Jump to content
IGNORED

Josh Duggar: Part 10- Will "Rehab" Ever End?


Recommended Posts

gustava
On 1/5/2016 at 8:55 PM, 19 cats and counting said:

President Obama did a campaign rally at Widener University in 2008 (I attended).  I wonder how this lawyer feels about that.  

And I live 1.5 hours away from Philly.... should I take one for the team and Duggar stalk the courthouse?  Is it worth the drive?

We know you're joking about stalking, but you might want to edit that word.

3 hours ago, Mothership said:

Is the Duggar definition of porn "The Young and the Restless"?  

If it weren't so sad, I'd laugh, but you're probably right.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 574
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Whoosh

    57

  • JenniferJuniper

    42

  • HerNameIsBuffy

    34

  • justoneoftwo

    27

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I thought college was bad and no one should go. Why are they using an evil, worldly college-going lawyer? Can't Josh just represent himself using what he learned from Bill Gothard's Wisdom Booklets?

That article makes it sounds like the Duggars either paid the sister to say that stuff so Josh wouldn't look so awful, or she's saying it to get HER 15 minutes of fame. Why would a porn star follow a

What makes no sense to me is that while both the molestation and cheating are bad things; the Duggar's believe that Josh cheating on Anna is MUCH MUCH worse and he needs to go to rehab and have treatm

Posted Images

OodOnTheLoo
On January 5, 2016 at 11:50 AM, 2manyKidzzz said:

Thanks so much. I somehow thought it was something new. I was wrong. 

Pickles loves to promote herself as some superior sleuth.  She's almost as unbearable as the Duggars these days.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Sweet Fellowship
9 hours ago, OodOnTheLoo said:

Pickles loves to promote herself as some superior sleuth.  She's almost as unbearable as the Duggars these days.

I reckon most of her "sleuthing" involves browsing good ol' Eff Jay.

  • Upvote 9
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Mothership said:

Also, I know there's a FJ expert who can really speak to whether porn addiction is a recognized pathology.

Very good question.  Although I'm a licensed clinician, I work primarily in research these days.  Is porn addiction a recognized pathology?  It depends on what you mean by "recognized."  Do some clinicians have a protocol for treating something called "pornography addiction" or more typically "sex addiction"?  Yes.  Is there an ICD-10 billable code or a section of the DSM-5 devoted to specifying criteria for porn/sex addiction?  No.  

Here's a link to a short explanatory article on why sex addiction isn't specified in the DSM-5.

https://www.addiction.com/expert-blogs/sex-addiction-dsm-5-2/

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
frugalitymom

I personally think Josh wouldn't be at rehab if they weren't in the public eye.  I think it would have been handled differently like the molestation was. Being in the public eye means they have to put on a show.  

  • Upvote 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, kimhoward said:

Joshes Facebook is back! This is his personal Facebook account… Not the "page" that he and Anna had. If he revived it, he must've had access to the Internet. Does this mean he had a pass from rehab?

https://www.facebook.com/joshduggar

 

Josh and I have mutual facebook friends. Yikes. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Flyinthesoup
2 hours ago, kimhoward said:

Joshes Facebook is back! This is his personal Facebook account… Not the "page" that he and Anna had. If he revived it, he must've had access to the Internet. Does this mean he had a pass from rehab?

https://www.facebook.com/joshduggar

 

I'm going to guess there's been a 'hack' to his account.  I cannot imagine anyone allowing or encouraging him this privilege.  Maybe I'm wrong.  Let's see how long it stays visible. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
kimhoward
24 minutes ago, Flyinthesoup said:

I'm going to guess there's been a 'hack' to his account.  I cannot imagine anyone allowing or encouraging him this privilege.  Maybe I'm wrong.  Let's see how long it stays visible. 

The way Facebook works can be a mystery to anyone. I've had my account deactivated in the past and unbeknownst to me, if you signed in, it would re-activate it. Maybe he (or his PR people) signed in to find something or to look at something else and didn't know they were re-activating it.   Flyinthesoup is right - him getting access is unlikely, especially if he's still in Jesus jail. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Cleopatra7
31 minutes ago, Flyinthesoup said:

I'm going to guess there's been a 'hack' to his account.  I cannot imagine anyone allowing or encouraging him this privilege.  Maybe I'm wrong.  Let's see how long it stays visible. 

It doesn't appear to have been updated since Joshgate 1.0 (the last entry is JB and Michelle's statement on his youthful "poor decisions"). Don't know why it's back up. Wherever Josh is, I doubt they're letting him have Internet access, and even if he was online, he'd get nothing but abuse if he was using his real identity.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Flyinthesoup
6 minutes ago, kimhoward said:

The way Facebook works can be a mystery to anyone. I've had my account deactivated in the past and unbeknownst to me, if you signed in, it would re-activate it. Maybe he (or his PR people) signed in to find something or to look at something else and didn't know they were re-activating it.   Flyinthesoup is right - him getting access is unlikely, especially if he's still in Jesus jail. 

Interesting, thank you for that information.  I could see that as a very real possibility.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sweet Fellowship

Perhaps his Facebook account returning is the beginning of the "Reformed" Josh campaign? I guess that the comments will be heavily moderated by someone other than Josh.

Or it could have been Josh logging in preparing to announce his turning away from Gothardism and intention to divorce Anna. Oh, and announcing he's working on a tell-all book.

Nah. That won't happen.

  • Upvote 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
CorruptionInc.

Maybe JB, Meeeeeeeeeechelle or Anna were the ones logging in?

