Jump to content
IGNORED

Trump 48: Nobody Likes Me


GreyhoundFan

Recommended Posts

Probably because it was his turn to be daddy's minder today.

Or he believes if he sticks close to daddy, they won't come to get him to testify...

 

  • Upvote 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Room rentals, resort fees and furniture removal: How Trump’s company charged the U.S. government more than $900,000"

Spoiler

The Secret Service had asked for a room close to the president. But Mar-a-Lago said it was too late. The room was booked. Would agents like a room across the street from the president, instead?

“I do have a Beach Cabana available,” a staff member at President Trump’s club in Palm Beach, Fla., wrote in March 2017 to a Secret Service agent seeking rooms for the upcoming weekend. “Across the street at the Beach Club, North end of the pool.”

The next time, the Secret Service didn’t take the same risk. It paid Mar-a-Lago to book rooms for two weeks at a time — locking them up before the club could rent them to others, according to newly released records and emails.

For Trump’s club, it appeared, saying no to the Secret Service had made it a better customer. The agency was paying for rooms on nights when Trump wasn’t even visiting — to be ready just in case Trump decided to go, one former Trump administration official said.

Trump has now visited his own properties 270 times as president, according to a Washington Post tally — with another visit planned for Thursday, when he is scheduled to meet GOP donors at his Washington hotel.

Through these trips, Trump has brought the Trump Organization a stream of private revenue from federal agencies and GOP campaign groups. Federal spending records show that taxpayers have paid Trump’s businesses more than $900,000 since he took office. At least $570,000 came as a result of the president’s travel, according to a Post analysis.

Now, new federal spending documents obtained by The Post via a public-records lawsuit give more detail about how the Trump Organization charged the Secret Service — a kind of captive customer, required to follow Trump everywhere. In addition to the rentals at Mar-a-Lago, the documents show that the Trump Organization charged daily “resort fees” to Secret Service agents guarding Vice President Pence in Las Vegas and in another instance asked agents to pay a $1,300 “furniture removal charge” during a presidential visit to a Trump resort in Scotland.

In addition, campaign finance records have provided new details about the payments the Trump Organization received from GOP groups, as a result of the 37 instances in which Trump headlined a political event at one of his properties. Those visits have brought the company at least $3.8 million in fees, according to a Post analysis of campaign spending records.

Since taking office, Trump has taken other actions that have shattered his early promise to “completely isolate” himself from the Trump Organization.

He tried to award the massive Group of Seven summit to his Doral resort in Miami, dropping the idea after a public backlash. He filmed video messages for big-spending private clients at Mar-a-Lago. He suggested that Pence visit a Trump property in Ireland, according to the vice president’s chief of staff. Pence then shuttled back and forth across Ireland, at U.S. taxpayer expense, to do government business on one coast and stay at Trump’s hotel on the other.

But the most frequent way Trump is known to have helped his properties has been just to visit them, with the vast, big-spending presidential entourage in tow.

“One would think that if he was trying to completely isolate himself from his businesses, he wouldn’t talk about his business, he wouldn’t promote his business, he wouldn’t go to his businesses,” said Noah Bookbinder, executive director of the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

Instead, Bookbinder said, “his businesses have been a constant presence in his presidency. No. The idea that he was going to isolate himself completely — it’s been quite the opposite.”

The Trump Organization provided a statement saying that it has complied with promises it made before Trump took office. The company said it has rejected all new foreign deals and donated any profits from doing business with foreign governments.

“Over the past three and a half years, we have gone to tremendous lengths to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, not due to any legal requirement, but because of the respect we have towards the office of the Presidency,” Eric Trump, the president’s son, said in a statement.

Eric Trump did not directly address questions about the Trump Organization’s charges to the U.S. government.

President Trump chose to keep ownership of his business while in office. He could. The president is largely exempt from government conflict-of-interest rules. But still — to address worries about distraction and the appearance of a conflict of interest — Trump made two sets of promises.

One set governed the Trump Organization, to keep Trump’s business away from his presidency.

The company, now led by Trump’s two adult sons, said it would exclude the president from decision-making, refuse any new overseas deals and give back any profits it made from doing business with foreign governments.

The other set governed Trump personally: He said he would keep his presidency far away from his business.

“President-elect Trump wants there to be no doubt in the minds of the American public that he is completely isolating himself from his business interests,” Sheri Dillon, a Trump lawyer, said at a news conference Trump called in January 2017. “He instructed us to take all steps realistically possible to make it clear that he is not exploiting the office of the presidency for his personal benefit.” (Dillon did not respond to requests for comment for this report.)

