Jump to content
IGNORED

Josh's NSFW twitter?


actuallyjessica

Recommended Posts

...There's no way. It can't be. Can it?

This is so fucking gross. There go the last few pieces of the Duggar empire to fall if this is him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't think this is Josh. One of the things I do believe coming from him is that he doesn't curse, and this account seems too vulgar to be his.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what to think about this account. I wonder how anyone in the first place linked it to Josh. There's always a possibility Josh changed the email, but why do that when he could just delete the account instead. I thought someone had found a link between facebook/email and this twitter, but if there's nothing more than the profile picture linking them then I'm skeptical about this too, especially since the email address doesn't match.

I am almost positive it was found doing a google image search to see what other accounts use that picture. The flaw in that is he didn't use that same picture for Facebook. He stole yet at another picture for the Facebook profile which *was* confirmed as his. So, really, it doesn't make sense he would use the same picture anyway. I really don't think this twitter account is his. :think:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it seems very vulgar to be Josh but ,like Lizbeth said, the orignal apology focused on his porn addiction. Which would make sense if he figured this was going to be found/knew it was out there. It's almost like he was apologizing for porn instead of AM in his apology. Nothing would really surprise me at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if it's him or not, but why wouldn't Josh say/type vulgar things?

His deeds have been the height of vulgarity. He's really into porn. There's no reason why he'd censor his words if he thought no one knew who he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With twitter (and Instagram for that matter), you cant directly search the email, but you can import friends from your contact list. Im guessing what the person did on ONTD was added Josh's email to his contacts, imported his friends, and then saw the page that came up for Josh's email. I hope im making sense ;)

That makes total sense to me. Any email address in your contacts list can be searched by most social media sites so you can "find friends" to connect with. If the email address is recognized, the person's page pops up. That was a genius thought process.

I also have a really hard time believing this random guy's picture was used again without there being a connection to Josh. What are the chances of this happening to random guy by two separate people for two separate highly sexual in nature accounts? If that's the case and it is more than one person, random guy should play the lottery. He's one lucky son of a bitch! That's a hell of a winning crap shoot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His language and the email is what is making me think that it could maybe not be him. But then there is the dates. It adds us. Especially when it ended or he stopped posting, May 17th.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a way to get a twitter user's partial email address by choosing "forgot your password" and type in the username of the user you want to check. When I do this and type in "toughguyy11" I get "ps***@gmail.com" - and the three stars doesn't have to be three characters. So Josh (assuming this twitter account really belong to him) may have other email addresses he has used for other sites or for second profiles on facebook/twitter/dating sites. Does anyone have any idea what this email could be?

Josh was so creative changing his birthdate by a day and a month on the AM accounts - why not see if there is anything to psmithsonnwa@ (just changing the first initial.) Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hates gays, but has no problem with lesbian porn? Fuck that noise, what a misogynistic prick.

Also, someone has massive Mommy-issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw the twitter-- :pink-shock: :lol: Josh likes the mammaries, lots of mammaries, and I'm guessing he has probably paid to see and touch some mammaries that are not a family members'. And touched some other parts as well. :popcorn2:

I must admit, I laughed when I saw he followed "Boobs in HD". :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OKC account predated the possible twitter account. I'm thinking that he was thinking of finding someone who would be more than a one night stand when he created the OKC account. So it makes sense that he would describe that personality I the best light...athletic, sexually adventurous etc.

When it got to the second Ashley Madison account with the guarantee he didn't care if he showed his most depraved (for him anyway) self and twitter was one more step beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an issue believing that this is his Twitter. Mostly because he RTed something that praised Sarah Silverman :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this time I have been using Twitter I didn't realize that anyone could post images that are that NSFW. :pink-shock: I'm surprised he didn't remember to shut that account down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of the names of the women he's tweeted to or about match his secret FB strippers friends. Though of course the pic is different.. but it still seems to me more likely that another person googled "random guy" and used that pic since it comes up. The dates are more of a red flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is Josh. One of the things I do believe coming from him is that he doesn't curse, and this account seems too vulgar to be his.

Wait.... so the child molestation was believable but common adult porn and cursing is too vulgar to be true????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait.... so the child molestation was believable but common adult porn and cursing is too vulgar to be true????

I agree with that. Watching porn and using vulgar language is nothing compared to incestuous child molestation. I tend to think that is his account. The same photo (reversed from the original, same as the Facebook account), the dates of the last posts that jibe with the molestation news and the last entries on the AM account, the same first name, his own statement that he was leading a double life and was "addicted to porn"--kinda adds up. The only thing that makes me wonder if it is his account is that it has not been deleted.

I wonder if any of the ladies (who seem to be porn or ex-porn actresses) could shed light on their correspondence with "John"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're different kinds of behavior, though. I do have a hard time imagining Josh using the language the twitter account uses. It's not something most people secretly hide in their head (unless they're at work or something), it's either part of your vocabulary or it isn't. It seems really strange to me that he would have an account like this. And I don't see the information he gave about himself on Ashley Madison as being any less vanilla than what his OKCupid account was. And in both cases it seemed clear he was looking for short relationships, as indicated by his OKC answer 'I'm more interested in you just for tonight'.

