Jump to content
IGNORED

Sewing can make boys gay, and so can "Musloid" culture


Burris

Recommended Posts

I don't know if this has been addressed here yet, but it certainly merits discussion - especially since that human guano smudge, Ann Barnhardt, has decided to stain this already sensational story with her poisonous presence.

I would usually describe it as a rare treat to find material this ripe for snarking. In truth, however, this woman has no redeeming qualities in her writing: She condones and applauds evil while calling it good. I know the type.

On December 12, 2014, Barnhardt commented on her blog under the heading, "Who Else Has the Stones to Say THIS...?" (Linked from FSTDT.com)

(NOTE: Barnhardt's expressing her opinion will likely cost her nothing even while driving her hit counter, and yet she acts as if she were the first to trash-talk a dead victim. Wow, but is she ever in for a disappointment.)

A 12-year-old boy (whom I'll call Akeldama), tried out for and was accepted to the cheerleading team at school. For this heinous - nay, unforgivable! - crime, Akeldama was bullied and mistreated to such an extent that the cruelty of it played a part in his decision to die by suicide. Even after his parents pulled him out of school, the bullying continued.

As I mention above, Barnhardt decides she needs to weigh in here:

I saw a story about a twelve year old boy who recently murdered himself. This boy behaved in extremely effeminate and flamboyant way, and was, by all appearances, an enthusiastic aspirant to the sodomite lifestyle. He was teased a bit at school. And I say “a bit†because by the sounds of it the majority of people not only tolerated his deviant behavior (yes, DEVIANT), but enthusiastically encouraged him in it.

First of all, there is no evidence in the article I read that Akeldama was anything other than a heterosexual. Even assuming he were gay or trans, however, that makes no difference.

And so there we have it: The degree to which Akeldama was bullied is mitigated in direct proportion to how many people supported his desire to follow through with...seriously...cheer leading.

Of course there's no real correlation between the amount of bullying Akeldama took from some students and how much acceptance he received from others - but this is Ann Barnhardt we're talking about, here: Her statements don't need to make sense. They just need to earn clicks.

Beyond that, I noticed Barnhardt's choice in terminology: Akeldama "murdered" himself. I'm not a lawyer, so perhaps someone can help me with this: If some or all of the bullies who harassed Akeldama encouraged him, whether in jest or not, to kill himself, would that make them accessories to murder?

Continuing on...

This kid was TWELVE.

I would just like to say, just so it is on the record when years from now people are sifting through the rubble and ash of this godforsaken culture, that this boy’s parents, teachers, and so-called “friends†– but most especially his parents – have his blood all over their hands. They failed him so profoundly that he murdered himself. In what sense?

Notice here how Barnhardt blames everyone - parents, teachers, other kids, and anyone else she can link even tangentially to this situation - but she saves none of her ire for the bullies. (Perhaps she doesn't like how such an admission - that the bullies who drove someone to suicide have blood on their hands - could create a precedent such that she finally implicates herself.)

Now let us take Barnhardt's argument one morsel at a time:

THEY DID NOT CORRECT AND PUNISH HIS DEVIANT BEHAVIOR.

...which was...

...they apparently bent over backwards to encourage their son to be an aspiring sodomite.

Setting aside for a moment that transexuality and homosexuality are two different things, and that the Biblical definition of "Sodomite" is more closely related to the way people mistreat strangers than to whether or not men are attracted to other men; and setting aside also that who knows this child's sexuality at all...

Yes, let's set that all aside for a moment and ask just how it was that Akeldama's parents encouraged him to be a "sodomite":

Who drove this boy to CHEERLEADING PRACTICE? Who paid for CHEERLEADING lessons? Who said, “yes†to his request to be a CHEERLEADER in the first place? And don’t tell me that male cheerleaders in college are macho and that this kid was analogous to them. Bull.

There you have it, ladies and gentlemen: Akeldama's parents encouraged him to want to have sex with other boys...or to have sex with girls while dressed as a girl...or something...by permitting him to become a cheerleader - a perfectly respectable activity for males only if they are powerlifters and thus macho enough to overcome the stereotype that would dog their Beta-male brothers.

Barnhardt's argument is so illogical she couldn't even adequately defend it against other people who might have agreed with her about the "deviance" of Akeldama's behaviour.

Take a moment to consider this with me: Akeldama's parents took him to CHEERLEADER practice, where he practiced to be a CHEERLEADER, and would eventually end up at actual sporting events in his CHEERLEADING uniform performing CHEERLEARING routines for the assembled onlookers.

