Jump to content
IGNORED

(Possible Child Sexual Abuse Content) Josh and Anna 34: Plea Deal in the Making?


Coconut Flan

Recommended Posts

I wish Gothard and the ILBP would come up at trial to illustrate Joshly’s view towards CSA. Josh has been brought up to believe the children are to blame for the assault 

  • Upvote 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FiveAcres said:

I am hoping that Emily Baker will cover it on her Coffee and Cursey Words Tuesday morning Youtube show tomorrow. Unfortunately, I will have to listen to it later because I have promised to set up a PC for a friend. 

On the last Friday Night Live Sept 24, 2021) Emily said no Coffee and Cursey words or Friday night live this week because of work and travel. I'm hoping she'll do a special Duggar live or some shorts to cover it. 

  • Upvote 5
  • Thank You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, imokit said:

JB is also in a difficult position.  He's paying for the lawyers, but they are Josh's.  JB isn't getting any extra info other than what Josh says to him, the lawyers aren't allowed to tell him things Josh tells them in confidence.

If JB sees which way the wind is blowing (which I think he will, because there are lots of nasty things JB is, but stupid isn't one of them) and wants to stop funding the lawyers, that has its own public draw backs.  If JB had never funded them in the first place, that's fine (it would have looked better publicly), but now he's started, stopping will make bad headlines for JB.  JB stops supporting son, JB abandons son, why stop the funding now?  All sorts of nasty public headlines about his hypocrisy. 

It could also lead to retaliation from Josh or even Anna.  Either of them with nothing to lose could go to the press and release more of JBs dirty secrets.  We know JB has them, they may be legal (we don't know that he's broken laws), but he's certainly done scummy things which he wouldn't want the public knowing.  Stopping the funding and cutting Josh and Anna loose has its own very big risks and it may that for him continuing to poor money through the sinking ship, now he's started may be the least bad or a bunch of bad choices.

And if I'm feeling really nice about JB (which I'm not), he may be worried that pissing Anna and Josh off would damage the M kids who likely get a lot of emotional stability from Duggar support systems.  Though I suspect that the M kids are the least of his considerations, one could hope.

JB better be praying 24/7 that none of the other 18 kids realise that the money he earned by selling their childhoods and privacy is vanishing and if he carries on funding Josh, all the will get from the TLC years is infamy. Because then THEY could be the ones threatening to spill secrets to make him stop funding lawyers for the pest.

  • Upvote 17
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, onekidanddone said:

I wish Gothard and the ILBP would come up at trial to illustrate Joshly’s view towards CSA. Josh has been brought up to believe the children are to blame for the assault 

That would be nice, but I don’t think the motivations, family background would usually come up in a trial. It’s kind of irrelevant. Did he do it? Is it illegal? How illegal? How much time should he get. That’s about it. Unless his defense decides they should be brought up in order to show he was in a cult, and it somehow diminished his capacity to tell right from wrong. But even then — that’s a pretty huge stretch. He’s not a sheltered teenager. 

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so four of the motions were denied (yay!): 

36- Suppress statements 

38- Suppress photos of hands and feet

39- Appointments clause (the one Emily called novel but didn't think would fly)

40- Claims government failed to preserve evidence 

So that is awesome news, but I don't see anything about motion 37 suppressing the evidence from the search. Anyone know what that means? 

  • Upvote 8
  • Thank You 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw a picture of him and a very pregnant Anna. Maybe outside the hearing? He's smug as usual and she's beaming that "stand by my man" smile. Both gross!

(From Pickles)

Edited by Not that josh's mom
  • Upvote 3
  • Disgust 14
  • Sad 1
  • Eyeroll 2
  • WTF 2
  • Thank You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Court denies Josh Duggar's motions to toss photographs, dismiss child porn case (nwahomepage.com)

A pretrial conference is set for November 18 at 9 a.m. in Fayetteville. A jury trial is set for November 30 at 9 a.m. in Fayetteville.

Another article, nothing new in it but a reminder of the pretrial conference November 18th. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Thank You 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Not that josh's mom said:

Just saw a picture of him and a very pregnant Anna. Maybe outside the hearing? He's smug as usual and she's beaming that "stand by my man" smile. Both gross!

