Jump to content
IGNORED

Scott Brown is mad at *everyone!*


Marian the Librarian

Recommended Posts

From his blog:

The most troubling fact behind the Obama presidency both first and now second term is not Obama himself but rather that the majority of Americans voted for him. This November, 62,088,847 Americans turned out to cast their vote in support for a man who unabashedly advocates socialism, the murder of millions of babies through abortion, the advancement of the sodomite agenda, financial licentiousness, and big government control of almost everything. As disappointing and frankly alarming as it is to again have a president like this in the White House, we should be far more concerned about the 62 million people who put him in office than we are with Barack Obama himself.

A president like Barack Obama is a result, not a cause. He would not be in his office if it were not for a corrupt populace. Blaming Obama is disingenuous. We the people are the problem. Sixty-two million of our fellow citizens elected the most liberal candidate in American history and another 58 million voted to elect an only slightly less liberal candidate who is a Mormon cult member. We must acknowledge that our nation has abandoned God and rushed to embrace socialism and many other forms of evil.

scottbrownonline.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

translation of S.B's tl;dr: Only true Christians!tm can persecute others, but people can't persecute critize us true Christianstm!1! Also, true Christianitytm! triumphs over all everybody else's rights! There should be no seperation of Church and State! ... Who's Scott Brown, btw? :think: Never heard of him before untill now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, does Scott Brown want to send us all to Christian reeducation camps? There's something wrong with "us"; obviously, we need to be corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a bay stater, it is my humble opinion that Scott Brown is a cocksucker. For reelz. Yes, I voted for Elizabeth Warren.

Different Scott Brown. Massachusetts Scott Brown is a dirt bag, but he ain't this crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to take this time to thank everyone who voted in favor of this sodomite agenda. I for one, am very proud that I voted for the candidate who wants reproductive health services to be available to all women, marriage quality for all, universal health care coverage, increases in pell grants, and an economic policy that gives back to the people instead of the 1%. Or the baby-killing socialist or whatever you want to call him :twisted:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama 'unabashedly advocates socialism', and Mitt Romney is 'only slightly less liberal'?! Sure, why not? :roll:

Trying to do a scale in my head as a crazy fuck like this might, if Obama is an unabashed socialist, and Romney is just slightly less of one BUT he also belongs to a cult, wouldn't that make Obama slightly less frightening? Or does Obama have something else going on that might make him less desirable than a cult member?

It's getting tiresome hearing these fools equate liberalism with socialism. And Obama's barely left enough to be considered a liberal in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Trying to do a scale in my head as a crazy fuck like this might, if Obama is an unabashed socialist, and Romney is just slightly less of one BUT he also belongs to a cult, wouldn't that make Obama slightly less frightening? Or does Obama have something else going on that might make him less desirable than a cult member?

It's getting tiresome hearing these fools equate liberalism with socialism. And Obama's barely left enough to be considered a liberal in the first place.

Obama's the black guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama's the black guy.

Thank you. I don't think the racist component of this collective right-wing panty twist can be overstated. Sure, the Republican Party is willing to tolerate the occasional Herman Cain and Condoleezza Rice, but if a black politician dares to work for the interests of poorer black people, then he is the DEVIL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess Scotty forgot about the sainted liberal George McGovern. But I'd say FDR takes the "socialist" cake, in the way these morons define it now. Such a shame it helped get the country back on its feet (with an assist from WWII); I'd wager the auto industry and other factory workers in the rust belt are to blame this time around, since those areas went pretty heavily for Obama.

Damn those people who just want to, oh, work. Damn them all to hell. :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama's the black guy.

yes. Romney's a socialist in a cult that requires him to wear majik underwear and believe that Jesus is currently governing the universe from Planet Kolob and will soon be returning to Jackson County, Missouri, but at least he has the right amount of melanin in his skin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes. Romney's a socialist in a cult that requires him to wear majik underwear and believe that Jesus is currently governing the universe from Planet Kolob and will soon be returning to Jackson County, Missouri, but at least he has the right amount of melanin in his skin.

That and Obama's a Muslim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy shit -- Scott Brown is a fucking nut job. The idea that he even feels he needs to write something like this should have him arrested. He's the kind of person we should be worried about. That he and Doug (is a tool) Phillips think government isn't necessary and they hate Obama and don't really like Romney much more than that is scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well he got the Mormon cult member bit right. Go Scott! But goodness... Obama is hardly the socialist antichrist. If he was I'd actually consider the US to have a reasonable standard of living. But it doesn't, so the only thing I'm jealous of is your access to great Mexican food.