By God, but Ann is right! I have seen some truly terrible things in my time,. but a young man participating in a typically female sporting event is worse than all the atrocities in human history put together; yeah, this but marks our decline. Barnhardt is enjoying her screed so much that she has lost all sense of perspective.

If a male - trans or not - wants to be a cheerleader and can pass the physical requirements, there is no logical reason whatsoever to bar him. None.

And as if Barnhardt's above complaint weren't facile and silly enough, she follows up with something so nutty that, were I not sure of the source, I would have immediately attributed what follows to The Onion:

Who indulged his hobby of fashion design? Who took him to the fabric store and encouraged a hobby that TODAY is utterly saturated and defined by SODOMITES? Who paid for the cable teevee that this YOUNG BOY sat in front of for the last twelve years, watching all of the satanic, sodomite-glorifying agitporn and allowing those seeds to be sown in his mind?

What we see here is not even an argument. It's so flimsy and ridiculous it barely rises to the level of a juvenile insult.

His parents encouraged his interest in fashion design and even *gasp* took him to the fabric store. I mean, come on, it was only a matter of time before he started bedazzling his leather underwear.

And one of the most frustrating parts about this is that she's not done:

Do you realize, or for most of you REMEMBER, when fathers and mothers actually did their jobs and corrected and punished deviant, perverted behavior in their children instead of wallowing in it as they derived a twisted self-satisfaction in watching their own offspring psychologically and spiritually self-destruct?

Let us play devil's advocate for a moment and assume Akeldama was in some way disordered, having deviated so much from the norm for an individual of his age, background, and gender that he actually stood out as being in need of help.

One step might be to assess whether this alleged deviance were dangerous. The analyst would also have to sift through which parts of Akeldama's behaviour were the result of this particular deviance, and which were merely personal idiosyncrasies.

Now assuming the analyst did find something dangerous within the deviance. (I can't imagine what that "something" would be, since I've yet to hear a single good argument from anyone anywhere, ever as to how either homosexuality or gender identity issues were actually harmful in themselves.)

Anyway, yes, the analyst approaches Akeldama's parents and tells them there's a danger in the way their child acts.

How does one go about correcting the deviance?

My guess - which proves correct later in the article - is that Barnhardt would ban her child from participating in any activity not gender-specific, along with the liberal application of corporal punishment capped with Bible verses.

Judging by how poorly "reparative therapy" has worked for homosexuals, it's highly likely Barnhardt's methods would fail. Some children of parents like that will choose to commit suicide, which is not only a shame and a waste, but leaves their parents bloody-handed. Others will wait until they're of age and simply walk away, or even rebel openly and sometimes outlandishly.

She continues...

Are any of you still able to comprehend the fact that schoolyard teasing for deviant, self-destructive behavior is actually a GOOD THING that keeps people from becoming self-destructive aberrosexuals?

The child killed himself. Only among the hateful and ignorant - among people who hate differences in sexuality but can never give a coherent reason as to why - would this be considered a good thing.

Barnhardt is essentially assigning those bullies to the role of social enforcers who are without restraint in what they do or in how they act just so long as their targets don't look like them, dress like them, or don't adopt their mannerisms.

And those little bullies grow into big bullies whose crimes likewise grow from name-calling and assault to atrocity and murder. (This comes up again later.)

If Barnhardt doesn't recognize that as a bad thing - and she doesn't - then I would judge her to be dangerously morally defective. Her reliance on shrill histrionics to sugar over what she knows to be a crime with a vile motive puts her in the same category as the perpetrators. And like so many other criminals with her mentality, she sees her vile antics as being done in service to good.

She's lost. Rudderless.

– but that’s redundant because aberrosexuality is by definition self-destructive. You know why? Because it is SIN.

Ah, yes, sin - a concept Barnhardt thinks she understands.

Let us first discuss the sins of Sodom.

Behold, the Biblical author writes, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: "he and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy." - Ezekiel 16:49 (ESV)

Now let us discuss enmity as it is handled in the New Testament:

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect." - Matthew 5:43-48 (ESV)

Hatred: "There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers." - Proverbs 6:16-19 (ESV)

But the verse that should worry this woman most - a woman who sins, even as all people do - is as follows: " For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you." - Matthew 7:2 (ESV)

This woman has clearly and unequivocally cast her lot with those who deliberately turned their feet towards mischief and whispered devious plans, not to protect themselves for indeed there was no danger, but rather to punish someone else for the heinous crime of failing to fit in.

