Jump to content
IGNORED

Russian Connection 5: In Which We Plan Sleepovers


Destiny

Recommended Posts

Some apprehension that Russia is massing troops on the Ukrainian border.  Important, very important to keep track of this.  As Garry Kaparov has noted, Putin creates incremental provocations to gauge European and world reactions. 

Trump sat on his thumb during the Russian takeover of Crimea and the Russian provocations in the Kerch Strait last week.  Putin is seeing a lot of green lights.  Although the Blue Wave wasn't good for Putin, he's still created instability in the US because Trump is our president and the WH is in chaos, with a Chief of Staff (no matter how ineffective) leaving in a few weeks with no viable replacement in sight (unless Rob Porter got plastic surgery in South American and a new identity). 

I'm not sure how Putin gauges Pompeo, but according the the WaPo op-ed, State is still demoralized and understaffed. 

Another warning tweet: 

 

Edited by Howl
  • Upvote 1
  • WTF 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ooooh, looking like Maria Butina may take a plea deal, but no one knows if she is cooperating.

Also, @fraurosena, here's another reference to the Fantasy Indictment League, but I think it's up to individuals to fill out their own roster. 

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question: Has anyone here on FJ Land figured out how many Republican men she attached herself to?  I know we've got pictures of soon to be former Wisconsin Gov Scottie Wanker?  I think she was spotted with Frothy Sanscrotum as well? 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 47of74 said:

Question: Has anyone here on FJ Land figured out how many Republican men she attached herself to?  I know we've got pictures of soon to be former Wisconsin Gov Scottie Wanker?  I think she was spotted with Frothy Sanscrotum as well? 

Scroll down to the second tweet for her and Sheriff Clarke:

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*singing* Do they know it's Flipmastime at all

Paul Erickson is screwed I think. Hopefully some others too. 

Although if Butina is Putin's girl she would still have an agenda. Mueller She Wrote said she was trying to send messages via a jailmate

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 47of74 said:

Question: Has anyone here on FJ Land figured out how many Republican men she attached herself to?  I know we've got pictures of soon to be former Wisconsin Gov Scottie Wanker?  I think she was spotted with Frothy Sanscrotum as well? 

 Mueller She Wrote had this mess

She was photographed with tons of other people at NRA conventions

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/10/2018 at 5:30 PM, AmazonGrace said:

Although if Butina is Putin's girl she would still have an agenda. Mueller She Wrote said she was trying to send messages via a jailmate

Putin is all like, "No idea who she is, never heard of her," so it seems she's twisting in the wind.  If she's deported back to Russia, it's either, "Oops, she fell out of the window of her 8th-story apartment" or  Putin will award her some kind of medal.  There doesn't seem to be much in between. 

Edited by Howl
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO COLLUSION! 

Quote

 

Maria Butina’s boyfriend claimed he set up Trump-Russia NRA “conduit” as campaign funds flowed

Republican operative Paul Erickson claimed in an email he’d set up a private Russia-GOP channel through the NRA

 

https://www.salon.com/2018/12/12/maria-butinas-boyfriend-claimed-he-set-up-trump-russia-nra-conduit-as-campaign-funds-flowed/

Russians are claiming that she was tortured. 

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/12/europe/russia-maria-butina-intl/index.html

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mariia Butina's signed plea agreement, stating she's guilty of being an agent for a foreign government.

 

  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 47of74 said:

 

*looks at lower left corner* It's been so long since I've heard anything about Bobby Jindal, that it took my brain a good 30 seconds or so before it could recall his name for me. :embarrassed:

  • Upvote 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*looks at lower left corner* It's been so long since I've heard anything about Bobby Jindal, that it took my brain a good 30 seconds or so before it could recall his name for me. :embarrassed:


That’s gotta be the biggest humiliation for a lot of these Republicans. That no one remembers them after their five seconds in the spotlight even if they go around trying to out Hitler everyone else.
  • I Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"New report on Russian disinformation, prepared for the Senate, shows the operation’s scale and sweep"

Spoiler

A report prepared for the Senate that provides the most sweeping analysis yet of Russia’s disinformation campaign around the 2016 election found the operation used every major social media platform to deliver words, images and videos tailored to voters’ interests to help elect President Trump — and worked even harder to support him while in office.

The report, a draft of which was obtained by The Washington Post, is the first to study the millions of posts provided by major technology firms to the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), its chairman, and Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), its ranking Democrat. The bipartisan panel hasn’t said whether it endorses the findings. It plans to release it publicly along with another study later this week.

