Jump to content

Flowers in the Attic: "Minutes Like Hours"


Maggie Mae

2,933 views

Minutes Like Hours: Page 112 of 411 (Kindle Version) 

Jesus. I'm on page 112. I now understand why Fred Clark's Left Behind Fridays have been going on for years. 

Quote

All the days dragged by. Monotonously. 

Just like this book. 

We get a paragraph of melodramatic teenage thoughts that lead me to believe that I could have been a much better writer had I not ever read such pondering about time. 

Then we get a paragraph of "what Chris thinks" about the same thing she was just thinking about. 

Momma comes to see them. She brings them games. So now they kids have a stack of board games, including the absolute worst game ever invented, Monopoly. Fun fact: Monopoly was originally created to help show how certain economic principles work. Also, the house rule about free parking sucks and should be abolished. 

The twins aren't interested in games, or toys. 

For some reason, the kids wake up at the same time every day, despite not having an alarm clock. They do have wristwatches, though. 

More logistics about how they go to the bathroom and get dressed. I'd wonder if perhaps the "All the days dragged by" was some sort of literary device to help you understand that the book is dragging because the kids are locked into a room with the same routine; but i don't know if VC is that smart. 

The grandmother quizzes them about the bible, they repeat back verses much like an internet atheist. However, you'd think that asking kids to repeat verses from Job is just asking for trouble. If she told me to recite a verse, I think I might go directly to Ezekiel 23:20. Then again, Grandmother has a whip and she's not afraid to use it. 

The mother shows up at 6 pm every evening with gifts, books, games. Does she ever remove broken items, trash, etc? 

Momma worries about how she's getting fat. Because that's what your children who are locked into an attic care about. How you aren't getting your daily run in because you bring food to your imprisoned children. 

The kids go to the attic and break a piano trying to tune it and listen to old records on a Victrola (records are these things we listened to music and audio recordings on before tapes, which came before CDS. You can still find CDs for sale sometimes. It was much less convenient than an MP3 but the sound quality was amazing and it's all probably  nostalgia for me.) 

Carrie is a brat. 

The kids take lots of baths because they are bored. 

They mock the grandmother, which is dangerous because you never know where she might be lurking.  

Cathy starts calling the twins "our twins" which is bizarre and sad. As they are the primary caregiver now, the twins are exhibiting learned helplessness at times with temper tantrums more suited to 3-year-old toddlers rather than 5-year-old children who should be in school,

Carrie will only wear ruffled lace panties, which I'm not sure is information we need, nor does it develop the character in any meaningful way.  

We also get our first glimpse at the reality of living in a room with kids not long out of diapers. Carrie gets diarrhea from fruit, Cory has a temperamental bladder. Cory is frequently peeing in a blue vase and Cathy is washing out lacy ruffled panties. Gross. 

They try to explain why they are imprisoned to the twins and it's just sad. 

Halfway through the chapter Momma didn't show up on a Sunday until the evening. She came in dressed for sailing, tan, bragging about how she's made plans for the afternoon, though she was kind enough to cut them short so she could see her children for five minutes before dinner. Her brothers taught her to sail. Which is pretty contradictory to the original claims that nothing fun was allowed in the Foxworth Ancestral Home. 

Cathy grows a tiny bit of a backbone and pushes back and asks why. Until Chris comes down and tells her to stop shouting at "our mother." He's such an ass. He kisses up to her a bit, complimenting her on her outfit and hugging her. Cathy shouts a bit, tells her she has to tell her father about them, that she wants to go sailing. Momma does the dramatic thing and sinks weakly into a chair. 

And then she confesses that she hasn't been honest. Well, shut the front door, I did NOT see that coming.

The letter that was written before they moved to Foxworth had a note from the grandfather. The grandfather said that he was glad that Christopher the Elder was dead and the only good thing about the marriage was that it hadn't created any Devil's Issue. (WTF?) Mother Olivia made plans for the concealment of the children that Grandfather didn't read. Cathy compares Chris to their father in the middle of this. 

Anyway, it takes over a page for mamma to come out and say that she plans on keeping the kids in the attic until Grandfather dies. Mother of the Year, might as well ship that right off to Foxworth. 

Links to previous recaps 

  1. Prologue and "Good-Bye Daddy"
  2. "The Road to Riches"
  3. "The Grandmother's House"
  4. "The Attic"
  5. "The Wrath of God"
  6. "Momma's Story"
  • Upvote 9

10 Comments


Recommended Comments

Destiny

Posted

These books are so so bad. I have no idea how child me didn't notice.

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Shocked

Posted

9 hours ago, Destiny said:

These books are so so bad. I have no idea how child me didn't notice.

Yep and sadly I read the first 2 and have the 3rd one getting dusty on my shelf. It only gets worse....

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
FloraDoraDolly

Posted (edited)

With the later books, we also get into all kinds of continuity issues. Corrine's version in "Petals on the Wind" of what the grandfather knew and when he knew it is completely different from Olivia's version in "Garden of Shadows" (which was mostly written by the ghostwriter after V.C. Andrews's death). We don't learn much of anything from "If There Be Thorns" because it's told by the POV of a creepy nine-year-old. And "Seeds of Yesterday" is mostly a tale of inertia.

Edited by FloraDoraDolly
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo?

Posted

I had to do a quick search to help me remember which of the books I read. Seeing the old covers helped. I stopped reading the Foxworth series after these five.

Spoiler

Screenshot_20170721-002303.thumb.jpg.c094d98a4d394308d01dcf3d4005f852.jpg

Those illustrations were creepy!

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
FloraDoraDolly

Posted

For those younger folks who missed the original versions of these books, there was a hole in each of these front covers where the character's face is. So when you flipped open the front cover, it took you to a secondary front cover, where you'd see the full picture of the character-- and more! (And people wonder why these books appealed to kids?)

