Josh's NSFW twitter?

[DuggarsTheEndIsNear]

I am very skeptical that this belongs to him. There's no common factors other than the profile picture. The real owner of that profile picture has stated he's been having problems for awhile now with people using the picture on false accounts.

People who are saying they confirmed this is Josh's account because the email address from the Facebook page is the same one linked with the Twitter are not being truthful, as you could easily figure out.

Plus, the Twitter page is under "John," while the FB page and OkC page were under "Joe." Seems weird to have two pseudonyms.

[HuggleMonster]

Of course his preference is for big boobs - they have to be bigger than his.

I just snorted so hard I scared my cat.

[notsocommon]

After seeing that twitter, I think that I need an adult!

[Koala]

There are members on here that lie and make up stuff to create a fantasy life online. We've outed three in the last couple months.

:shock: How do I miss this stuff?

[HerNameIsBuffy]

Yes. Thank you.

1. The picture means nothing. The real guy in the picture had a public post on his FB stating he has had issues with that picture being used by multiple others. He changed his picture settings because that picture was grabbed by Google.

2. The timing means nothing. That is the timing the picture fell into the search engines and the real guy became "random Facebook guy".

3. The email address doesn't match OK cupid, Facebook, or AM. So he used the same address (and name) for all of them, but suddenly mixed it up for twitter? It makes no sense.

ITA - once I read the email link was tenuous if not nonexistent I don't think there's anything to tie him to this. As you said the guy had issues with other people using his pic. This could be anybody.

See, that's why I don't post my picture. I'm so damn good looking some of you would use it for your porn twitters and I don't want to have to answer for strangers' turn-ons. :wink-kitty:

[nelliebelle1197]

:shock: How do I miss this stuff?

Since your PMs are turned off, go check the specularium in AYTFJ

[nelliebelle1197]

You mean you are not Anissa Jones!?

ITA - once I read the email link was tenuous if not nonexistent I don't think there's anything to tie him to this. As you said the guy had issues with other people using his pic. This could be anybody.

See, that's why I don't post my picture. I'm so damn good looking some of you would use it for your porn twitters and I don't want to have to answer for strangers' turn-ons. :wink-kitty:

[HerNameIsBuffy]

You mean you are not Anissa Jones!?

I just channel her through Mrs. Beasley. She speaks through me because afterlife broadband sucks.

[HarleyQuinn]

Wait.... so the child molestation was believable but common adult porn and cursing is too vulgar to be true????

[singsingsing]

Yeah, it is. I don't think this account belongs to Smugger. If he was using the same email for his other shit, why would this be different? And lesbian porn? Come on. This can't be him.

All other arguments aside, it can't be him because 'lesbian porn'??? Really? He had no trouble ignoring his other values, I'm sure he'd have no problem with this. Plenty of men who are vehemently against gay rights enjoy lesbian porn. Because they're raging hypocrites. Just like Josh.

[FloraKitty35]

That one woman looked like Jill. :brain-bleach:

[mebeforee]

I also think it's extremely unlikely that Josh would look at lesbian porn. Even in his liberated online personas his homophobia shone through. You think Josh would look at pornography that excluded the presence of a dick? His behavior is highly self-serving. It seems unlikely he would get past both his hatred of gay people AND the ability to project himself into a scene. Having spectacularly failed to uphold a number of his principles doesn't mean that all of them are irrelevant when trying to determine the validity of an anonymous online account.

[FreeJesusFromFundies]

I don't think Josh would look at lesbian porn, not because of homophobic reasons , but it seems to defy his mindset. Two Lesbians seem more equal, more empowered. If he is anything like the fundie men I know, he will want to see women getting it from men, submissive objects, as he feels women are and should be.

[HerNameIsBuffy]

I also think it's extremely unlikely that Josh would look at lesbian porn. Even in his liberated online personas his homophobia shone through. You think Josh would look at pornography that excluded the presence of a dick? His behavior is highly self-serving. It seems unlikely he would get past both his hatred of gay people AND the ability to project himself into a scene. Having spectacularly failed to uphold a number of his principles doesn't mean that all of them are irrelevant when trying to determine the validity of an anonymous online account.

I disagree a lot of raging homophobes are completely fine with lesbian porn. Maybe they don't see it as really gay, because they can rationalize it as acting for the sake of the men watching, or maybe they feel weird watching porn where a man is featured because they are getting turned on in part by watching a naked man, or any other crazy ass reasons.

As Paul Buchman once said in Mad About You on the subject of lesbian porn, "what's not to like? They're naked and I agree with both of them."

