Jump to content
IGNORED

United States Congress 5: Still Looking for a Spine


Destiny

Recommended Posts

Devin Cowflake Nunes thinks it's  okay to say mean things about black people 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 500
  • Created
  • Last Reply

"‘Who’s going to help me?’: Steve King denigrates Hurricane Katrina victims for needing government assistance"

Spoiler

Rep. Steve King, the Iowa Republican who has made a series of statements embracing white nationalism, on Thursday noted a contrast between the response of people in his state to spring flooding and the response of the residents of New Orleans to Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

Speaking at a town hall in Charter Oak, Iowa, a city that is 99.4 percent white, according to census estimates, the nine-term congressman didn’t say what attributes explained the differing reactions. But racist tropes about African American dependence on the government echoed in the observations about New Orleans. The Crescent City maintains a black majority, though the community has shrunk since the disaster struck nearly 14 years ago.

"We go to a place like New Orleans, and everybody’s looking around saying, ‘Who’s going to help me? Who’s going to help me?’” King said, recounting what he said officials at the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, had told him about the relief effort, in which he said he had participated. Yet, he was also one of 11 members of Congress to oppose a bill providing federal aid to Katrina victims in 2005.

In his home state, he said, residents looked after one another without government handouts. Meanwhile, Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds has declared a disaster in more than half of Iowa’s 99 counties because of severe flooding and is seeking a federal declaration that would free up funds from Washington.

“We go to a place like Iowa, and we go see, knock on the door at, say, I make up a name, John’s place, and say, ‘John, you got water in your basement, we can write you a check, we can help you,'" King said. “And John will say, ‘Well, wait a minute, let me get my boots. It’s Joe that needs help. Let’s go down to his place and help him.’”

King, who was stripped of his committee assignments in January over comments questioning whether the term “white supremacist” was offensive, said FEMA officials are “always gratified when they come and see how Iowans take care of each other.”

“We’re Iowans, and I’m always proud of our reaction to this,” he added, suggesting that his constituents displayed up-from-their-bootstraps grit in the face of environmental calamity, while the victims of Katrina — the deadliest storm to buffet the United States since the Okeechobee hurricane of 1928 — helplessly went in search of government assistance.

Katrina was responsible for an estimated 1,833 deaths, more than half of which were suffered by African Americans, according to data analysis by public health experts.

King then turned to discussing trade negotiations, which have major implications for his constituents. His district received more than $9 billion in federal farming subsidies between 1995 and 2017 — more than any other district in Iowa, which has received more subsidies than any other state in the nation.

An angry reaction met King’s remarks on Thursday.

Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards, a Democrat, called the comments “disgusting and disheartening.”

Rep. Cedric L. Richmond (D-La.), whose district includes most of New Orleans, said the comparison was further proof that King was a “white supremacist."

“When people show you who they are, believe them,” Richmond added.

The two men have clashed before over King’s use of New Orleans to draw unflattering comparisons. In 2017, while touting a measure that would have tracked offenses committed by immigrant children from “the most violent places in the world,” King said he was struck that the homicide rate in New Orleans was equivalent to that in certain Central American countries.

“It’s insensitive, and it’s nothing more than traditional white privilege of, ‘Let me criticize a minority city,’” Richmond said.

A spokesman for King, 69, didn’t return a request for comment.

Examples abound of King disparaging immigrants, minorities and women who undergo abortions, as well as taking up the cause of ethnic nationalism. Most recently, he shared a meme on Facebook suggesting that red states would win a civil war because they have “about 8 trillion bullets, while the other side doesn’t know which bathroom to use.” He has palled around with figures on Europe’s far-right fringes and retweeted a message from a self-described “Nazi sympathizer.”

King’s record of incendiary statements became so glaring in the weeks before the midterm elections last fall that a party often reluctant to police its own members virtually abandoned him.

The chairman of the House Republican campaign arm assailed his colleague for “white supremacy and hate,” saying the group would stay away from King’s reelection effort. He ended up narrowly beating back a challenge from a first-time Democratic candidate in his deep-red district.

In February, when he announced his intention to seek a 10th term next year, King appeared unbowed. “I have nothing to apologize for,” he said. Competition from Republican state Sen. Randy Feenstra is likely to present a more formidable challenge.

One prominent Republican who has not censured King is President Trump, who has also invoked Hurricane Katrina for his own political ends. Last year, the president pointed to the death toll in New Orleans to cast the relief effort in Puerto Rico in a more positive light. But vastly more people died as a result of Hurricane Maria’s devastation in the U.S. territory — nearly 3,000, according to a George Washington University report — than perished in New Orleans.

Critics of how the Trump administration dealt with that natural disaster argue that the response was tinged with racism. Those allegations recall the fallout from Hurricane Katrina, which exposed stark racial inequities.

Despite President George W. Bush’s statement in 2005 that “the storm didn’t discriminate, and neither will the recovery effort,” most of the people who languished in unbearable conditions in the city’s low-lying eastern areas were poor and black. An estimated 73 percent of those displaced by flooding or damage were black, according to a report by the Congressional Research Service. Of those who survived, many fled New Orleans the year after the storm, including more than 175,000 black residents, according to FiveThirtyEight. More than 75,000 never returned.

“No one is going to tell me it wasn’t a race issue,” an evacuee said in congressional testimony in December 2005.

Another victim said she blamed every level of government. “I blame local. I blame state. I blame federal,” she said.

City residents as a whole were more likely to acknowledge the contribution made by charities and religious organizations than by the federal and state governments, though most still said public assistant was at least somewhat helpful, according to a 2015 report from the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Race remains a fault line in opinions about the storm and its aftermath. In 2015, a Louisiana State University survey found that 80 percent of white residents of New Orleans believed the state had “mostly recovered” from the destruction. Nearly 60 percent of black respondents said the opposite, believing that the state had “mostly not recovered.”