On the campaign trail in 2016, Trump had offered one simple way to underline his separation from his properties: He just wouldn’t visit.

“I may never see these places again,” Trump said during a rally in August 2016. “Because I’m going to be working for you. I’m not going to have time to go play golf. Believe me.”

In response to questions for this report, White House spokesman Judd Deere said in a statement that Trump has “turned over the day-to-day responsibilities of running the company though he was not required to, [and] has sacrificed billions of dollars” because of discarded deals.

Deere did not directly address questions related to the second set of promises Trump made before taking office — the promises that he would not use his presidency to help the Trump Organization.

“The Washington Post is blatantly interfering with the business relationships of the Trump Organization, and it must stop,” Deere wrote in his statement. “Please be advised that we are building up a very large ‘dossier’ on the many false David Fahrenthold and others stories as they are a disgrace to journalism and the American people.”

The full amount paid by the U.S. government to Trump’s properties is unknown. Neither the Trump Organization nor the White House would provide a figure, and many of the records showing these transactions have not been released.

To sketch out how Trump complied with his promises, The Post interviewed staff members at Trump properties and former Trump administration officials, and reviewed thousands of pages of federal spending records obtained via public-records requests. Most recently, The Post received 265 pages of receipts and emails that the Secret Service released this month, in response to The Post’s lawsuit, and that provided new details about previously identified payments to Trump properties.

These show that Trump’s pledge to isolate himself did not survive his first two weeks in office. On his 15th day as president, he went to Mar-a-Lago. And the end of his literal isolation also ended his financial isolation: Trump’s visit brought the club a new, deep-pocketed customer.

On that trip, the Secret Service reserved a house, a cottage, two suites and two hotel rooms from the club to guard the president, according to newly released documents. The Secret Service paid $10,660 for the weekend, federal records show. The Secret Service declined to comment for this article.

“His knee-jerk, every single time, was to do things at his own properties,” said the former Trump administration official. “He never really understood that you couldn’t do it. In his mind, he could never understand that you should do it somewhere else.” Like other officials interviewed for this report, the former official spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal matters.

These visits, which sometimes happened against the counsel of Trump’s advisers, turned the federal government into a steady customer. If Trump was at Mar-a-Lago, the Secret Service could not be anywhere else. The Trump Organization has said it does not seek to exploit that relationship: Last year, for instance, Eric Trump said that the company charges taxpayers “like 50 bucks” for rooms used by his father’s aides and Secret Service agents.

But The Post has found no evidence to support that assertion. Instead, the Trump Organization charged rates as high as $650 per night for rooms at Mar-a-Lago and $17,000 per month for a cottage at President Trump’s club in Bedminster, N.J., according to previously released federal receipts and two people who have seen nonpublic records.

The newly obtained federal records showed other instances in which the Trump Organization charged the government rates far above what Eric Trump claimed.

In early 2017, for instance, Pence visited Las Vegas to speak to a Republican Jewish Coalition gathering. He stayed one night at the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas, newly released receipts show. The Secret Service was charged for 151 rooms, at about $102 per room per night — the maximum rate for Las Vegas at the time under normal federal per-diem rules. Secret Service agents are allowed to exceed the limit while on protective duty.

In Las Vegas, the Trump hotel also tacked on $29 per room in “resort fees,” receipts show. That added $4,379 to the bill, for a total of $20,183. The hotel’s website said the fee covered services such as coffee, shoe shines and shuttle service to the shopping mall at the Caesars Palace casino. The Trump Organization did not say why it had charged resort fees to working Secret Service agents.

Another extra charge: When Trump spent two nights at his Turnberry resort in Scotland in 2018, the Secret Service needed furniture removed from rooms. Records show that Trump’s club levied a “furniture removal charge” of $1,300 plus tax.

Trump’s children and grandchildren also visited Trump properties repeatedly, bringing their own taxpayer-funded Secret Service details.

In September 2017, for instance, Donald Trump Jr. stayed at the Trump hotel near the White House while in Washington to testify before a Senate committee investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign. His Secret Service detail reported paying the hotel $3,300 for rooms over two days, according to the newly released receipts. It is unclear what nightly room rate the agents were charged — the Secret Service redacted that information before releasing the receipts.

Trump Jr. did not respond to requests for comment.