He is very vocally anti-gay. But if asked I'm sure he'd have been just as anti-molestation and anti-porn and anti-Ashley Madisoning your faithful wife. But his actions don't match his words when it comes to sexual ethics on the other stuff so why would this be different.

[JenniferJuniper]

Everything Josh has done has been in total conflict with his alleged values.

Guys love lesbian porn. Or so I hear tell.

[HerNameIsBuffy]

I don't think Josh would look at lesbian porn, not because of homophobic reasons , but it seems to defy his mindset. Two Lesbians seem more equal, more empowered. If he is anything like the fundie men I know, he will want to see women getting it from men, submissive objects, as he feels women are and should be.

I don't know, maybe it's me but it's hard enough to figure out the ins and outs of someone you're sleeping with, forget about the reasoning behind the hard wiring. I wouldn't even attempt it with a stranger based on professed religious and political views.

Don't most people have some things that interest them sexually that would surprise people who know them, but not intimately? Heck sometimes I'm surprised by what gets me going - day dream takes a weird turn and I wonder where did that come from. :lol:

[Cartmann99]

Everything Josh has done has been in total conflict with his alleged values.

Guys love lesbian porn. Or so I hear tell.

Some men love the idea that if a man is not available, a heterosexual woman could be so overcome by desire that she would have sex with another woman.

[artdecades]

I don't think this is his twitter

1) Because FKA, the ontd user who posted this, is a known troll

2) The names don't match up

3) The guy in the photo is used by a lot of creeps online to fake profiles.

4) I am not saying that Josh isn't into MILFs or that lesbian porn is too much for him. I think he could easily be into MILFs and watch lesbian porn. However, the profiles we have seen have been a lot tamer. He wants to experiment and learn and explore based on his interests. It was all relatively tame. This feed does not line up with that. It would mean he escalated significantly in a really short period of time (again, not impossible, but just makes me skeptical).

[YoshiCat]

Everything Josh has done has been in total conflict with his alleged values.

Guys love lesbian porn. Or so I hear tell.

Straight men love lesbian pornography because they love women and find women's bodies beautiful. Lesbian pornography is twice the women, two beautiful women to admire instead of one. There are always lesbian scenes in straight porn.

Straight men tend to think men's bodies are unattractive. They kind of wonder how women find them attractive (but are

extremely grateful that women do find them attractive). For some straight men, a man in the porn ruins it, they don't want to see another man while they're having sexual thoughts.

[doggie]

Saw the twitter-- [emoji14]ink-shock: [emoji38] Josh likes the mammaries, lots of mammaries, and I'm guessing he has probably paid to see and touch some mammaries that are not a family members'. And touched some other parts as well. [emoji14]opcorn2:

Can't hate him for liking the mamories but that's about it.

It may have just been an online relationship type thing, like a catfish situation. I bet he probably didn't really meet that person.

[Terrier99]

Even if it isn't his, I want those images out of my head NOW!!!!! :ew: :ew: :ew: :pink-shock: :pink-shock: :pink-shock:

[mfch]

So I'm going to say I don't think this is actually Josh. Doesn't fit with the other stuff, the email is different. Could be wrong, but I think this is just someone else using 'random guy'

[NurseNell]

Saw the twitter-- :pink-shock: :lol: Josh likes the mammaries, lots of mammaries, and I'm guessing he has probably paid to see and touch some mammaries that are not a family members'.

Well, when your mother wears a tent to nurse all your many baby brothers and sisters so you won't see her breasts you'll probably grow up to be fascinated by breasts.

[mebeforee]

But again, the email address doesn't match the one he had been using previously. So there is no link between this account and Josh's other accounts aside from the 'random guy' picture. So the speculation about whether he likes lesbian porn or not is moot. There's no reason to believe this belongs to Josh other than the sensational irony it would provide. But it doesn't seem to match his MO and isn't connected to the information we know him to have used before.

[Queen Of Hearts]

But again, the email address doesn't match the one he had been using previously. So there is no link between this account and Josh's other accounts aside from the 'random guy' picture. So the speculation about whether he likes lesbian porn or not is moot. There's no reason to believe this belongs to Josh other than the sensational irony it would provide. But it doesn't seem to match his MO and isn't connected to the information we know him to have used before.

Here are the links:

1.) same picture

2.) start and ending timeframe match other accounts start and end times (and the molestation scandal becoming known)

3.) PORN!

Here are the non-links:

1.) different email address

Frankly, for me there is enough other factors that I don't think the email address being different necessarily discounts that it is him.