Jump to content
  • entries
    20
  • comments
    64
  • views
    2,769

Photography Ain't Easy


SpoonfulOSugar

1,255 views

It's definitely not easy when your subjects are independent li'l cusses which move very quickly.

I was out early doing chores the other morning, when a neighbor kitten came to visit.

He's a cutie pie and *very* curious.

Spoiler

8_1_Junior_in_the_garden.JPG

So, since I was tired and taking a break, I thought I'd try to get some shots of him.

Here he is investigating the Jerusalem artichoke.

Spoiler

8_1_Junior_investigates.JPG

Now, to be fair, I have trouble shooting outside in bright light because the polarization on my glasses interferes with the screen on the camera.  But this shot is just bad:

Spoiler

8_1_Junior_out_of_focus.JPG

So I tried again.  Something's in focus - but it's not the kitten. :(

Spoiler

8 1 Junior out two.JPG

"Don't give up!"  I said to myself.  "You can get something spectacular!"

Unfortunately, my subject was tired of posing.

Spoiler

8_1_Junior_butt.JPG

That's why I prefer to photograph flowers!

  • Upvote 10

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

Imrlgoddess

Posted

I love marmalade kitties....my sister has been owned by three and they have all been adventurous Tom Cats.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Karma

Posted

Aaaaggghhhh polarisation of glasses and trying to take a portrait photo.  Sooo aggravating.  Plus the indicators on our train stations are polarised as well, so are black if you're wearing prescription sunglasses.  It looks a bit odd to turn your head to the side to read it. Take the glasses off and it's too blurry to read it.  Who invents these things?

cute cat btw

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
SpoonfulOSugar

Posted

6 minutes ago, Karma said:

Aaaaggghhhh polarisation of glasses and trying to take a portrait photo.  Sooo aggravating.  Plus the indicators on our train stations are polarised as well, so are black if you're wearing prescription sunglasses.  It looks a bit odd to turn your head to the side to read it. Take the glasses off and it's too blurry to read it.  Who invents these things?

cute cat btw

No one told me about the polarization problems when I got my new prescription.  I like them otherwise - but it is *SEVERELY* annoying when I can't make the camera work.  I really should go back to my contacts - I saw better with them and didn't have these problems!

(I've debated trying without the glasses, but if I cannot see the E on the eye chart, how would I see the images?)

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Karma

Posted (edited)

No, no one told me either.  I thought the indicator boards at the train station weren't working at first.  My distance vision isn't that bad, but my close up vision is poor, particularly in my left eye, and once I needed distance glasses as well as close up I opted for multifocals.  Took a while to get used to them, but they've been great.  I do find though that I'm taking more landscape photos than I used to, and cropping them to portrait on the computer, which is stupid.  Or I take the glasses off, and point and shoot.  Which is possible since I have a point and shoot camera, and don't have to focus :) .  If I close my left eye I can kind of see what is on the screen.

Edited by Karma
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Red Hair, Black Dress

      Posted (edited)

      I think she unenthusiastically said yes to the first man Scotty Brown (not/never father of the year) convinced/ coerced to take her and the 6 step kids.

      Hope she is happy, but intuition tells me no, and that she believes the unhappiness is normal married life.

      Really really really hope she wasn't "convicted" to have more children.

      Edited by Red Hair, Black Dress
    • JermajestyDuggar

      Posted

      20 hours ago, zimona said:

      Childless semi-old catlady here. I don't hate kids. I hate parents who don't bother to teach their kids (age apropriate, of course) about boundaries. I'm quite happy to let kids be kids. But if they start to actively pester me and intrude on me (like trying to drink from MY lemonade in a Café, or wiping their chocolate covered fingers on my backpack during train rides...) then I will speak up and tell them to stop, and I'm fully aware that to the innocent bystander I might come across as 'hating' kids, especially since I might be a bit worked up at that point. I'm not blaming the kids, they don't know better. I'm blaming those parents who shy away from putting a brake on their kids' (sometimes) too exuberant behaviour. 

      What’s funny is I often say this about dogs! 🤣🤣🤣 Every time I find myself hating a dog, I realize I just hate how horrible the owner is. It’s always someone who lets their dog get away with the most horrific behavior at the expense of other people. 

      • Upvote 4
      • I Agree 1
    • 4boysmum

      Posted

      I have a bunch of kids and as much as I love them they also drive me nuts.  They can be loud and messy.  The younger ones are still figuring out where their personal space ends and other people's (mostly mine!) begins.  But I can't ever imagine them doing something like drinking someone else's lemonade.  And if they ever took leave of their senses long enough to try, I would deal with it ASAP and also buy you another lemonade.

      My kids are my responsibility and if they act up in public it's my job to correct them or take them somewhere else so they aren't disturbing others.  

      But I have also occasionally come across people who do seem to resent children being present in public at all.  Don't think they should be brought to restaurants, etc.  I couldn't say what percentage of the childfree population feels that way, but people like that do exist.  And I think it's a shame because (a) how do you teach kids to behave in places like restaurants if you don't take them to practice, and (b) if I've put in the work to teach my kids how to behave in various places and they are not being disruptive, they really do have just as much right to be there as any other segment of the population.

      • Upvote 1
      • I Agree 2
    • CarrotCake

      Posted

      It makes me wonder: would these modesty-fundies be okay with swimwear on girls-only trips?

      In this case it is filmed and published so the same standards as public places would apply but what if it was a private moment between friends and family?

      For instance, Muslim women do not dress with the same modesty standards in the private of their household.

      • Upvote 1
    • EmiSue

      Posted

      3 hours ago, CarrotCake said:

      There is also a toy rabbit with a pink ribbon in the picture.

      Either they use it to honor Isla or it’s an announcement for a girl. 

      My guess is to honor Isla, since she'd be a few months old now if she made it, but could be both.

      • Upvote 1


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.