Jump to content
IGNORED

Trump 42: Racist In Chief


GreyhoundFan

Recommended Posts

Fox news is just getting to this? I've been saying it for the last two years. My guess is Donald jr. In 24 and 28, then Ivanka in 32 and 36, Eric in 40 and 44, and then we'll see what happens if it's the next generation thing or if Barron will be crowned.

I am a big reader of dystopian novels but I never thought I would be living in one here.

Edited by Audrey2
  • Upvote 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, mamallama said:

I love how even Fux ignores Eric.  

I wonder if ignoring Eric comes from Trump himself or if it's a way that FOX is sucking up to Trump since he obviously prefers Donald Jr. and Ivanka.

  • Upvote 3
  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting analysis: "The real reason Donald Trump was secretly trying to meet with the Taliban"

Spoiler

Forty-one years ago, in September of 1978, President Jimmy Carter shepherded a brilliant series of talks over 12 days between the previously hostile nations of Egypt and Israel. Carter’s master stroke was significantly aided by the willingness of the two heads of state, Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin. What Sadat wanted to rechristen “the Jimmy Carter Accords” became more prosaically known to history as “The Camp David Accords,” and garnered for Sadat and Begin equal shares in that year’s Nobel Peace Prize.

 

This was an event so justly famous in its day that even the then 32-year-old make-believe millionaire Donald Trump was probably aware of it. That he may have managed to retain the memory of that diplomatic coup of long ago, despite the depredations of chemical hair treatments, penis-enlargement pills, very little exercise and an appalling diet of junk food, is problematic. Naturally, various poison spiders whispering in his ear, beginning with the likes of Stephen Miller, no doubt were available to jog his adderall-addled memory if necessary.

 

This is speculation, of course, but it is an interesting coincidence that Trump’s recent aborted attempt to meet with members of the Taliban was to take place in September, and it was to happen in Camp David, and previous such talks redounded down through history to the glory of Jimmy Carter, and that Carter’s talks consequently ended with two Nobel Prizes. Above all, Trump very much needs a victory. In a presidency almost routinely disastrous, the last couple of months have been particularly disastrous for Donald Trump. While the Camp David Accords didn’t save Jimmy Carter’s presidency, it certainly didn’t hurt, and gave Carter something that Trump lacks to a degree one would have not thought possible three years ago: a legacy.

 

It may actually be true that twelve people had to die for Trump’s befuddled, clumsy attempt at recreating history, when a car bomb blast took their lives in Shash Darak. The Taliban, not exactly history’s most rational group, may have murdered those people, or allowed them to be murdered, to test Donald Trump ahead of the talks and to see how much they could get away with. That Trump cancelled the talks is proof that even Donald Trump is capable of doing something sane, if only by accident.

 

For Trump there will be no trip to Oslo to pick up his Peace Prize. It’s easy to imagine the speech he would have given, how only he could bring peace to Afghanistan, how utterly Obama failed, and how truly great he is. I think any of us could have told him that wasn’t going to happen in any event without asking. The great pity of it is, it’s very possible that today 12 people would still be alive if Donald Trump weren’t so jealous of Jimmy Carter and weren’t so incompetent at doing the job some Americans elected him to do.

 

  • Upvote 5
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NWS is now telling its people not to contradict fuck head

Quote

After President Donald Trump falsely claimed in a tweet that Hurricane Dorian would hit the state of Alabama “(much) harder than anticipated,” National Weather Service staff were directed not to contradict his assertion. In an agencywide directive, employees were instructed to “only stick with official National Hurricane Center forecasts if questions arise from some national level social media posts which hit the news this afternoon” and encouraged not to “provide any opinion,” according to an email obtained by the Washington Post.

An anonymous NOAA meteorologist told the Post that the directive was interpreted to be a reaction to a tweet sent by the National Weather Service’s office in Birmingham saying the president was incorrect.

