Jump to content

FJ Reviews & Recaps

  • entries
    488
  • comments
    466
  • views
    85,913

Contributors to this blog

  • crazyforkate 304
  • Maggie Mae 97
  • jinjy2 35
  • MarblesMom 33
  • Curious 9
  • GolightlyGrrl 8
  • kunoichi66 2

Worldly Distractions: Downton Abbey 5.7 - Episode 7


crazyforkate

508 views

blog-atticusrose.jpg 

atticusrose

So with two episodes to go, what's happening in the land of Downton? Basically, everyone's headed on a collision course, except the Bateses, who seemed doomed to repeat the same damned story every season or two. What new twists and turns could the Abbey residents be headed for next?

 

Rosamund arrives from London, where she is met by her mother. Violet has decided that they have to tell Cora the truth - though her courtesy won't extend as far as Robert, due to his maleness. Mrs Hughes and Carson gossip about it downstairs. Tom, Blake, Rose, Robert, Tony, Laine Fox and Posh Spice discuss her possible whereabouts. Violet steers Cora into the garden for a walk, and Mary is faced with the terrifying prospect of caring for her own son and niece. Meanwhile, Mrs Drew has turned up on their doorstep, which may well blow the secret early.

Outside, Tony and Blake have a match over the two women they're juggling. Basically, they fight over Mary, but pretend not to. The Bateses have a new problem - they have to find a new tenant for the House Bates's mother left him. Their marriage and general life path seem to be back on track, FINALLY.

Cora is understandably shocked and betrayed at the news of her extra grandchild. Rosamund and Violet try to explain themselves away, but it doesn't work. "We wanted to contain it," Violet claims, helpfully. Once she calms down, she decides to a) go find Edith and B) keep Robert out of it. And what are they going to do if they keep the kid and she grows up to look exactly like Edith?

Mrs Hughes fills Mary in on the Scotland Yard situation, mentioning that the train ticket is actually proof of Bates' innocence. Unfortunately, Mary burned it long ago. They're interrupted by the arrival of Atticus and his parents, Lord and Lady Sinderby, which is sure to be entertaining - as well as Lord Merton. Meanwhile, Daisy has taken her learning to heart, which extends to current events, and this is bumming her out. In fact, she sounds just like Miss Bunting, ugh.

Baxter shows up to apologize to the Bateses for kind of implying that Bates was a murderer to the police. She gets exactly no forgiveneess. The dinner goes on upstairs, where they spend most of their time trying to establish how cool they are with the Jewish thing, citing the deceased Mr. Levinson quite often. Rosamund asks Tom if he's planning to leave, which is somewhere along the lines of "maybe, I dunno, pass the potatoes". Atticus is apparently the first person to think of looking for Edith at the publishing house she's inherited, which makes him automatically smarter than all the Crawleys put together. The end of the table is occupied by Love Drama between the quadrangle formed by Blake, Handsome Tony, Mary and Miss Fox.

Isobel interrupts all these sordid affairs by announcing her engagement to Lord Merton, which is met by a general cry of delight, if a slightly tepid reception from Violet. Mary continues to snark about Edith, which meets with some heavy condemnation from her grandmother.

Molesley corners Daisy, expecting some intellectual conversation, but Daisy is still feeling down and goes to bed. Molesley cannot fathom why she's given up on possibility. Mrs Patmore urges him to keep going with this new friendship.

Lord Merton is thinking of hosting a dinner to introduce his sons to Isobel, which sounds like a horrendous idea when you consider that his darling offspring, Larry, was the one who drugged Tom into foolish rambling in Episode 3.1 - right before Matthew and Mary's wedding. We also find out that Merton is Mary's godfather. Considering all the connections involved, the Crawleys wind up hosting yet another event.

Tony tries to explain to Miss Fox that he can't leave Mary, because boning and stuff. Everyone seems happy about Rose and Atticus, except for Atticus' dad. Rose has passed on Atticus' suggestion, which prompts Cora and Rosamund to head to London to look for her. Cora claims she will never trust her mother-in-law again, which is fair enough.