The research — by Oxford University’s Computational Propaganda Project and Graphika, a network analysis firm — offers new details of how Russians working at the Internet Research Agency, which U.S. officials have charged with criminal offenses for meddling in the 2016 campaign, sliced Americans into key interest groups for targeted messaging. These efforts shifted over time, peaking at key political moments, such as presidential debates or party conventions, the report found.

The data sets used by the researchers were provided by Facebook, Twitter and Google and covered several years up to mid-2017, when the social media companies cracked down on the known Russian accounts. The report, which also analyzed data separately provided to House Intelligence Committee members, contains no information on more recent political moments, such as November’s midterm elections.

“What is clear is that all of the messaging clearly sought to benefit the Republican Party — and specifically Donald Trump,” the report says. “Trump is mentioned most in campaigns targeting conservatives and right-wing voters, where the messaging encouraged these groups to support his campaign. The main groups that could challenge Trump were then provided messaging that sought to confuse, distract and ultimately discourage members from voting.”

Representatives for Burr and Warner declined to comment.

The new report offers the latest evidence that Russian agents sought to help Trump win the White House. Democrats and Republicans on the panel previously studied the U.S. intelligence community’s 2017 finding that Moscow aimed to assist Trump, and in July, they said investigators had come to the correct conclusion. Despite their work, some Republicans on Capitol Hill continue to doubt the nature of Russia’s meddling in the last presidential election.

The Russians aimed particular energy at activating conservatives on issues such as gun rights and immigration, while sapping the political clout of left-leaning African American voters by undermining their faith in elections and spreading misleading information about how to vote. Many other groups — Latinos, Muslims, Christians, gay men and women, liberals, Southerners, veterans — got at least some attention from Russians operating thousands of social media accounts.

The report also offered some of the first detailed analyses of the role played by YouTube, a subsidiary of Google, and Instagram, owned by Facebook, in the Russian campaign, as well as anecdotes about how Russians used other social media platforms — Google+, Tumblr and Pinterest — that have received relatively little scrutiny. The Russian effort also used email accounts from Yahoo, Microsoft’s Hotmail service and Google’s Gmail.

The authors, while reliant on data provided by technology companies, also highlighted the companies' “belated and uncoordinated response” to the disinformation campaign and, once it was discovered, criticized the companies for not sharing more with investigators. The authors urged that in the future they provide data in “meaningful and constructive” ways.

Facebook, for example, provided the Senate with copies of posts from 81 Facebook pages and information on 76 accounts used to purchase ads, but it did not share posts from other user accounts run by the IRA, the report says. Twitter, meanwhile, has made it challenging for outside researchers to collect and analyze data on its platform through its public feed, the researchers said.

Google submitted information in an especially difficult way for the researchers to handle, providing content such as YouTube videos but not the related data that would have allowed a full analysis. The YouTube information was so hard for the researchers to study, they wrote, that they instead tracked the links to its videos from other sites in hopes of better understanding YouTube’s role in the Russian effort.

Facebook and Google did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In a statement, Twitter stressed it had made “significant strides” since the 2016 election to harden its digital defenses, including the release of a repository of the tweets that Russian agents previously sent so that for researchers can review them. “Our singular focus is to improve the health of the public conversation on our platform, and protecting the integrity of elections is an important aspect of that mission," the company added.

Facebook, Google and Twitter first disclosed last year that they had identified Russian meddling on their sites. Critics previously said it took too long to come to an understanding of the disinformation campaign, and that Russian strategies have likely shifted since then. The companies have awakened to the threat — Facebook, in particular, created a “war room” this fall to combat interference around elections — but none has revealed interference around the midterm elections last month on the scale of what happened in 2016.

The report expressed concern about the overall threat social media poses to political discourse within nations and among them, warning that companies once viewed as tools for liberation in the Arab world and elsewhere are now threats to democracy.

“Social media have gone from being the natural infrastructure for sharing collective grievances and coordinating civic engagement to being a computational tool for social control, manipulated by canny political consultants and available to politicians in democracies and dictatorships alike,” the report said.

Researchers also noted that the data includes evidence of sloppiness by the Russians that could have led to earlier detection, including the use of Russia’s currency, the ruble, to buy ads and Russian phone numbers for contact information. The operatives also left behind technical signatures in computerized logs, such as Internet addresses in St. Petersburg, where the IRA was based.