“The Secret Service is always there,” said one former employee at the Trump hotel in Washington. With all the visits by the president, his children and top officials, the former employee said, “it’s like being in the White House — that’s how I felt working there.” The former employee spoke on the condition of anonymity to preserve relationships at the hotel.

Another former Trump administration official said that Trump’s logic for these trips was one that turned his initial promise — to steer clear of his business interests — on its head. As Trump saw it, the official said, people didn’t expect him to stay away.

They expected him to visit.

“The president argued repeatedly that the people knew who they elected when they picked him and that his businesses were central to his image,” the official said.

Trump’s visits as president also brought payments from Republican political groups, which held fundraisers at his properties, with Trump himself as the headliner. This summer, four such events have been held, three at Trump’s Bedminster club and another at his Washington hotel. The costs of those events have not yet been released.

Trump is expected to visit the Trump International Hotel in D.C. on Thursday to meet with donors and supporters, according to officials involved in planning the visit.

The hotel has been a hub of activity all week for top donors and Trump supporters, with panels and private events led by senior Trump administration officials ahead of the Republican National Convention speech. Some Trump family members, officials and allies have spent time in a private suite there before and after their speeches. Thursday’s event is arranged by Trump Victory, a joint fundraising committee for the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee, the officials said.

Trump has also used his taxpayer-funded trips to help customers that hold charity galas or wedding receptions in his business’s ballrooms.

The revenue he has reaped from these visits is harder to measure: Wedding-reception bills, for instance, are not subject to public-records requests. But Trump’s attention to these events underscores how he has discarded his promise to separate his business and his White House.

“I’m standing at the White House. Right over my shoulder is the Oval Office,” Trump said in a video he filmed in 2019 for the Palm Beach Police Foundation, one of Mar-a-Lago’s most loyal and lucrative charity customers. That year, permits show, the foundation’s event at Mar-a-Lago was supposed to attract 450 people and cost $250,000.

It was an unusual thing — a sitting president, taping a White House message meant only for private clients of his company.

“So many of my friends are with you tonight. They’re in that beautiful ballroom,” Trump said. “Have an incredible evening. I’ll be there next year.”

That promise, Trump kept.

This January, when the police foundation held another gala in Mar-a-Lago’s huge ballroom, Trump was there in person.

 

10 minutes ago, fraurosena said:

Probably because it was his turn to be daddy's minder today.

 

Maybe Failson2 was confused and thought the briefing was about his wife, Lara.

  • Upvote 7
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Twitler, the cruelty is always there...\image.png.ae773b2a4194f5b7f54c94d44fb5876b.png

  • Upvote 5
  • Angry 1
  • WTF 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2020 at 8:51 AM, smittykins said:

I asked about this on another thread, but I’ve since confirmed that yes, Vicente Fox was the one who said that Mexico wasn’t going to pay for “the fucking wall.”

And I love John’s reaction that “he took the extra effort to swear in English!”

And I see Dubuque got a bit of a shout out in this video too (at about 16:10). 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You couldn't make this up:

image.png.ae01bc2144bb36b5e68a7978624824c5.png

  • WTF 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GreyhoundFan said:

You couldn't make this up:

image.png.ae01bc2144bb36b5e68a7978624824c5.png

Note his body language. His arms are crossed in front of his chest defensively. He’s got an expression on his face that exudes boredom and apathy. 

  • Upvote 8
  • I Agree 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will get the orange knickers in a twist: "Secretly recorded audio of Trump’s sister prompts new call for investigation into his admission to Penn"

Spoiler

A professor at the University of Pennsylvania has renewed a request to investigate how President Trump was admitted to the school in 1966, citing what he called “new evidence” on secretly recorded tapes in which Trump’s sister says a friend took his entrance exam.

The professor, Eric W. Orts, is one of six faculty members who asked Penn’s provost earlier this summer to launch an investigation into how Trump transferred into the school. He noted that the president’s niece, Mary Trump, wrote in her book published in July that the president paid someone to take his SATs.

The provost, Wendell E. Pritchett, replied to Orts on July 20 that “we certainly share your concerns about these allegations and the integrity of our admissions process. However, as you suggest in your message, we have determined that this situation occurred too far in the past to make a useful or probative factual inquiry possible. If new evidence surfaces to substantiate the claim in the future, we will continue to be open to investigating it.”

Orts, a professor of legal studies and business ethics at the Wharton School, said he contacted Pritchett after The Washington Post on Saturday published a story that included audio of conversations Mary Trump recorded in 2018 and 2019 with Maryanne Trump Barry, the president’s sister.

