It's Still Women's Fault

[debrand]

wordpress.com/2012/11/09/1741-return-to-decency/

I found another article blaming women for the downfall of society. What can I say, vaginas are superpowerful.

I like how he faulted feminists for both 'lesbo hatred of men' and giving men too much easy sex. Wow. We are some busy people.

Our fast-disappearing Judeo-Christian culture still enables women to lead and men to follow. No other culture or religion does that. Female-dominated cultural values proved until the 1960s that filth and indecent conditions aren’t present when women don’t permit it. The present filth, family separations, violence, disrespect, irresponsible men, and numerous other female-unfriendly conditions arose out of Feminism, which purposely polarized the sexes.

Feminists and followers spread the originators’ lesbo-hatred of men. They demeaned and treated men as irresponsible, lazy, burdensome, inadequate, not admirable, not respected, and unnecessary for fulfilling female hopes and dreams. The self-fulfilling prophecy kicked in. With a new generation of boys coming online every six years, after eight generations males have become just what women claimed and TV, movies, and commercials continue to ridicule (as pointed out by Her Highness Boomer Babe).

Feminism, leftist politics, and cheap and easy sex came to dominate society. The male-dominated conditions will continue to worsen until girls and women demand through actions that men get rid of filth, restore decency, remain responsible for offspring, prevent violence, spread more respect in society, and on and on and on. (Men aren’t like women. They don’t much value what they hear. So, female words don’t work, but female actions impress men.)

It also worsens because women continue to do all the wrong things, and especially they try to talk and discuss relationship problems away. In short, the male gender continues to be demeaned as inadequate. Men see it as impossible or not worth it to be admired and respected by women. Consequently, they fulfill their natural need for self-admiration in ways that women disapprove as demeaning to females. (Ever heard of wham bam, booty call, porn, abortion?) Anyway, that’s the problem.

The solution lies in the hands of women. Men follow when women lead with female-friendly values, such as feminine mystique, female modesty, lifelong marriage, sex only inside marriage, family chain of command, he rules the roost and she rules the rooster, standards for ladies and gentlemen, and on and on. In this case, men are simple. In return for their handiness and hardiness at providing and protecting, they expect only respect for who they are and admiration for what they do. Do those things to match her man’s self-interest and a woman achieves one pinnacle of female life—if that’s truly what she wants.

Desirable change will come only from women. They have to start noticeably and generate change with femininity, indirectness, persistence, and hard-headedness to first teach all the men in their individual lives how to act around, treat, and entertain women as ladies and well-respected wives instead of women of the night and short-term lays. With actions that seem to demand it, they have to expect that men will rise to meet a woman’s expectations.

[debrand]

The man who is writing the blog is named Bill Clark Dean

http://www.amazon.com/Where-Did-All-Goo ... 07XIFDCC#_

The first Amazon description makes a reference to his blog

[Guest Anonymous]

wordpress.com/2012/11/09/1741-return-to-decency/

I found another article blaming women for the downfall of society. What can I say, vaginas are superpowerful.

Mine turns cartwheels while whistling "Ode To Joy" and picking winning lotto numbers.

[emmiedahl]

Our fast-disappearing Judeo-Christian culture still enables women to lead and men to follow.

I can think of a lot of Bible verses that say the exact opposite and a lot of churches that disagree.

No other culture or religion does that.

Actually, many do.... Misogyny is somewhat of a norm in agricultural and industrial cultures, but there are a lot that are not as bad as various Christian cultures.

Female-dominated cultural values proved until the 1960s that filth and indecent conditions aren’t present when women don’t permit it. The present filth, family separations, violence, disrespect, irresponsible men, and numerous other female-unfriendly conditions arose out of Feminism, which purposely polarized the sexes.

Um, feminism was partly in response to those conditions and continues to advocate for women in bad situations.

Feminists and followers spread the originators’ lesbo-hatred of men. They demeaned and treated men as irresponsible, lazy, burdensome, inadequate, not admirable, not respected, and unnecessary for fulfilling female hopes and dreams. The self-fulfilling prophecy kicked in. With a new generation of boys coming online every six years, after eight generations males have become just what women claimed and TV, movies, and commercials continue to ridicule (as pointed out by Her Highness Boomer Babe).

