Jump to content

FJ Reviews & Recaps

  • entries
    488
  • comments
    466
  • views
    85,913

Contributors to this blog

  • crazyforkate 304
  • Maggie Mae 97
  • jinjy2 35
  • MarblesMom 33
  • Curious 9
  • GolightlyGrrl 8
  • kunoichi66 2

Worldly Distractions: The Simpsons 26.4 - Treehouse of Horror XXV


crazyforkate

1,523 views

blog-treehouseofhorror.jpgtreehouseofhorror

 

Well, it's that time of year again! Perhaps the only episode of the season reliably worth checking out, Treehouse of Horror is a glorious celebration of all things creepy, kooky and altogether ooky. Some years have been funnier than others, but in general, the Halloween episodes boast a high quality and a tremendous novelty factor. In fact, it's hard to imagine Halloween without them. So tonight, fun-sized candy bars and mini-bags of chips in hand, let's all get together to mark a quarter-century of this annual macabre extravaganza. What terrors and treats will they have to offer us tonight?

We start with a variety-show style from Kang and Kodos' home planet, featuring clips from old episodes and a dizzying array of guest stars - all of whom are chopped up to form the title. The aliens laugh uproariously, and I would be if they hadn't done it already a few seasons back.

The first offering is "School is Hell", based on the art of Neil Gaiman. We begin with Bart being given an excessively long detention yet again. Bored, he begins to mess with the furniture. He wipes the dust off the desk and finds an old enchantment written in Ancient Aramaic. Lisa translates it with an app. Unfortunately, the curse they unlock drags them both straight to hell, which is their umpteenth such visit over both Canon and Treehouse-verse. Now turned into goat creatures, they meet all kinds of monster cliques, and for a while things are looking kind of good. Lisa even becomes popular, whereupon it promptly begins to snow. All the characters appear as various monster caricatures. Bart is taken to Hell Class, where he excels in coming up with horrific kinds of torture. The teacher admits to having a crush on him, because in hell that kind of stuff is possible.

Lisa soon comes up with a portal back to earth, but Bart is reluctant to go. They show up in their portal on Earth, which is located in Burns' office. Bart goes to his parents and asks to transfer to Hell School. Marge is thrilled that he wants to learn something, and Homer is glad it's free. However, at the first parent-teacher conference, they express some trepidation over the school's location. With assurance from Hell!Skinner/Chalmers (a two-headed deal), they agree to give it a try. Beelze-Bart proceeds to kick ass at an increasingly gruesome series of classes. At the final exam, he is asked to torture Homer. Since he never seems to die, this shouldn't be an issue, but Bart is worried anyway. Homer encourages him to at least try to succeed at something. Bart gives it a go, and is chosen to be valedictorian of his class.

Well, this one was a good starter. Though not really laugh-out-loud funny, they did put a great amount of effort into establishing the school, and the setting really was its strength. The Simpsons have had many visits to hell before, and Bart has been to many schools, but I wouldn't call it stale at this point. This is a great example of how old concepts can be twisted a little to create a perfectly serviceable episode.

"A Clockwork Yellow" is next, and looks fantastic. Moe, Lenny, Carl and Homer are all droogs in an Anthony-Burgess style gang, highly violent and well-choreographed. To my delight, Russian words and terrible British accents are everywhere. The movie is parodied in a manner most pitch-perfect. In 1970s-style futuristic London, Homer hooks up with Marge to the strains of classical music, falls in love with her, and decides to give up the gang. Moe is devastated at the loss of his friend "Dum". Lenny and Carl kick Moe out, and he becomes a lowly bartender.

Years later, watching TV with those eye-clamp things, Moe is startled to hear a knock on the door. Dolph, Kearney, Nelson and Jimbo break in and immediately proceeded to fuck his shit up. Bruised, Moe summons his respectable friends Dum and Marge. He expresses his desire to get revenge. Marge urges them not to return to gang life, citing their toddler  (Clockwork!Maggie), but Dum and Moe go back to the old ways. While jaywalking, they run into Lenny and Carl and convince them to return for a series of extremely insignificant crimes. Soon it investigates to crashing a party at the Mayor's house, a parody of Eyes Wide Shut that is racier than anything else The Simpsons has ever done. The gang goes to town on the whole place, committing mass murder.  Several other Kubricks are parodied in the process. Moe concludes that at least he is happy. The sequence is revealed to be part of Kubrick's editing process, where he expresses dissatisfaction with the result. He throws a pen in the air, just like 2001. It's glorious.

