Jump to content
  • Sky
  • Blueberry
  • Slate
  • Blackcurrant
  • Watermelon
  • Strawberry
  • Orange
  • Banana
  • Apple
  • Emerald
  • Chocolate
  • Charcoal
choralcrusader8613

Jana 7: Home Sweet TTH

Recommended Posts

xenobia
17 hours ago, Coconut Flan said:

Possibly there are some interesting, unmarried, ministry-minded males attending so in JB's mind good husband hunting territory.

This was my first thought when I saw that Jana was there with her sisters + their families. I'm sure Jeremy can introduce her to a suitable bachelor pastor. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ever

I noticed the recent photos of Jana all have her hand hidden except this one- there is a ring on her ring finger.....

DCE687A2-7D76-43DC-B70D-F42214C05991.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VelociRapture
8 minutes ago, Ever said:

I noticed the recent photos of Jana all have her hand hidden except this one- there is a ring on her ring finger.....

DCE687A2-7D76-43DC-B70D-F42214C05991.jpeg

I’m pretty sure they do purity rings. I know the Bateses do at least. They had a episode where Kelly and Gil took Carlin out for a nice dinner and gave her one. It kind of creeps me out to be honest. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wine time!
Snarkasarus Rex
4 minutes ago, VelociRapture said:

I’m pretty sure they do purity rings. I know the Bateses do at least. They had a episode where Kelly and Gil took Carlin out for a nice dinner and gave her one. It kind of creeps me out to be honest. 

Yeah, I think it’s a purity ring.  Hannie has one too.🤮

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Depressed
onekidanddone
2 minutes ago, Snarkasarus Rex said:

Yeah, I think it’s a purity ring.  Hannie has one too.🤮

Hannie is child and has no business having her "purity" shown off.

Jana is an adult and her purity is nobody's business 

  • Upvote 13
  • I Agree 9
  • Love 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
theotherelise

That ring is on her right hand, it's just the mirror that makes it look like her engagement ring finger. You can see that ring in the over head shot of her making the bread. 

I kind of like the idea that Kelly thinks Lawson needs to get off his butt and make a move towards marriage and also she loves Jana, so she liked that comment on purpose! Seriously, Lawson could get married tomorrow if he wanted to and he'd have tons of options in their world. I think he might realize that all the flirty poses and posts would have to stop if he were courting in favor of the couple shots his sisters do. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HurricaneBells
On 1/19/2019 at 2:04 AM, luv2laugh said:

Although, I’d wonder why Jill wouldn’t re-tweet Derick’s outbursts nor post something on Instagram to defend his controversial statements in a somewhat Ken Alexander style. 

Kim Kardashian West is an excellent example of supporting the stupid things your hubby says and often defends or clarifies Kanye West's bizzare musings. Just last week he posted something she could see would go the wrong way (it did) and followed it up herself with "I'm just going to nip this in the bud and explain what he means" Of course Kim's has the advantage of social media training and freedom to challenge her husband but I find it so much weirder when it's ignored. I think that's Jills coping mechanism and I feel for her. Sometimes.

Edited by HurricaneBells
Laughing because I then thought of the K's vs the D's, can you imagine JB meeting Kris Jenner? Ahahahaha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Casserole
1 hour ago, theotherelise said:

That ring is on her right hand, it's just the mirror that makes it look like her engagement ring finger. You can see that ring in the over head shot of her making the bread. 

I kind of like the idea that Kelly thinks Lawson needs to get off his butt and make a move towards marriage and also she loves Jana, so she liked that comment on purpose! Seriously, Lawson could get married tomorrow if he wanted to and he'd have tons of options in their world. I think he might realize that all the flirty poses and posts would have to stop if he were courting in favor of the couple shots his sisters do. 

I definitely think it was intentional. IIRC, they did similar coy responses and vague liking of Lawson-Jinger speculation before outright saying that they weren't in a relationship. Anything to string along the humpers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mollysmom

I too, think that it's her purity ring. I remember when the pig proposed to Anna she took her purity ring off so he could put her engagement ring on. (I have no idea how I remember that detail but it definitely happened) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AtlanticTug

The purity ring is yet another example of how these idiots don't follow the Bible they try to shove down our throats. Matthew 6:1, "Be careful not to parade your uprightness in public to attract attention; otherwise you will lose all reward from your Father in heaven."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Giddy
Carm_88
12 hours ago, xenobia said:

This was my first thought when I saw that Jana was there with her sisters + their families. I'm sure Jeremy can introduce her to a suitable bachelor pastor. 

