Jump to content
IGNORED

Daughters And Disney - Merge


FJismyheadship

Recommended Posts

First off I never called the girl a slut. However, by stating that she would get pregnant early was the truth as both Psych. Today and Progress articles confirm that the sexuality exhibit today by young teens certainly leads to young pregnancies (77% in boys and 60+% in girls).

And clearly a lack of sex education has nothing to do with anything. Teens have ALWAYS been sexual. They just used to be married before it was considered a problem. The problem of teen sexuality today is with adults who want to think their teens are still innocent little babies. It's a lie to say teens are more sexual today than they used to be. They're just starting to be more open about it.

BTW Mental illness is a disease that affects your mood, thinking and behavior. The thinking of both you and Trynn trying to pass teens at taking naked pics and forwarding them to friends as normal ISN"T IT IS ILLEGAL. You seemingly can't get past that self expression at her age in that manner is ILLEGAL the way she is doing it. If you can't get that concept than you certainly fit in the category of having a mental illness due to your thinking this is normal.

Does this mean that kids playing doctor is a horrific, illegal thing? No. Exploration and curiosity is a normal part of growing up. A lot of things are normal and natural. Sometimes these needs to be education, sometimes kids just need to get to be kids and figure some things out for themselves. A teen taking a picture of her own body and sending it to a friend who wanted it enough to not delete it shouldn't be a criminal. And it's a sign of the height of the pedestal you put yourself on that you think that seeing normal parts of teen development as normal is somehow being mentally ill, as if you're the authority on Things and Life In General, and anybody sane knows that, so only a mentally ill person would disagree with you instead of basking in your wisdom.

I dont' get what you mean by slut shamming. What she did was ILLEGAL. Pure and Simple. Please see my other thread for the rest of the answer. Have your child forward a naked picture to another kid and ask that kid to take the photo to the police to see what happens. It's a fact.

Shame on her for taking a picture of her body and sending it to a boy who wanted it. She's going to be pregnant within 2 years, and that's a fact.

According to you.

Now onto Psych. Today. First off by your own admission you disagree with the experts. You can go back decades and the experts have espoused the same thing that kids who are sexual at a young age fit that pattern.

This became a problem when it became more normal to wait until adulthood for marriage, but even before that, there was plenty of sexing going on. There've been points in history where half of brides were pregnancy when they went up the aisle. It's complete stupidity to think that horny teens wanting sex is a new thing.

As to Progress article, Yes I have read them. By your own summary you''ve already pointed out what I have noted. Young sexuality leads to young teenage pregnancy.

Teen pregnancy wasn't seen as a problem, or even called teen pregnancy, when teens were married off by 12. Maranatha Chapman was married off at 15 and pregnant right away, but she's not considered to be a teen mom since she was married. She was a young pregnant woman elevated out of teen pregnancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hello fun killer, I started the thread so not to highjack the Disney daughters thread. Child porn is Illegal and egregious by definition. I wanted to point out to parents how this looks to the court by advising them on the basics of what is Child porn by law. After all what is the purpose of starting a new thread if not to identify and talk about a new subject. Did I think that there would be so many parents agreeing to let their children commit child porn and choosing not to want to fully face and deal with that issue is a whole separate matter. These parents are completely daft when presented in front of Judge in our country and don't want to own up to what is proper by the laws of the land. However, I see you have earned your title well and don't find the need to have a discussion on child porn. But need I remind you that it is very hard to challenge and win on any child porn issues.

Are you incredible dense? If you had spent any time at Free Jinger you would have realized that you didn't NEED to start a new thread on the subject because you can continue discussing that subject on the thread it started. That is how Free Jinger works. HA is not saying that there is no need to have this discussion, just that there was no need to start a new thread since the norm here is for threads to go off topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused by your posts, FreeFundies.

Are you coming at this from a place of concern for the kids who are doing this?

The vibe I'm getting is that you really only want to hoot and holler about legalities, so that's why I'm asking.

Fundiefarmer, I started the separate thread as sort of a PSA (Public Service Announcement) regarding a very bad issue in what constitutes child porn and how it is taken and handled in the courts. As I was reading Disneydaug. thread I found Trynn's post so egregious that I started a new thread to discuss same as this is an up can coming issue in the todays world and will only continue to do so in the future. I was hoping that more parents would come to honest hold a discussion about this subject but it seems as though parents want to turn a blind eye to the subject and act as if it is normal when it is the complete opposite. Parents in the end are responsible for their kids and by not teaching them right from wrong especially what is Illegal you are only leading them down a path to get them into trouble later on.

