Lori Alexander 52: Looking for Debt-free Virgins Without Tatoos

[Red Hair, Black Dress]

Did Lori delete the post with the Pope Francis quote and all the anti-Catholic comments? It seems to be gone from FB.

[louisa05]

1 hour ago, Red Hair, Black Dress said:

Did Lori delete the post with the Pope Francis quote and all the anti-Catholic comments? It seems to be gone from FB.

Nope. I was just reading it. The comment section was quite enlightening with all the talk of idols and "popery". 

[onekidanddone]

5 hours ago, usmcmom said:

I had tons of sex during my junior and senior years at that evil Christian college. 

Sex sex sex sex sex! 

I mean, I got married the summer before my junior year but still...we were having all the sex during the last half of college. 

So am I half a slut? Not a slut because I was married? Total slut because I went to college? 

Maybe Lori will do a post on that. I need a clear reading on my slut-o-meter. 

Not half slut maybe 33.3

[Curious]

On 7/27/2018 at 4:16 PM, ladyicantxplain said:

ALCR

I took a little break from our Lady of Perpetual Vileness and am just catching up.  What does the above stand for please?  I'm trying to update our acronym too as I catch up on this thread and read others.

TIA

[polecat]

3 hours ago, kpmom said:

'm also pretty sure this is what Ken told her when she caught him looking at porn on his computer.

No doubt. 

So let me make sure I understand correctly. 

If a man eyeballs my cleavage, I'm a filthy slut who's basically committing adultery (in my heart even though I never even saw pervy dude checking out the goods).

If I wear yoga pants and a man ogles me, I'm a filthy slut x2 + adulteress.

If I wear a "thong bikini" and some guy eyes my ass, I'm a super-slut.

But dudes jerking off to porn, ehhhh ... no biggie.

[delphinium65]

1 hour ago, polecat said:

No doubt. 

So let me make sure I understand correctly. 

If a man eyeballs my cleavage, I'm a filthy slut who's basically committing adultery (in my heart even though I never even saw pervy dude checking out the goods).

If I wear yoga pants and a man ogles me, I'm a filthy slut x2 + adulteress.

If I wear a "thong bikini" and some guy eyes my ass, I'm a super-slut.

But dudes jerking off to porn, ehhhh ... no biggie.

Of course. It's ALWAYS a woman's fault. 

[klein_roeschen]

3 hours ago, polecat said:

No doubt. 

So let me make sure I understand correctly. 

If a man eyeballs my cleavage, I'm a filthy slut who's basically committing adultery (in my heart even though I never even saw pervy dude checking out the goods).

If I wear yoga pants and a man ogles me, I'm a filthy slut x2 + adulteress.

If I wear a "thong bikini" and some guy eyes my ass, I'm a super-slut.

But dudes jerking off to porn, ehhhh ... no biggie.

Yes of course. If you offer him your body to ogle at. Without you and your defrauding clothes and bodyparts, he wouldn't have anything to stare at. Just wear an 3 times oversized potatosack instead of a thong.

And didn't you know, porn is a feminist conspiracy to destroy good, christian marriages. The evil porn actress putting her private parts on full eyesight and doing things with her and other peoples private parts, a guy can't resist to watch these, it's the one weak spot of good men.  Because the husband is distracted with porn he can't properly provide for his wife, who stays home with the kids. She will be forced to work outside the home and leave the kids to public education, so  that they have food, because daddy is buisy watching dirty movies. The clear hierachy will crumble and will end in an ungodly divorce and the public education will teach the kids to become evil liberal feminists.

[feministxtian]

if some guy wants to ogle my tits, have at it. Touch them and you'll pull back a nub. Want to ogle my non-existent ass, have at it. 

We have a no porn rule here...there are reasons. Thing is, porn has been around since the first caveman picked up a piece of charcoal and rubbed it on a cave wall. These idiots think everything has gone to shit just in the last 40-50 years. Their lack of historical context is quite bothersome. 

[EowynW]

7 hours ago, feministxtian said:

if some guy wants to ogle my tits, have at it. Touch them and you'll pull back a nub. Want to ogle my non-existent ass, have at it. 

We have a no porn rule here...there are reasons. Thing is, porn has been around since the first caveman picked up a piece of charcoal and rubbed it on a cave wall. These idiots think everything has gone to shit just in the last 40-50 years. Their lack of historical context is quite bothersome. 

I think what has changed has been the ease of accessibility now that we have the internet, smart phones, etc. It is very easy to find or even accidentally stumble onto if you mistype a website adresss like I did as a kid. 

[Lgirlrocks]

Wonder what kind of bible studies she’s been to? Usually if you are studying someone else’s work, a book based on the Bible, it’s called the study of (name of book). Or something along those lines. 

