Jump to content
IGNORED

Trump 40: Donald Trump and the Chamber of Incompetence


Destiny

Recommended Posts

"Trump hotel emoluments case is at federal appeals court as president asks for it to be thrown out"

Spoiler

RICHMOND — President Trump’s luxury hotel in downtown Washington and the foreign dignitaries who book rooms and host events there are central to a novel appeals court case Tuesday involving anti-corruption provisions of the Constitution.

The attorneys general for Maryland and the District of Columbia contend that the president is illegally profiting from the Trump International Hotel’s foreign and state government visitors and that his financial gain comes at the expense of local competitors.

“The president is neither above the law nor exempt from litigation, and nothing in this suit impinges on his public duties,” D.C. Attorney General Karl A. Racine (D) and Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh (D) say in court filings in advance of oral arguments at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.

At issue are the Constitution’s once-obscure emoluments clauses, designed to prevent undue influence on government officials but never before applied in court to a sitting president.

A federal judge in Maryland allowed the case to move forward and adopted a broad definition of the ban to include “profit, gain, or advantage” received “directly or indirectly” from foreign, federal or state governments.

Trump and his lawyers appealed, saying in court filings that the president should be shielded from such liability and legal distractions. They also are trying to stop an order from U.S. District Judge Peter J. Messitte authorizing dozens of subpoenas to federal government agencies and Trump’s private business entities.

The subpoenas seek details on some of the most closely held secrets of Trump’s business and finances: Which foreign governments have paid the Trump Organization money? How much? And for what?

All of the documents — including marketing materials targeted to foreign embassies, credit card receipts and restaurant reservation logs — relate to Trump’s D.C. hotel.

“The complaint rests on a host of novel and fundamentally flawed constitutional premises, and litigating the claims would entail intrusive discovery into the president’s personal financial affairs and the official actions of his Administration,” according to the Justice Department’s filing.

“Despite this remarkable complaint, the district court treated this case as a run-of-the-mill commercial dispute,” the filing continues. Not only did it deny the president’s motion to dismiss, but it refused even to certify for immediate appeal.”

The Richmond-based court, which takes appeals from Maryland, temporarily put the subpoenas on hold while the case is pending.

The three-judge panel on Tuesday will specifically consider whether the District and Maryland have legal grounds — or standing — to sue the president in the first place. And the appeals court will consider the president’s request to dismiss the case outright or to take the unusual step of ordering the lower-court judge to allow a midstream appeal.

“The president seeks to justify that extraordinary remedy on the ground that he is completely immune from judicial process,” Racine and Frosh said in their court filing.

Unlike past presidents, Trump has retained ownership of his private businesses, including the hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue, a few blocks from the White House, that has attracted government clients. The Kuwaiti Embassy has held its National Day celebration there three years in a row. Lobbyists representing the Saudi government reserved blocks of rooms in December 2016. The former governor of Maine stayed at the hotel and dined at its restaurant in 2017.

Despite the case — and a separate emoluments suit brought by 198 Democrats in Congress — the Trump Organization did more business with foreign governments in 2018 than it did the year before. The company said it received $191,000 in profits from large events and hotel bookings paid for by foreign governments last year, money it donated to the U.S. Treasury. The previous year the company reported about $150,000.

In January, the inspector general for the General Services Administration said the agency had “improperly ignored” potential conflicts with the emoluments provision in leasing the Old Post Office building to the hotel. The watchdog agency did not recommend that GSA modify the deal, but several House committees are now planning investigations into the project.

In his initial ruling in March 2018, Messitte found that Maryland and the District had sufficiently shown that Trump’s hotel “has had and almost certainly will continue to have an unlawful effect on competition.” He specifically noted the local governments’ financial interests in the Walter E. Washington Convention Center and the Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, which offer venues that may compete for some events.

The provisions being reviewed by the 4th Circuit have never before been tested at a federal appeals court. One bars federal officers from taking presents, or emoluments, from foreign governments. The other prohibits presidents from taking side payments from individual states.

