Jump to content

FJ Reviews & Recaps

  • entries
    488
  • comments
    466
  • views
    84,548

Contributors to this blog

  • crazyforkate 304
  • Maggie Mae 97
  • jinjy2 35
  • MarblesMom 33
  • Curious 9
  • GolightlyGrrl 8
  • kunoichi66 2

Worldly Distractions: The Big Bang Theory 8.22 - The Commitment Determination


crazyforkate

533 views

blog-kissing.jpgkissing

 

First off, massive apologies for the delay in updates. It's been a rough week. However, everything will be up-to-date by tomorrow. In the meantime, let's enjoy this season's finale. I hear it's going to be big. Dun dun DUN.

We cut in on Sheldon and Amy sitting on the couch, K-I-S-S-I-N-G. Cue a "wooooo" from the audience. It's their five-year anniversary, but Sheldon is pretty much focused on television. Amy's dismayed, to say the least. He accuses her of killing the mood. Yep, it's her fault, Sheldon. She accuses him of not being committed, though he counters that paying attention to a television series is a commitment in itself. Sheldon doesn't quite get it. Opening credits.

Stuart is closing the store early, because he's invited himself to eat at Howie and Bernie's. Emily is still exhibiting serial killer tendencies, which somehow fails to repel Raj. Meanwhile, Penny and Leonard return from the farmers' market, sporting some fresh goat bites. Sheldon complains about his love life. Unsurprisingly, Penny is Team Amy, once she hears the whole story. Leonard is not much better at explaining, though he's much more sympathetic on the TV side of it. Meanwhile, Raj and Emily are also joining the Wolowitz-Rostenkowskis for dinner, where Raj expresses his concerns about Emily's macabre tastes. (Er, sex in a cemetery?) He wonders if the relationship should continue. Er, Raj, you're lucky you haven't been turned into a dress. Howard thinks they should stay together, not least because it's someone who will willingly have sex with Raj the handsome astrophysicist. Geez, this series. Raj points out that they're being hypocritical, as they haven't managed to kick out Stuart yet. Ooh, kinky.

Sheldon and Penny argue about whose relationship is more stagnant, as neither of them seems to be moving forward. Sheldon wonders why they've been engaged for a year without setting a date. His friends make lame excuses, then tell him to shut up.

Bernadette and Howard talk about tossing Stuart out onto the street, and finally decide they will do it tonight. Of course, Howard makes Bernie handle it. Meanwhile, Leonard wonders why they haven't picked a date. She challenges him to pick a date. They argue about wedding details for a few minutes, and come to an agreement, but Sheldon points out that there's still no date. Hmmm.

Raj and Emily go for a picnic/fuckfest in a cemetery, which Raj is clearly not into. Emily, however, is extremely turned on. Sheldon gives a non-apology for being intrusive. However, Penny and Leonard are too wrapped up in their own problems to really pay attention. Penny wonders why they have to pick a date at all, because piece of paper =/= commitment and stuff. However, Sheldon thinks they're being ridiculous. So Penny tells Leonard she's free that night- and "Vegas isn't far away". At this momentous news, Sheldon even lets them sit in his spot for five whole minutes.

Bernie and Howie try to kick Stuart out, but he's so damn nice that they can't quite bring themselves to do it. Meanwhile, Raj and Emily continue their macabre rendez-vous. Finally, Raj manages to start breaking up with Emily, saying "You're dark on the inside and I'm dark on the outside." However, he says "I love you" instead. Stuart reveals it's his birthday, ending the kicking-out for at least a few more days.

Penny and Leonard speed towards a Vegas wedding chapel. "No surprises and no regrets," they say, without real conviction. Spurred by this, Leonard admits that he dilly-dallied with someone on the ship in the North Sea. Kinda. Penny accepts this kinda graciously. However, she never did anything similar, so Leonard is in the wrong. Also, she questions his sense of timing, which yeah, Leonard, what is with this sense of timing? They agree to move on and keep heading for Vegas. Reluctantly.

Sheldon and Amy finally Skype, during which Sheldon starts to apologize. However, Amy tells him they're going on a break before he can finish. Awww. This is made doubly heartbreaking when Sheldon hangs up the conversation and pulls a ring from his desk drawer.

AND THEN THE EPISODE ENDS THERE WHAT EVEN SADJAJPIQWJPSD:NJASFMDASK:"FSD.

Okay, now that I've gotten over my pique, lets talk about the episode. I thought it held up pretty well, with a lot of devotion to the characters and relationships (even poor Raj). It wasn't very funny (though it had some moments), but it definitely contained all the drama worthy of a season finale. So the question is, what comes next? I guess we'll have to wait until September.

FJ Discussion Thread

 

 

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • viii

      Posted

      True, we don't know what goes on behind the scenes, and perhaps I'm projecting a little.

