Jump to content
  • entries
    20
  • comments
    64
  • views
    2,737

Photography Ain't Easy


SpoonfulOSugar

1,238 views

It's definitely not easy when your subjects are independent li'l cusses which move very quickly.

I was out early doing chores the other morning, when a neighbor kitten came to visit.

He's a cutie pie and *very* curious.

Spoiler

8_1_Junior_in_the_garden.JPG

So, since I was tired and taking a break, I thought I'd try to get some shots of him.

Here he is investigating the Jerusalem artichoke.

Spoiler

8_1_Junior_investigates.JPG

Now, to be fair, I have trouble shooting outside in bright light because the polarization on my glasses interferes with the screen on the camera.  But this shot is just bad:

Spoiler

8_1_Junior_out_of_focus.JPG

So I tried again.  Something's in focus - but it's not the kitten. :(

Spoiler

8 1 Junior out two.JPG

"Don't give up!"  I said to myself.  "You can get something spectacular!"

Unfortunately, my subject was tired of posing.

Spoiler

8_1_Junior_butt.JPG

That's why I prefer to photograph flowers!

  • Upvote 10

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

Imrlgoddess

Posted

I love marmalade kitties....my sister has been owned by three and they have all been adventurous Tom Cats.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Karma

Posted

Aaaaggghhhh polarisation of glasses and trying to take a portrait photo.  Sooo aggravating.  Plus the indicators on our train stations are polarised as well, so are black if you're wearing prescription sunglasses.  It looks a bit odd to turn your head to the side to read it. Take the glasses off and it's too blurry to read it.  Who invents these things?

cute cat btw

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
SpoonfulOSugar

Posted

6 minutes ago, Karma said:

Aaaaggghhhh polarisation of glasses and trying to take a portrait photo.  Sooo aggravating.  Plus the indicators on our train stations are polarised as well, so are black if you're wearing prescription sunglasses.  It looks a bit odd to turn your head to the side to read it. Take the glasses off and it's too blurry to read it.  Who invents these things?

cute cat btw

No one told me about the polarization problems when I got my new prescription.  I like them otherwise - but it is *SEVERELY* annoying when I can't make the camera work.  I really should go back to my contacts - I saw better with them and didn't have these problems!

(I've debated trying without the glasses, but if I cannot see the E on the eye chart, how would I see the images?)

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Karma

Posted (edited)

No, no one told me either.  I thought the indicator boards at the train station weren't working at first.  My distance vision isn't that bad, but my close up vision is poor, particularly in my left eye, and once I needed distance glasses as well as close up I opted for multifocals.  Took a while to get used to them, but they've been great.  I do find though that I'm taking more landscape photos than I used to, and cropping them to portrait on the computer, which is stupid.  Or I take the glasses off, and point and shoot.  Which is possible since I have a point and shoot camera, and don't have to focus :) .  If I close my left eye I can kind of see what is on the screen.

Edited by Karma
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Ozlsn

      Posted

      Ok, I am not going to say I haven't read the left leaning conspiracy theories about this shooting, even if I'm trying to hold off until we have more verified information.

      But I don't get where this "Biden sent the shooter" idiocy is coming from because seriously here? He has an actual job, with stuff to do etc. Now if you wanted me to believe Steve Bannon sent the shooter I would be more receptive, mostly because it's the kind of out there theory I can get behind.

    • Ozlsn

      Posted

      3 hours ago, Bassett Lady said:

      I don’t mind that they want to see people they love, but why the prevarication

      Doesn't fit in with the "we need a safe and stable home across the country " grifting theme. I don't think people would have donated as much if they knew there was a planned holiday in the middle, and I am wondering how many donors are now side-eyeing the hell out of them. Because that wasn't a small omission there, it was strongly implied that both flights were sequential and necessary to get to where they are planning to live.

      I swear if it turns out they've moved two suburbs away in Seattle... I will probably laugh. I doubt this is the case - why fly the cats? - but part of me is expecting to find out they've moved to Salem, Oregon, or Sacramento.

      • Upvote 1
    • noseybutt

      Posted

      It is possible for spouses and children of defendants in federal CSA/child porn cases to request (and receive) mental health services through the Federal Defender Victim/Witness programs. But the key detail is that it has to be requested and typically that happens in situations where the spouse is trying to separate/divorce from the offender.

      • Thank You 1
    • HumbleJillyMuffin

      Posted

      8 minutes ago, Bassett Lady said:

      “The discrimination was awful, and TSA held us up for over an hour and made us late for our first flight.”

      My husband flies with his mobility assistance gear all the time for work, including into and out of Seattle. He says their claim sounds like absolute rubbish. Every interaction he has had with the Seattle airport has been professional, swift,  and courteous. 
       

      Over the years he has used a  cane, walker, manual wheelchair and power chair. At every turn the Seattle airport has been kind and competent, 

      Well we all know how entitled Artemis is, no surprise they figured they could run late and the TSA line would part for them like the Red Sea in the Ten Commandments because they have mobility devices and cats. The "awful discrimination" was probably other people who told them to wait in line and the TSA staff probably reiterated that using mobility devices does not give them the right to expect special treatment. 

      • Upvote 1
      • I Agree 1
    • Coconut Flan

      Posted

      Counseling would come from a different court than the criminal court Josh was in.  It would only be ordered due to a CPS investigation.  



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.