The Justice Department had urged Messitte to dismiss the case, arguing that the clauses were meant to stop officials from taking bribes — but not to prevent them from doing business.

The Office of Legal Counsel within the Justice Department has routinely addressed the meaning and implications of the provisions for presidents past. President Ronald Reagan requested a guidance about whether he could accept the pension he earned as California’s governor. President Barack Obama accepted the Nobel Peace Prize only after the legal counsel’s office said he could do so without violating the emoluments clause.

 

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just threw up in my mouth a little. :puke-right:

 

  • Disgust 4
  • WTF 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if he, or any repug for that matter, actually knows what socialism is, other than a derogatory term they use against democrats.

 

  • Upvote 4
  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Deutsche Bank, George Conway and the black hole of Trump’s corruption"

Spoiler

There are varying ways to deal with President Trump and the gravitational pull of his corruption. One is exemplified by Deutsche Bank. Another is exemplified by George T. Conway III, the husband of top Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway.

Bear with us on this one.

If you’re at all familiar with Trump’s financial history, you know that Deutsche Bank looms large. That’s the German institution to which, it would not be an exaggeration to say, Trump owes the survival of his real estate business. After he bankrupted a couple of casinos and became known in the financial world as a liar, a con man and somebody you’d be a fool to loan money to, Deutsche Bank was still there for him. In the early 2000s, when no other bank would loan Trump the hundreds of millions of dollars he needed for his large projects, Deutsche Bank kept doing so.

But why? Some light is shed on the answer in an investigation by David Enrich of the New York Times, and what it reveals could be a metaphor for much of Trump's life, especially his political life.

According to Enrich, Deutsche Bank kept loaning Trump money even though he was lying to them and they knew it — and even as he screwed them over and sued them. What Deutsche Bank’s approach embodies is similar to those who allow themselves to get drawn into Trump’s orbit of corruption, even though they are fully aware of the risks involved.

Here’s the summary:

Over nearly two decades, Deutsche Bank’s leaders repeatedly saw red flags surrounding Mr. Trump. There was a disastrous bond sale, a promised loan that relied on a banker’s forged signature, wild exaggerations of Mr. Trump’s wealth, even a claim of an act of God.

But Deutsche Bank had a ravenous appetite for risk and limited concern about its clients’ reputations. Time after time, with the support of two different chief executives, the bank handed money — a total of well over $2 billion — to a man whom nearly all other banks had deemed untouchable.

When Trump was seeking funding for a tower in Chicago, he claimed he was worth $3 billion, “but when bank employees reviewed his finances, they concluded he was worth about $788 million.” Yet they lent him $500 million to build the project.

Multiple times, Trump would default on a loan or otherwise cost the bank dearly, and one division would sever ties with him, yet he managed to get more money from a different arm of the bank. And multiple times they concluded he was lying to them about his assets, but decided that, for other reasons — such as his income from “The Apprentice,” they’d loan him more money despite his lies.

There’s a degree to which one is inclined to look at this story and say, “Anyone who’s dumb enough to loan money to Donald Trump deserves what they get.” Which may be true. Deutsche Bank wasn’t like Trump’s other marks — the struggling people whose life savings he stole with Trump University, or the small business owners whose bills he refused to pay, or the people seeking to turn their financial lives around that he preyed on with the Trump Institute, or the foreign models he exploited with Trump Model Management, or any of the other victims of his long history of scams and cons.

But this isn’t really about what Deutsche Bank did or didn’t get from their relationship with him. If Trump knowingly submitted false documents in order to obtain loans, that would be a crime. And, indeed, the New York state attorney general has issued subpoenas to the bank covering a number of transactions, including Trump’s failed attempt to buy the Buffalo Bills. You may recall that this came up in Michael Cohen’s recent testimony to Congress. Here’s what happened there, per the Times investigation:

Mr. Trump asked Ms. Vrablic if the bank would be willing to make a loan and handed over bare-bones financial statements that estimated his net worth at $8.7 billion.

