Jump to content

FJ Reviews & Recaps

  • entries
    488
  • comments
    466
  • views
    85,913

Contributors to this blog

  • crazyforkate 304
  • Maggie Mae 97
  • jinjy2 35
  • MarblesMom 33
  • Curious 9
  • GolightlyGrrl 8
  • kunoichi66 2

Review: Kate Gosselin: How She Fooled The World


Curious

834 views

blog-kate-radarol.jpg[caption id=attachment_939" align="alignleft" width="236]Kate Gosselin How She Fooled The World via Radar Online[/caption]

Warning: Any posts on this book may contain possible triggers for survivors of child abuse.

I normally don't post on our blog, but am taking one for the team with the re-release of the Robert Hoffman book, Kate Gosselin: How She Fooled the World ~ The Rise and Fall of a Reality TV Queen.   For those who have not followed the Gosselin saga and are saying "Kate who?." Robert Hoffman originally released a version of this book a couple years ago and it was on sale at amazon for a whopping 2 days before amazon pulled it due to potential copyright issues.

If you listen to Kate's sheeple, they want you to believe that Kate got the book pulled, but in reality it was actually TLC and possibly some other businesses that filed claims with amazon because there were full contracts published in the book and they considered that proprietary information.   Amazon has a very simple policy.  It is not their job to figure out who owns the copyright, that is the work of lawyers and judges, so if there is a copyright claim filed (and I'm sure it has to look reasonable), they will pull the book.   They make no determination on whether this IS a violation, they just pull the book.   So while Kate's flock likes to make it sound like she personally got the book pulled because it was full of lies, there is no evidence that is the case.  In fact, there is evidence that she tried to keep the book from publication and could not do so.   I'm not going to cover that, google will give you more background than you could ever want about the situation, though, if you are interested.

Mr. Hoffman was originally assigned to follow the Gosselin saga by US Weekly when the situation started melting down in 2009 and continued to follow Kate based on what he saw during his time as a reporter for the magazine.

The book is currently only available as an e-book.  I do not know if they have plans to also publish a dead tree edition or not.  According to amazon, it has approximately 728 pages.  It is split into 42 chapters not including the preface and epilogue.

If you read the first version of the book, you will probably remember that it held a lot of interesting and damning information, but it was a hot mess where editing was concerned.   There was a considerable amount of repetition in the first version and the timeline was fairly hodgepodge.   You can tell that there were editors involved in this new version of the book.  It's a much "easier" read thanks to the editing.  There was still a little repetition and while the timeline started out quite well, I felt like it got a little sloppy and jumped around a fair bit by the midway point in the book.

Another difference between the first version and this version is that rather than having pages and pages of actual contracts, emails and journal entries, there are bullet points and summaries of the information.    This made the book much more reader friendly while still getting the information across.    I had trouble reading the first book in one sitting between the lack of editing and the disturbing material being presented.   This book was a much smoother read and having the material in bullet points and summarized made it easier to digest without internalizing it quite as much.    I'm unsure if a first time reader would feel the same way though.  I had a good idea about what much of the content was going to be like having read the first book already.

Overall, I liked the book and I hope people (meaning people that don't just follow the Gosselin saga) read the book and Kate finally fades away into obscurity where she belongs and her children can have what remains of their childhood away from the cameras in peace.   There were a few things that I felt were a bit of a stretch and probably could (should) have been left out because there is plenty to complain about with Kate, there is no real need to take leaps or make any stretches.   If those things had been left out, perhaps some of the other information Robert had, could have been included.  According to Mr. Hoffman, only about 10% of the material he had made it into the first book.   There was not a lot of new information in this second one and much of it was things that have happened since the publication of the first one, so I trust there was plenty of non-stretchy info that he could have used.

Kate's alleged abortion was disclosed again and that was another area that I felt was perhaps not necessary.  I understand why he put it in both books, given the circumstances of her claiming PCOS and worrying about being able to get pregnant, but if she was forced to have an abortion as a teenager, it's not really something that should be snarked on.    It also doesn't really have anything to do with her ability to become pregnant again.  Many woman suffer from secondary infertility after they became easily pregnant the first time, for example.

From the writing, it comes across that Mr. Hoffman cares for the Gosselin children and the things he has seen and read have bothered him enough to stick to his guns to get this information out there despite the lengths Kate has gone to ruin him and stop the book.    I think it will be good for the kids to know they had someone fighting for them once they are adults, even if no one was really able to help them as children.

Starting (hopefully) tomorrow, I will be doing a chapter by chapter summary of the book for those folks that don't want to actually read the book.

You can also join our discussion.

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Xan

      Posted

      The egg apron is a deal breaker for me.  That was just an insult.  "You think you deserve a gift?  I'll show you your place!"

      And I'm a little bit tired of the social media scolds.  If they didn't put their lives on the internet, we wouldn't have opinions.  They did so we do.  If most of us think that he's a bully, he probably is.  I guess it's another case of the husband being so full of himself that he was sure the interview would show him in a good light.  It didn't.

      • Upvote 2
    • Xan

      Posted

      I always find these Trump fantasy worlds very bizarre.  He's never in a nice suit meeting a world leader or even in a fireman's suit saving a child from a burning building.  It's always some fake macho outfit and, in this case, driving a car with a Confederate flag on it.  Their heroes don't seem that heroic.

    • JDuggs

      Posted

      On 12/22/2023 at 11:51 PM, JDuggs said:

      It looks like Micah is in a relationship, or very good friends, with this Florida realtor Veronica Peters. I’ve seen photos of them together on Micah’s IG, but I always thought she kind of looked too old for him. Maybe not.