Though the Kubrick parodies were kind of funny, I would call this segment the weakest of the three. The setting did look great, as did the character design. However, as a segment it didn't really "hang", and the story was rather poorly developed. It would have benefited from an extra minute in running time. And honestly - considering the famous brutality of A Clockwork Orange, it would have helped if they had gone further with the old ultra-violence. Both the first and last segments were much more violent, which seemed strange given the film's history.

Last, but not least is a parody of The Others, which is apparent by an immediate shift in animation. The family begins receiving strange messages from the house, including writing on the mirror and a TV that only plays Married With Children. Soon, they are unable to sleep at night. When Marge leaves the room, Homer is molested by a ghost while the bed levitates. Homer summons the ghosts with "The Car-Sellers Bible" ("The power of Chrysler compels you!"), whereupon they are revealed to be the Simpsons from the 1989 Tracey Ullman shorts. Yup, those one where they look like they were doodled in the margins during a boring math class. Homer falls in love with 1989 Marge (she's not bitter about him yet, you see), 1989-Homer attacks present-day Bart, and things are getting chaotic. Present-day Marge, despondent, kills herself by putting her head in the oven (wait, WHAT?!) and appears to Homer as a ghost. 1989-Homer kills Homer with the toaster in the bathtub, Bart jumps out the window, and Lisa dies going after him. Groundskeeper Willie runs off with the bodies, and accidentally kills Maggie too. Two full Simpson families now haunt the house, and Doctor Marvin Monroe, now some kind of semi-ghost after his ambiguous status for many seasons, is called in to sort them out. The Marges suggest that Homer choose between them. Present-Marge tells Homer that even though she knows everything about him, she still wants to stay with them. Both Simpson couples reconcile. The families live happily in the house, and Lisa wonders whether more may not exist. On cue, a parade of Simpsons families show up, including Lego Simpsons, Anime Simpsons, Despicable Me Simpsons, South Park Simpsons, and 3D-animated Simpsons (their Homer played by perennial Pixar actor John Ratzenberger). A brief coda shows the original two families taking a family photo.

I really, really liked the concept of putting the two families together, and it was interesting to see the contrast between the show at the beginning and the show as it is now. However, this premise started getting a bit thin - so it was a relief when the deaths started. It moved at a brisk pace and continued to hold audience interest, especially with the visually arresting ending featuring multiple Simpsons incarnations. Aesthetically, this segment was quite strong, and it hearkened back to our sense of nostalgia, which was very fitting for this twenty-fifth anniversary episode. An effective parody of The Others it wasn't, but the rest of the segment made up for it, and I would definitely rank it as the strongest part of tonight's outing.

Overall, I would say that this episode was solid, but not classic. Last year's was much stronger, taking a ton of risks, and of course neither of them could touch the Golden Era. However, it had three creative segments with plenty for the viewer to notice, and worked well both on an artistic and entertainment level. In an increasingly shaky series, the ToH episodes reliably bring us the Simpsons' trademark sense of humour, though of course slightly more twisted than usual - and rarely disappoint. I'll hand the conversation over to the discussion thread, though - what did YOU guys think?

FJ Discussion Thread

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • JermajestyDuggar

      Posted

      There was a post on social media talking about this recent interview with Ballerina Farm and asking what people think about some of the things in it. So many commenters were like, “it’s her business! It’s not your life so why do you care?” This is the type of thing that bugs me to no end. Ballerina Farm posts their lives willingly! They post their children’s lives! Of course people will speculate and care! If they didn’t put their lives all over social media none of us would know anything about them. 

    • LongTimeLurkerOG

      Posted

      On 7/25/2024 at 6:47 PM, LilMissMetaphor said:

      Just FYI in case someone missed it the first time round, this is what Art wrote on Reddit a year ago addressing some of the concerns that were brought up.  It's very telling if you read between some of the lines.

      "I don’t lie or make fraudulent claims to get money. That’s what a grifter is. I’ve closed all previous fundraisers and not all of them were successfully funded – for instance my legal name change and wedding fund did not get funded, so I still haven’t had a chance to do those things.

      I’m unable to work for a variety of medically supported reasons. It’s not okay to ask disabled people for proof of their disability simply because it’s medical information. To entertain the question is to concede that it’s okay to go ask other disabled people for their private medical history. It’s a common misconception that people pretend to be disabled for benefits or monetary gain, but it’s rare and doesn’t really make sense to do because benefits and fundraising add up to so little.

      I have been going to Seattle to look at possible places to live because it’s literally unavoidable, and I’ve been in severe pain because of it. That doesn’t mean I could do manual labor on a consistent basis. I don’t even drive, so I’ve had to cover gas and ask friends for help with rides.