The meteorologist said this directive was the first of its kind he’d ever received. “This is the first time I’ve felt pressure from above to not say what truly is the forecast,” the meteorologist said. “It’s hard for me to wrap my head around. One of the things we train on is to dispel inaccurate rumors and ultimately that is what was occurring — ultimately what the Alabama office did is provide a forecast with their tweet, that is what they get paid to do.”

According to Jane Lubchenco, Obama’s NOAA administrator, the agency is acting to help the president save face rather than focusing on providing accurate information.

Fuck Trump and his lackeys. 

  • Upvote 6
  • Disgust 2
  • WTF 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, JMarie said:

What was the purpose of the insane cat video?

"Donald Trump Tweets Bizarre Cat Meme About Doctored Hurricane Dorian Map"

Quote

Between tweets about a secret meeting with Taliban leaders and “Leakin’ Lyin” James Comey, President Donald Trump continued to drag on his Hurricane Dorian saga with a bizarre cat meme on Twitter late Saturday night.

In what some on social media questioned was a distractionary tactic away from bigger headlines, Trump shared the video in which a cat plays with a laser pointer in front of a Hurricane Dorian forecast map, with “Yakety Sax” playing in the background.

The video was originally shared by the account @SOM3THINGWICKED, which frequently shares pro-Trump memes, with the caption, “Live look at CNN.”

Trump’s tweet comes one week after he falsely claimed that Alabama would be significantly hit during Hurricane Dorian, despite the NOAA National Weather Service insisting otherwise.

“In addition to Florida – South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated,” Trump tweeted on Sept. 1.

The tweet and subsequent correction from NOAA sparked a week-long series of back-and-forth in which Trump repeatedly doubled down on his claim that Alabama was, in fact, going to get hit by the storm.

The drama peaked on Wednesday when Trump pulled out a NOAA forecast that had been altered with black marker to extend the hurricane’s path of destruction to include Alabama during an Oval Office meeting.

“I know Alabama was in the original forecast … And, in all cases, Alabama was hit – if not lightly, in some cases pretty hard. Georgia, Alabama – it was a different route. They actually gave that a 95 percent chance probability. It turned out that that was not what happened; it made the right turn up the coast,” he said, providing no citation for his 95 percent claim. “But Alabama was hit very hard, and was going to be hit very hard, along with Georgia.”

Trump continued to tweet about Alabama, slamming the “Fake News” media for twisting his words in order to “demean” him, and repeatedly sharing maps that showed Alabama having no more than 30 percent chance of getting tropical-storm-force winds that had been published days before Trump’s initial comments, which he originally claimed were based on new information.

The cat video came after a tweet on Saturday that slammed a New York Times article about the subject, and said he “would like very much to stop referring to this ridiculous story.”

The video was shared shortly after Trump wrote on Twitter that he had arranged – and canceled – a secret meeting with Taliban leaders at Camp David after they “admitted to an attack in Kabul that killed one of our great soldiers, and 11 other people.”

image.png.0d5c3e3a44f80f5c31dc4ff60ea1c47b.png

The meeting with the Afghan extremist group was to take place just days before the anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

“I immediately cancelled the meeting and called off peace negotiations,” Trump wrote. “What kind of people would kill so many in order to seemingly strengthen their bargaining position? They didn’t, they only made it worse! If they cannot agree to a ceasefire during these very important peace talks, and would even kill 12 innocent people, then they probably don’t have the power to negotiate a meaningful agreement anyway.”

Taliban leaders have since responded, saying the meeting’s cancelation has hurt U.S. credibility considering a deal had been “finalized,” but that they would likely return to negotiations, according to the Associated Press.

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thank You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a thing and its a real thing. An actual real thing from an actual real American bank.  No doubt in my mind that Trump is manipulating the market to the advantage of himself, his children and his "associates."  I like the word associates, because in most contexts, it's used to describe criminal elements without actually calling them that. 

This is the first tweet in a thread.  I've included a link to the unroll below. 