She calls the death of Akeldama, murder, and so it is murder, and so she is in league with those who conspired to cause the death of another human being. (Welcome to the world of blood-guilt, bitch.)

This person did nothing to those who tormented him. The worst Branhardt can say of this boy is that he was, oh god, a CHEERLEADER (CAPS!!!! sic) and liked to shop for fabric. In an era where school use metal detectors and hire full time peace officers, where little kids are being searched for weapons, the worst this woman can think of - a crime apparently worthy of death - is that one kid was too effeminate for her taste.

If that is the measure by which she wants God to test her, so be it.

Do we or do we not believe that sodomy IS A SIN, in fact, one of the sins that cry out to heaven for God’s vengeance? DO YOU BELIEVE THAT OR NOT?

Sodomy? You mean a failure to help the needy by those who are themselves idle and full of food? Because those are the only sins the Bible specifically lays at the gate of Sodom. Yeah, those are sins - and Barnhardt hangs out with some of the worst offenders, basking in their idolization of her foolish notions.

Do I think buttsex is a sin, and so vile it calls out to the very heavens for justice? NO. (DO THE CAPS LOCKS HELP YOU UNDERSTAND, LADY? HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT HURTING YOU. YOU KNOW THIS. YOUR CLAIMS TO THE CONTRARY ARE, IN MY OPINION, DELIBERATE LIES.)

She's so obsessed with sin - and especially with the harmless variety. Driving someone to suicide, for example, is far less serious than becoming a male cheerleader.

I guess those guys who put together whole fashion shows are worse than Stalin and Hitler combined.

If you do, then to say that a parent should not only NOT aggressively correct and punish such wicked (yes, WICKED) behavior, but encourage and ratify all of the egregious signs of a child or young adult falling into the sodomite psychosis, which can only lead to misery, despair, and eventually hell, is self-contradicting nonsense.

So a minority sexual preference is psychosis, or the precursor to psychosis? If homosexuality is a mental illness, how in hell is punishing it going to correct the "problem"? Seriously: I really would like to see an answer to this question - preferably one that doesn't involve mass murder.

That boy would be alive today had his parents DONE THEIR JOB and refused to indulge and facilitate their son’s obvious and profound bewitchment by the sodomite culture which they pumped to him via the family cable feed.

Wrong. That boy, like so many other young people, would be alive today if irrational pusbags such as yourself would stop polluting the culture with lies - and yes, people such as the author of the original article are lying: They cannot prove in any way, shape, or form that one sexual preference is naturally more harmful than another.

They first fall back on the tired claim that it's sin.

They then lie, turning homosexuality from merely one of many sins condemned in the Bible to the worst thing ever to befoul the Earth. The Bible itself doesn't make that claim, nor do pre-20th Century expositors.

When people such as Barnhardt assert homosexuality is (a) intrinsically dangerous and (b) considered an especially heinous sin in the Bible, they are either ignorant or lying.

And since very few people change their ideas once presented with the facts, the explanation that these people are ideologically-driven liars who don't care how much blood they get on their hands in their mad dash for power - well, that is most likely.

Akeldama never did a single thing to hurt Branhardt in any way. He'd never so much as met the woman, and yet behold her disproportionate hatred for this 12-year-old boy. And she justifies this hatred - in earnest, she justifies it - by complaining that his parents allowed him to become a cheerleader and to work with textiles.

Those kids who hounded Akeldama to his death - he likely didn't do a damned thing to any of them.

But woe to Barnhardt, and woe to her supporters: Those children with that blood on their hands will eventually grow into adults, a great many of whom have issues so severe they have already started eating the poisoned fruit of assault when barely teens themselves.

The monsters you make now - you will have to deal with them later, I promise. You will.

He would be alive today if at the first instance of him vying for attention by acting camp and feminine he had been given a good hard smack and sent to his room, with the stern, crystal clear warning that any further repetition of such wickedness would be punished swiftly and severely.

If a child subjected to such stupidity is not homosexual, then he'll simply conform to your wishes until he moves out and then he'll marry a woman.

If a child subjected to such stupidity is a homosexual, then he'll simply conform to your wishes until he moves out at which point he will eventually start dating men - because there is a growing body of evidence that homosexuality isn't a choice.

Either way, you're still a mentally unstable bigot who thinks normal make-believe is a way to pass along the disease of gayness. You're an unfit parent.

Barring supernatural intervention, prepare to see the percentage of the population that is sexually deviant skyrocket parabolically, because as the musloid culture proves beyond a shadow of a doubt with its sky-high rates of man-on-man and man-on-boy perversion, deviant sexuality CAN be inculcated with great “successâ€...