      I had two friends that were best friends and had been since elementary school. So they had years of deep, solid friendship. They were both in each other's weddings, etc. Friend A got pregnant and Friend B threw her a massive baby shower. Everyone was so excited. Friend A gave birth at 39 weeks to a stillborn daughter. Entire friend group was devastated for her and did everything we could to support her. Two years after the loss, Friend A went on to have another child, this one a boy. Friend B threw another baby shower (this time after he had already arrived) and everyone was so happy. Two years later, Friend B gets pregnant. Friend A starts to get a little cagey. Doesn't know if she'll come to the shower, let alone throw it. Friend B finds out she's having a daughter and tells Friend A before the shower so she isn't surprised by it. Friend A is furious that Friend B is having a daughter and cuts her out cold turkey. Never speaks to her again. Removes herself completely from the friend group and tells everyone that we weren't supportive of her loss and it was incredibly insensitive for Friend B to have a baby shower for her daughter when Friend A never got to raise her daughter. 

      Soooo.... I understand situations like this can be tricky. I understood Friend A was hurt but I also thought Friend A was a bad friend for not being happy for Friend B for something she can't control (ie the sex of her unborn baby). This is what I mean by it's a fine line between protecting yourself but also sometimes having to put your own issues aside to support a love one. 

    • RebeccaRay

      Posted

      15 hours ago, SoSoNosy said:

      Probably.  She showed a big picture of the balloon release but I didn't look closely.  I was just glad that the family gathered around her when she needed it.  The lady's name was something like Tuff Decisions.

      She's just as good of a source as wacb

    • Cam

      Posted (edited)

      1 hour ago, viii said:

      I don't think I'd find it understandable if it was me. I'd side-eye my sister if she didn't attend my child's funeral, especially knowing how deep the grief is. I would hope that my sister would be there for me, since she would be able to relate the most. 

      I understand how some trauma can be triggering, but I also think there comes a point where we need to be there for loved ones. If Joy had just lost her daughter within the last year, that might have been a different story. 

      It's a fine line between protecting yourself and supporting loved ones. 


      We don’t know what goes on behind the scenes. Joy may have had a conversation with Jill on the phone discussing why she might not be able to attend and offer her condolences that way. Maybe even with a promise to get together soon in a more private manner.

      My brother suffered a devastating family loss. Most of our other family members went to the funeral. I was unable to attend due to extenuating circumstances. My other sister was out of town. When she returned a couple weeks later. she, I and our husbands took the three hour trip to visit Brother taking huge amounts of food and spending all day with him. It was very meaningful.

       

      55 minutes ago, Mama Mia said:

      It also might just be that Joy had the stomach flu or some other normal reason. Or a kid had to go to the ER 
       



      Definitely a possibility. I was thinking what if her kid(s) had pink eye or something.
       

      Edited by Cam
    • Mama Mia

      Posted

      3 minutes ago, viii said:

      I don't think I'd find it understandable if it was me. I'd side-eye my sister if she didn't attend my child's funeral, especially knowing how deep the grief is. I would hope that my sister would be there for me, since she would be able to relate the most. 

      I understand how some trauma can be triggering, but I also think there comes a point where we need to be there for loved ones. If Joy had just lost her daughter within the last year, that might have been a different story. 

      It's a fine line between protecting yourself and supporting loved ones. 

      I don’t know. I think I’d understand if it was just too much for her to handle. Everyone is different. And it’s not like she doesn’t have multiple other sisters and her mom there. As well as brothers, in-laws, friends, etc…..If Joy was her sole support it might be different. 

      It also might just be that Joy had the stomach flu or some other normal reason. Or a kid had to go to the ER for a fall , or one of the kids was having a meltdown cause they were scared of balloons so she took them somewhere else during the release,  I think with that huge a family it would be difficult to get everyone in one spot  for anything. Especially when so many have little kids. 
       

       

      • Upvote 3
    • Antimony

      Posted

      52 minutes ago, tanba said:

      If I was implementing this, I would be blurring before putting in the database. Now I’m also very doubtful that it can’t be unblurred, at least enough to reconstruct recognizable things, but blurring is also likely to save space, so even from a database and systems design perspective, I would be surprised if they saved the original images somewhere permanently, also due to legal liability. 

      There was one case with a pedophile (given the name "Mr Swirl" in the news) who had posted a manipulated image of his own face online and it took like...one guy with Photoshop who was like, "Uh, yea, that can be undone."

      Some reports suggest it took a little too long to find this one guy and perhaps the confidence of said pedophile made them thing the manipulation algorithm was more than it was but it was really...literally like the spiral twist function.

      I am mostly doubtful CE owns or bought any sort of interesting blurring algorithm. If we can pick past the diffraction of light with STORM...well. It just struck me as such an outlandish claim. 



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.