Mr. Cohen testified to Congress last month that the documents exaggerated Mr. Trump’s wealth. Deutsche Bank executives had reached a similar conclusion. They nonetheless agreed to vouch for Mr. Trump’s bid, according to an executive involved.

To repeat, over and over the bank knew Trump was lying to them but gave him more money anyway. To be sure, this isn’t much different from the way many Republicans think of him. Sure, he lies about everything all the time. But they’ve decided that they’re going to live with that and go along for the ride, in part because he’s giving them something specific they want, like a bunch of right-wing judges.

But it’s one thing to sacrifice your integrity to stand behind the most corrupt and personally repugnant president we’ve ever had, and it’s another to become a direct party to his misdeeds. I can’t say whether anyone at Deutsche Bank is in legal jeopardy, but I’m guessing that, right now, with law enforcement poking around, some of them are ruing the day they decided to become partners with Trump. They’re hardly alone in that: As Trump’s own former lawyer Cohen testified, “The more people that follow Mr. Trump as I did blindly are going to suffer the same consequences that I’m suffering.”

Conway’s insinuations about Trump’s mental state

Now let’s talk about Conway. Lately, he has been publicly insinuating that Trump is in serious mental decline. This finally baited Trump into responding: “A total loser!”

And that, in turn, led to this new Post story digging into the backstory here.

Trump’s campaign manager Brad Parscale is now claiming that Trump “doesn’t even know” Conway, as if not having the great privilege of personally knowing Trump is a mark of terrible shame, and that Trump turned down Conway for a job he wanted (hence “loser"). But Conway told The Post that, in fact, he and Trump have had multiple personal interactions. Conway also says he turned down an offer from Trump to work at the Justice Department, because, having seen Trump fire former FBI director James B. Comey in early 2017, he understood that the agency would be under relentless presidential assault for the next two years.

What’s funny is what came next. As The Post report notes:

In a conversation with Trump at the wedding of Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in June 2017, Conway said, Trump approached him and complimented him for not taking a job under then-attorney general Jeff Sessions.

“He said to me, I remember it clearly, you were smart not to work for that guy,” Conway said. “He is so weak.”

Trump then ranted for several minutes that Sessions should have never recused himself from the Mueller investigation. “I told him, I’d heard the recusal issue was pretty clear, that Sessions had to recuse himself,” Conway said. “He took great affront at that.”

In other words, Trump, by ranting uncontrollably about Sessions’s failure to live up to his corrupt demand that he act as his personal protector, confirmed that Conway’s assessment had been right — that there would be no way to work at the Justice Department without getting drawn into a bottomless cesspool of a situation stemming from Trump’s corruption.

Something tells us that Conway’s reading of the dangers of getting pulled into Trump’s orbit will be vindicated, while Deutsche Bank’s approach to those dangers will not.

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Obama’s presidency will be hailed as transformative. Trump’s will be viewed with scorn."

Spoiler

As it was with George W. Bush and every other president who preceded him, Barack Obama made policy decisions I found troubling.

Obama once described the driving principle of his foreign policy as little more than “don’t do stupid s---.” That reflexive reaction to Bush’s military adventurism led to U.S. inaction in the face of some 500,000 Syrian deaths and the greatest refugee crisis since World War II. Domestically, Obama failed to pass a significant piece of legislation during his final six years in office.

And yet, 100 years from now, Obama’s presidency will be hailed as the most transformative of our lifetimes, and Donald Trump’s will be viewed with the same scorn that followed the Dred Scott decision. Like that pre-Civil War Supreme Court case, Trump will forever be condemned as a racial reprobate whose words and actions inspired white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

Last week’s slaughter of Muslims in New Zealand was allegedly committed by a fascist who claimed to draw inspiration from President Trump, among others. It was the latest in a long line of tragedies that our president failed to clearly condemn. After the 2017 riots in Charlottesville, Trump proclaimed a moral equivalence between neo-Nazis and their opponents. Following the killings in Christchurch, the president dismissed the threat of white supremacy while claiming the rising tide of violence coming from the far right was limited to a few troublemakers with “very serious problems.”