Down at Bates cottage, Anna and Bates discuss the always-riveting matter of real estate, since everything is totally cool with the police and all (he's getting hanged next episode, right?). They also talk about why there's no Baby Bates, which I assume will be the entire plot next season. Tom and Robert ask Mary which man she's chosen, because that's totally in-character, and the answer is David Beckham neither. Robert expresses concern that Tom might go to America, and blames himself. Tom has gone so far as to write to his cousin in Boston to look at opportunities. NOOOOO NOT TOM WE CAN'T LOSE THE HOT ONE!

The ladies show up at Edith's publishing house, where they promptly run into Edith, who is royally pissed off that the secret's out. Mary shows up at her grandmother's, where Spratt (kind of my new favourite character) is dangerously indiscreet. Violet still seems really edgy about the Merton thing, which Mary chalks up to the loss of her "protege" to marriage. In fact, it's plain old loneliness. The femmeslash is raging, my friends. Fanfic writers, to your keyboards!

Tom and Sybbie go out for a walk, where they play Pooh Sticks on the bridge. Tom broaches the idea of moving across the sea as Sybil's Theme plays its melancholy tune. Sybbie is confused, and Tom really can't give her any answers.

Baxter has come up with a new idea - she can swear to the police that she saw the ticket and it was unused. It's too late to do any good, and they're not keen on an olive branch. Molesley rises to her defense, but is quickly sent away by Thomas, who urges her to come clean about her reasons.

Charles calls from London - he's been posted to Poland and will be leaving for several months. He also has a great plan for "settling the matter once and for all", an idea from Laine, which involves going to the cinema for some reason. Meanwhile, Isis continues to be sick and the vet's out of town. Rose arrives all aflutter about Atticus. Robert counsels her not to make any rash decisions. There's some concern about faith and such, and he tells her it will be a rough path down the line.

Edith has been thinking of going to America, too, but has thought better of it and is now thinking of the "orphan godchild" plan. Cora does her one better - they'll bring Marigold back to Downton, claim the Drews were overwhelmed with kids, and let Marigold take her place in the Downton nursery. This way, no one will know and Edith will be close to her child. Rosamund thinks they're nuts, but hasn't come up with anything better, so the plan is on.

Daisy and Molesley have been invited to visit Mr Mason, which is weird because I'm sure Mr Mason has never heard of Molesley before. Mrs Patmore even offers to let her off for the day. The women arrive home, but Mary's leaving for London at the same time, so they have some sneaky subterfuge with the help of Mr Drew. Fortunately, they manage to pull it off.

Lord Merton and Isobel have a tense tea with Violet. Isobel takes her aside and thanks her for her support, and asks after Prince Kuragin, whose wife is still missing amid plans to bring her back to England. They're interrupted when Spratt resigns, in his customary monotone. You go, Spratt. Violet calls him "as touchy as a beauty losing her looks", which sounds rather apt, but she's not willing to find a new butler, so she'll forgive him  this time.

At the movies, Blake and Flapper!Mary sneak into the lobby and kiss conspicuously in the lobby. They are then "discovered" by Fox and Handsome Tony, who seems rather good-natured about the whole charade. It's like one of those old-fashioned, trumped-up "adultery" cases in divorce. Everyone gets back with their respective partners and all is well. That was - surprisingly painless.

Daisy arrives at her former father-in-law's, with Baxter and Molesley in tow. He gives her a speech about how "education is power" and how keeping at her books is everything. Baxter and Molesley flirt adorably, Daisy continues to mope. Mr Mason urges her not to give up, no matter what the political situation. Another note - it's rare to see the staff out of uniform, and Daisy and Baxter look fabulous - very '20s.

The family  discusses the "adoption", and are all skeptical. Robert comes in with the real news of the episode, which is that Isis has cancer and only a little time left. He's devastated, and everyone else is deeply sympathetic. I lean over and pat my own golden, because dammit, it's always the worst when the dog dies. The children are brought down, and Mary and Robert dismiss her idea. Cora carefully works around their objections. Marigold has a new home. Sybbie goes to pat Isis, which makes everyone's eyes well up.