      This was on Moriah’s IG:

        Hide contents

      image.thumb.jpeg.e5583f82734714ccb023fc889e4f0f90.jpeg

      And this was on Veronica’s personal IG and professional IG:

        Hide contents

      image.thumb.jpeg.e637a588be2f14fc379935962e743f47.jpeg

        Hide contentsimage.thumb.png.bfaa9a4a2ac77388067acef5c5afb81c.png

       

      Quoting myself from six months ago. I think this really is Micah’s girlfriend. She doesn’t seem quite as public about their relationship as she did back then.

      This photo of Veronica didn’t get copied over from my old post.

      Spoiler

      image.thumb.jpeg.0ae44da117d43f1db49868c42924ea03.jpeg

       

      • Upvote 1
    • JermajestyDuggar

      Posted

      There was a post on social media talking about this recent interview with Ballerina Farm and asking what people think about some of the things in it. So many commenters were like, “it’s her business! It’s not your life so why do you care?” This is the type of thing that bugs me to no end. Ballerina Farm posts their lives willingly! They post their children’s lives! Of course people will speculate and care! If they didn’t put their lives all over social media none of us would know anything about them. 

      • Upvote 1
    • LongTimeLurkerOG

      Posted

      On 7/25/2024 at 6:47 PM, LilMissMetaphor said:

      Just FYI in case someone missed it the first time round, this is what Art wrote on Reddit a year ago addressing some of the concerns that were brought up.  It's very telling if you read between some of the lines.

      "I don’t lie or make fraudulent claims to get money. That’s what a grifter is. I’ve closed all previous fundraisers and not all of them were successfully funded – for instance my legal name change and wedding fund did not get funded, so I still haven’t had a chance to do those things.

      I’m unable to work for a variety of medically supported reasons. It’s not okay to ask disabled people for proof of their disability simply because it’s medical information. To entertain the question is to concede that it’s okay to go ask other disabled people for their private medical history. It’s a common misconception that people pretend to be disabled for benefits or monetary gain, but it’s rare and doesn’t really make sense to do because benefits and fundraising add up to so little.

      I have been going to Seattle to look at possible places to live because it’s literally unavoidable, and I’ve been in severe pain because of it. That doesn’t mean I could do manual labor on a consistent basis. I don’t even drive, so I’ve had to cover gas and ask friends for help with rides.

      Have you ever tried working at a call center? I have. They’re severely strict and demanding, and incredibly demoralizing without paying much. They’re not an accessible alternative for people who can’t do more demanding manual labor. “Get a job like the rest of us” is ableist and is a fundamental misunderstanding of how accessible jobs are. It’s no better than yelling it at someone panhandling on the street. The supposedly “easy” or “low-skill” jobs are still difficult to do.

      I do use what resources I can, but it’s a total myth that there’s a robust social welfare system anywhere in the United States. If there was, we wouldn’t have so many hundreds of thousands of homeless people here, with millions more just a few missed paychecks away from joining them.

      The toxic mold was confirmed. My partner is literally terminally ill from it. If you read the actual updates, the name of the illness and the research surrounding it have been detailed. We have a letter from the pulmonologist that we sent to the landlord explaining that the environment my partner was in was causing the illness. Again, you’re demanding medical proof that you have no reason to ask about. Some things can’t just be washed out.

      I am as clear as I can possibly be about specific needs so that people know what they’re helping to support. I have said again and again that people shouldn’t give unless they can spare it and want to help. I even said that in the post linked to in this comment thread. My patreon is explicitly to support my writing.

      So why am I still fundraising and making money off telling my story? Because I literally have no other real options. I’ve been formally diagnosed with PTSD, it’s not “alleged trauma.” If it was working all that well, I wouldn’t have to keep detailing my needs.

      The real grifters in our society are billionaires, not poor disabled people. You sound like you just hate us for trying to exist."

      I remember reading this before. Well, they can take all their reasons and Stop. Grifting. Plenty of people with disabilities work and /or receive assistance (as I mentioned previously, my exPOS, who has disabilities so I'm familiar with a number of options and money). Some family, have / had disabilities. I've been an advocate for services and staff training (and provided training) for Years with previous positions - because it matters to me. So, yea, Artemis get. a. job. 

      57 minutes ago, Ozlsn said:

      Art lists manual labour and call centres. And that's it. Not any jobs they could look at involving writing, from editing to writing student essays for money (yes it's dodgy but people do it). Not even playing video games for money (get character to a level where they have cool stuff for someone.)  Nothing about remote work, which there is more of now, and not even entry level white collar work.

      On the one hand I agree with them that the social support is inadequate, and that detailing your medical needs shouldn't have to happen - but they just grifted nearly $5000 to move and for a holiday, and with the amount of effort that took they probably could have held down employment of some description and to be honest would probably be better off.

      So many WFH/remote legit jobs now. Hell, you can play games on your phone and earn gift cards; donate blood and get gift cards. I knew a homeless couple that donated plasma for higher amount g.c.

      Absolutely! The amount of money; it's disgusting. And that amount of effort... At some point, even we don't want to or circumstances we don't want to deal with and adult, because... We're adults! Plenty of things I want to ignore or not deal with, just have go away but persevere because the alternative... not an option.

      2 hours ago, Bookworm1564 said:

      My all-time favourite Art post is the one where they say “Just for today, you can double the impact of your support with this opportunity” as if this was the moment we were all waiting for.

      Like a sale for limited-time-only 🤣



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.