Trump’s acting chief of staff appeared on national television to declare that “the president is not a white supremacist.” White House counselor Kellyanne Conway once again shamed herself by dismissing the fascist mass murderer from Australia as an “eco-terrorist.” The president’s apologists denied that the current commander in chief was inspiring right-wing violence. But the Center for Strategic and International Studies reported in November that far-right attacks rose in Europe by 43 percent since 2016, while right-wing terrorist attacks have quadrupled in the United States over the same time. Hate crimes rose 17 percent in 2017.

This troubling chapter in U.S. history has one author — and his name is Donald Trump. This sputtering reality star has created a political identity and corrupt presidency inspired by the wave of racism that followed Obama’s. The Manhattan multimillionaire’s 2016 calls for a Muslim ban and creation of a Muslim registry; the claim of ignorance toward former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke; the attack on a Hispanic judge’s integrity; the callousness shown toward a Muslim Gold Star family; and the anti-Semitic tweet featuring a Star of David and piles of $100 bills next to Hillary Clinton’s face. These are just a few of the racially charged offenses that Trump committed even before Americans elected him president.

The shocking conclusion to the 2016 campaign made millions of Americans, including me, look foolish for believing that Obama’s victories in 2008 and 2012 had proved that the United States had emerged from the scourge of racism infecting it for more than four centuries. I remain shocked that this strain of bigotry still fuels the political careers of Trump and his enablers on Capitol Hill.

The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. often said that “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” That is but one reason why the rise in bigotry shown to Muslims, Jews, Hispanics, blacks and “others” has been so discouraging in the age of Trump. Like those who believed these racists were relics from a bygone age, I had also convinced myself that my Republican colleagues were so repelled by racism that they would never support a leader who provided inspiration to neo-Nazis and white supremacists; the manifesto of the New Zealand killer and the words of David Duke after Charlottesville showed just how wrong I was.

That’s why any policy differences I had with Obama now seem so insignificant. Americans who still have faith in the upward arc of King’s moral universe should be grateful for Obama’s presidency and the way his election exposed the white racism that is still at large in our land. If changing the Constitution and reelecting Obama two more times would break the fever that now ravages Trump’s Washington, I would cheerfully champion the passage of that constitutional amendment, slap a “Hope and Change” sticker on my shirt, and race to the nearest voting booth to support the man historians will remember as the most significant president since Abraham Lincoln.

 

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck this guy.

Quote

Carrying a bitter personal feud beyond the grave, President Donald Trump escalated his attacks on the late Sen. John McCain on Tuesday, declaring he will "never" be a fan of the Vietnam war hero and longtime Republican lawmaker who died last year of brain cancer.

"I was never a fan of John McCain, and I never will be," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

The fresh vitriol followed Trump's weekend tweets insulting the 2008 Republican presidential candidate, with whom he long had a fractious relationship. He repeated some of those attacks, complaining about McCain's vote against repealing President Barack Obama's health care law.

 

  • Disgust 4
  • Sad 2
  • WTF 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The presidunce must be mighty proud that his not so insidious call for civil war is being heard.

 

35EA5DFE-5623-43FD-87BB-9A8EFC6C30FE.jpeg

  • Upvote 1
  • Disgust 12
  • WTF 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the presidunce is aware he doesn’t have a snowflake’s chance in hell of actually winning an election and believes he needs the undemocratic, archaic and obsolete Electoral college to remain in power.

What he doesn’t realize is that he won’t win that either. Too many states will flip blue in 2020. 