Mrs Hughes and Anna discuss how Times are Changing, both personally and in general. However, Anna has something else to talk about - she thought she saw something involving Mr Drew, Edith and a kid. Mrs Hughes tells her to mind her own business, since the child is loved and that's all that matters.

At dinner, Isobel thinks the adoption's a great idea. Lord Merton's sons are predictably horrid about every topic brought before them. This, of course, extends to Mrs Crawley, their soon-to-be stepmother. Larry immediately goes too far, and Robert throws him out. Tom calls him a bastard, which Robert kind of supports. Young Merton is kicked to the curb. Or kerb, I should say. The other son, however, is just as snobbish. The servants all gossip, of course, as long as Carson's not in the room.

Atticus takes Rose aside and proposes, despite having known her about two weeks. The flighty young flapper immediately says yes. No way this is going to end badly. There's some hallway necking for good measure. Take care, naughty young things.

An embarrassed Merton and Isobel try to patch things up, but Isobel is clearly having serious doubts. Upstairs, Robert is quite sure Isis won't last the night, so Cora and Robert take her into their bed, so that she can be beside the people she loves in her last hours. And so we all end the episode sobbing. Thanks, Fellowes.

Next time: The engagement is announced, everyone flips out. Daisy thinks of moving on. Tom appears to have decided to leave. There's more drama in the House of Bates.

Okay, now that I've finished crying over Isis, let's talk about the show. Thank effing god the Marigold issue seems to be settled - I look forward to seeing her settle in with her new cousins. It remains to be seen, of course, whether they can keep her identity a secret. However, I'll eat my hat if we're done with Scotland Yard and the Bateses. It just seems too neat. So, what are we to expect in the finale? Class drama. Mary probably getting some action. And, of course, some wonderful quips from the DC to keep us going. Who could ask for anything more?

FJ Discussion Thread

 

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • JermajestyDuggar

      Posted

      There was a post on social media talking about this recent interview with Ballerina Farm and asking what people think about some of the things in it. So many commenters were like, “it’s her business! It’s not your life so why do you care?” This is the type of thing that bugs me to no end. Ballerina Farm posts their lives willingly! They post their children’s lives! Of course people will speculate and care! If they didn’t put their lives all over social media none of us would know anything about them. 

    • LongTimeLurkerOG

      Posted

      On 7/25/2024 at 6:47 PM, LilMissMetaphor said:

      Just FYI in case someone missed it the first time round, this is what Art wrote on Reddit a year ago addressing some of the concerns that were brought up.  It's very telling if you read between some of the lines.

      "I don’t lie or make fraudulent claims to get money. That’s what a grifter is. I’ve closed all previous fundraisers and not all of them were successfully funded – for instance my legal name change and wedding fund did not get funded, so I still haven’t had a chance to do those things.

      I’m unable to work for a variety of medically supported reasons. It’s not okay to ask disabled people for proof of their disability simply because it’s medical information. To entertain the question is to concede that it’s okay to go ask other disabled people for their private medical history. It’s a common misconception that people pretend to be disabled for benefits or monetary gain, but it’s rare and doesn’t really make sense to do because benefits and fundraising add up to so little.

      I have been going to Seattle to look at possible places to live because it’s literally unavoidable, and I’ve been in severe pain because of it. That doesn’t mean I could do manual labor on a consistent basis. I don’t even drive, so I’ve had to cover gas and ask friends for help with rides.

      Have you ever tried working at a call center? I have. They’re severely strict and demanding, and incredibly demoralizing without paying much. They’re not an accessible alternative for people who can’t do more demanding manual labor. “Get a job like the rest of us” is ableist and is a fundamental misunderstanding of how accessible jobs are. It’s no better than yelling it at someone panhandling on the street. The supposedly “easy” or “low-skill” jobs are still difficult to do.

      I do use what resources I can, but it’s a total myth that there’s a robust social welfare system anywhere in the United States. If there was, we wouldn’t have so many hundreds of thousands of homeless people here, with millions more just a few missed paychecks away from joining them.