Please god not another Pastor! We don't need another Jeremy! 

  • Upvote 8
  • I Agree 5
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wine time!
Markie

I agree. No. More. Pastors. Howabout a nice religious carpenter, mason or landscaper for Jana?

Edited by Markie
Typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fjrocks
On 1/18/2019 at 6:50 PM, HerNameIsBuffy said:

but you did.  without using the words you tossed out a completely baseless accusation in a way that left zero doubt as to what you meant.

you're not clever, that's a shitty thing to put out there.

    I have to step in here.  I just don't get this kind of harsh insults, it hurts my heart.  I went back and read what @allthegoodnamesrgone said and it really didn't seem that significant to me. But it was so offensive she left zero doubt?!  What are you reacting to so harshly? That she thinks the Duggars could consider divorce worse then what Josh did?  Their beliefs are so wacky, let's discuss that rather than insult each other.   Are you reacting to "At best Derick is EXTREMELY controlling, and I don't even want to speak about, the worst case scenario."   I read that and interpreted it as , oh @allthegoodnamesrgone is alluding that Derick could treat Jill poorly enough to be  abusive.  Was that what provoked your insult? 

       We just spent four pages over in the Dillard thread discussing how he LIVE STREAMED, (not just posted a video) but he WENT LIVE to her freaking 2 million followers without her consent, he mocked her when she was visibly upset and then asked who would clean his clothes and make his dinner.  Numerous people felt it was inappropriate at best and abusive at worse, and said so directly and did not mince any words.  Why are you over here on THIS thread hand slapping someone for just alluding to things?  People over there came right out and stated it, using words like abusive, controlling, etc. 

  We discuss how dangerous their beliefs are all the time.    Here are things Derick and Jill have done  that genuinely bothered me personally and I don't think any of them are "completely baseless" concerns.

    The bizarre way their courtship unfolded

    Derick cyber-bullying an LGBT child

    Bragging, literally bragging, about being beaten with a wooden object by his mother.

    Not holding steady employment to provide for basic needs and flip-flopping on careers paths

   Filming sick kids at freaking 1 AM to be YouTube stars

   Posting pictures of distressed babies rather than comforting them.

    Not getting better prenatal care for either birth, but especially Sam's after she had known complications.

   Taking a toddler and a pregnant woman to a Zika infested area for unnecessary reasons

      Anyways,  while I don't agree with everything that is said on here,  we aren't on thread 72 of the Dillard thread because he actually is #besthubbyever. 

     Why are you telling other posters how "not clever" they are?  Why on earth are you talking down to people like that?   It's just mean, frankly. 

   

Edited by Fjrocks
tense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HerNameIsBuffy
5 hours ago, Fjrocks said:

    I have to step in here.  I just don't get this kind of harsh insults, it hurts my heart.  I went back and read what @allthegoodnamesrgone said and it really didn't seem that significant to me. But it was so offensive she left zero doubt?!  What are you reacting to so harshly? That she thinks the Duggars could consider divorce worse then what Josh did?  Their beliefs are so wacky, let's discuss that rather than insult each other.   Are you reacting to "At best Derick is EXTREMELY controlling, and I don't even want to speak about, the worst case scenario."   I read that and interpreted it as , oh @allthegoodnamesrgone is alluding that Derick could treat Jill poorly enough to be  abusive.  Was that what provoked your insult? 

       We just spent four pages over in the Dillard thread discussing how he LIVE STREAMED, (not just posted a video) but he WENT LIVE to her freaking 2 million followers without her consent, he mocked her when she was visibly upset and then asked who would clean his clothes and make his dinner.  Numerous people felt it was inappropriate at best and abusive at worse, and said so directly and did not mince any words.  Why are you over here on THIS thread hand slapping someone for just alluding to things?  People over there came right out and stated it, using words like abusive, controlling, etc. 

  We discuss how dangerous their beliefs are all the time.    Here are things Derick and Jill have done  that genuinely bothered me personally and I don't think any of them are "completely baseless" concerns.

    The bizarre way their courtship unfolded

    Derick cyber-bullying an LGBT child

    Bragging, literally bragging, about being beaten with a wooden object by his mother.

    Not holding steady employment to provide for basic needs and flip-flopping on careers paths

   Filming sick kids at freaking 1 AM to be YouTube stars

   Posting pictures of distressed babies rather than comforting them.