"Musloid" culture? Shari'a prohibits homosexuality as far as I know, so how exactly would an influx of devout Muslims create this paradise for gays?

Frankly, I'd be embarrassed if I opposed homosexuality and had the misfortune to find this bizarre fruitcake on my side. I would ask her, in earnest, to stop trying to "help" the anti-gay lobby. Her arguments are fragmented and incoherent - and those are their only good points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is one of the most hard hearted things I have read. A child was driven to suicide and all this woman can think of is "blame the gays!!!".

Someone should have told these guys that they were sodomites. :roll:

2hq8cn4.jpg

It is the 1899 University of Kansas cheer squad.

George W. Bush was a head cheerleader in highschool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 year old boys who want to be cheerleaders now qualify as "enthusiastic aspirant of the Sodomite culture?"

The parents let him watch "sodomite agitprop" on TV instead of what, beating him into socially acceptable interests?

Bitch. Stupid, hateful, bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just sewing that's a problem? I don't need to worry about my 10 yo son's love of crochet, right? Because he really loves his crochet, and I'd hate to have to stop him because it's "deviant" behavior.

(Also, the history of cheerleading is riddled with men. Maybe she should crack open a book and stop vomiting stupidity in public.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George W. Bush was a head cheerleader in highschool.

He continued his wicked cheerleading ways at Yale.

Rick Perry (AKA, Governor Goodhair) was a yell leader at Texas A & M Univ. It's kind of a big deal there. Rick tried to run for Pres last time, but didn't make it. He got some new manly Intellectual Guy glasses and he's going to try again, cause apparently, being a yell leader gives you the enthusiasm to keep on trying. Hmmm, the prior and current Texas governors were cheerleaders at their respective universities and one of them made it to the White House. They are both Evangelicals. Rick Perry is hard-core Evangelical.

But, I digress. This Ann person drips venom in its ugliest form. Her hate-filled screed is the very definition of the most vicious form of agitprop. I can just imagine her at the gates of Heaven, feeling all self righteous and preening a little bit, because even in heaven, she'll be among the most righteous. The expression on her face when she finds out she got it totally WRONG and was really doing Satan's work all along? Priceless.

Tragically, there are people who believe what she is saying. I fear that the blood of innocents will be on HER hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:shock: Who IS this fuckwit, anyway? Google really didn't turn up much–-not even a Wikipedia page that I could find. Is she a person with any influence or just some random wingnut who got a little bit of attention for her odious ramblings (and pink assault rifle) but whom no one is willing to claim or support? Seriously, this is one deranged woman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i clicked on the thread because i had no idea what "musloid" culture is...that's a new one for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can hope that this is just an evil troll looking for clicks, but even that would still be evil.

How the fuck can anyone take a tragic death of a child and deliberately torment the family and desecrate his memory?

Every single word she wrote was just cruel and evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a palette cleanser from that horror.

One school district I sub in is a consolidated school where students are drawn from two small towns and the surrounding rural area. There are about 250 kids in the high school. This is in very conservative Nebraska.

I was there the day of the homecoming pep rally. I was a bit surprised to see a boy performing on the dance team. I was even more surprised that the students cheered loudly for him. I asked another teacher about it later and she said it has never been an issue. He tried out the year before, made the team and now does most of the choreography. The students don't say anything about it. Direct quote: "he is who he is and I think a lot of them respect that he is comfortable in his own skin". If anything derogatory is said, which happened a bit the first year, the teachers shut it down. They already had a school wide focus on accepting each other and it is working. My nephew is an alum and knows this kid and told me everyone basically likes him, then pointed out that one of his good friends there was gay and "no one cared".

It doesn't have to be this way. A school that works hard to create a culture where everyone is accepted can exist. And it can exist anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:shock: Who IS this fuckwit, anyway? Google really didn't turn up much–-not even a Wikipedia page that I could find. Is she a person with any influence or just some random wingnut who got a little bit of attention for her odious ramblings (and pink assault rifle) but whom no one is willing to claim or support? Seriously, this is one deranged woman.

Looks like she has a YouTube channel, which I refuse to look at. The photos with the pink rifle and the crazy eyes pretty much say it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't generally preach, but somebody needs a refresher on the Bible.