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am old enough to remember when Trump said he'd be better for LGBTQ people than HRC

 

  • Disgust 4
  • WTF 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oooh, somebody's been triggered. He barely knows Conway but gave him a job at DOJ. A job by the way, that Conway rejected right after Comey was fired. 

I am more and more of the opinion that Kellyanne is a plant in the administration, leaking here, there and everywhere, who is the author of that open letter disparaging the presidunce last year, and who is spilling the beans to Mueller. She's spun this line that her husband is jealous and horrible to her to garner sympathy (and to keep her job!) and the presidunce is simply repeating what she whispered in his ear.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Trump retweets QAnon conspiracy theorist, via Larry the Cable Guy, to slam the TSA"

Spoiler

From a QAnon conspiracy theorist to actor James Woods to comedian Larry the Cable Guy to the leader of the free world. Thus travels information in the age of Twitter and President Trump, who took a late-night swing at a familiar punching bag — the Transportation Security Administration — via a nearly two-year-old video spread by a character on the far fringes of the Internet.

“Not a good situation!” Trump tweeted on Tuesday just before midnight about the clip of a young man subjected to a very thorough pat-down by a TSA agent.

Trump’s critique of the TSA, an agency he has lashed out at repeatedly on the campaign trail, is hardly extreme. The video he retweeted garnered millions of views and sparked outrage back in March 2017 after a woman named Jennifer Williamson filmed her son, who she said had a sensory processing disorder, at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

But the source who belatedly brought the video to Trump’s attention, through a winding path of Twitter celebrities, is likely to raise new questions about where a president fond of spreading conspiracy theories gets his information.

The video was reshared on Monday by a Twitter account called Deep State Exposed, which is operated by Jeremy Stone, a follower of the QAnon conspiracy theory. Stone’s twitter bio includes the phrase “WWG1WGA,” shorthand for “Where We Go One We Go All,” a rallying cry for the bizarre theory that ties together the Pizzagate conspiracy and a supposed “deep state” plot to control American politics. Stone soon added a follow-up tweet to the viral video claiming that “TSA goes out of their way to hire high school dropouts with an inclination for sexual perversion. It’s mind control!!!”

On his Twitter feed, Stone regularly mixes fake Hillary Clinton quotes with truly odd conspiracies. The next clip posted after the video retweeted by the president was a piece of shaky cellphone footage suggesting that empty Walmarts are being used as “CONCENTRATION CAMPS SET TO HOUSE AMERICAN CITIZENS!!”

Tuesday night was not Trump’s first brush with that account’s particular brand of paranoia. The Twitter bio for Deep State Exposed boasts of nine retweets from the president. The feed made headlines in September 2017 when Trump reshared a meme from the account about Hillary Clinton’s book “What Happened.”

Stone’s latest presidential nod of approval tapped into a long-simmering point of anger for Trump: the TSA and the American airport experience in general. In May 2016, Trump complained that the TSA was “falling apart.” At the Republican National Convention two months later, Trump called the agency a “total disaster” and promised that he would “fix TSA.” Yet, among Trump’s budget moves was a proposal in 2017 to slash TSA’s funding to help pay for his border wall.

At rallies and in interviews, Trump also routinely complains that America’s airports are “like from a third-world country.”

So it’s no surprise that the video of the young man in Dallas undergoing an intense body search would resonate. James Woods, an actor turned conservative social media activist who has been suspended from Twitter in the past for sharing a hoax, helped spread the clip by tweeting it with the simple phrase, “Uh...”

Larry the Cable Guy, a stand-up comedian famed for his “Git-R-Done” catchphrase, then weighed in, calling the video “Absolutely ridiculous!”

“How many times do you have to feel a kid up to figure out he’s not a threat? This is infuriating and hard to watch,” the comedian tweeted, which caught the president’s eye hours later. Donald Trump Jr. also joined in the outrage, calling the video “sickening.” (Deep State Exposed quickly thanked the president’s son for the retweet, adding in a fake Hillary Clinton quote for good measure.)