I know for a fact, especially in big law offices, a full and complete background check will be done on you as well as domain sites, FB, Twitter, etc. You will be profiled. All Large companies do this now. You are judged by what your content is. If you show yourself in certain situations you will not get those jobs. The attorneys will never discuss that with you but it is a fact. Everything that is put on social media becomes you next employers profiling method in your life. People now have to deal with this issue and more so for their kids.

I have to say fundiefarmer that you said it best, I expected too much of the people on this board. Parents are deeply daft in their denial but you proved it youself but your own post. You witnessed porn at the college level and knew how it was received and mocked and that many of those people had to wait out the embarrassment. However, when child porn goes out the younger ones are going to get hit harder with it and the parents need to own those actions because if they are presented in court that is the only option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you don't seem to grasp FreeFundies is that people here are acknowledging those laws, they just disagree with them. Would you like to discuss that? No one is really turning a blind eye, they are just not agreeing that these laws are the correct way to handle this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say I would be ok with it, I said the desire to do so was fairly normal. I don't tend to say much when I'm posting on a phone. If it were my daughter we'd talk about it, especially the fact that it does qualify as child poem and that she needs to be careful about that.

Do you truly believe it is normal for a young girl to want to send nude pictures of herself?

I have a 15yo daughter and we have faced this very problem, Snapchat being straight from the devil and all. I do not consider this normal behavior, a normal desire. I considered it highly influenced by peers.

How old is your daughter Trynn and have you caught her sending a nude pic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, goddamn, the grandparent abuser is now trying to make people think she is a lawyer! That is hi-lar-ious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is normal for young teens to do incredible stupid things without thinking of the long term consequences. So I could see a teen thinking it would be fun to send a topless picture and it would be normal for her to not think about the bad things that can come from doing this.

I do think parents need to have a long, hard talk with their kids about the subject and make it clear that there are life long consequences from sending a topless picture when you are 13. I do not think that a teen should be charged with disseminating porn for sending a nude picture of herself to another teen. A teen should not get on a sex offender list for doing something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only degreed thing about this idiot is the degrees of bullshit being spouted :lol:

Public service announcement???

Arrives as a Duggar fan.

Has an urge to start brain fart threads about duggars.

So super religious that hits her grandad for cursing.

Seems to have a problem with defining mental illness.

Can't spell, or really use .... Coherent words.

Pulls the old lawyers together with 2xx ( that did make me chuckle)

Has neighbours who seem to suffer many topical issues and share ALL the details!!!!

Has no more knowledge of child pornography than any concerned parent. Who have more knowledge.

Just discovered the existence of the 'Dark Web' :lol: that WAS funny! There's also this new thing called the wheel you should check out!!!

No idea if a troll or not deffo deffo a total fanny though!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is normal for young teens to do incredible stupid things without thinking of the long term consequences. So I could see a teen thinking it would be fun to send a topless picture and it would be normal for her to not think about the bad things that can come from doing this.

I do think parents need to have a long, hard talk with their kids about the subject and make it clear that there are life long consequences from sending a topless picture when you are 13. I do not think that a teen should be charged with disseminating porn for sending a nude picture of herself to another teen. A teen should not get on a sex offender list for doing something like that.

That's really it in a nutshell, FG. Now that we have been thoroughly educated on this topic perhaps we should move on to the legalities of elder abuse. Is smacking one's grandfather in the face legal?? Anyone know the law on this? Any 'lawyers' around here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:shifty-kitty:

To OktobeTakei, I am on the Board Assoc. for my condo group so I have several hundred neighbors that I know (specifically 18 who live directly in my section alone) so I can say quite honestly that we all know each other well and many of us talk to one another on a weekly basis in the commons area. When you live in a nice community and see everyone by the pool, ponds, and workout facility you hear many stories from many people.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

OF COURSE you are on the condo board! Are you President? Because this is EXACTLY how I would picture most of the Condo Board Presidents I've known interacting on a forum! I believe you're the one also calling the police on small children? Seriously, this is just too on the mark as a caricture of busy-body, power hungry Condo Board Member. It's like a skit.

Eta: no offense to condo/ homeowners association / mobile home park Board Members who aren't obsessively snooping, power hungry, nosy, domineering, rule obsessed jerks making their neighbors miserable .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote="DGayle

And clearly a lack of sex education has nothing to do with anything. Teens have ALWAYS been sexual. They just used to be married before it was considered a problem. The problem of teen sexuality today is with adults who want to think their teens are still innocent little babies. It's a lie to say teens are more sexual today than they used to be. They're just starting to be more open about it.