Men can sew:

"Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age: and he made him a coat of many colours." - Genesis 37:3

Men can dance:

"Then David danced before the Lord with all his might; and David was wearing a linen ephod. " - 2 Samuel 6:14

Slander, however, is not acceptable. The Bible has a LOT to say about that:

http://www.openbible.info/topics/slander

Then, there is basic kindness and human decency. Otherwise known as one of the greatest commandment:

"The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.†" - Mark 12:31

Which is a restatement of this commandment:

"Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord." - Leviticus 19:18

Finally, we have the Golden Rule:

"Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets." - Matthew 7:12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i clicked on the thread because i had no idea what "musloid" culture is...that's a new one for me!

I had to google it -- at first, given the focus on the kid's affinity for fabric, I thought it was "one who favors muslin"

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone should ask her if military issued sewing kits present a danger to male soldiers. :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took a visit to her Web site. She is Catholic. She is crazy. She loves conspiracies. She believes there is no gold to back up paper money -- topic of a recent post. She believes that if you can't stand in front of something and protect it with a firearm, you don't really "own" it. Here's an interesting post that encapsulates her level of crazy on just one topic: Benghazi

Because Chris Stevens was a lynchpin in the running of arms by the Obama regime and Clinton’s State Department in full cooperation with each other to the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda through Libya. And yes, it is absolutely sane and appropriate to assume that Huma Abedin (Hillary’s consigliere and daughter of high-ranking Muslim Brotherhood leaders, and possible lesbian concubine of Hilary) figures into this.

or this gem

After years of reading and research, trying earnestly to disprove or discredit it, and despite the fact that the Kennedy family is Roman Catholic, I was received into the One Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church on April 7, ARSH 2007. As this was before Summorum Pontificum, I was unaware of the Latin Mass parish in Denver, and thus entered the Church in a Novus Ordo parish, through the “RCIA†program. Novus Ordo Masses, while illicit, are indeed (mostly) valid, and Our Lord is physically present therein. I know this for a metaphysical certitude. I am NOT a sedevacantist. It is precisely because the Novus Ordo Masses are valid that the sacrilege built into the Rite by Bugnini and the other infiltrators matters, and why the Novus Ordo Rite MUST be exterminated as quickly as possible. There will be no civilizational recovery so long as the Novus Ordo remains.

I have the feeling that this woman is certifiable. She and Orly Taitz are two sisters from different mothers. Both well educated, both had professional careers, both obsessive nut cases.

Ann is living off donations as her savings from selling her brokerage firm dwindle.

Also, she uses ARSH in front of a year, for example, ARSH 2007. Does anyone know what this stands for? I wasn't able to google it successfully.

Glen Beck and Rush think she's great.

She posted a YouTube video of herself burning the Koran with bacon inserted between some pages, along with her actual address, but can't figure out why that didn't hit the 24-hour news cycle and nobody came to see her to talk about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I finally know what I want for Christmas--that Akeldama's parents never accidentally come across that b!tch's screed.

I see a Freudian slip in her mis-spelling of the word linchpin. Guaranteed she'd like to bring back lynch mobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i glanced over her blog, and she talks in a lot of mumbo-jumbo, to me. she seems pretty crazy. she sold off her brokerage firm because she felt there was some impending demise and she wanted to protect her clients (or something like that). then she refused to pay taxes. then the irs took her house, naturally. and since paypal is refusing to allow recurring donations for her, she's requesting cash money be sent to her.

yup, fucking insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh! oh! and i almost forgot...she got picked up by rush limbaugh and glenn beck. no idea what they had to say about her, but it was probably pretty complementary. yuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just sewing that's a problem? I don't need to worry about my 10 yo son's love of crochet, right? Because he really loves his crochet, and I'd hate to have to stop him because it's "deviant" behavior.

TIL my Dad is gay because he can sew. Aka, he grew up without a lot of money and had to be able to mend his own trousers and sew buttons back on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, she uses ARSH in front of a year, for example, ARSH 2007. Does anyone know what this stands for? I wasn't able to google it successfully.

I was also curious about that abbreviation, I found the answer in the FAQ section of her blog:

2. What does ARSH mean on your date stamps?

It is the abbreviation for the Latin, “Anno Reparatae Salutis Humanae†which means, “In the Year of the Reparation of Human Salvation.†Why? Because “Anno Domini†just isn’t quite hardcore enough for me.

Edited to add source: barnhardt.biz/faqs/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was also curious about that abbreviation, I found the answer in the FAQ section of her blog:

Edited to add source: barnhardt.biz/faqs/

I thought it was Latin for "Look at me! Look at me! Look how Holy I am compared to you!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was Latin for "Look at me! Look at me! Look how Holy I am compared to you!"

same difference

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.