Jump to content

Looking For a Clue

  • entries
    100
  • comments
    213
  • views
    16,411

NaNoWriMo


clueliss

670 views

Since it was brought up on the board and I saw that some folks didn't understand it.  I decided to blog about it.

Hi, I'm a Nanowrimo participant this year.  My first year was, I think, 2005.  I won that year.  Meaning I completed 50,000 words in 30 days.   Yes, on one (rather bad) project.  I did it to see if I could.  In other years I have crashed and burned out the gate.  And in others not even attempted.  Normally I think about it.  Some years are better than others.  I have documented wins in 2008 and last year.  

Nanowrimo is short for National Novel Writing Month - which is November.  The goal is to write 50,000 words in 30 days.  Being a numbers sort of person this means 1667 words per day for the 30 days.  I personally find that keeping that words per day bit in mind makes the big goal feel more attainable.  

Why do I do it?  Because honestly, for various reasons I don't write consistently.  Yes, I should.  But I don't.  I used to.  But life has gotten in the way.  I found that my depression (actually the meds) sort of rewired my creative brain and it was hard to write for years.  I also have an overloaded schedule due to work during this time of the year.  And in some years it is just too much.  Lately I find that giving myself a diversion (Nano for instance) helps keep me sane and gives me a distraction (or outlet).  

I know of published authors who do Nanowrimo?  Why - it is a good time to focus on something new.  For me this year I've jumped out of my comfort zone of mystery/suspense into some sort of weird Sci-Fi/fantasy something or other.  I've jump started past projects.  Move ahead in a series (nope, not published).  Or gone back to the drawing board on some things.  

For me, planning is key.  So while Nano is technically in November, my planning and thought process begins months ahead of time.  My process is a bit character driven and there is a magic combo that I cannot explain of the right character and the right spark or seed.  Once I have those I need time to wallow with my characters and figure out what they want or where they are going.  I've long heard the term Plotter (people who outline the whole novel in detail) and Pantser (people who just start writing and fly by the seat of their pants).  I'm a bit in the middle.  I need to know what we want and where we're going.  I  typically use a loose 3 act structure and need my 5 plot points.  I have been known to toss said plot points aside in the middle of writing but at the start I need them for a guide.  From there I am a bit more loose and let the character(s) drive the story.  Sure it leads to more editing but in the world of writing it is what works for you.

I hope this gives some of you a better feel for what Nanowrimo is.  

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • MariaariaM

      Posted

      6 hours ago, JDuggs said:

      He probably needed to at least give a partial payout to Kim so she could buy her boat (which was a crazy odd choice).

      Boat: a hole in the water you throw money into.

      Forgot where I read that but it's kind of true in a lot of cases. 

      3 hours ago, JDuggs said:

      She doesn’t seem quite as public about their relationship as she did back then.

      No surprise really, given how much shit gas gone down in this series/family. If she has any sense and isn't just looking for the limelight she'll stay out of that mess. I think if the girlfriend was a paid actress she'd be on camera more, not less. Creating drama and storylines.

    • MariaariaM

      Posted

      5 hours ago, Ozlsn said:

      On the one hand I agree with them that the social support is inadequate, and that detailing your medical needs shouldn't have to happen

      It would definitely have to happen if they wanted support based on their medical needs from the state though. Why on earth should I believe some rando on the internet when they tell me they can't work, without any proof? They can claim all they want and I won't care or challenge them but when they want me to give them money? Yep, I do indeed want to see some kind of proof they legit need what they say they need or I will put my money toward another one of the thousands of other desperate pleas. There are so many in genuine need: why would I give my money to them and not the dog with the piece of ham on its face?

    • marmalade

      Posted

      5 hours ago, Bookworm1564 said:

      My all-time favourite Art post is the one where they say “Just for today, you can double the impact of your support with this opportunity” as if this was the moment we were all waiting for.

      It's a PBS pledge drive! 😂

      • Upvote 1
      • Haha 4
    • Bluebirdbluebell

      Posted

      3 hours ago, Ozlsn said:

      Whereas I am very amused that 8 years after the fact they are still hung up on Hillary Clinton. Guys, she's just not that into you and has moved on with her life... get over it?

      (also is Vance's wife in there at all?)

      I agree. They also included Rush Limbaugh, who is dead.  I also don't really understand why Dan Scavino is there. Maybe they updated something from 2016. After reading the link below, I think there is really one female character in the Dukes of Hazzard, which is why Vance's wife is out. Hillary is cast as a male bad guy.

      1 hour ago, Xan said:

      I always find these Trump fantasy worlds very bizarre.  He's never in a nice suit meeting a world leader or even in a fireman's suit saving a child from a burning building.  It's always some fake macho outfit and, in this case, driving a car with a Confederate flag on it.  Their heroes don't seem that heroic.

      It's based on old American television show from the 1980s. It was called the Dukes of Hazzard (Hazzard being a county in Georgia) (link). There was also a movie in 2005 with different people.

      • Upvote 1
    • Ozlsn

      Posted

      2 hours ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

      So many commenters were like, “it’s her business! It’s not your life so why do you care?”

      This annoys me because it stops people reaching out. It used to be the excuse to not investigate or prosecute domestic and family violence - it's their business, it's private, don't ask questions, what happens out of sight is no one's business but theirs. Except that makes it harder for people to escape abusive relationships, and when people are too scared to even tell anyone their only recourse can become people asking questions and making reports. Coercive control is not always well understood but is abusive.

      As you said firstly this is their public business - they put it on social media, they choose to agree to interviews with mainstream media, they undoubtedly make money through clicks and product placement.

      Even if they didn't put it all out there though - the hospital staff should be (and hopefully are) asking her privately if she is OK, giving her information, and making notes. The epidural discussion to me is - if accurate - a really concerning indicator. Her being pregnant again within a short time of giving birth is by itself not necessarily an issue, but the consistency of it happening is possibly an indication of issues (and not great for her from a health perspective either). 

      "It's not your life so why do you care?" - if she looked happy, and wasn't whispering about the one epidural she's had, and there were tickets to Greece in the pocket, then I wouldn't care. But when things are raising flags and questions for me then I care because even rich women and children deserve to live without fear, and to be able to make autonomous decisions about their body. And I'd rather the questions were raised than find out later they spent years cowering in fear, too afraid to even look for a way out.

      • Upvote 2
      • I Agree 2


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.