Just checking to make sure he hadn't befriended any defrauding women or had any secret messages?

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Sweet Fellowship
2 minutes ago, CorruptionInc. said:

Maybe JB, Meeeeeeeeeechelle or Anna were the ones logging in?

Just checking to make sure he hadn't befriended any defrauding women or had any secret messages?

Probably Anna? Am I recalling wrong, or did Daddy Keller tell Josh that Anna would have to be a accountable for his Internet access? I could be mixing it up with Pecan and Priscilla.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Valerie3kids
26 minutes ago, Sweet Fellowship said:

Probably Anna? Am I recalling wrong, or did Daddy Keller tell Josh that Anna would have to be a accountable for his Internet access? I could be mixing it up with Pecan and Priscilla.

So she will have four young children to watch and have to babysit the pig aka her husband? Jeepers. Can we add anymore stress to that girl's life? She will need a good computer class as I feel the Keller's homeschooling is no better than the Duggars and she will need to learn to sleuth in order to catch the addicted Josh. I am sure he has his ways and she is going to have to sneakier than he is and I can't see that one happening. She is too trusting and naïve.

  • Upvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Valerie3kids said:

So she will have four young children to watch and have to babysit the pig aka her husband? Jeepers. Can we add anymore stress to that girl's life? She will need a good computer class as I feel the Keller's homeschooling is no better than the Duggars and she will need to learn to sleuth in order to catch the addicted Josh. I am sure he has his ways and she is going to have to sneakier than he is and I can't see that one happening. She is too trusting and naïve.

I presume 1TON ramp doesn't have a class to teach wives to babysit their husbands' internet activity... 

  • Upvote 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
sj3339sta

There are filters she can use to limit access to a lot of things on the internet.  Having the computer ALWAYS in a common area is another good idea.  She will not need to babysit him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mela99

I really wonder if Papa Keller's demands to TFDW were drawn from what he already knew about Smuggar. I have a feeling he was caught with porn or something on the computer a long time ago...

  • Upvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mrsaztx
On January 6, 2016 at 9:25 AM, TXGirlInAMaterialWorld said:

I don't know what it would take for JB to be convinced they can't win- he believes that God is on their side- so who can stand against them? 

Quick poll: how many people here think JB actually believes what he's spewing re: God? I often wonder that about these religious/cult leaders. I think very few of them actually believe, they just see it as the easiest way to control people. 

  • Upvote 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mercer

I think it's entirely possible Josh is sneaking internet access somehow while in rehab.

At the group home where I work, we sometimes have residents who for their own safety due to their decision-making cannot be allowed online. Speaking from my experience, is difficult to impossible to fully enforce that because so many devices are internet enabled and some are small enough to be easily hidden on one's person. People who are really determined to get online will find a way somehow, more often than not, even in a program where that is supposed to be prevented.

  • Upvote 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
Kjaerringa

Has anyone else heard that Josh et al have filed a petition for the lawsuit to be dismissed.....because A) she has no proof of her accusations, and B) (  < this is supposed to say 'B' but the sunglasses won't go away!! ) because she accepted money for sex? Rather mind boggling, IMHO.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
EmCatlyn
39 minutes ago, Mercer said:

I think it's entirely possible Josh is sneaking internet access somehow while in rehab.

At the group home where I work, we sometimes have residents who for their own safety due to their decision-making cannot be allowed online. Speaking from my experience, is difficult to impossible to fully enforce that because so many devices are internet enabled and some are small enough to be easily hidden on one's person. People who are really determined to get online will find a way somehow, more often than not, even in a program where that is supposed to be prevented.

I will grant that he could sneak some access if he really wanted to.  I just can't figure why he would use that access to go back to his Facebook page.  He can't use it without risking discovery.  If I were going to secretly go on the internet I would first and foremost establish a new identity and be very careful to stay away from my old "haunts."

Incidentally, Daniel Keller (Anna's brother, who had closed his FB account after the incident when he posted about "the pig she calls her husband") is back on FB.

Link to post
Share on other sites
OldFadedStar
5 minutes ago, Kjaerringa said:

Has anyone else heard that Josh et al have filed a petition for the lawsuit to be dismissed.....because A) she has no proof of her accusations, and B) (  < this is supposed to say 'B' but the sunglasses won't go away!! ) because she accepted money for sex? Rather mind boggling, IMHO.

I wouldn't be surprised at all if he filed for it to be dismissed because he paid her for sex... seems like something he would do. "Well she broke the law too! She's a hooker" 

 

PS. Doesn't mean I think that it should be dismissed for those reasons...

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Cleopatra7
1 hour ago, Mrsaztx said:

Quick poll: how many people here think JB actually believes what he's spewing re: God? I often wonder that about these religious/cult leaders. I think very few of them actually believe, they just see it as the easiest way to control people. 

ATI is so restrictive that I can't imagine anyone doing it and not being convinced of its efficacy when there are many, less restrictive forms of Christianity out there. If nothing else, only someone wearing some seriously distorted faith goggles would look at those worthless Wisdom books and think that they could provide a halfway decent education.

  • Upvote 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mercer
7 minutes ago, EmCatlyn said:

I will grant that he could sneak some access if he really wanted to.  I just can't figure why he would use that access to go back to his Facebook page.  He can't use it without risking discovery.  If I were going to secretly go on the internet I would first and foremost establish a new identity and be very careful to stay away from my old "haunts."

It may have been accidental if he was trying to log onto a different site that authenticated using Facebook credentials.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Coconut Flan locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.