Thread unroll: JPMorgan has a new index — called the “Volfefe Index” — that measures Trump’s tweets and their impact on bond volatility.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thank You 4
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was secret mission to extract a spy from Russia because CIA was worried about Trumps handling of intelligence. In other words, a country's intelligence agency was worried their president would give away secret information. Let that sink in for a minute..

US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017

Quote

In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN.

A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.

The decision to carry out the extraction occurred soon after a May 2017 meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump discussed highly classified intelligence with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. The intelligence, concerning ISIS in Syria, had been provided by Israel.

The disclosure to the Russians by the President, though not about the Russian spy specifically, prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk of exposure, according to the source directly involved in the matter.

At the time, then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo told other senior Trump administration officials that too much information was coming out regarding the covert source, known as an asset. An extraction, or "exfiltration" as such an operation is referred to by intelligence officials, is an extraordinary remedy when US intelligence believes an asset is in immediate danger.

A US official said before the secret operation there was media speculation about the existence of such a covert source, and such coverage or public speculation poses risks to the safety of anyone a foreign government suspects may be involved. This official did not identify any public reporting to that effect at the time of this decision and CNN could not find any related reference in media reports.

Asked for comment, Brittany Bramell, the CIA director of public affairs, told CNN: "CNN's narrative that the Central Intelligence Agency makes life-or-death decisions based on anything other than objective analysis and sound collection is simply false. Misguided speculation that the President's handling of our nation's most sensitive intelligence—which he has access to each and every day—drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate."

A spokesperson for Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declined to comment. White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said, "CNN's reporting is not only incorrect, it has the potential to put lives in danger."

Wide concerns about Trump in intelligence community

The removal happened at a time of wide concern in the intelligence community about mishandling of intelligence by Trump and his administration. Those concerns were described to CNN by five sources who served in the Trump administration, intelligence agencies and Congress.

Those concerns continued to grow in the period after Trump's Oval Office meeting with Kislyak and Lavrov. Weeks after the decision to extract the spy, in July 2017, Trump met privately with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 summit in Hamburg and took the unusual step of confiscating the interpreter's notes. Afterward, intelligence officials again expressed concern that the President may have improperly discussed classified intelligence with Russia, according to an intelligence source with knowledge of the intelligence community's response to the Trump-Putin meeting.

Knowledge of the Russian covert source's existence was highly restricted within the US government and intelligence agencies. According to one source, there was "no equal alternative" inside the Russian government, providing both insight and information on Putin.

CNN is withholding several details about the spy to reduce the risk of the person's identification.

The secret removal of the high-level Russian asset has left the US without one of its key sources on the inner workings of the Kremlin and the plans and thinking of the Russian president at a time when tensions between the two nations have been growing. The US intelligence community considers Russia one of the two greatest threats to US national security, along with China.

"The impact would be huge because it is so hard to develop sources like that in any denied area, particularly Russia, because the surveillance and security there is so stringent," a former senior intelligence official told CNN. "You can't reacquire a capability like that overnight."

Months of mounting fear

The decision to pull the asset out of Russia was the culmination of months of mounting fear within the intelligence community.

At the end of the Obama administration, US intelligence officials had already expressed concerns about the safety of this spy and other Russian assets, given the length of their cooperation with the US, according to a former senior intelligence official.

Those concerns grew in early 2017 after the US intelligence community released its public report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election, which said Putin himself ordered the operation. The intelligence community also shared a classified version of the report with the incoming Trump administration, and it included highly protected details on the sources behind the intelligence. Senior US intelligence officials considered extracting at least one Russian asset at the time but did not do so, according to the former senior intelligence official.

In the first months of his administration, Trump's handling of classified intelligence further concerned intelligence officials. Ultimately, they decided to launch the difficult operation to remove an asset who had been working for the US for years.

The President was informed in advance of the extraction, along with a small number of senior officials. Details of the extraction itself remain secret and the whereabouts of the asset today are unknown to CNN.