    Not getting better prenatal care for either birth, but especially Sam's after she had known complications.

   Taking a toddler and a pregnant woman to a Zika infested area for unnecessary reasons

      Anyways,  while I don't agree with everything that is said on here,  we aren't on thread 72 of the Dillard thread because he actually is #besthubbyever. 

     Why are you telling other posters how "not clever" they are?  Why on earth are you talking down to people like that?   It's just mean, frankly. 

   

This is not the first time you've had issues with me (and others) speaking too harshly for your heart.

You have every right to be offended by whatever you like.  You aren't entitled to an explanation on why I am not posting in manner of which you approve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unimpressed
Palimpsest
11 hours ago, Fjrocks said:

     Why are you telling other posters how "not clever" they are?  Why on earth are you talking down to people like that?   It's just mean, frankly. 

She's an Admin trying to control for distasteful, over the top, or baseless speculation.  Perhaps she over-reacted but, quite frankly, after the last month I'm not surprised if some of our volunteer Admins and Helpmeets are sounding a bit testy.  If you feel the need to argue about her tone, or with moderation in general, then you should complain over on Community Discussion.  That is why we have that subforum so as not to disrupt threads.

Back to topic:

21 hours ago, Casserole said:

I definitely think it was intentional. IIRC, they did similar coy responses and vague liking of Lawson-Jinger speculation before outright saying that they weren't in a relationship. Anything to string along the humpers.

Yes, they like dropping hints and Kelly is good at publicity and not always honest.  I hope it is just stringing along the humpers because Lawson strikes me as a conceited oaf.

Edited by Palimpsest
  • Upvote 9
  • Confused 1
  • I Agree 1
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AnnaRuk09

Jana responding to a commenter. I hope it's loud and clear to all the leg humpers now

 

one.thumb.PNG.0412a696ea8fcffb0a871e4e8b4f4b9b.PNG

two.PNG.a77929b13d03ac5e96c01b2c18a35481.PNG

three.PNG

Edited by AnnaRuk09

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Happy
TatiFish9

Seems like Lawson got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. If so, I am so glad Jana is the one to slap it out. This seems like agency on her part.

Outside of general fundiness and all that comes with it, I don't have a problem with Lawson or his antics. I just think opportunism that rides on the coattails of a blantant lie is uncool.

I do think something is going on with him and the Duggars. I wonder if Jana is a foil. It could be anything as minor as him working musically with the younger Duggar girls or him possibly looking to court someone close (proximity) to the Duggars. I dunno. All I know is when the rumors were out (again) about him and Jana, the most I thought it could be was unrequited interest on his end. Because I am one of the ones who kinda buys into him and Jinger in a "failed" gettingtoknow-ship. Even if he is now into Jana , I could not see her settling for it. If waiting for that very special one is what she's doing, it is difficult to believe she would give into her sister's sorta ex (from her perspective). That may not inspire *sisterly affection*😉.But who knows. Stranger things have occurred with both these families. 

Also, there is a part of me that thinks (and hopes) Jana created this account of her own volition with the encouragment of her sisters. Maybe they are helping her break free of some of those Gen2A Fundie chastity beliefs holding her back from finding her true self and inevitably a mate. Because let's be honest, that is usually end game with them. And I don't think it is a stretch to say that.

 

 

Edited by TatiFish9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Happy
TatiFish9
On 1/16/2019 at 10:17 PM, Vivi_music said:

 But I can't seem to remember seeing Jana and Jill often together since Jill moved out. I know Jill isn't on the show anymore but from what we see on social media, she is not being shunned from her family completly. She is seen with her younger siblings often, she posted about visiting Jessa for play dates with the cousins and she was at the TTH for the ugly Christmas sweater thing. But her and Jana together? I can't seem to recall. 

@luv2laugh "I've always been surprised that Jana, who was known as the "BFF of Jill", is frequently hanging out with Jessa, Jinger, and Anna but I can't remember her being pictured with Jill other than at family events."

-------

This has been of particular interest to me. Jana was seen face timing Jill while the Dillards were in SCA. So I dont think it was a pairing thing. I am thinking there was a general interest to keep in touch ( at least on Jana's part). I suspect either Jill started giving the cold shoulder[ she said to Joy it was okay to put hub and kids first. It did not mattet what others said] or Jana changing her opinion of Jill based on things she saw of the Dillards. Laura says Jana is sassy but classy. That is a side of Jana the public has rarely seen. I could see her calling Jill out without regret.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×