Most white residents said the city was better off than it was before the hurricane struck, while most black people said the opposite.

The deluge inundating the Midwest has already been blamed for three deaths. While scientists have not yet completed models assessing the contribution of planetary warming to the most recent outbreak of heavy rainfall, they do believe that climate change is intensifying extreme precipitation.

King is an outspoken climate skeptic. In 2010, he said at a town hall that climate science was the “modern version of the rain dance.”

But Iowa residents won’t need the help of ancient rituals to induce rain. They’re going to have plenty of it this spring.

He is one of most repugnant beings to ever darken the earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We knew all along there would be something tying Nunes to Russia, and here it is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Nunes' Cow has been calling Nunes "milk dud".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2019 at 8:55 PM, GreyhoundFan said:

 

I'm just waiting for whatever it is that Trump has on Lindsey becomes public.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's a perpetual machine. Sooner or later we will  end up discussing the special counsel investigation that was appointed to investigate the special counsel investigation that was appointed to investigate the special counsel investigation that was appointed to investigate Mueller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AmazonGrace said:

 

It's a perpetual machine. Sooner or later we will  end up discussing the special counsel investigation that was appointed to investigate the special counsel investigation that was appointed to investigate the special counsel investigation that was appointed to investigate Mueller.

If Putin is Edgar Bergen and Trump is Charlie McCarthy is Graham Mortimer Snerd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GOP thinks drowning islanders are hi-la-ri-ous

 

 

I guess when you're married with kids you won't mind drowning so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2019 at 1:55 AM, GreyhoundFan said:

 

Is this why Trey Gowdy left Congress? Because he knows he's next in line for a Supreme Court nomination?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fraurosena said:

Is this why Trey Gowdy left Congress? Because he knows he's next in line for a Supreme Court nomination?

I saw speculation to that effect last year. He made it pretty well known that he would be thrilled to be offered a judgeship. I guess because he's judgy, at least to Democrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inhofe is such a tool that he should change his name to Doug Phillips.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GreyhoundFan said:

Inhofe is such a tool that he should change his name to Doug Phillips.

 

They way repugs think they are being clever when they are making complete idiots of themselves is astounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"This Lindsey Graham quote perfectly explains the GOP’s codependent relationship with Trump"

Spoiler

Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) on Wednesday offered his most extensive comments to date about President Trump’s continued attacks on his friend, the late senator John McCain (R-Ariz.).

And it’s a great window into the codependent relationship Trump has forged with GOP lawmakers like Graham.

Graham’s lack of a more forceful defense of McCain has been criticized, even as he has gradually weighed in more. He even copped this week to his own role in McCain turning over the Steele dossier to the FBI — the initial source of Trump’s latest McCain onslaught.

But Graham also explained to CNN that he wasn’t minding his critics because he felt they were just using him to make Trump look bad. “If you think the only way to honor John McCain is to tell this president, ‘I won’t work with you; I won’t ever help you,’ ” Graham said, “that’s your agenda, not mine."

And then came the big quote.

“President Trump has been good to me in the sense that he’s allowed me in his world,” Graham said. “He’s made decisions, I think, based on some input I’ve given him. He’s subject to changing his mind, and I want him to be successful.”

That first part is key — the part about how Trump has been “good to me” and “allowed me in his world.” Graham isn’t just any senator, you see; he’s the chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee. He’s one of the most potent people in what is supposed to be a coequal branch of government. Yet he’s suggesting Trump has done him an important favor by accepting his guidance.

It’s tantamount to admitting that Trump holds the cards in this relationship — which he clearly does. Graham rather obviously didn’t like Trump, calling him crazy and unqualified during the 2016 campaign. Graham has since pulled perhaps the most stunning 180 in Washington, becoming a close Trump ally and confidant. He has admitted this is in large part about his own political future; he’s up for reelection in 2020, and the threat of a primary challenge was always very real.

And Graham’s conversion has paid off. After turning himself into the designated GOP attack dog during Supreme Court hearings on Brett M. Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination and sidling up to Trump, a recent Winthrop University poll showed Graham’s approval rating among South Carolina Republicans rising from 51 percent in April 2018 to 74 percent less than a year later. Graham isn’t stupid, and he has shown that his gambit — no matter how transparent — has worked.

But it has also come at the cost of some pride. Graham suggests that it’s not worth giving Trump ultimatums, because he needs something from Trump. But Trump also needs something from congressional Republicans. They have controlled the fate of his legislative agenda. Graham showed what he can do for Trump during the Kavanaugh hearings. Graham’s approval still lends legitimacy to Trump, because he was such a vocal critic one day and he’s a leading GOP voice on both judicial issues and foreign policy — and especially the latter now that McCain is gone.

What Graham is really saying isn’t that he doesn’t want to get tough on Trump, but that he can’t. Graham is admitting defeat in the face of a GOP base that abhors the kind of Trump critic he once was. Trump has built this kind of loyalty among congressional Republicans by punishing those critics with an iron fist and rewarding those who lavish him with praise — oftentimes by letting them be influential.

The result is powerful senators like Graham apparently believing it’s a privilege to be “in his world,” rather than emphasizing the role they play a legislative branch that is meant to be a check on the executive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Stephen Colbert's take on Mike Lee's dumb speech:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, GreyhoundFan said:

I love Stephen Colbert's take on Mike Lee's dumb speech:

I hadn't had time to listen to Mike Lee's dumb speech until now.  I think I just overdosed on idiocy.  How embarrassing.  Are his unfortunate constituents too busy making babies to notice how stupid he is? :text-bs:   :stork-girl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marco needs his meds updated:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • GreyhoundFan locked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.