And so, the US lost a valuable and virtually irreplaceable asset from within the Kremlin. What a win for Putin...

Edited by fraurosena
riffle
  • Sad 4
  • WTF 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was secret mission to extract a spy from Russia because CIA was worried about Trumps handling of intelligence. In other words, a country's intelligence agency was worried their president would give away secret information. Let that sink in for a minute..
US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017
In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN.
A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.
The decision to carry out the extraction occurred soon after a May 2017 meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump discussed highly classified intelligence with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. The intelligence, concerning ISIS in Syria, had been provided by Israel.
The disclosure to the Russians by the President, though not about the Russian spy specifically, prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk of exposure, according to the source directly involved in the matter.
At the time, then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo told other senior Trump administration officials that too much information was coming out regarding the covert source, known as an asset. An extraction, or "exfiltration" as such an operation is referred to by intelligence officials, is an extraordinary remedy when US intelligence believes an asset is in immediate danger.
A US official said before the secret operation there was media speculation about the existence of such a covert source, and such coverage or public speculation poses risks to the safety of anyone a foreign government suspects may be involved. This official did not identify any public reporting to that effect at the time of this decision and CNN could not find any related reference in media reports.
Asked for comment, Brittany Bramell, the CIA director of public affairs, told CNN: "CNN's narrative that the Central Intelligence Agency makes life-or-death decisions based on anything other than objective analysis and sound collection is simply false. Misguided speculation that the President's handling of our nation's most sensitive intelligence—which he has access to each and every day—drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate."
A spokesperson for Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declined to comment. White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said, "CNN's reporting is not only incorrect, it has the potential to put lives in danger."
Wide concerns about Trump in intelligence community
The removal happened at a time of wide concern in the intelligence community about mishandling of intelligence by Trump and his administration. Those concerns were described to CNN by five sources who served in the Trump administration, intelligence agencies and Congress.
Those concerns continued to grow in the period after Trump's Oval Office meeting with Kislyak and Lavrov. Weeks after the decision to extract the spy, in July 2017, Trump met privately with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 summit in Hamburg and took the unusual step of confiscating the interpreter's notes. Afterward, intelligence officials again expressed concern that the President may have improperly discussed classified intelligence with Russia, according to an intelligence source with knowledge of the intelligence community's response to the Trump-Putin meeting.
Knowledge of the Russian covert source's existence was highly restricted within the US government and intelligence agencies. According to one source, there was "no equal alternative" inside the Russian government, providing both insight and information on Putin.
CNN is withholding several details about the spy to reduce the risk of the person's identification.
The secret removal of the high-level Russian asset has left the US without one of its key sources on the inner workings of the Kremlin and the plans and thinking of the Russian president at a time when tensions between the two nations have been growing. The US intelligence community considers Russia one of the two greatest threats to US national security, along with China.
"The impact would be huge because it is so hard to develop sources like that in any denied area, particularly Russia, because the surveillance and security there is so stringent," a former senior intelligence official told CNN. "You can't reacquire a capability like that overnight."
Months of mounting fear
The decision to pull the asset out of Russia was the culmination of months of mounting fear within the intelligence community.
At the end of the Obama administration, US intelligence officials had already expressed concerns about the safety of this spy and other Russian assets, given the length of their cooperation with the US, according to a former senior intelligence official.
Those concerns grew in early 2017 after the US intelligence community released its public report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election, which said Putin himself ordered the operation. The intelligence community also shared a classified version of the report with the incoming Trump administration, and it included highly protected details on the sources behind the intelligence. Senior US intelligence officials considered extracting at least one Russian asset at the time but did not do so, according to the former senior intelligence official.
In the first months of his administration, Trump's handling of classified intelligence further concerned intelligence officials. Ultimately, they decided to launch the difficult operation to remove an asset who had been working for the US for years.
The President was informed in advance of the extraction, along with a small number of senior officials. Details of the extraction itself remain secret and the whereabouts of the asset today are unknown to CNN.
And so, the US lost a valuable and virtually irreplaceable asset from within the Kremlin. What a win for Putin...


