Women must be controlled cause they're less tribal

[antares]

From the racist forum the Phora y'all, discussing russian ladies marrying Chinese men

 

 

Quote

For women to be racialist or nationalistic is an anomaly. Women will engage with whichever man can provide for them the best lifestyle. This is best displayed during wartime, women of occupied countries will freely give themselves to occupying armies in exchange for food, status and protection. Men are more intellectual and guided by high-minded ideals like patriotism, while women are interested mainly in survival. This is why women are historically "oppressed" in some societies. Mongol, Hun, and Moorish armies probably did not get much resistance from European women, in fact they probably had to fight them off with a stick.

 

The West has become overintellectualized and has invented all these concepts (feminism, monogamy, human rights, "love marriages") to avoid uncomfortable aspects of basic human nature and none of them work because they obviously conflict with one another (i.e. how do you fall in love and stay monogamous with a feminist?).

 

The less intellectualized cultures on earth know all about this, which is why they place a lot of restrictions on their own women and their behavior, while at the same time engaging in the practice of concubinage (mostly of conquered or lower caste women). Another good example of this is Islamic immigrants in Europe, who guard the chastity of their own womenfolk while taking advantage of the whoredom of the white girls they feel they are conquering. This is the natural order of things. Human females similar to other primates are biologically evolved to be sluts who can take sex from multiple males in the same day. This is something Eastern cultures are well aware of and go to great lengths to both protect their own females from while at the same time take advantage of it. The Bible has a lot of the same thinking.

[lilith]

When one of your main arguments is that European women in the Middle Ages "probably" didn't resist having sex with men of invading armies, your argument is based on a pretty shaky premise.

[Arete]

Yeah, how dare women allow their bodies to be used by conquering armies in exchange for keeping or feeding their children, or maybe allowing their male children to merely be castrated as opposed to put to the sword. Or giving themselves to be raped in the place of their teenage daughters (who would be raped in turn anyway, but those poor women did try and bargain). After all, what is trying to save lives next to patriotism. Oh, that's right, trying to save yourself or your babies from the sword is all about maintaining a LIFESTYLE.

Deep thinkers in their mothers' basements....I just can't.

[Effie]

Patriotism is a high-minded ideal? Baah haha what a wannabe intellectual.

[Anny Nym]

So basically some basement dwellers heads are exploding right now because they realize the "russian mail order bride to the western countries" business is fading quickly and may soon be thing of the past and so not even an theoretical option anymore?

Haha!

[August]

I feel sorry for the poor woman who's going to have to live with him as her ticket out. How long until she gets to cut him loose?

[Diana]

When one of your main arguments is that European women in the Middle Ages "probably" didn't resist having sex with men of invading armies, your argument is based on a pretty shaky premise.

and the reality is that there are a lot of examples of women in that hard times that showed really patriotic and strong actitudes, who becomed heroines in the fights like Joan of Arch, Agustina of Aragon.. But how can we take seriously the opinion of a person that says that human and primate females are sluts like a scientific fact without shame? :ew:

[2xx1xy1JD]

At some point, some folks are just so repulsive you don't even want to try to refute utterly offensive arguments. I mean, since I think that racism is a bad thing, claiming that women aren't as racist could sound like a compliment.

His argument, though, is completely illogical. So, women are "sluts" who will sleep with men from other cultures if their survival is at stake....but what exactly does that make men who sleep with women from other cultures?

[antares]

At some point, some folks are just so repulsive you don't even want to try to refute utterly offensive arguments. I mean, since I think that racism is a bad thing, claiming that women aren't as racist could sound like a compliment.

His argument, though, is completely illogical. So, women are "sluts" who will sleep with men from other cultures if their survival is at stake....but what exactly does that make men who sleep with women from other cultures?

'Conquerors' I suppose. Women will sleep with men from different tribes so they must be controlled, men will take women from different tribes and that's a sign of conquest, and the men from different tribes will fight each other. Women are symbols of defeat or conquest.

Blech. Now I need to bleach my mouth.