Jump to content
IGNORED

Head of NOM caught at Gingrich fundraiser


dawn9476

Recommended Posts

In case anyone doesn't know, NOM is short for National Organization for Marriage, which is a far right group that exists to "Protect marriage" from gay people.

Now why would the head of an organization that is supposed to protect marriage going to an event for a man, who has been married three times and the reason why his first two marriages failed was because he cheated on his wife and wanted to move on with his mistresses? ::SMH::

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wh ... uJHVlbdL8k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the head of that org, is Maggie Gallagher, who was a single mom before marrying some time back...Gallagher made no bones about dissing OTHER single moms when she was still one herself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from the blog the OP linked to;

“Newt Gingrich would like to remind everybody that that marriage is between one man and one woman whom you abandon riddled with cancer on her hospital bed while you fuck the shit out of your mistress whom you later marry and cheat on with a third woman while screaming with Godly moral outrage about the infidelities of the president,†Jervis writes.

It's just so perfect I had to quote it here.

P.S. Do you get the feeling the Repubs are in "Anybody but Romney" mode?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P.S. Do you get the feeling the Repubs are in "Anybody but Romney" mode?

Absolutely. I am just glad no one is taking Michelle B. seriously any longer. This is going to be a very loooong election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P.S. Do you get the feeling the Repubs are in "Anybody but Romney" mode?

I think a lot of the social conservative Republicans are like that but the establishment Republicans want Romney. Though what sucks for the establishment Republicans is that it is typically social conservatives who vote in primaries while your pro-establishment Republicans, moderates and independents don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case anyone doesn't know, NOM is short for National Organization for Marriage, which is a far right group that exists to "Protect marriage" from gay people.

Now why would the head of an organization that is supposed to protect marriage going to an event for a man, who has been married three times and the reason why his first two marriages failed was because he cheated on his wife and wanted to move on with his mistresses? ::SMH::

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wh ... uJHVlbdL8k

Newt is not of teh ghey color.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from the blog the OP linked to;

“Newt Gingrich would like to remind everybody that that marriage is between one man and one woman whom you abandon riddled with cancer on her hospital bed while you fuck the shit out of your mistress whom you later marry and cheat on with a third woman while screaming with Godly moral outrage about the infidelities of the president,†Jervis writes.

It's just so perfect I had to quote it here.

P.S. Do you get the feeling the Repubs are in "Anybody but Romney" mode?

I think Romney is going to win the nomination. Newt has too much baggage. I would vote for Romney over Obama

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was the rumor. She was on her death bed.

the quote said that she was on her hospital bed, riddled with cancer. she obviously survived. just because someone is hospitalized with cancer doesn't mean that they're on their death bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Romney is going to win the nomination. Newt has too much baggage. I would vote for Romney over Obama

The only way Romney wins is if more people who don't hate him for Romneycare and/or being Mormon turn out, which will be easier said than done in this toxic political environment and due to the fact that moderates and independents tend to skip primaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silly rabbits, the GOP nomination is for good Christians like Newt - not for Mormons like Mitt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the Cancer thing isn't true, Newt is still a man, who portrayed himself back when he was in congress, and still portrays himself as this big family values guy when he committed adultery twice and is on his third marriage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the Cancer thing isn't true, Newt is still a man, who portrayed himself back when he was in congress, and still portrays himself as this big family values guy when he committed adultery twice and is on his third marriage.

Newt is smarter than the rest of the pack. He just has too much baggage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the Cancer thing isn't true, Newt is still a man, who portrayed himself back when he was in congress, and still portrays himself as this big family values guy when he committed adultery twice and is on his third marriage.

According to this Salon article she did have cancer when they separated and divorced. Apparently an old Mother Jones article reported he showed up at the hospital with legal papers for her to sign. His spokesperson says no.

Either way, this was a guy who tried to hound Clinton out of office, and wasn't exactly pure as the driven snow himself.

http://www.salon.com/2011/03/08/gingric ... al_cancer/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the Cancer thing isn't true, Newt is still a man, who portrayed himself back when he was in congress, and still portrays himself as this big family values guy when he committed adultery twice and is on his third marriage.

Ah, but he converted to Catholicism before marrying Calista, who is a devout Catholic who has been seen at Opus Dei fundraisers even.

So, wouldn't the church have annulled his previous marriages? Therefore, no adultery because he was never really married before!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, but he converted to Catholicism before marrying Calista, who is a devout Catholic who has been seen at Opus Dei fundraisers even.

So, wouldn't the church have annulled his previous marriages? Therefore, no adultery because he was never really married before!

My understanding is that his Catholic conversion occurred after his marriage to Calista. He did ask for an annulment of his 19 year marriage to his second wife on the grounds that she'd been previously married (as had he but that apparently wasn't at issue) but I don't know whether the annulment was granted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.