[Curious]

On 7/27/2018 at 5:03 PM, Hisey said:

You know what's sad? I have an 18 year old daughter who is going out in the world soon. It breaks my heart to think she may somehow encounter these men, and the horrible assumptions they will make about her.  My daughter and her girlfriends are all nice, sweet kids, and NOTHING like the horrible things those MRAs say. (Hypergamy? C-- carousel?)

It is really sad when you think of these MRAs encountering the young women in your life. Because, when they talk about "women", they really mean the young, cute women--the ones they are attracted to. They don't worry so much about the 65-year old granny next door. They aren't writing blog posts and comments about Granny's thoughts and feelings. 

Most of the young women I know are nice people. They are generally attractive but insecure about their looks. They have career aspirations but are a bit shy about talking about them. They'd like a partner one day, but aren't sure if they'll ever meet him or her. They value their friendships. They try to be smart about their money so they can be independent. They get excited about an upcoming concert or a trip to the beach with friends. They really don't think about the things the MRAs are always harping about. 

I think that if the MRA types took a hard look at themselves they would see why women shun them in giant droves like a herd of gazelle when they see a lion.  I mean seriously even if you were the kind of woman they wanted to be with, why would YOU want to be with THEM?  The same thing with the incel subset.  

They all think the world OWES them what they want, even if they have been married before and supposedly had what they wanted.   I would bet that the majority of women who have divorced those men (and taken all their money, kids, puppies, hobbies, etc) had a good reason to get the hell out.

They reek of desperation and entitlement.  Who needs that?  No one, which is exactly why they are still single and not having sex with anyone. 

[Momto2Princesses]

40 minutes ago, Lgirlrocks said:

Wonder what kind of bible studies she’s been to? Usually if you are studying someone else’s work, a book based on the Bible, it’s called the study of (name of book). Or something along those lines. 

I was wondering the same thing. Every one that I have participated in has helped my journey in this crazy thing called life. I have met some of the greatest older women and some fantastic younger women.  We build each other up, are an ear for when things get tough.

I think that is Lori's problem, she wouldn't know kindness or love if it smacked her upside of the head. Plus I think it falls right back into isolating these young women so they don't have a place or friends that they can go to in a time of need, or just a sounding board. 

 

[SilverBeach]

2 hours ago, EowynW said:

It is very easy to find or even accidentally stumble onto if you mistype a website adresss like I did as a kid. 

The first time this happened to me (white house anybody?), I was so shocked that I couldn't close the page fast enough. That's why I don't think browsing history should indict anybody.

[ladyicantxplain]

15 hours ago, Curious said:

I took a little break from our Lady of Perpetual Vileness and am just catching up.  What does the above stand for please?  I'm trying to update our acronym too as I catch up on this thread and read others.

TIA

ALCR = Always Learning Chat Room

aka  the super secret chat  room of Lori Alexander and some 800 women.

[Sarah92]

Okay I don't tend to like curriculum based Bible studies because I think they can be too shallow. Also I hate, hate, hate work books and will refuse to fill out Bible study work books 90% of the time. I don't know why, it's just a weird quirk. Maybe it feels too much like school. As far as them being too shallow, maybe I've just not been in the right groups. I'm too slow to trust people (had bad experiences with  confidentiality in small groups before) so it's difficult to share. But I've almost always been with MIXED group bible studies. Now if I'm with my close female friends it gets deep and vulnerable.

What Lori apparently missed is that most Bible studies: male, female, or mixed use books to go through a specific book or topic of the Bible. As much as I sometimes struggle with them, they help provide focus on specific areas especially for new believers.

Besides its not really that much different than Lori pulling things off of other webpages and using them to support her nonsense. 

[SuperNova]

4 hours ago, Lgirlrocks said:

Wonder what kind of bible studies she’s been to? Usually if you are studying someone else’s work, a book based on the Bible, it’s called the study of (name of book). Or something along those lines. 

Speaking of "two edged sword". Lori says women shouldn't attend bible study. Today's doodle is about hiding god's word deeply in your children's heart. 

"I took my children to AWANA all of their childhood so they memorized a lot of scripture."

Isn't AWANA like a children's bible study? 

[ladyicantxplain]

Lori has not studied the Word of God without someone else interpreting it for her, at her own admission. She has told women repeatedly that they need "male preachers" to interpret it and teach it to them.  She has had Ken interpret it for her; she has regularly read commentaries (by men) which interpreted scripture for her.

Very little of what she has posted in the past has been a study of the Word, interpreted by Lori.  It has been a compilation of men's ideas and religion, pieced together into some kind of perverse puzzle that looks nothing like Jesus Christ.