Obviously incestuous molestation is a million times worse than cheating, looking at porn or swearing. But it's not a given that he would secretly be swearing it up online. It doesn't sound like him. (That doesn't mean it ISN'T him, but I think the language is a valid point, especially since the email addresses apparently don't match and it's not clear how people came to the conclusion that this was him.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy overreaction, Batman.

There is no conclusive evidence this is his Twitter account.

There is no proof Josh actually cheated on Anna. He had a fantasy online life that included porn and flirtations on a dating site. There are members on here that lie and make up stuff to create a fantasy life online. We've outed three in the last couple months. Millions of people out there have fantasy lives online that have nothing to do with who they are in real life.

Why are people so horrified that a Twitter account with some perfectly legal porn may be Josh's? His parents oppressed his normal sexuality and development to the point of abuse. What the hell do people expect?

Yeah, so he ran his big mouth about stupid religious and political mores he really doesn't buy into. Why are people trying to string him up over this latest? FFS, David Vitter was caught with hookers wearing baby diapers and he still got to legislate conservative morality in way with a hella lot more impact than FRC and its uneducated spokesman could ever have. :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may have misread it but it looked to me like the things were mostly re-tweets.

I wouldn't take it seriously unless the account is confirmed, but nothing there surprises me. It is run of the mill porn (though I too am shocked to see it on Twitter! :o :D )

Josh seems very stunted emotionally and, to me, his retweeting of curse words, seems reminiscent of the behaviour of some toddlers when they first learn about swear words and gleefully run around yelling "PissPoopBumShit!" to test the water with their parents/teachers. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy overreaction, Batman.

There is no conclusive evidence this is his Twitter account.

Yes. Thank you.

1. The picture means nothing. The real guy in the picture had a public post on his FB stating he has had issues with that picture being used by multiple others. He changed his picture settings because that picture was grabbed by Google.

2. The timing means nothing. That is the timing the picture fell into the search engines and the real guy became "random Facebook guy".

3. The email address doesn't match OK cupid, Facebook, or AM. So he used the same address (and name) for all of them, but suddenly mixed it up for twitter? It makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no proof Josh actually cheated on Anna. He had a fantasy online life that included porn and flirtations on a dating site.

If he did not hate teh sex he would have made that clear in his confession. Not actually having teh sex would have been a big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he did not hate teh sex he would have made that clear in his confession. Not actually having teh sex would have been a big deal.

I disagree, His confession was vague. For some, lusting with their heart is akin to actual cheating. So it is hard to know if he actually had sex with another woman, had phone sex with another woman, exchanged dirty texts and emails, or if he just fantasized about it.

The actual details of did he or didn't he, don't really matter much to me. Infidelity is certainly not unique, but it is again the hypocrisy of preaching family values, and of telling the world that he has been healed and forgiven by Jesus for his previous sexual sins, only to find out he has continued with what his ilk would consider serious sexual sins.

In any other situation, I don't really find infidelity all that shocking. Take for example Ben Affleck and the nanny? Shocking? No. Do I feel bad for his wife? Maybe, though I don't think she is a saint either. Do I feel badly for the Kids? Yes, of course.

The Josh Duggar Scandal is a scandal, not because he wants to cuddle and have oral sex with a stranger, but because of who he is, and who he has pretended to be. And because following the more disturbing outing of his molestation and hx as a sexual predator, The Leg Humpers were claiming him to be a man changed by his Love For Christ, and we should just leave him alone and move on. Turns out, ol' Joshie wasn't apparently all that cured, though we have no reason to believe that he continued with his predatory behavior.

We also, taking a page from Gothard, who has preached the Sins of the Father are visited upon the Son, are curious to know if JB had knowledge of this, or if He himself has some sexual sins hidden in his closet. I think we all realize that Josh is a product of some pretty messed up parenting and patriarchal religious ideology, so while we see the hypocrisy, we also assume that what is "Rotten in DenmarK' started with JimBob and Michelle. They are fully responsible for what has happened. They lied and covered up the first scandal, they denied treatment to their son, who by all accounts asked them for help. They did not protect their daughters, They put their family on TV knowing they had dark secrets, They showed pride and arrogance in their Godliness, They seem to have forced or at least strongly encouraged young Josh to marry very young, in order to give him an outlet for his sexual desires. They taught their sons that they are in charge of the wives, and had a right to demand sex whenever they wanted. They taught their sons that they have very little personal responsibility and that their wives are responsible if they make mistakes, or have sinful temptations. They taught their children to have hateful attitudes about people with differing opinions to theirs.

They are the monsters. Josh, as a man of nearly 30, must be held accountable for his choices, but he is a product of these monsters. And as he seems quite content to have lived the good life with little effort, he seems unlikely to have done any outside exploration or education about differing points of view. Even his method to having an affair was lazy, i.e., Just pay for it, rather than actually try to meet someone, develop an attraction etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.