And yet the Branch Trumpvidian mouth breathers will continue to support that six foot high stack of orange shit. If said stack got the asset killed they’d be falling over each other praising fuck face.
  • Upvote 3
  • I Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why, but this tweet just made me guffaw...

Poor pwesiduncey needs his validation soooo bad.

Edited by fraurosena
  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big news from the official site of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence:

Three House Committees Launch Wide-Ranging Investigation into Trump-Giuliani Ukraine Scheme

Quote

Today, three House Committees launched a wide-ranging investigation into reported efforts by President Trump, the President’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, and possibly others to pressure the government of Ukraine to assist the President’s reelection campaign.

In letters to the White House and the State Department, Chairmen Eliot L. Engel of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Adam B. Schiff of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and Elijah E. Cummings of the Committee on Oversight and Reform demanded records relating to President Trump’s and Mr. Giuliani’s attempts to manipulate the Ukrainian justice system to benefit the President’s re-election campaign and target a possible political opponent. These initial requests represent a first step in a broad investigation into this matter.

“A growing public record indicates that, for nearly two years, the President and his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, appear to have acted outside legitimate law enforcement and diplomatic channels to coerce the Ukrainian government into pursuing two politically-motivated investigations under the guise of anti-corruption activity,” wrote the Chairmen. “As the 2020 election draws closer, President Trump and his personal attorney appear to have increased pressure on the Ukrainian government and its justice system in service of President Trump’s reelection campaign, and the White House and the State Department may be abetting this scheme.”

It was also recently reported that the Trump Administration is threatening to withhold security assistance to Ukraine in defiance of explicit congressional direction. The Committees will investigate whether this is part of President Trump’s effort to coerce the Ukrainian government into pursuing politically-motivated investigations, including of former Vice President Joe Biden and his family—all in service of President Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign.

The Trump Administration’s decision to withhold vital security assistance to Ukraine is only the latest in a series of actions in which President Trump appears to undermine U.S. foreign policy to placate Russia and place his personal interests above the national interest.

Full text of the letters follows and can be found here.

ETA: Wow. From the official letters:

[...] According to the Ukrainian government, in a July 25, 2019 call with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President Trump apparently focused on these investigations [into Joe Biden's son], telling President Zelenskyy that he is "convinced the new Ukranian government will be able to quickly improve [the] image of Ukraine, [and] complete [the] investigation of corruption cases, which inhibited the interaction between Ukraine and the USA. The next day, Ambassador Kurt Volker, U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine, was dispatched to meet with President Zelenskyy. Days later, the President's personal attorney, who has no official administraiton or diplomatic position, reportedly suggested a "possible heads of state meeting" between President Trump and Zelenskyy and tweeted an accusation about former Vice President Biden's son. [...]

Edited by fraurosena
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*sniff* ... walks of lice.. mumble... *sniff*

 

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here comes Donny singing oldies, goldies
"Be-Bop-A-Lula", "Baby What I Say"
Here comes Donny singing "I Gotta Woman"
Down in the tunnels, trying to make it pay

He got the action, he got the motion
Yeah, the boy can play
Dedication, devotion
Turning all the night time into the day

He do the song about the sweet lovin' woman
He do the song about the knife
He do the walk, do the walk of lice
Yeah, he do the walk of lice

  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that Chinese woman with the many phones that got caught in Mar-a-Loco?

Underwear blunder stalls trial of Chinese woman accused of trespassing at Mar-a-Lago

Quote

The trial of a Chinese businesswoman charged with lying to a Secret Service agent and trespassing at President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club bogged down Monday before jury selection over her lack of underwear, the latest bizarre moment in a case that has been filled with them.

Before the potential jurors were brought into the courtroom, Yujing Zhang told Judge Roy Altman that she was wearing brown jail garb instead of civilian clothing because she had not been provided any underwear. Defendants generally wear civilian clothing during trials to not prejudice jurors against them.