      Have you ever tried working at a call center? I have. They’re severely strict and demanding, and incredibly demoralizing without paying much. They’re not an accessible alternative for people who can’t do more demanding manual labor. “Get a job like the rest of us” is ableist and is a fundamental misunderstanding of how accessible jobs are. It’s no better than yelling it at someone panhandling on the street. The supposedly “easy” or “low-skill” jobs are still difficult to do.

      I do use what resources I can, but it’s a total myth that there’s a robust social welfare system anywhere in the United States. If there was, we wouldn’t have so many hundreds of thousands of homeless people here, with millions more just a few missed paychecks away from joining them.

      The toxic mold was confirmed. My partner is literally terminally ill from it. If you read the actual updates, the name of the illness and the research surrounding it have been detailed. We have a letter from the pulmonologist that we sent to the landlord explaining that the environment my partner was in was causing the illness. Again, you’re demanding medical proof that you have no reason to ask about. Some things can’t just be washed out.

      I am as clear as I can possibly be about specific needs so that people know what they’re helping to support. I have said again and again that people shouldn’t give unless they can spare it and want to help. I even said that in the post linked to in this comment thread. My patreon is explicitly to support my writing.

      So why am I still fundraising and making money off telling my story? Because I literally have no other real options. I’ve been formally diagnosed with PTSD, it’s not “alleged trauma.” If it was working all that well, I wouldn’t have to keep detailing my needs.

      The real grifters in our society are billionaires, not poor disabled people. You sound like you just hate us for trying to exist."

      I remember reading this before. Well, they can take all their reasons and Stop. Grifting. Plenty of people with disabilities work and /or receive assistance (as I mentioned previously, my exPOS, who has disabilities so I'm familiar with a number of options and money). Some family, have / had disabilities. I've been an advocate for services and staff training (and provided training) for Years with previous positions - because it matters to me. So, yea, Artemis get. a. job. 

      57 minutes ago, Ozlsn said:

      Art lists manual labour and call centres. And that's it. Not any jobs they could look at involving writing, from editing to writing student essays for money (yes it's dodgy but people do it). Not even playing video games for money (get character to a level where they have cool stuff for someone.)  Nothing about remote work, which there is more of now, and not even entry level white collar work.

      On the one hand I agree with them that the social support is inadequate, and that detailing your medical needs shouldn't have to happen - but they just grifted nearly $5000 to move and for a holiday, and with the amount of effort that took they probably could have held down employment of some description and to be honest would probably be better off.

      So many WFH/remote legit jobs now. Hell, you can play games on your phone and earn gift cards; donate blood and get gift cards. I knew a homeless couple that donated plasma for higher amount g.c.

      Absolutely! The amount of money; it's disgusting. And that amount of effort... At some point, even we don't want to or circumstances we don't want to deal with and adult, because... We're adults! Plenty of things I want to ignore or not deal with, just have go away but persevere because the alternative... not an option.

      2 hours ago, Bookworm1564 said:

      My all-time favourite Art post is the one where they say “Just for today, you can double the impact of your support with this opportunity” as if this was the moment we were all waiting for.

      Like a sale for limited-time-only 🤣

    • justpassingthru

      Posted (edited)

      So another page shared the Lott's story and this is a comment on that post. People believe "Fundy Snark" is a person. There are at least a couple other comments that refer to the sub as a person

      Screenshot_20240726_191210_Instagram.jpg

       

      Screenshot_20240726_191619_Instagram.jpg

      Edited by justpassingthru
    • Ozlsn

      Posted

      6 hours ago, AverageGiraffe said:

      This woman makes me especially sad. She reminds me a lot of Alyssa Ann (Wakefield) Welch, of the now defunct resolved2worship xanga. A couple of years ago I re-read through the entire thing on the wayback machine, after she did an interview about her abusive marriage, and I see a lot of the same dynamics in this family. I can't put my finger on exactly why this particular woman reminds me of her, and to be fair I haven't consumed any of their content directly, just read the interview article that was posted, but for some reason I feel so sad for her. 

      It reads like at the very least an extremely controlling relationship and I would say abusive. The egg apron could have been a funny gift - if tickets to Greece were in the front pocket. If they weren't they were just an on camera reminder to her that she is subservient to his desires and that he is in control.

      3 hours ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

      Oh I’m sure she has access to credit cards. But I would be she can only buy stuff that he thinks fits their “homestead” life.

      It wouldn't surprise me if they're set up so he has to approve any transaction to be honest. 

      • Upvote 2
    • thoughtful

      Posted

      13 minutes ago, Ozlsn said:

      (also is Vance's wife in there at all?)

      Of course not!

      • Upvote 1
      • Eyeroll 1


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.