Uganda

[debrand]

christianreconstructionist.wordpress.com/2012/12/02/hostile-takeover-or-populist-makeover-why-uganda-poses-a-problem-for-some-christians/#comments

Christian Reconstructionists don't want to take over the government. They want to convince people to live a more Christian life and stone the gayz!

It is not the leaders â€seeking to impose a top-down, theocratic agenda†on the people of Uganda.

No, no, no, gentle reader. That’s what the critics want you to believe. That is what those who hate government-enforced biblical morality want you to believe.

Rather, it is the people of Uganda who are doing this. They are telling their elected officials, this is what WE want!

Big difference.

The writer is putting up a strawman to knock over. No one has said that the Uganda leaders' are not acting with their fellow compatriots' support. So what? The results are not different. Human beings are going to be hurt for something that hurts no one.

The media, of course, has been apoplectic and unrighteously indignant at the inclusion of a death penalty in the bill for certain “aggravated†offenses involving acts of homosexuality. Lawmakers caved (to pressure and their own misgivings), and that provision has since been removed.

Pressuring the government not to kill someone for having consensual sex is a good thing

[notablesquid]

"No totalitarianist tendencies here." <---- What a liar. Wanting permission to kill people seems pretty effing totalitarian.

He's so typically hypocritical it's not even funny. Legal abortion = sin. Marriage equality = sin. Stoning the gayz = YAY!!!!!

And this about Trayvon Martin from a post in July 2013 is horrifying on a whole different level:

The question is this:

How many potential crime victims of Trayvon Martin have been saved, and how many of his potential, future crimes and violent acts against others have been avoided and averted since Feb. 2012 when the tragic shooting took place?

Obviously, that’s a question no one can answer. But the fact is, had this seriously delinquent young man lived, who knows how many more people would have been his unwitting victims as his budding career as a street thug and heartless criminal was just starting to take off.

Paul Ramirez, you're a sick fuck. You may consider yourself BULLISH on the kingdom of God, but what you are is really an anti-Christlike hatemongering racist, misogynist, homophobic bigot. Your views are heinous and made of The BULLSHIT.

[debrand]

"No totalitarianist tendencies here." <---- What a liar. Wanting permission to kill people seems pretty effing totalitarian.

He's so typically hypocritical it's not even funny. Legal abortion = sin. Marriage equality = sin. Stoning the gayz = YAY!!!!!

And this about Trayvon Martin from a post in July 2013 is horrifying on a whole different level:

Paul Ramirez, you're a sick fuck. You may consider yourself BULLISH on the kingdom of God, but what you are is really an anti-Christlike hatemongering racist, misogynist, homophobic bigot. Your views are heinous and made of The BULLSHIT.

Trayvon Martin never hurt anyone but Zimmerman has been accused of abusing two women and attacking a policeman.

Yes, Ramirez is a pretty sick guy. He thinks that if Martin had lived he should have paid Zimmerman.

If Trayvon had lived, God’s law — biblical law — would require him to compensate George Zimmerman fully for the injuries he caused him: medical bills, lost income, etc. It would require the guilty party, the perpetrator, the aggressor, NOT the TAXPAYER or the STATE, to make restitution to the victim.

Under his article on Martin Luther King he writes:

And the goal was always a political one: equal rights under the law. Which was another way of saying blacks had a right to the same unequal and unfair treatment under the same bureaucratic and corrupt system of tyranny and excessive taxation that whites enjoyed. â€Now, that’s worth marching for!â€