(From Pickles)

can you cut and paste it please I am at work and unable to access social media 

  • Upvote 6
  • Rufus Bless 1
  • Thank You 1
  • Love 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The comments WOACB’s seemed to speculate on the witnesses be David Waller. I haven’t listened to her video though 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What expressions the photographer caught.  (A single photo doesn't have to have a spoiler.) 

image.png.be90cb4e5a8deb9447922b987ef33ffc.png

Edited by Coconut Flan
  • Upvote 6
  • Disgust 13
  • Sad 1
  • WTF 8
  • Thank You 24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Coconut Flan said:

What expressions the photographer caught.  (A single photo doesn't have to have a spoiler.) 

image.png.be90cb4e5a8deb9447922b987ef33ffc.png

fuck I dont know who I wanna smack more 

Thats it I am done with anna never again will I give her any sympathy she is my first bet to smack cause she aint pregnant in her head 

  • Upvote 24
  • Haha 8
  • I Agree 10
  • Love 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mela99 said:

I can’t decide if I think she’s clenching her jaw, holding in vomit, or both.

more like i cant decide what i am doing out of those two things based off my reaction to that pic

  • Upvote 6
  • Haha 5
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to those who posted the pictures. I couldn't figure out how to do that. Or maybe gagging too much to try?

  • Upvote 5
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Not that josh's mom said:

Thanks to those who posted the pictures. I couldn't figure out how to do that. Or maybe gagging too much to try?

thank fuck you are not that Josh's Mum 

or Anna's for that matter either

 

  • Upvote 9
  • Haha 2
  • I Agree 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty easy, copy image, and then paste.  Right click on the photo on the other forum and select copy image and then put the cursor in the post block and right click and select paste.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thank You 5
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mrs Ms said:

JB better be praying 24/7 that none of the other 18 kids realise that the money he earned by selling their childhoods and privacy is vanishing and if he carries on funding Josh, all the will get from the TLC years is infamy. Because then THEY could be the ones threatening to spill secrets to make him stop funding lawyers for the pest.

I think some of them must realize that they are owed some of the money that is going to Josh’s defense but may not feel that they can go against JB.  We shouldn’t forget that they were raised to revere their father.  There were probably a number of beatings, going without food and family shaming for those who challenged or disobeyed while they were all growing up.  You don’t break away from that easily, especially if you have remained in the cult by marrying someone from a similar family.

There may be family arguments about this, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there was some indignation about all the money Josh is costing them, but I don’t see them threatening to reveal family secrets.

As far as JB feeling that he has to save face and not “abandon” Josh, his “out” may very well be his other responsibilities.  

For example, Headline:  “With no more income from TLC, Jim Bob Duggar stops funding Josh’s defense.” Report:  “‘We have spent more than what would have been his inheritance when his mother and I died,’ said the reality show patriarch. ‘We have to think of the other 18 children, and we also have to look after Josh and Anna’s children, who are innocent victims of the left-wing conspiracy against their father.’  Explaining that he understood that a public defender might not have as much time to give Josh’s case as another lawyer might, Jim Bob said that he thought Josh’s case should be simple from this point on, and that they were all praying to Jesus in whose hands we all are.”  Or something like that.

  • Upvote 17
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't believe how smug they both look. I've tried to understand Anna, but no more "maybe she doesn't understand" or "but she's brainwashed". She just plain f'd up! How could you stand by him smiling? The lawyers needed to get them out a back way or something. Whatever sympathy someone might have had must be gone now. Ugh ugh ugh!

  • Upvote 20
  • I Agree 16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, AussieKrissy said:

fuck I dont know who I wanna smack more 

Thats it I am done with anna never again will I give her any sympathy she is my first bet to smack cause she aint pregnant in her head 

You know, my response was to think, “Poor woman!”

I think she is a complacent, enabling idiot, but she is also very pregnant, her husband is more trouble than he is worth, and she thinks she has to “stay sweet” and smile when most of us would use the pregnancy to hide at home instead of going to stand by him in court.

She is really pathetic.  
 

ETA: I don’t think she is smug.  I think she just doesn’t have any suitable expression for what she is going through. To me, her “smile” looks sort of sick, and Josh’s is surely a borderline, “shit-eating grin.”  

Edited by EmCatlyn
  • Upvote 17
  • Confused 1
  • I Agree 9
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, EmCatlyn said:

You know, my response was to think, “Poor woman!”

I think she is a complacent, enabling idiot, but she is also very pregnant, her husband is more trouble than he is worth, and thinks she has to “stay sweet” and smile when most of us would use the pregnancy to hide at home instead of going to stand by him in court.

She is really pathetic.

I honestly dont think that she is that good of an actress to stay that sweet 

I take it on face value she is a smug as fuck and standing by her man

  • Upvote 12
  • I Agree 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • nelliebelle1197 locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.