Jump to content

Randumb Thoughts

  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Twenty Minutes of Action



It's time for me to hop back on the serious issue bandwagon here. 

In January of 2015, a student at Stanford University sexually assaulted and raped an unconscious woman behind a dumpster.  His actions were so heinous and despicable that one of the two witnesses who saw what he did, broke down and cried as he held the assailant down until police arrived.  The victim is forever scarred by this incident, as you might imagine.  She went out drinking and passed out.  Not a wise choice on her part, obviously, but that is in NO way an excuse to be fondled and penetrated without knowing about it.  This woman's life has been immeasurably altered forever.  Not for the next few months or even years, but FOREVER.

The assailant was found guilty of rape and faced a possible 10-year prison sentence.  In a plea for leniency, the boy's father wrote a letter to the judge, explaining that his son's personality has changed since the night of this event.  He's no longer "easy going" and no longer carries a "welcoming smile."  He's been kicked out of an elite college institution, as well he should be, and facing a maximum sentence "Is a steep price to pay for 20 minutes of action."


Say what???  Even this young guy can't believe it!  Sure, I get that this father loves his son and wants to protect him.  But those 20 minutes have permanently affected the life of another human being.  If she's lucky, she will get through this and lead a successful life, but it will forever haunt her and likely damage her ability to trust men, let alone people in general.  It's not like the boy egged someone's house and it can be cleaned up.  NO!  This is harm inflicted on another human being that will NEVER go away or be cleaned up.  Even if he serves a full 10-year sentence, he gets out in half that time most likely and can live his life knowing what he did.  Yes, he's now got a damaged record and is a registered sex offender, but that hardly compares to the anguish and torment the victim likely will deal with for the REST OF HER LIFE!

I don't know what the judge was thinking or if the boy's wealthy family background and high-priced legal representation had anything to do with the ultimate decision, but the sentence issued was six months.

Are you f*cking kidding me?  How is this justice?  In her own words, the victim says she has suffered "irreversible damage."  With this light sentence, our society has suffered irreversible damage as well.

Just sayin...


  • Upvote 3


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Smee


      12 hours ago, Giraffe said:

      I was thinking this after the latest post. I wonder how many of their "patients" are still alive one year after their "treatment." I'd also like to know how many people begin actual medical treatment after leaving there. Eta my guess is not many. If they're deep enough into the woo to go there in the first place* they may dig their heals in further upon leaving. 

      *and wealthy enough. Even if they fundraise and sell everything they can to go down there there's still some degree of financial ability to do it. (On that note I wonder how many "patients" or their families come back to the states destitute. 

      Someone posted a link about this way upthread somewhere - a youtube guy who went searching to see how many patients who had started GoFundMes had evidence of being alive or deceased a couple of years post treatment. The stats were pretty much what you'd expect

    • GreenBeans


      6 hours ago, Giraffe said:

      I find it strange having a name theme. I'm used to John and Jane happen to start with the same letter and since they stopped at two they technically had a "theme" but only because those were the names they liked. It wasn't some "we have to come up with a name we like that fits the theme." Maybe it's just me but I find it weird that so many second gen Kellers have an intentional theme. (Outside of bible names or something. Eta so I guess I'm used to "bible names" being a theme.  But starting with the same letter is weird to me)

      I think the whole idea of a “name theme” is kind of foreign to me. The biggest family I know personally have 3 kids. More than 3 is really uncommon here. Parents will usually gravitate towards somewhat similar types of names (in terms of social background connotations, modern vs. traditional, similar “vibe”), but I’ve never heard of anyone with a naming theme outside of FJ.

    • Giraffe


      1 hour ago, Mrs Ms said:

      Honestly, they could actually be working and still grifting for extra cash. We obviously can’t expect honesty or true transparency from them!

      I would almost be proud of them if they were pulling this off. 

      • Upvote 1
      • I Agree 1
    • Mrs Ms


      We have such an obscure naming theme that I’m not sure if my partner even noticed I did it! The obvious one is that all of us have names that are technically biblical, but so common that people don’t automatically associate it. The other 2 things with my kids nobody has ever picked up on.

      • Upvote 1
    • Mrs Ms


      Honestly, they could actually be working and still grifting for extra cash. We obviously can’t expect honesty or true transparency from them!

      • Upvote 2
      • I Agree 1

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.