After some discussion about which agency was supposed to provide Zhang with underwear, she was taken to a holding cell and changed into a copper-colored blouse and khaki slacks found in her hotel room after her March arrest.

Zhang is acting as her own attorney during the federal trial, much to Altman's frustration. He again tried Monday to change the 33-year-old Shanghai consultant's mind as he did during every pretrial hearing since she fired her public defenders in June and urged her to let them try the case. When he demanded that she answer yes or no, she went into a long monologue in Mandarin. Altman cut her off before it could be translated and she finally said she didn't want them.

He spoke to Zhang sternly Monday after she told him "I don't know why I am here" and said she wasn't prepared because she said she thought the trial had been cancelled.

"You know precisely why you are here," Altman told her. He has repeatedly accused her at previous hearings of "playing games."

Zhang primarily used a translator Monday, but at one point told Altman she hadn't spoken Mandarin in months and was having a hard time following along.

"You speak Chinese - you are from China," Altman replied.

Soon after, 60 potential jurors were brought into the courtroom and jury selection began. Several told Altman they have negative feelings about Trump, but Altman, a Trump appointee, assured them the president has no direct connection to the case. Broward County is a Democratic stronghold.

Jury selection was expected to take some time before opening statements are made later Monday.

Zhang was arrested March 30 after she allegedly lied to get past a Secret Service agent guarding Mar-a-Lago, saying she was there to use the pool. She made it to the lobby where she told a receptionist she was there for a United Nations friendship event that night and had come early to take pictures. That event had been canceled and prosecutors say Zhang had been informed. The president was staying at Mar-a-Lago that weekend, but was at his nearby golf club when Zhang arrived. She faces up to six years if convicted.

Prosecutors have filed under seal secret evidence that they say has national security implications, even though Zhang is not charged with espionage. The Secret Service said when agents detained Zhang at Mar-a-Lago she was carrying a computer, a hard drive, four cellphones and a thumb drive containing malware, although agents later recanted that accusation.

Agents said Zhang told them she brought the electronics to Mar-a-Lago because she feared they would be stolen if left at her nearby hotel, but in her room they allegedly found a device to detect hidden cameras, computers, $8,000 in cash plus credit and debit cards, all in the open.

Her former public defenders are on standby in case she changes her mind about representing herself. They have said she appears mentally competent, but she wouldn't speak to a psychologist. They said Zhang's Chinese relatives told them she has no mental health problems.

So, she held a long monologue in Mandarin in answer to a simple yes or no question, but hadn't spoken it in months and had a hard time following translators? :crazy:

Edited by fraurosena
removed extraneous spacing
  • Confused 2
  • WTF 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the new smart terrorist ploy: go to a hurricane ravaged country, survive a hurricane, flee to the United States

 

Because everyone who lost everything in a hurricane has managed to hold on to their paperwork.

  • WTF 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fraurosena said:

Remember that Chinese woman with the many phones that got caught in Mar-a-Loco?

 

Underwear blunder stalls trial of Chinese woman accused of trespassing at Mar-a-Lago

So, she held a long monologue in Mandarin in answer to a simple yes or no question, but hadn't spoken it in months and had a hard time following translators? :crazy:

She sounds like another one of Trump's best people. We know he's buddies with Russia, North Korea, and China.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AmazonGrace said:

From that article:

Quote

“Guys like boring musician @johnlegend, and his filthy mouthed wife, are talking now about how great it is - but I didn’t see them around when we needed help getting it passed.”

The president’s fury appeared to be in response to an NBC News segment on criminal justice and inmates who have been wrongfully accused. Parts of the series were broadcast last week, including one featuring Legend, who has raised awareness of criminal justice reform through his organisation FREEAMERICA. 

Sorry, Donnie, you don't have an EGOT. You don't even have one part of an EGOT. John Legend will always be better than you.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • GreyhoundFan locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.