What I wouldn't give to find tomatillos in the supermarket. You cannot make good salsa from canned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama 'unabashedly advocates socialism', and Mitt Romney is 'only slightly less liberal'?! Sure, why not? :roll:

That douchebag says that Obama is the most liberal Presidential candidate ever. Has he completely forgotten about George McGovern in 1972?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a bay stater, it is my humble opinion that Scott Brown is a cocksucker. For reelz. Yes, I voted for Elizabeth Warren.

As a fellow MA resident may I say thank you. Go Liz! :D

Our Scott Brown posed as a moderate while he ran for and represented the Commonwealth. His voting record was well to the right though. We haven't got rid of Scott yet as I'm sure he will run again. Governor or Senate if Kerry joins the Obama administration?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that it is very convenient that these wingnuts have created Satan. Satan is to blame for every compelling arguement that they are wrong, for every time one of "theirs" personally fucks up and for every time the population overwhelmingly goes against them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can some please tell me where in the bible it says that Socialism is a form of evil and Capitalism is the way of the Lord? I must have not been paying attention that day during Sunday School or Confirmation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can some please tell me where in the bible it says that Socialism is a form of evil and Capitalism is the way of the Lord? I must have not been paying attention that day during Sunday School or Confirmation.

Can't think of anything. One the contrary, Acts 3 sounds positively socialist, and Ananias and Sapphira were struck down by god for not being socialist enough and with holding part of their cash from the commune.

(KJV for Fundie Lurkers.)

"32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. 33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all. 34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will do post on the difference between primitive communism and other forms later if anyine cares ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's Scott Brown, btw? :think: Never heard of him before untill now.

Sorry, I should have been more specific, given the potential for confusion with Massachusetts' Scott Brown.

The angry Scott referenced here is affiliated with the National Center for Family Integrated Churches, and a reigning member of Fundie Dominionist Royalty. He and Doug-Phillips-Is-A-Tool are thick as thieves. Dougie has officiated at Scott's children's weddings; BRADRICK! is Scott's son-in-law. Dougie and Scott co-host conferences regularly. Basically, they would like the US to be run their way: menz in charge, wimminfolk poppin' out and homeschoolin' the baybeez. No ebil gummint necessary, because the Lord will miraculously take care of everything.

Serendipitously, there are great letters in yesterday's New York Times, under the heading "Why the Religious Right Lost at the Polls." They make me so happy, I'm taking the liberty to quote them here:

I am a white upper-middle-class married mother of three and a mainline Protestant. In other words, I was Mitt Romney’s targeted demographic. Instead, I voted for Barack Obama a second time, having contributed to his campaign and knocked on doors.

My religious understanding involves healing the sick and feeding the poor, so I support food stamps and Obamacare.

As an educated person, I find myself alienated by the anti-woman and anti-science sentiments espoused by the G.O.P. Its “take back America from the undesirables†message nakedly exploits and encourages people’s prejudices against undocumented immigrants, gays, single mothers and minorities.

I wouldn’t allow such hateful and nonsensical talk at my dinner table; I certainly don’t want to send it to Washington.

MEREDITH SCHULTZ

Boca Raton, Fla., Nov. 11, 2012

As your article makes clear, at long last Election Day efforts to legislate religious beliefs met with failure throughout the country. Personal liberty and freedom were affirmed when anti-abortion candidates were defeated and measures permitting people the right to same-sex marriage were enacted.

The tide has turned. The control of a woman’s body remains properly in her hands, and the right of people to love and marry the partner of their choice is affirmed.

In this process there has been no infringement of the rights of churchgoers to practice their own theology but confirms that they may not impose their dogma on others.

ARTHUR L. YEAGER

Edison, N.J., Nov. 10, 2012

You quote the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary as saying, “An increasingly secularized America understands our positions, and has rejected them.†A better analysis may be that voters rejected the effort to create civil law to enforce or deny behavior based on one’s religious belief.

Teaching and preaching about moral principles are certainly legitimate functions of religious leaders, but to try to enlist the government as an enforcer is to go down a dangerous path.

CONRAD B. POWER

Bronxville, N.Y., Nov. 10, 2012

The religious right construes its rejection at the polls as a sign of America’s rejection of moral values and of our national decline. The opposite is true.

We have rejected moralism, not morality. We have rejected the premise that sanctimonious preachers can herd our votes by claiming to be on God’s chat list. We are evolving to a higher morality of knowledge, compassion and stewardship.

CHRISTOPHER BLACK

Greenwich, Conn., Nov. 10, 2012

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:roll:

How I wish Barack Obama was the "most liberal" president ever. He's actually much closer to Nixon's policies than what McGovern ran on. You can't even find a democrat these days who doesn't support the death penalty, for instance, even though polls show it's becoming less and less accepted within the population. I sincerely wish that a real liberal would be able to run and win, but that's not the case. We tend to remain a center/center-right country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.