      The toxic mold was confirmed. My partner is literally terminally ill from it. If you read the actual updates, the name of the illness and the research surrounding it have been detailed. We have a letter from the pulmonologist that we sent to the landlord explaining that the environment my partner was in was causing the illness. Again, you’re demanding medical proof that you have no reason to ask about. Some things can’t just be washed out.

      I am as clear as I can possibly be about specific needs so that people know what they’re helping to support. I have said again and again that people shouldn’t give unless they can spare it and want to help. I even said that in the post linked to in this comment thread. My patreon is explicitly to support my writing.

      So why am I still fundraising and making money off telling my story? Because I literally have no other real options. I’ve been formally diagnosed with PTSD, it’s not “alleged trauma.” If it was working all that well, I wouldn’t have to keep detailing my needs.

      The real grifters in our society are billionaires, not poor disabled people. You sound like you just hate us for trying to exist."

      I remember reading this before. Well, they can take all their reasons and Stop. Grifting. Plenty of people with disabilities work and /or receive assistance (as I mentioned previously, my exPOS, who has disabilities so I'm familiar with a number of options and money). Some family, have / had disabilities. I've been an advocate for services and staff training (and provided training) for Years with previous positions - because it matters to me. So, yea, Artemis get. a. job. 

      57 minutes ago, Ozlsn said:

      Art lists manual labour and call centres. And that's it. Not any jobs they could look at involving writing, from editing to writing student essays for money (yes it's dodgy but people do it). Not even playing video games for money (get character to a level where they have cool stuff for someone.)  Nothing about remote work, which there is more of now, and not even entry level white collar work.

      On the one hand I agree with them that the social support is inadequate, and that detailing your medical needs shouldn't have to happen - but they just grifted nearly $5000 to move and for a holiday, and with the amount of effort that took they probably could have held down employment of some description and to be honest would probably be better off.

      So many WFH/remote legit jobs now. Hell, you can play games on your phone and earn gift cards; donate blood and get gift cards. I knew a homeless couple that donated plasma for higher amount g.c.

      Absolutely! The amount of money; it's disgusting. And that amount of effort... At some point, even we don't want to or circumstances we don't want to deal with and adult, because... We're adults! Plenty of things I want to ignore or not deal with, just have go away but persevere because the alternative... not an option.

      2 hours ago, Bookworm1564 said:

      My all-time favourite Art post is the one where they say “Just for today, you can double the impact of your support with this opportunity” as if this was the moment we were all waiting for.

      Like a sale for limited-time-only 🤣

    • justpassingthru

      Posted (edited)

      So another page shared the Lott's story and this is a comment on that post. People believe "Fundy Snark" is a person. There are at least a couple other comments that refer to the sub as a person

      Screenshot_20240726_191210_Instagram.jpg

       

      Screenshot_20240726_191619_Instagram.jpg

      Edited by justpassingthru
    • Ozlsn

      Posted

      6 hours ago, AverageGiraffe said:

      This woman makes me especially sad. She reminds me a lot of Alyssa Ann (Wakefield) Welch, of the now defunct resolved2worship xanga. A couple of years ago I re-read through the entire thing on the wayback machine, after she did an interview about her abusive marriage, and I see a lot of the same dynamics in this family. I can't put my finger on exactly why this particular woman reminds me of her, and to be fair I haven't consumed any of their content directly, just read the interview article that was posted, but for some reason I feel so sad for her. 

      It reads like at the very least an extremely controlling relationship and I would say abusive. The egg apron could have been a funny gift - if tickets to Greece were in the front pocket. If they weren't they were just an on camera reminder to her that she is subservient to his desires and that he is in control.

      3 hours ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

      Oh I’m sure she has access to credit cards. But I would be she can only buy stuff that he thinks fits their “homestead” life.

      It wouldn't surprise me if they're set up so he has to approve any transaction to be honest. 

      • Upvote 2
    • thoughtful

      Posted

      13 minutes ago, Ozlsn said:

      (also is Vance's wife in there at all?)

      Of course not!

      • Upvote 1
      • Eyeroll 1


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.