As for TSA, the agency in 2017 defended its handling of the viral pat-down at the Texas airport, noting that the procedure took “approximately two minutes” and “was observed by the mother and two police officers who were called to mitigate the concerns of the mother.” The agency even wrote a lengthy blog post titled “TSA Mythbuster: The Rest of the DFW Pat-down Story” to combat blowback from the incident.

“TSA allows for a pat-down of a teenage passenger, and in this case, all approved procedures were followed to resolve an alarm of the passenger’s laptop,” spokeswoman Lisa Farbstein told The Post at the time. “The passengers were at the checkpoint for approximately 45 minutes, which included the time it took to discuss screening procedures with the mother and to screen three carry-on items that required further inspection.”

 

  • WTF 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time I think Dumpy couldn't be more of a moron, he finds something else to be stupid about.

 

  • WTF 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, 47of74 said:

There are no words for how angry his posthumous attacks on John McCain make me.

Oh, for the days when the worst thing POTUS could do, apparently, was to wear a tan suit.

  • Upvote 5
  • I Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, apple1 said:

There are no words for how angry his posthumous attacks on John McCain make me.

Oh, for the days when the worst thing POTUS could do, apparently, was to wear a tan suit.

And can you imagine how mad the Branch Trumpvidians would be if Senator McCain had died while the guy who wore a tan suit was in office and he had said the slightest negative thing about McCain then?  

  • Upvote 5
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GreyhoundFan said:

"Trump retweets QAnon conspiracy theorist, via Larry the Cable Guy, to slam the TSA"

  Hide contents

From a QAnon conspiracy theorist to actor James Woods to comedian Larry the Cable Guy to the leader of the free world. Thus travels information in the age of Twitter and President Trump, who took a late-night swing at a familiar punching bag — the Transportation Security Administration — via a nearly two-year-old video spread by a character on the far fringes of the Internet.

“Not a good situation!” Trump tweeted on Tuesday just before midnight about the clip of a young man subjected to a very thorough pat-down by a TSA agent.

Trump’s critique of the TSA, an agency he has lashed out at repeatedly on the campaign trail, is hardly extreme. The video he retweeted garnered millions of views and sparked outrage back in March 2017 after a woman named Jennifer Williamson filmed her son, who she said had a sensory processing disorder, at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

But the source who belatedly brought the video to Trump’s attention, through a winding path of Twitter celebrities, is likely to raise new questions about where a president fond of spreading conspiracy theories gets his information.

The video was reshared on Monday by a Twitter account called Deep State Exposed, which is operated by Jeremy Stone, a follower of the QAnon conspiracy theory. Stone’s twitter bio includes the phrase “WWG1WGA,” shorthand for “Where We Go One We Go All,” a rallying cry for the bizarre theory that ties together the Pizzagate conspiracy and a supposed “deep state” plot to control American politics. Stone soon added a follow-up tweet to the viral video claiming that “TSA goes out of their way to hire high school dropouts with an inclination for sexual perversion. It’s mind control!!!”

On his Twitter feed, Stone regularly mixes fake Hillary Clinton quotes with truly odd conspiracies. The next clip posted after the video retweeted by the president was a piece of shaky cellphone footage suggesting that empty Walmarts are being used as “CONCENTRATION CAMPS SET TO HOUSE AMERICAN CITIZENS!!”

Tuesday night was not Trump’s first brush with that account’s particular brand of paranoia. The Twitter bio for Deep State Exposed boasts of nine retweets from the president. The feed made headlines in September 2017 when Trump reshared a meme from the account about Hillary Clinton’s book “What Happened.”

Stone’s latest presidential nod of approval tapped into a long-simmering point of anger for Trump: the TSA and the American airport experience in general. In May 2016, Trump complained that the TSA was “falling apart.” At the Republican National Convention two months later, Trump called the agency a “total disaster” and promised that he would “fix TSA.” Yet, among Trump’s budget moves was a proposal in 2017 to slash TSA’s funding to help pay for his border wall.

