Jump to content
IGNORED

Hypothetical curious question


Juliakitty

Recommended Posts

Suppose a man has been diagnosed with an incurable, life-threatening sexually transmitted disease. The disease is currently showing no symptoms; however, it's still contagious.

Suppose the man converts to fundieism and marries a woman. The woman knows about the disease and is willing to accept the risk IF he wears a condom every time.

Do the fundie leaders let him use a condom, or do they expect that he should go without and possibly give the disease to his wife AND any future children they might have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the fundie leaders know about the disease, there's no way in HELL they'd allow him to breathe the same air they do. He'd be politely snubbed, or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most likely he wouldn't be ever be truly accepted in the church. He might be allowed to stick around as a motivating testimonial and/or a warning to the youth, but he would never be more than a prop to them. If he somehow managed to get a father's permission to marry a fundie bride, there would absolutely not be any condoms used. They would all pretend that God would magically protect her from it if he loves her enough. She would be expected to have baby after baby just like any other Quiverfull wife, and just accept this one additional risk that comes along with it. If they don't care about women dying in childbirth, why would they care about women dying from an STD? She'd just be a martyr for the cause, dying for the group's strict belief in no condoms. They'd justify it by saying her life alone is worth less than the potentially dozens of lives that would never exist if her husband used condoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the STD could also be transmitted to the kids during pregnancy/birth?

Silly, if that happens it's Gods will that the children be punished for their parents actions. :naughty:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I cannot imagine them fully accepting him, unless its an outreach church where they specifically cater to people with STD's etc, so only then would they probably be able to marry someone who has the same/similar disease as them? Who knows!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suppose a man has been diagnosed with an incurable, life-threatening sexually transmitted disease. The disease is currently showing no symptoms; however, it's still contagious.

Suppose the man converts to fundieism and marries a woman. The woman knows about the disease and is willing to accept the risk IF he wears a condom every time.

Do the fundie leaders let him use a condom, or do they expect that he should go without and possibly give the disease to his wife AND any future children they might have?

I actually had a friend in a sort of similar sitution. They were devout catholics and had 3 kids. He was in a horrible car accident in the late 80s and wound up HIV positive. The churh (or atleast his priest) allowed them to use condoms to protect her because not having sex in the marriage was a greater risk to the marriage than using the condom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Trending Content

  • Recent Status Updates

    • bea

      bea

      I have discovered a DELIGHTFUL youtube channel where you can watch Sovereign Citizens get arrested.  😁
      · 0 replies
    • Gobbles

      Gobbles

      Guess I should update again? Frieda (Kiki, we renamed her) is here since the end of February 2021. She came with a bunch of problems, but is the best dog ever and is doing better every day. But we do now know how a dog with ptsd looks like. For real, not joking. If she is triggered during the day, she wakes up screaming at night. Not like dogs dream, but literally screaming. Other than that she went with us on countless trips, loves hiking and even cable cars. She is one heck of a fearless dog in situations who do not remind her of her old life. 
      My Grandpa passed away last May and I'm still grieving a lot. After sharing a house with my grandparents for over 30 years it is just horrible to lose one of them. Even though it was his decision and he got to go like he wanted. At home, in his bed during the night without doctors. He would have need more care and he did not want more care. So after turning 90 he decided to let go and became weaker and weaker. 
      In other news my dad stops working for good on April 1st. Retirement time. Keep my Mum and myself in your prayers. We really do not want him at home all the time. Haha! 
      · 0 replies
    • Bluebirdbluebell

      Bluebirdbluebell

      When it's a mix of religion and violent crime, I post the thread in the Quiverfull of True Crime section.
      · 0 replies
    • 47of74

      47of74

      Yes this is true 

      · 0 replies
    • Scrabblemaster

      Scrabblemaster

      Life is short. Live it.
      · 0 replies
    • FluffySnowball

      FluffySnowball

      I don't always make good decisions for myself due to severe depression but I did today actively decide not to do something that might have been detrimental for me and am very proud of myself. 
      · 1 reply
    • BlackberryGirl

      BlackberryGirl

      Well, this is weird. At some point, recently, I broke my wrist. I had to get a Dexa-scan today (put it off for years) and along with some bone loss, damn I had it a few minutes ago… the results said, “Fracture risk is moderate, and the patient has a significant wrist fracture. Treatment is advised.”  my left wrist aches a little but not near as much as my back, feet, knees or fingers, damn RA. I have no idea how it happened. I haven’t fallen in 2 years, haven’t banged or bumped…  the dr will call tomorrow and we’ll get  this straightened out.
      · 2 replies
    • 47of74

      47of74

      I need this. Bad. 

      · 0 replies
    • 47of74

      47of74

      I got my thin mint fix this evening...

      I'm looking forward to when my nieces can be my Thin Mint suppliers.
      · 1 reply
    • 47of74

      47of74

      I got my stickers today after renewing my vehicle registration. 
      Just reminded me again how different Minnesota is from Iowa.  Since I didn't register my vehicle in January last year, I got a sticker for the month since all MN plates are made with JAN printed in the lower left hand corner.  They also require people to put stickers on both the front and back plates, as opposed to Iowa that just want's the single sticker on the rear plate.
      Oh well, considering how MN is trying to move into the 2020s while Iowa is trying to lurch the fuck back to the 1840s, the type and number of license plate stickers is really a minor thing.
      · 0 replies
  • Recent Blog Entries

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.