Jump to content

Buffy's Commentary

  • entries
    273
  • comments
    1,396
  • views
    44,951

Help Interpreting Dreams?


HerNameIsBuffy

512 views

The last 3 nights I've had 3 separate dreams.  Nothing remarkably good or bad, just moderate surreal to normal stuff.  But in each there was one man.

I didn't see his face.  In the context of each dream we were together in a long term relationship.  I loved him and felt he loved me in that settled and secure ltr way.

In each dream there was softcore erotic activity, think Cinemax.  Each time I thought the same thing, this is pleasant...I don't mind this.  It wasn't that I was putting up with sex, but I didn't crave it either...it was fine.  As far as it went it was certainly adequate.

I never knew his name, nor did I see his face.  But from the more intimate parts of him I did see in the dream he's not a past partner.  I didn't see anything I recognized.

I'm not seeing anyone.  There is no one he reminded me of, no one I've been thinking about.

So who is this guy?  And if I'm going to have sex dreams why can't it be better than merely pleasant.  

My subconscious is letting me down ... but it's trying to tell me something.  But what?

  • Upvote 6

8 Comments


Recommended Comments

Maggie Mae

Posted

It's telling you that the next section of Flowers in the Attic are about Cathy's dreams, and you are very excited for my next chapter! 😂🤣

Seriously, though, was it the same guy in all three dreams? 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
HerNameIsBuffy

Posted

6 minutes ago, Maggie Mae said:

It's telling you that the next section of Flowers in the Attic are about Cathy's dreams, and you are very excited for my next chapter! 😂🤣

Seriously, though, was it the same guy in all three dreams? 

Yep - same guy.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Maggie Mae

Posted

11 minutes ago, HerNameIsBuffy said:

Yep - same guy.  

Maybe you are going to soon meet a very boring fella. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
HerNameIsBuffy

Posted

7 minutes ago, Maggie Mae said:

Maybe you are going to soon meet a very boring fella. 

Well, since the only part of him I'd recognize isn't visible in pants I won't know when I meet him.  will save us both a lot of misery.

 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
AnnaSofia

Posted

Sometimes elements in our dreams are stand-ins for something going on in our waking life (like job/school/home/social life/etc.). The dreams could be about deciding whether you're getting adequate fulfillment (and making peace with the idea of keeping things as they are), or if you need to make a change.

  • Upvote 4
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Cartmann99

Posted

I agree with @AnnaSofia. When I interpret my own dreams, I always focus on the emotions that were brought up in the dream and then think about where I'm feeling those same emotions in my waking life. 

 

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Lisafer

Posted

Also agree with @AnnaSofia. Are you perhaps feeling a dissatisfaction with some aspect of your life? Something that is not bad, but could be better? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
HerNameIsBuffy

Posted

Thanks everyone - it hasn't happened since.

Actually the only thing I'm fine with like that is being single.  I'm truly fine with it but at times I miss some things about a relationship.  Everything else in my life is pretty much shitting the bed except my family which is great.  

I have been looking inward though, and it spooked me a bit.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AliceInFundyland

      Posted

      3 hours ago, CyborgKin said:

      I've seen an idea floating through the twittersphere and tabloids that alleges that 'Anna thinks Biden is behind all this', but I haven't seen any actual source for this rumour and it's just something people keep quoting without checking that it's real.  Does anyone know where this idea got started?  Is this some woacb nonsense?

      I'm most amused that you got @PennySycamore

      to use such strong sentiments. 🤣

      Not that I disagree.

    • hoipolloi

      Posted

      46 minutes ago, AnnaSofia said:

      I could possibly see them challenging Geoff's leadership if they're not depending on T.Rex for anyone's livelihood.

      I agree. Surprised that Lucas isn't an elder yet, or at least a deacon.

    • 10 hours ago, Jinder Roles said:

      After listening to the podcast (which I believe is legit or else this Justin guy deserves an award) is that Josh really knows his way around a computer and has for a minute. 

      Justin sees Josh's passwords as reflecting comfort rather than being unintelligent. He compares it to forgetting to lock a car door because you feel safe where you are. He thinks Josh has been doing this for a long time. 

      That's scary to think about. 

      I really appreciate the podcast for highlighting the toxic structures of fundamentalist and conservative Christianity. These environments harbour all kinds of abuse and isms (sexism, racism, fatphobia, ableism, xenophobia etc). 

      This^^^^

      What really stuck with me after listening to the 1st episode, was all that talk about "Satan attacking". Justin (and his wife) explained in great lengths the fundie-mindset that might have been prevalent in Josh, JB, and others in the church, when Josh was disciplined for his "porn-problem" (more likely the molestations). 

      Justin explains, that due to Josh being the golden child, and "reeking of destiny" (as he put it), this "Satan attack" will most likely have been viewed as some distinction or a "badge of honour". Meaning, that the attack (and the "serverity" of it) shows Josh being "chosen" for a "greater destiny", so Satan considers him 'important' enough to severely attack him (and thus God's plans with Josh). This will most likely have been also prevalent in Josh's thinking. So the church discipline in this context was yet another "distinction", and I think it's quite possible that this train of thought might have helped him to get through this. This also explains to me why nothing changed afterwards and Josh just carried on as he did before and got deeper and deeper into the quagmire. When "being under attack" is not your fault, there's no reason to change your behaviour, right?

      To me this again shows the degree of mental gymnastics that are happening in those circles in order to ward off cognitive dissonances or doubts or whatever.

      It also shows that "personal responsibilty" for your actions is not a concept that is held high in those circles. Everything and anything is externalized and pinned either on God (the good stuff, but also God 'testing' you) or Satan (attack, temptation). Having grown up in a fundie environment myself I kind of know this mechanism to a lesser degree out of my own experience. It was only by externalizing all that stuff, esp. the undesirable stuff, that made the pressure of having to be 'perfect' somewhat bearable.

      This is not to defend Josh and his actions, it's rather an attempt to look behind the surface and find some possible answers to "how could this happen?" and "why did this end up (had to end up?) in such a mess?"

      • Upvote 1
    • AnnaSofia

      Posted

      Yeah, the Tuckers seem to be second in command.

      At one point, I think at least two of Jonathan Tucker's kids, David, and Alicia, worked for T.Rex Arms. I'm pretty sure Alicia left awhile ago, and looking at LinkedIn, it seems David did as well (to work for his father, apparently), a little over a year ago.

      I could possibly see them challenging Geoff's leadership if they're not depending on T.Rex for anyone's livelihood.

    • Bethella

      Posted

      2 hours ago, Smoochie said:

      If I remember correctly when Josh & Anna sold the house and moved to the warehouse it was due to a lawsuit that Josh was involved in, there was perhaps an ownership change too (?) and it was reasoned that it was to remove the assets from his name so there would be nothing to win, or for them to lose should judgement be against him.  Perhaps someone remembers more of the details.

      The house was moved to an LLC (ALB Investments) just before the Danica Dillon lawsuit back in 2015. They stayed there for another couple of years before selling it. This article was before they confirmed that ALB was Josh and Anna. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3330441/amp/Josh-Duggar-s-dream-home-sold-mystery-investment-company-tied-longtime-member-family-s-inner-circle-two-days-porn-star-accused-violent-paid-sex-sessions.html
       

      This article is from when it was put back on the market in 2019. https://starcasm.net/josh-and-anna-duggars-house-photos/
       

      And an article confirming that they were living in the warehouse from 2020. https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/1415834/josh-anna-duggar-living-jim-bob-warehouse-six-kids/amp/

      • Thank You 2


×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.