Many of the findings track, in general terms, work by other researchers and testimony previously provided by the companies to lawmakers investigating the Russian effort. But the fuller data available to the researchers offered new insights on many aspects of the Russian campaign.

The report traces the origins of Russian online influence operations to Russian domestic politics in 2009 and says that ambitions shifted to include U.S. politics as early as 2013 on Twitter. Of the tweets the company provided to the Senate, 57 percent are in Russian, 36 percent in English and smaller amounts in other languages.

The efforts to manipulate Americans grew sharply in 2014 and every year after, as teams of operatives spread their work across more platforms and accounts to target larger swaths of U.S. voters by geography, political interests, race, religion and other factors. The Russians started with accounts on Twitter, then added YouTube and Instagram before bringing Facebook into the mix, the report said.

Facebook was particularly effective at targeting conservatives and African Americans, the report found. More than 99 percent of all engagement — meaning likes, shares and other reactions — came from 20 Facebook pages controlled by the IRA, including “Being Patriotic,” “Heart of Texas,” “Blacktivist” and “Army of Jesus.”

Together, the 20 most popular pages generated 39 million likes, 31 million shares, 5.4 million reactions and 3.4 million comments. Company officials told Congress that the Russian campaign reached 126 million people on Facebook and 20 million more on Instagram.

The Russians operated 133 accounts on Instagram, a photo-sharing subsidiary of Facebook, that focused mainly on race, ethnicity or other forms of personal identity. The most successful Instagram posts targeted African American cultural issues and black pride and were not explicitly political.

While the overall intensity of posting across platforms grew year by year — with a particular spike during the six months after Election Day 2016 — this growth was particularly pronounced on Instagram, which went from roughly 2,600 posts a month in 2016 to nearly 6,000 in 2017, when the accounts were shut down. Across all three years covered by the report, Russian Instagram posts generated 185 million likes and 4 million user comments.

Even though the researchers struggled to interpret the YouTube data submitted by Google, they were able to track the links from other sites to YouTube, offering a “proxy” for understanding the role play by the video platform.

“The proxy is imperfect,” the researchers wrote, “but the IRA’s heavy use of links to YouTube videos leaves little doubt of the IRA’s interest in leveraging Google’s video platform to target and manipulate US audiences.”

The use of YouTube, like the other platforms, appears to have grown after Trump’s election. Twitter links to YouTube videos grew by 84 percent in the six months after the election, the data showed.

The Russians shrewdly worked across platforms as they refined their tactics aimed at particular groups, posting links across accounts and sites to bolster the influence operation’s success on each, the report shows.

“Black Matters US” had accounts on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Google+, Tumblr and PayPal, according to the researchers. By linking posts across these platforms, the Russian operatives were able to solicit donations, organize real-world protests and rallies, and direct online traffic to a website that the Russians controlled.

The researchers found that when Facebook shut down the page in August 2016, a new one called “BM” soon appeared with more cultural and fewer political posts. It tracked closely to the content on the @blackmatterus Instagram account.

The report found operatives also began buying Google ads to promote the “BlackMatters US” website with provocative messages such as, “Cops kill black kids. Are you sure that your son won’t be the next?” The related Twitter account, meanwhile, complained about the suspension of the Facebook page, accusing the tech company of “supporting white supremacy.”

 

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cartmann99 said:

*looks at lower left corner* It's been so long since I've heard anything about Bobby Jindal, that it took my brain a good 30 seconds or so before it could recall his name for me. :embarrassed:

Ah Bobby. If I recall correctly he gave the gave some speech once mocking President Obama’s funding into studying volcanic activity. Seems the Bobster felt it was stupid since volcanos ? were no longer a problem. Maybe he just got confused and thought volcanology was the study of Lenord Nemoy 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Important to remember that the Russians have not backed off on their bot/troll activities on social media.  It's an on-going war.  As the New York Times noted in July 2018, "Despite Facebook's efforts, stopping coordinated influence campaigns has proved difficult.

Or perhaps one should say, Despite Facebook's half-assed efforts.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Important to remember that the Russians have not backed off on their bot/troll activities on social media.  It's an on-going war.  As the New York Times noted in July 2018, "Despite Facebook's efforts, stopping coordinated influence campaigns has proved difficult.
Or perhaps one should say, Despite Facebook's half-assed efforts.


Fuckerberg likes the Russians sowing chaos.
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.