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo?

Posted (edited)

Here's the original Flowers in the Attic cover:b5ed886fdee31786cad2627a26a25f8c.jpg.0a48df1a4a1b4a892aaa2335d7dd5963.jpg

And I found a description of how the design team came up with the idea.

Edited by WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo?
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Maggie Mae

Posted

@WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo? the flower/face with the petal being ripped off of it is weird and creepy; Ii think I prefer the creepy kids in the attic with the cutout. Or the current cover which is perfectly bland. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo?

Posted

@Maggie Mae--I wonder if anyone who buys the book with the new bland cover is ever surprised by the creepiness of the book? It's pretty well known as an incest-fest, so I guess it isn't likely that people get blindsided.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Maggie Mae

Posted

@WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo? There have also been two movies, and I don't think anyone is buying this book who hasn't already read it. I mean, maybe a kid found it in the library or something, but it doesn't seem like it should be a timeless classic that lasts beyond our generation. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Shocked

Posted

I have the original ones with the cut out cover.

On ‎7‎/‎20‎/‎2017 at 5:02 PM, FloraDoraDolly said:

With the later books, we also get into all kinds of continuity issues. Corrine's version in "Petals on the Wind" of what the grandfather knew and when he knew it is completely different from Olivia's version in "Garden of Shadows" (which was mostly written by the ghostwriter after V.C. Andrews's death). We don't learn much of anything from "If There Be Thorns" because it's told by the POV of a creepy nine-year-old. And "Seeds of Yesterday" is mostly a tale of inertia.

Good to know that there are discrepancies. I don't know if I'll ever continue on anyways. There's another writer who incorporates incest stuff into her books. I wish I could remember her name but her books were wonderfully written besides that whole weird incest thing.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Pancakes@Tiffany's

      Posted

      Edith, Evangeline, Elaine, Ethel, Evonne, Enola, Esme, Elmira, Eileen, and Eudora. Ethan, Emanuel, Edward, Everett, Easton, Errol, Earnest, Erasmus, Ezekiel, and Ellis. 

      I’d add Ebony to the list, but the Kellers really can’t go with that one unless they actually adopt.

    • noseybutt

      Posted (edited)

      33 minutes ago, hoipolloi said:

      Well, we know what Mike said when James & Shoshanna married in 2004 & he seemed to think James was great then. Typically, neither Mike nor Debi has ever acknowledged Shoshanna's or Gabe's divorces, although they have been backpedaling on some of their hardline stuff in recent NGJ articles.

      Shoshanna's IG reel is so garbled it's hard to understand but she seems to be saying that, essentially, her divorce was good because she wanted it. This comports with the primary rule of the Pearls' teachings: Do as we say and not as we do.

      Re: Jeremiah's engagement. Not surprising and also not surprising that Shoshanna seems to have memory-holed all of her advice about not getting married too young.

      Shoshannaonyoungmarriagein2022..thumb.png.1d2cc6255fe1839a3685bb51a4800caa.png

      Jeremiah's cousin, Shalom Brand's oldest, Janelle, got married at 17 in 2022. It's what these people do. 


      Whoa. Since spouses now have rights, I give it 6 months to a year for a public change in the Pearl's divorce theology. 


       

      Edited by noseybutt
    • Marmion

      Posted

      18 hours ago, MariaariaM said:

      Curious foreigner here: is normal in the US to spell out 2024, 5:30, and May but use numerals for the 23rd day OF May? My Dutch teacher would have had a red pen ball.

       

      Yes it is actually .  Though there are some difference in the order in which dates are written , depending upon whether it's American or British English . 

       

      Spoiler

       

       

    • hoipolloi

      Posted (edited)

      3 hours ago, noseybutt said:

      we don't know, really, what opinion her parents had of it. I mean, we know that they are stridently anti-divorce in general terms BUT they are so two-faced that I wouldn't necessarily conclude they were anti-divorce in her situation. IOW, it's hard to know if she was going against her parents wishes or abiding by it.

      Well, we know what Mike said when James & Shoshanna married in 2004 & he seemed to think James was great then. Typically, neither Mike nor Debi has ever acknowledged Shoshanna's or Gabe's divorces, although they have been backpedaling on some of their hardline stuff in recent NGJ articles.

      Shoshanna's IG reel is so garbled it's hard to understand but she seems to be saying that, essentially, her divorce was good because she wanted it. This comports with the primary rule of the Pearls' teachings: Do as we say and not as we do.

      Re: Jeremiah's engagement. Not surprising -- and also not surprising that Shoshanna seems to have memory-holed all of her advice about not getting married too young.

      Shoshannaonyoungmarriagein2022..thumb.png.1d2cc6255fe1839a3685bb51a4800caa.png

      Jeremiah's cousin, Shalom Brand's oldest, Janelle, got married at 17 in 2022. It's what these people do. 

      Edited by hoipolloi
      • WTF 1
      • Thank You 1
    • Marmion

      Posted (edited)

      On 3/25/2024 at 12:29 PM, Cults-r-us said:

      I accidentally deleted my pic. Does anyone know what skirts-wearing fundie sect wears round, doily-ish head coverings? We saw them at a dinosaur museum. The girls had on white ones (assume single)  and the girl with kids had black, so I assume she's married

       

      Those have become rather generic among various head covering wearing Christian sects .  I have come to most commonly associate this style of headwear with the Beachy Amish-Mennonites I had played volleyball with several years ago .  I am still Facebook friends with one of the young women I'd met there , whom has since left the church . For reference,  here is a picture of one of them playing along side me .    

       

      image.png.e921cc84f7965e890d8c2c5e132ddbd2.png

      Edited by Marmion


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.