In one tape, Barry said she did her brother’s homework for him and that “I drove him around New York City to try to get him into college.” She said Donald Trump “went to Fordham for one year [actually two years] and then he got into University of Pennsylvania because he had somebody take the exams.”

In their initial letter, the six professors wrote that “failing to investigate an allegation of fraud at such a level broadcasts to prospective students and the world at large that the playing field is not equal, that our degrees can be bought, and that subsequent fame, wealth, and political status will excuse past misconduct.” The school’s rejection of the July request was reported by the Daily Pennsylvanian, a student-run publication.

After The Post published the recording online last weekend, Orts said he emailed Pritchett that the audio constituted the kind of “new evidence” that the provost said was needed to launch an investigation.

Orts said he had not heard back from Pritchett. The provost and his spokesman did not respond to a request for comment. Orts is a registered Democrat but said he is seeking the investigation on moral, not political, grounds. He provided the text of Pritchett’s email to The Post, and he said he wrote the follow-up request individually, not with the group that asked for the initial investigation.

Barry said in one of the tapes that the person who took the test was named Joe Shapiro. Trump knew a person with that name at Penn, but his widow and sister told The Post that he would have never taken a test for Trump, and they said he didn’t know Trump until he attended Penn, so the timing was not right. Mary Trump has said it was a different Shapiro, but that person has not come forward or been identified.

The White House declined to comment for this article. Before the existence of the tapes was known, White House spokeswoman Sarah Matthews said the allegation that someone took the SATs for Trump was “completely false.” Trump, responding on Saturday to The Post’s report about the tapes, said “Who cares?” and did not dispute their authenticity. Barry has not responded to requests for comment.

Starting in 1964, Trump went to Fordham in New York City for his freshman and sophomore years and then transferred in 1966 to Penn’s undergraduate Wharton School of Finance. Trump has said that he was admitted to the “the hardest school to get into, the best school in the world,” calling it “super genius stuff.”

Trump has contrasted his own intellect with that of others and made an issue of releasing transcripts, saying in 2011 that he questioned how President Obama got into Columbia University and Harvard Law School and challenged him to substantiate how he was admitted.

“How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to Harvard?” Trump asked in a 2011 Associated Press interview. “I’m thinking about it, I’m certainly looking into it. Let him show his records.”

Trump has not released his own records, and an investigation by The Post last year found that his claim that Wharton was the hardest school to enter was not substantiated.

The Post reported last year that the Penn admissions official who interviewed Trump was a close friend of Fred Trump Jr., the brother of Donald Trump and father of Mary Trump. That former official, James Nolan, said that it wasn’t difficult to get into Penn at that time, with more than half of applicants granted admission and an even higher percentage of transfer students. By comparison, the admission rate last year to Penn was 7.7 percent.

“It was not very difficult,” Nolan said last year about Trump’s admission in 1966, adding: “I certainly was not struck by any sense that I’m sitting before a genius. Certainly not a super genius.”

In an interview Thursday, Nolan said Penn did require that an applicant submit SAT scores in order to be considered for admission. Typically, Nolan said, a transfer student would have taken the SAT to get into the initial school and those scores would then be submitted to Penn.

A Fordham spokesman said the school required SATs for entrance at the time Trump attended. The spokesman declined to comment when asked whether the school would investigate Trump’s application.

Nolan said that, given the taped conversations with Trump’s sister, there may be enough information for the school to launch an inquiry at Penn. It does not matter if the SATs were taken to gain entrance to Fordham, he said, because the same scores would have been required to be submitted to Penn.

“The allegation was made,” Nolan said. “If indeed he falsified his application — even though it is [54] years ago — his admission should be withdrawn and therefore his degree would be null and void.”

Nolan said the school could try to determine if Trump’s admission records are stored in its archives. Such information is not publicly available because of privacy laws. Even if the records are found, it could be difficult to determine if someone else took the test for Trump.

Nolan, while stressing that he had no knowledge if someone else took Trump’s test, said it would have been easier decades ago for someone to take a test for another person. He said that he sometimes proctored SAT exams at the time, and he recalled that students submitted a paper stating who they were, but doesn’t recall such information being checked as rigorously as it is today.

 

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fuck face branded hotel has closed

Quote

Reservations are no longer being taken at the 147-room Trump-branded hotel. A staff member answering phones on Friday told Postmedia that the hotel was “closed for good.”

