This Alabama Judge Has Figured Out How To Dismantle Roe v. W

[doggie]

we have seen the stat of this who knows?

http://www.propublica.org/article/this- ... roe-v-wade

IN 2005, THE WITHERSPOON SCHOOL of Law and Public Policy held a conference in Virginia’s Blue Ridge Mountains. The school’s name was something of a misnomer: Rather than grant JDs, Witherspoon staged seminars and lectures offering lessons in what it summarized as “the comprehensive biblical foundation for our common law and constitutional government.†Its target audience was homeschooled young men. The school itself was a project of Vision Forum, a Texas-based ministry whose founder was also a leader in the Christian Patriarchy movement, which preaches, among other things, that husbands should vote for their wives.

Timeline: The Personhood Movement

Where it came from and where it stands today.

Most sitting judges would go to great pains to avoid such a gathering. But Tom Parker, then a few months into his first term on the Alabama Supreme Court, gladly accepted an invitation to speak at that year’s Witherspoon retreat. Before his election to Alabama’s highest court, Parker had been an aide-de-camp to Chief Justice Roy Moore, whose installation of a granite Ten Commandments monument in the state judiciary building had touched off what became for Alabama both a considerable embarrassment and a genuine constitutional crisis. At Parker’s swearing-in, he made it clear that he had sought the bench to continue his old boss’s spiritual fight.

“The very God of Holy Scriptures, the Creator, is the source of law, life, and liberty,†he declared to an audience that included his eight unsmiling fellow justices.

The atmosphere at Parker’s Witherspoon appearance was far warmer, and his remarks there were even more candid. A DVD of the session shows him gripping the lectern, dressed in a gray suit and blue tie, as he railed against the perceived sins of jurists at every level. “It’s the judges who have legalized abortion and homosexuality … They are shaking the very foundation of our society.†Parker made it clear that he had no intention of letting legal precedent get in his way. “We cannot fall under that trap,†he insisted. “We have to stand for what’s right.†The one thing he most wished for the young men before him was that they find a way to gain positions of influence and turn them to God’s purpose. No opportunity to do so should be shrunk from or wasted.

In the nine years Parker has now served on the court, he has made the most of his opportunities. Child custody disputes, for instance, have made good occasions to expound on the role of religion in parental rights. (“Because God, not the state, has granted parents the authority and responsibility to govern their children, parents should be able to do so unfettered by state interference,†he wrote in one case.) But Parker has been the most creative in his relentless campaign to undermine legal abortion. Again and again, he has taken cases that do not directly concern reproductive rights, or even reproductive issues, and found ways to use them to argue for full legal status for the unborn.

Those efforts have made Parker a pivotal figure in the so-called personhood movement, which has its roots in a loophole in Roe v. Wade. While that 1973 ruling was creating a broad new right to abortion grounded in a constitutionally protected right to privacy, an often-overlooked passage left an opening for those who would seek its undoing. During oral arguments, the justices had asked Roe’s lawyer what would happen if a fetus were held to be a person under the Constitution. “I would have a very difficult case,†she had replied. In his majority opinion, Justice Harry Blackmun noted that the Supreme Court could find no basis for such status, before adding, “If this suggestion of personhood is established, [Roe’s] case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed.â€

[DGayle]

The right to life means you need to have the things necessary for your life. If you have the right to life, but not the right to food, then you are going to be deprived of life. I want to see how of people people advocating everyone regardless of income get an allotment of food.

[doggie]

Plus they often support the death penalty and cooperations that hurt the world. But this could have very long legs

[Coco]

The right to life means you need to have the things necessary for your life. If you have the right to life, but not the right to food, then you are going to be deprived of life. I want to see how of people people advocating everyone regardless of income get an allotment of food.

The poor will have their allotment of rice cakes and beans and basic maternity and health care to keep them alive and procreating, and a guaranteed job in the factories. No sense shipping orders across the oceans when we can have an in-country demographic to exploit. Taxes on everything will keep them down, voting district restructuring will keep them silent.

[RosyDaisy]

Tom Parker is a tool of the highest order. I believe he had ties to VF.

[doggie]

Tom Parker is a tool of the highest order. I believe he had ties to VF.

the article points that out