Because art causes conditions and never reflects them? And teh poor, poor menz cannot make their own decisions? And modern feminism has not even been around for 8 generations (sigh).

Feminism, leftist politics, and cheap and easy sex came to dominate society.

I wish.

Men aren’t like women. They don’t much value what they hear. So, female words don’t work, but female actions impress men.

So they are dumber than chimpanzees and small children?

It also worsens because women continue to do all the wrong things, and especially they try to talk and discuss relationship problems away.

Marriage counseling: the new Satan.

In short, the male gender continues to be demeaned as inadequate.

Um, you basically said they cannot hear... that sounds pretty inadequate.

Men see it as impossible or not worth it to be admired and respected by women. Consequently, they fulfill their natural need for self-admiration in ways that women disapprove as demeaning to females. (Ever heard of wham bam, booty call, porn, abortion?) Anyway, that’s the problem.

Wha--?

The solution lies in the hands of women. Men follow when women lead with female-friendly values, such as feminine mystique, female modesty, lifelong marriage, sex only inside marriage, family chain of command, he rules the roost and she rules the rooster, standards for ladies and gentlemen, and on and on. In this case, men are simple. In return for their handiness and hardiness at providing and protecting, they expect only respect for who they are and admiration for what they do. Do those things to match her man’s self-interest and a woman achieves one pinnacle of female life—if that’s truly what she wants.

Seriously, if this is true, men should never be in power. Are presidents supposed to take their papers home and ask their wife what to do? If so, why did we elect Barack and not Michelle, George and not Laura, etc?

[ElphabaGalinda]

So us women both hate men and offer men easy sex...even though we hate them. It doesn't even make twisted sense. He does make it sound like our vaginas have superpowers to control every aspect of the lives of the men folk.

This image seems appropriate:

[Koala]

(Ever heard of wham bam, booty call, porn, abortion?) Anyway, that’s the problem.

Well played :clap: I laughed so hard I almost cried :lol:

[Arete]

Consequently, they fulfill their natural need for self-admiration in ways that women disapprove as demeaning to females. (Ever heard of wham bam, booty call, porn, abortion?) Anyway, that’s the problem

So, if we don't pet them, they turn to porn, have booty calls and get abortions. Who knew? All we have to do is admire them and not only will they stay faithful, we will also solve the problem of abortion. :roll:

I don't think he understands what the chain of command is for men who are under a "he rules the roost, she rules the rooster" arrangement. Hint-the rooster is not CENT COMM. The hen does not spontaneously gush admiration either.

[Artemis]

I don't want to be boss, or to be bossed; rule the roost or rule the rooster: I have the right to be an equal partner.

I don't need to be aggressive, passive aggressive, or submissive: I have the strength to be assertive.

I don't hate men, even though I may refuse some of them sex, and I don't give them sex to manipulate them. I choose to share the sexual act as an equal, loving partner with a man of my choice who chooses me.

I don't want to be protected and provided for, and I don't want to be forced to provide mandatory respect and admiration. We protect and provide for each other and respect and admiration is mutual.

What is so damn hard for men to understand about that?

[sassycupcake]

The solution lies in the hands of women. Men follow when women lead with female-friendly values, such as feminine mystique, female modesty, lifelong marriage, sex only inside marriage...

Does she know what "feminine mystique" even means?

Betty Friedan would be amused if she were with us today.

[FlorenceHamilton]

I don't want to be boss, or to be bossed; rule the roost or rule the rooster: I have the right to be an equal partner.

I don't need to be aggressive, passive aggressive, or submissive: I have the strength to be assertive.

I don't hate men, even though I may refuse some of them sex, and I don't give them sex to manipulate them. I choose to share the sexual act as an equal, loving partner with a man of my choice who chooses me.

I don't want to be protected and provided for, and I don't want to be forced to provide mandatory respect and admiration. We protect and provide for each other and respect and admiration is mutual.

What is so damn hard for men to understand about that?

It is diffulcult for me to understand how anyone would not see this as the life to which all humans would want to aspire. It is good for relationships and it is good for the people in them and it is good for society.