At rallies and in interviews, Trump also routinely complains that America’s airports are “like from a third-world country.”

So it’s no surprise that the video of the young man in Dallas undergoing an intense body search would resonate. James Woods, an actor turned conservative social media activist who has been suspended from Twitter in the past for sharing a hoax, helped spread the clip by tweeting it with the simple phrase, “Uh...”

Larry the Cable Guy, a stand-up comedian famed for his “Git-R-Done” catchphrase, then weighed in, calling the video “Absolutely ridiculous!”

“How many times do you have to feel a kid up to figure out he’s not a threat? This is infuriating and hard to watch,” the comedian tweeted, which caught the president’s eye hours later. Donald Trump Jr. also joined in the outrage, calling the video “sickening.” (Deep State Exposed quickly thanked the president’s son for the retweet, adding in a fake Hillary Clinton quote for good measure.)

As for TSA, the agency in 2017 defended its handling of the viral pat-down at the Texas airport, noting that the procedure took “approximately two minutes” and “was observed by the mother and two police officers who were called to mitigate the concerns of the mother.” The agency even wrote a lengthy blog post titled “TSA Mythbuster: The Rest of the DFW Pat-down Story” to combat blowback from the incident.

“TSA allows for a pat-down of a teenage passenger, and in this case, all approved procedures were followed to resolve an alarm of the passenger’s laptop,” spokeswoman Lisa Farbstein told The Post at the time. “The passengers were at the checkpoint for approximately 45 minutes, which included the time it took to discuss screening procedures with the mother and to screen three carry-on items that required further inspection.”

 

I'm sure Trump's outrage would NOT be the same if this was a child of color.

  • Upvote 3
  • I Agree 5
  • Love 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today is Barron W. Trump's birthday. Should we tell the presidunce? ?

  • Upvote 3
  • Sad 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GreyhoundFan said:

Every time I think Dumpy couldn't be more of a moron, he finds something else to be stupid about.

 

Remember when we were little kids, like during the primary years in elementary school, when we thought the President of the United States was the most powerful person on the planet. We might have said things like, "When I am president, I'm going to outlaw homework." or, "When I am president, everyone is going to have to do exactly as I say." sadly, Trump is still at this stage, and no one has told him that being president is not like this at all. He still thinks that he can say something and his minions will rush around to ensure that it happens.

  • Upvote 6
  • I Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor presidunce doesn't understand that there are many, many hate-followers (like me, for instance) who absolutely do not agree with him on anything.

 

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"What explains Trump’s mental strain? His facade is showing fresh cracks."

Spoiler

In the past few days, as President Trump’s rage-tweeting has grown more erratic and littered with capital letters, news organizations have come up with multiple delicate ways to hint that he’s showing unusual levels of mental strain. Trump has been acting “rattled and encircled.” He has been “nursing past grievances” while “seeing enemies everywhere.” He’s newly given to “scattershot” outbursts and feels “isolated” and “under siege.”

On Wednesday, Trump will travel to Ohio in what will be his first visit since the GOP’s 2018 bloodbath to a state that is crucial to his reelection hopes. Trump’s political team will hype the visual of Trump touting the economy in this industrial Midwestern state.

Yet what’s going on in Ohio is plainly nagging at Trump very deeply. The closing of a GM plant in Lordstown is one of the things that prompted the barrage of bizarre tweets that inspired all the veiled hints that Trump is feeling more unsettled than usual.

It’s an interesting paradox of this moment that these signs of strain are emerging right when Trump and his allies are redoubling efforts to create the impression that he’s winning everywhere and has everything totally under control.

Trump, his team proclaims, is presiding over a gangbusters economy heading into 2020. He’s boasting that his border wall is getting built. His advisers are leaking word that the special counsel’s underwhelming findings will allow him to unleash a fearsome, table-turning political offensive. His aides are crowing that they’re stonewalling Democratic investigations.