The doors to the tower’s main entrance have been boarded up for months.

The hotel, which is owned by the Vancouver-based developer Holborn Group, opened on Feb. 28, 2017.  Three of U.S. President Donald Trump’s children — Donald Jr., Eric and Tiffany — were on hand to cut the ribbon at the $360-million complex. The visit from the Trump Organization executives sparked a protest outside the hotel which led to a $105,000 policing bill for the city.

The strata council at the Trump tower, which has more than 200 private residences, has informed owners and residents that TA Hotel Management, the hospitality arm of Holborn which operates the property, has filed for bankruptcy.

 

  • Upvote 13
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Trump still can’t do ramps.

 

  • Upvote 8
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*sniggers*

Those rating numbers @GreyhoundFan posted in the other thread really hit a nerve.

 

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My weather program says it's 88F/31C with 67% humidity in Lake Charles right now, which means the heat index is over 100F/38C. ?  Why is he wearing a jacket?

 

  • Upvote 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure this will inspire a tantrum:

 

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump still can’t do ramps.

 

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rittenhouse is a prime example of incel white supremacist insecurity.

But I guess he reminds Trump of himself...

 

Edited by fraurosena
typo
  • Disgust 4
  • WTF 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Racist psychopathic fuck

Quote

In the words of noted tech journalist Kara Swisher, “When you need to be saved by Laura Ingraham, it’s not good.” But that’s what happened over and over tonight in a Fox News interview in which Ingraham repeatedly went out of her way to try to save the President of the United States from himself. Still, that did not stop him from saying utterly baffling and at times downright shocking (even for him) things.

Case in point: after being asked by Ingraham to comment on the dangers of being a police officer in 2020, Trump opined, “The police are under siege. They can do 10,000 great acts, which is what they do, and one bad apple or a choker — a choker, they choke.” Ingraham then jumped in, “You mean, they, they panic.”

Trump continued, “Shooting the guy in the back many times…Couldn’t you have done something different? Couldn’t you have wrestled him?…You know, in the meantime, he might’ve been going for a weapon. And you know there’s a whole big thing there. But they choke, just like in a golf tournament, they miss a 3-foot putt…” It was here that Ingraham apparently sensed that Trump was about to drive the car straight into the ditch and quickly interjected in an attempt to steer him back on course: “You’re not comparing it to golf, because of course that’s what the media would say” as she smiled and nodded her head. But, of course, the president was indeed comparing cops who kill to golfers who panic and miss easy putts.

 

  • Disgust 3
  • WTF 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is like your crazy uncle who sits in the corner, babbling nonsense. The only problem is that a bunch of voters actually believe his rambling crap.

 

  • WTF 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GreyhoundFan said:

He is like your crazy uncle who sits in the corner, babbling nonsense. The only problem is that a bunch of voters actually believe his rambling crap.

 

Fortunately I don't have any of those on either side.  Aunts or uncles.  A few BTs on my dad's side but they're not that far gone.  Lot more Democrats on my mom's side and the majority of them think as much of Fuckopotomus von Clownstick und #BunkerBitch as I do. 

  • Upvote 5
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 47of74 said:

What I don’t understand is what the hell is going through her mind when she decides to obfuscate his obvious mental instability. His complete mental unfitness to fulfill the office he holds. I mean, I disapprove of her keeping a corrupt person in office, but I could understand her motives if they were that he represents her (disgusting) values. But his unfitness is not only his corruption and nepotism. His mental state makes him acutely dangerous. What is his fear of losing the elections were to make him quite literally go nuclear? Because he absolutely could... And she, nor anyone else on the planet would be safe when that happens.

  • Upvote 4
  • I Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agent Orange went to Kenosha despite being asked to stay away by state and local officials. Now, we're hearing this:

 

  • Disgust 4
  • WTF 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many times can he say "soup for my family"?

 

  • Upvote 2
  • WTF 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I shudder to think of the increase in chaos that is headed our way:

 

  • Upvote 12
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, fraurosena said:

Talk about stating the obvious...

 

We need a shrug reaction  ?‍♀️ 

  • Upvote 4
  • I Agree 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, fraurosena said:

Talk about stating the obvious...

 

Well, yes. I mean, the shade of orange they use for prison jumpsuits would clash horribly with the orange of his skin... 

And they don't have golf courses in most prisons. (Probably any prisons, but I'm probably wrong.)

  • Upvote 9
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • GreyhoundFan locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.