Gayle, I don't care if your teen wants to have sex at a young age or if he/she wants to experiment. That is not the issue at hand. However, when h/she takes a naked photo and shares it that constitutes Child Porn. Tell you chlld to refrain from sharing the photo and then she hasn't crossed the line. If she crosses the line and someone gets her in trouble just expect to shell out a few thousand to protect her.

Does this mean that kids playing doctor is a horrific, illegal thing? No. Exploration and curiosity is a normal part of growing up. A lot of things are normal and natural. Sometimes these needs to be education, sometimes kids just need to get to be kids and figure some things out for themselves. A teen taking a picture of her own body and sending it to a friend who wanted it enough to not delete it shouldn't be a criminal. And it's a sign of the height of the pedestal you put yourself on that you think that seeing normal parts of teen development as normal is somehow being mentally ill, as if you're the authority on Things and Life In General, and anybody sane knows that, so only a mentally ill person would disagree with you instead of basking in your wisdom.

Gayle, once again, I agree curiosity is normal growing up but taking and sharing naked pictures is criminally Illegal. Not everyone wants to view you son or daughter naked and that is their right but if you child sends them a racy photo and doesn't advise them and they open it and feel it is wrong they are within their rights to handle it as such because it is what it is. What I think it showing mental illness is the inability to realize that the parent can stop the child from creating Child Porn. As for the pedestal, the nation has placed that pedestal their to protect those that don't wish to see it and haven't been given a choice in the matter.

I dont' get what you mean by slut shamming. What she did was ILLEGAL. Pure and Simple. Please see my other thread for the rest of the answer. Have your child forward a naked picture to another kid and ask that kid to take the photo to the police to see what happens. It's a fact.

Shame on her for taking a picture of her body and sending it to a boy who wanted it. She's going to be pregnant within 2 years, and that's a fact.

According to you.

Nope, must refer to the experts at Psy. Today as he/her have more of a chance at becoming pregnant young than not (boys are 77% likely to knock someone up (so over 2/3rds, and girls 60+%, just under 2/3rds). I don't shame her for taking the picture although I would highly advise against it for future purposes for certain jobs. What I object to is sharing the photo. That is the illegal part.

Now onto Psych. Today. First off by your own admission you disagree with the experts. You can go back decades and the experts have espoused the same thing that kids who are sexual at a young age fit that pattern.

This became a problem when it became more normal to wait until adulthood for marriage, but even before that, there was plenty of sexing going on. There've been points in history where half of brides were pregnancy when they went up the aisle. It's complete stupidity to think that horny teens wanting sex is a new thing.

As to Progress article, Yes I have read them. By your own summary you''ve already pointed out what I have noted. Young sexuality leads to young teenage pregnancy.

Teen pregnancy wasn't seen as a problem, or even called teen pregnancy, when teens were married off by 12. Maranatha Chapman was married off at 15 and pregnant right away, but she's not considered to be a teen mom since she was married. She was a young pregnant woman elevated out of teen pregnancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I on ignore?

Anyway, I don't think DGayle was saying she was okay with teen pregnancy. I can't actually see how anyone could take her post that way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only degreed thing about this idiot is the degrees of bullshit being spouted :lol:

Public service announcement???

Arrives as a Duggar fan.

Has an urge to start brain fart threads about duggars.

So super religious that hits her grandad for cursing.

Seems to have a problem with defining mental illness.

Can't spell, or really use .... Coherent words.

Pulls the old lawyers together with 2xx ( that did make me chuckle)

Has neighbours who seem to suffer many topical issues and share ALL the details!!!!

Has no more knowledge of child pornography than any concerned parent. Who have more knowledge.

Just discovered the existence of the 'Dark Web' :lol: that WAS funny! There's also this new thing called the wheel you should check out!!!

No idea if a troll or not deffo deffo a total fanny though!!

Oh, goddamn, the grandparent abuser is now trying to make people think she is a lawyer! That is hi-lar-ious!

I am quite capable of defending myself and have many an opportunity to do so at Court. So take your hits they mean nothing to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only degreed thing about this idiot is the degrees of bullshit being spouted :lol:

Public service announcement???

Arrives as a Duggar fan.

Has an urge to start brain fart threads about duggars.

So super religious that hits her grandad for cursing.

Seems to have a problem with defining mental illness.