Yet on every one of these fronts, if you peek behind the facade, serious trouble is lurking.

Trouble in Ohio

First, Ohio. When Trump raged about the Lordstown plant, he insisted this shouldn’t be happening “in one of the greatest economies in our history.” Yet this boast undermines itself: If this is such a great economy, why should one plant closing matter politically?

One answer is that Trump made it matter. He has repeatedly touted his efforts to reverse individual plant closings, which has now left Trump convinced that he can’t allow this one to close. A local union leader has claimed that many Trump-backing autoworkers are waking up and understanding that he isn’t delivering as promised — indeed, that’s one thing that set Trump off this time. Worse, experts say Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs are already hurting the industry and local manufacturing.

Trump’s own metric — placing too much significance on individual plant closings — and his inability to foresee the damage from tariffs represent a failure to understand the complexities of global supply chains. Thus, Trump’s unwillingness to inform himself about these complexities created the petard on which he is now being hoisted.

On top of that, Politico now reports that Trump is moving closer to slapping massive tariffs on imported automobiles, and that officials have told him he can justify this in the name of national security. But many of his own advisers are desperately trying to stop this, arguing it could alienate allies, and industry watchers say it could cost untold jobs.

As one expert puts it: “The reality is auto tariffs would put Ohio in a recession.” Trump may refrain. But at best, his administration is in turmoil about what to do, and at worst, he may actively make the situation much worse. All this may not cost Trump Ohio. But remember, in part due to his trade policies, Republicans lost all six statewide races in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin — which are also crucial to his reelection hopes.

Trump’s imaginary wall won’t help him

Second, the border. Trump’s advisers have instructed his supporters to chant “Finish the wall,” rather than “Build the wall,” to sustain the lie that the wall is actually being built, something he often falsely tweets himself.

But trouble lurks here as well. The Post recently reported that not only is the influx of migrant families swelling; officials expect that to keep ballooning next month. This would again reveal Trump’s toughness-as-deterrence to be failing. And remember, Trump himself erupted in a fury when this happened last spring, precisely because he sees this as a metric by which his presidency will be judged a failure.

False bravado from Team Trump

Finally, the investigations. Trump’s political team is making a big show of plans to go on offense if special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s findings underwhelm. And his advisers are claiming that when they successfully block House Democratic investigations, it will excite his supporters.

But, while it’s true that Democratic investigations will face tough sledding, this reeks of false bravado. As CNN’s Stephen Collinson reports, the latest filings from Mueller’s team reveal that even after his probe wraps up, multiple other outside investigations will continue “penetrating deep into Trump’s business, personal, and political life” for “years to come.”

Trump, for instance, is still implicated in the criminal hush money scheme carried out by Michael Cohen. Trump’s former lawyer testified that Trump had gamed his assets for fraudulent purposes, leading the New York attorney general to launch a separate investigation into Trump projects.

And as NBC News’s Ken Dilanian reports, even absent further charges, Mueller may still have collected much evidence on Trump’s dealings with Russia — and on whether he is compromised — as part of the counterintelligence investigation (as opposed to the criminal one) his team has been pursuing for years. Legal experts tell Dilanian this matters because those findings must be turned over to Congress, meaning Trump will not keep them suppressed — and that Democratic investigations will get a big assist, in potentially explosive fashion.

Reflecting on all the legal travails Trump will continue to face, former FBI assistant director Frank Figliuzzi told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace:

“He is looking at the destruction of his organization, his foundation, certainly his presidency and its legacy, and possibly even criminal exposure for family members. He should be worried every day. And there’s certainly evidence from his behavior that he is.”

That’s a simple explanation for Trump’s unusually unsettled state, and sometimes the simplest explanations are the right ones. We’d only add that this applies beyond his legal travails, and on all these other fronts as well.

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • GreyhoundFan locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.