She has taken commentaries that she likes, and agrees with, and built her own doctrines around them.  On the rare occasion that she has actually tried to interpret scripture on her own accord, she has ended up with a handwritten doodle with two contradicting scriptures which makes her look silly.

Always Learning was a good name for the old blog, because she missed the last (very important half) of that scripture: 

2 Timothy 3:7 Amplified Bible (AMP)

7 always learning and listening to anybody who will teach them, but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

 

She really needs to get alone and off the interwebz for awhile and read the bible for herself.  Without ANYONE interpreting it for her but the Spirit of God.  Then, perhaps she may see a portrait of JESUS and not a perverted image of her own thinking.

[feministxtian]

1 hour ago, Sarah92 said:

Okay I don't tend to like curriculum based Bible studies because I think they can be too shallow. Also I hate, hate, hate work books and will refuse to fill out Bible study work books 90% of the time. I don't know why, it's just a weird quirk. Maybe it feels too much like school. As far as them being too shallow, maybe I've just not been in the right groups. I'm too slow to trust people (had bad experiences with  confidentiality in small groups before) so it's difficult to share. But I've almost always been with MIXED group bible studies. Now if I'm with my close female friends it gets deep and vulnerable.

The best study I did was based on that book called "The Story" which goes through the bible in a more abridged form, hitting the high points w/o slogging through the begats. I made lifelong friends in that study, surprising for me since I was new in town. Unfortunately, my current church doesn't do women's studies but I think I may visit another church that has an active women's study group after we move (the church is like right down the road). I'm not crazy about the church itself, it's one of those megachurches and I don't like those, but the women's study group might be my thing...and being out one night a week is also something I know I'd enjoy. 

[Mellowing With Age]

Lori says to be a joyful and cheerful mother who doesn't complain so that your children will be attracted to Jesus in you and to be able to clearly see that living for Him makes a difference. 

Who has EVER been attracted to Jesus by looking at Lori??

[Free Jana Duggar]

I've been in many different women's Bible studies. Not once have I ever heard a woman talk negatively about her husband or be mean. You know what we did do?  We talked about the Bible and the subject of the study.

I will even say one time I went on a beach trip with some women teacher friends (not a church group). Things did get a little gossipy, but someone spoke up and "Y'all, we need to hush. We're being mean." Guess what...everyone agreed and we stopped. 

[squiddysquid]

4 hours ago, SilverBeach said:

The first time this happened to me (white house anybody?), I was so shocked that I couldn't close the page fast enough. That's why I don't think browsing history should indict anybody.

I use a kids mode filter. It also gets rid of those gamling site pop ups. It usually doesn't block anything I look up.

Except for the time I wanted to buy a bikini on H&M And clinical anatomy apps...

[wallysmommy]

Her latest post about raising children: joyful and cheerful are the last two words I would use to describe Lori Alexander. Harpy and fishwife are much more fitting. 

[feministxtian]

5 hours ago, Free Jana Duggar said:

I've been in many different women's Bible studies. Not once have I ever heard a woman talk negatively about her husband or be mean. You know what we did do?  We talked about the Bible and the subject of the study.

I will even say one time I went on a beach trip with some women teacher friends (not a church group). Things did get a little gossipy, but someone spoke up and "Y'all, we need to hush. We're being mean." Guess what...everyone agreed and we stopped. 

Me neither. IF a woman was having problems, she'd be referred to one of leaders for counseling (if it was serious. If he was just being a sorta jerk, that's different). I've never met a "mean girl" in a women's study at all. Lots of love, laughter, occasional TMI, food and fun, yes. Mean girls and gossip, nope. No wonder Lori hates women's studies, her mean girl style of bitchiness wouldn't get her very far. 

The studies I was a part of were all about a few general topics...learning more about our faith, and/or the bible, learning how to apply certain things to our own lives to be better Christians, better women, better wives (but none of that uber submission shit), and/or better mothers (outgrew that one). 

[Lgirlrocks]

Just going to leave this here.

[Liza]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Lori went to a private college.  they were always expensive (she is thinking in yesterday's dollars, I am quite sure.  In any case, Ken (and she) felt it was a waste of money for their daughter to go to college ... even though there are many ways this could be achieved (help from parents, loans, and scholarships.)    But, you know, if it didn't work for Lori, it's not good for anyone.  This shows she has been controlling her kids and doesn't give a damn what they want.  It is always what she wants for "others".  The desire to control her kids is probably there to this day.  Most parents would try and Lori certainly had the money.   She wants, above all things, to be RIGHT and to control EVERYONE.   That is not love, nor is it kind.   There is nothing of the spirit of Jesus in her at all.