtual

Quote

The Commission on Presidential Debates says the second Trump-Biden debate will be `virtual' amid concerns about the president's COVID-19.

Now, the candidates will "participate from separate remote locations," while the participants and moderator remain in Miami.

Good. We don’t need the super spreader in chief infecting Biden or anyone else. 

  • Upvote 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s hope Trump forgets to unmute himself...and no one says anything?

Breaking news! Trump threw a fit and says he’s not going to participate in the next debate. ???

That was really stupid, btw. But good for our collective sanity.

Edited by Snarkasarus Rex
  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Snarkasarus Rex said:

Let’s hope Trump forgets to unmute himself...and no one says anything?

Breaking news! Trump threw a fit and says he’s not going to participate in the next debate. ???

That was really stupid, btw. But good for our collective sanity.

Because he and his administration haven't infected enough people yet, apparently. 

I hope they hold it anyway and give all the time to Biden. Won't happen, of course, but canceling would also be fine - President Oompa-Loompa won't get his chance for "ratings" or headlines or fawning praise from Fox for his masterful debating skill, and Joe can go on with his low-key do-no-harm campaign, noting that it isn't happening for one reason and one reason only - the President refuses to take Covid seriously.

Added:  From the Trump campaign:   "We'll pass on this sad excuse to bail out Joe Biden and do a rally instead.”  :shock: Yeah, need to infect more people! 

Edited by Becky
  • Upvote 2
  • WTF 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • GreyhoundFan locked and unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.