Can't spell, or really use .... Coherent words.

Pulls the old lawyers together with 2xx ( that did make me chuckle)

Has neighbours who seem to suffer many topical issues and share ALL the details!!!!

Has no more knowledge of child pornography than any concerned parent. Who have more knowledge.

Just discovered the existence of the 'Dark Web' :lol: that WAS funny! There's also this new thing called the wheel you should check out!!!

No idea if a troll or not deffo deffo a total fanny though!!

Whilst I agree with all of this, (ETA - and subsequent posts by Freefundies are making it even worse)the bolded had me running for the loo before I dampened my granny knickers. I'm sure our real attorney 2xx1xy1JD* will have a measured response.

No idea as to whether this one lives under a bridge or is just completely and utterly dense. But I decided to break out the nail polish. I'm painting my toe nails a pretty spring green. Mutton dressed as lamb? Freefundies - this is known as the pedicure manoeuver. Look it up!

Others may want to play. I just want to laugh. :cracking-up:

*Actually, I have no proof that 2xx is a real JD -- but the cumulative impact of her many thoughtful responses convinces me that she is not just playing a lawyer on the internetz. Unlike the supposedly new "degreed" legal professional here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

OF COURSE you are on the condo board! Are you President? Because this is EXACTLY how I would picture most of the Condo Board Presidents I've known interacting on a forum! I believe you're the one also calling the police on small children? Seriously, this is just too on the mark as a caricture of busy-body, power hungry Condo Board Member. It's like a skit.

Yes I was asked to be President of it several years ago but due to family schedule opted not to do so. We are calling the police and CPS as the amount of damage to date in the past 4 months alone is rounding $1000 with no responsible parents coming forth to take care of the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am quite capable of defending myself and have many an opportunity to do so at Court. So take your hits they mean nothing to me.

That's a bit worrying for you. Why are you defending yourself in court?

My advice would be to get a good lawyer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, Just gotta say some of you are fairly mentally ill especially in regards to your children but once again parents not properly being parents and trying to say I'm shaming girls.

I know I'm late to all this, but I just wanted to add a resounding "fuck you" for this. I sincerely hope that you don't count one of the 46% of Americans that will have a mental illness in their lifetimes as a friend or family member.

Someone who disagrees with you is not mentally ill. Someone who you believe doesn't 'properly parent' is not mentally ill. No one, and I mean no one, asks to be mentally ill, and they shouldn't be insulted, stigmatized, or punished for it anymore than someone who has cancer or heart disease. You owe many, many people here an apology for using this medical term as an insult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a bit worrying for you. Why are you defending yourself in court?

My advice would be to get a good lawyer.

I am one and fight all the time for others. Something you can only dream on this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am one and fight all the time for others. Something you can only dream on this board.

You fight for other lawyers? Man I'm confused.

I think this is a dream. Yours. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for a fact, especially in big law offices, a full and complete background check will be done on you as well as domain sites, FB, Twitter, etc. You will be profiled. All Large companies do this now. You are judged by what your content is. If you show yourself in certain situations you will not get those jobs. The attorneys will never discuss that with you but it is a fact. Everything that is put on social media becomes you next employers profiling method in your life. People now have to deal with this issue and more so for their kids.

Any company that wouldn't hire me only because I don't believe we should be tossing teens onto a sex-offender registry to DESTROY THEIR FUCKING LIVES for taking a picture of their own chests and sending it to a peer who wants it isn't the sort of company I'd want to work for. Fuck those companies that think literally destroying children for innocent indiscretions is the right way to hand things. Seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's really it in a nutshell, FG. Now that we have been thoroughly educated on this topic perhaps we should move on to the legalities of elder abuse. Is smacking one's grandfather in the face legal?? Anyone know the law on this? Any 'lawyers' around here?

I always wanted to be a lawyer. So I'm a lawyer not. Wow, becoming a lawyer is easy!

FreeFundies, it's not your job to raise your grandfather or to correct his occasional use of swearing. I'm going to call it assault, and the sentence, because I Know Things because of my degreed law professional learnings, is usually some jail. But since I'm also GOD, again because I say so, I'll have mercy on you and sentence you to a little more time under the bridge I tossed you under the last time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Gayle, usually when grumpy gramps gets kicked out of a facility for his abusive behavior I'll make sure to send him to your nutty home next where I'm sure your child porn sharing children will love to show them the Art they've created. Oh by the way when he comes it is a one way ticket with no returns. Congrats and good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.