Jana Duggar 13: I Don't Think She Will :(

[goddefinedcalves]

1 hour ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

Speaking of fundie couples who look like brother and sister… Marjorie Jackson’s sister and her husband look like twins. I swear if we face swap it wouldn’t be a huge difference.

“Corporate is asking you to find the difference between these pictures…”

[AussieKrissy]

6 minutes ago, goddefinedcalves said:

“Corporate is asking you to find the difference between these pictures…”

Omg it just looks like she has a weight gain (or pregnancy puff) and he just looks younger. Super same same but different. What’s Majorie been up too? 

[JermajestyDuggar]

28 minutes ago, AussieKrissy said:

Omg it just looks like she has a weight gain (or pregnancy puff) and he just looks younger. Super same same but different. What’s Majorie been up too? 

Working for FRC in DC like Josh before he got fired. 

[AussieKrissy]

4 hours ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

Working for FRC in DC like Josh before he got fired. 

Oh yes, thanks. That now rings a bell. 

[CarrotCake]

6 hours ago, goddefinedcalves said:

“Corporate is asking you to find the difference between these pictures…”

Hahahahaha

I remember someone did this for the Pecans before and it had the same effect 🤣

[medimus]

OMG, I didn't even notice they had been switched!

Spoiler

Spoiler

 

 

 

[gustava]

21 hours ago, ihaveanexamintwodays said:

Maybe that's why he wore the beard xD

I think they both look very smug!

 

[JermajestyDuggar]

50 minutes ago, gustava said:

I think they both look very smug!

 

I think they probably use some sort of birth control because he’s in med school and they’ve had no pregnant announcement since they got married. 

[Flossie]

On 10/26/2021 at 6:20 PM, mpheels said:

One advantage to waiting until after the trial - no question about if and how Josh can attend. If he’s convicted, he doesn’t attend. If there is a wedding soon after, people might have enough pity and self restraint to politely ignore the elephant in the room. On the off chance he’s acquitted, then he can attend without any restrictions and the family gets to boast about their blessings.

The smart thing to do if Josh gets off, is for he to not go to the wedding.

A PR statement could be released saying that the Josh Duggar family won't be attending.  They and their children have had a tough time lately, and although Josh has been exonerated from the vile charges alleged against him, he and Anna don't want to draw attention away from the bride and groom.  Instead, they will be watching remotely.  They send their love and best wishes to the happy couple and will include them in their daily prayers.

But if Bob is really savvy, he'll not tell the public that Josh won't be there.  Then he can live stream the wedding at a nominal cost.  While he's at it, he can sprinkle the attendees with a few people who resemble Josh and Anna.  Open a chat, and keep the viewers hooked as they try spot the real Josh.

Keep key parts of the wedding hidden while the cameras focus on the audience, and then he can get paid again from TLC when they show the entire wedding.

[theotherelise]

I think Stephen and Hannah look more alike than Jana and Jeremiah. 

 

[LanaBanana]

WOACB is claiming that Jana was charged with Endangering the Welfare of a Minor back on Sep 10th and has a court date scheduled for January 2022. Apparently she verified the info with the Elm Springs District Court, but I don't see anywhere this info could be found without contacting them directly. If this is made up, she's about to get her butt sued. If not... there goes the whole "Jana didn't get married to protect her younger sisters narrative.

Edit:

Looks like Duggar Data was able to confirm the charge.

https://duggardata.tumblr.com/post/670210060662849536/but-turns-out-you-can-search-online-for-your

Edited December 10, 2021 by LanaBanana

[xenobia]

5 minutes ago, LanaBanana said:

WOACB is claiming that Jana was charged with Endangering the Welfare of a Minor back on Sep 10th and has a court date scheduled for January 2022. Apparently she verified the info with the Elm Springs District Court, but I don't see anywhere this info could be found without contacting them directly. If this is made up, she's about to get her butt sued. If not... there goes the whole "Jana didn't get married to protect her younger sisters narrative.

I would guess that it's true, since it would be easy to check for anyone who wants to. The court date is also just a month away. Well, I can't say I'm totally surprised. 

[Laura2730]

Does anyone know what endangerment of a minor could mean, like examples?

[hauntedoklahoma]

Washington County (where Elm Springs is located) reports their dockets to CourtConnect.

https://caseinfo.arcourts.gov/cconnect/PROD/public/ck_public_qry_main.cp_main_idx

Edited December 10, 2021 by hauntedoklahoma

[ihaveanexamintwodays]

1 minute ago, Laura2730 said:

Does anyone know what endangerment of a minor could mean, like examples?

DuggarData mentions Jana's the "recklessly endangering a minor (as opposed to knowingly doing so)" - which off the top of my head makes me think reckless driving, though I'm sure plenty of other possibilities. Maybe she was speeding with one of the lost girls in the car? 

[FiveAcres]

3 minutes ago, Laura2730 said:

Does anyone know what endangerment of a minor could mean, like examples?

Driving a child without a car seat?

Leaving a child unattended in a car?

Leaving a child alone in a hotel room?

 

[LanaBanana]

7 minutes ago, Laura2730 said:

Does anyone know what endangerment of a minor could mean, like examples?

(1) A person commits the offense of endangering the welfare of a minor in the third degree if the person recklessly engages in conduct creating a substantial risk of serious harm to the physical or mental welfare of a person known by the actor to be a minor.

(2) As used in this section, "serious harm to the physical or mental welfare" means physical or mental injury that causes:

     (A) Protracted disfigurement;

     (B) Protracted impairment of physical or mental health; or

     (C) Loss or protracted impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ.

[Laura2730]

[xenobia]

I checked Woacb's instagram. Some quotes: 

 "....we reached out to Elm Springs District Court in Arkansas, to verify if charges were filed.
The County Clerk confirmed that on September 10, 2021, Jana Duggar was charged with Endangering the Welfare of a minor.
They did not reveal any further details about the specifics of the case".

"Yesterday we reported that the insider said that Children in Jana’s care allegedly wandered off the Duggar’s property. We have not confirmed the specifics."

Take it with a grain of salt, at least the second part. But it's a possible scenario.

[JermajestyDuggar]

To be completely honest, I would expect this charge to be extremely common amongst fundies. How many times have we seen fundies driving their kids all over without seatbelts or car seats? Fundies have gotten lucky in my opinion. Maybe Jana’s luck ran out. 

[imokit]

So not only did JB run for senate while his oldest was facing court for child porn.  He also did it knowing his 2nd child was awaiting court for endangering the welfare of a minor.

Talk about brilliant timing for the leak though!

Everyone move on from Josh, our kids are going through the legal system in order and its kid number 2s turn for the limelight.

Forget about the child sexual abuse, move onto child endangerment.

Edited December 10, 2021 by imokit
typo

[TuringMachine]

10 minutes ago, xenobia said:

"Yesterday we reported that the insider said that Children in Jana’s care allegedly wandered off the Duggar’s property. We have not confirmed the specifics."

In Jana's care. Cause of course who the hell knows where JB and Michelle are.

[EyesOpen]

Wow. Who would file on her?

[Idlewild]

It seems odd to charge her with a criminal offence for a child wandering away. Of course we don’t know the age of the child or how they came to be found - normally a lost child would result in words from the police and nothing else?

[FiveAcres]

5 minutes ago, Idlewild said:

It seems odd to charge her with a criminal offence for a child wandering away. Of course we don’t know the age of the child or how they came to be found - normally a lost child would result in words from the police and nothing else?

Perhaps it has happened more than once?