Jump to content

Sunday school teacher axed for lessons on racism/LDS related


Recommended Posts

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/sunday- ... cist-past/



Sunday school teacher fired for using official Mormon website for lessons on church’s racist past


David Edwards

06 May 2015 at 12:45 ET


Former Sunday school teacher Brian Dawson said that the Mormon church dismissed him because he used the church’s own writings to explain the evolution of racial biases within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.


Dawson, who is a former Mormon missionary, recalled to The Salt Lake Tribune, that children in his Sunday school class asked him in February why his Nigerian wife would have chosen to join a church with a history of banning black people from the priesthood.


So he turned to a 2013 church essay titled “Race and the Priesthood,� which argued that former LDS President Brigham Young was influenced by racial attitudes of the 1800s. At the time, the church taught that black members could not enter the priesthood because the color of their skin proved that they were “fence-sitters� in the war with Satan.


The ban on black priests was lifted in 1978, although some Mormons still cling to the belief that dark skin is a curse.


After Dawson discussed the church’s essay with his Sunday school class, at least one of the parents complained to his bishop.


“Anything regarding black history before 1978 is irrelevant… and a moot point,� Dawson recalled the bishop warning him.


Dawson said that he was ordered to never again discuss “black Mormon history� with students, but he declined.


“If the [Holy] Spirit guides me in a way that involves these multitude of documents, who am I to resist the enticing of the Spirit?� Dawson asked.


The bishop replied: “The Spirit is telling me to tell you not to use those documents.�


Ezinne, Dawson’s Nigerian wife, pointed out that she grew up in the Mormon church, she said that she first felt racism within the organization when she attended BYU as a freshman.


“It didn’t make sense to me,� Ezinne told the Tribune. “He was not teaching black history. He was teaching Mormon history.�


“Our children are going to deal with this,� she added. “Lots of members are going to have to deal with it.�


In the end, church leaders agreed that they wanted members to use the essay to talk about racial issues, but they just didn’t feel like church was the right place to do it.


Ed note: The article has been updated to note that Ezinne Dawson first experience racism within the church when she attended BYU, not more recently.


Additional article


http://www.sltrib.com/lifestyle/faith/2 ... fullpage=1

Edited by OnceUponATime
adding tags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not surprising. For a long time, the LDS church tried to deny a lot of the things that ex-Mormons knew were true about the church's history. They only started to address that stuff recently because the spread of information on the internet made it impossible to deny any longer.

If you look objectively at the history of the LDS church, it quickly becomes blatantly obvious that the whole thing was founded by a con man who just used religion to trick young girls and women into having sex with him. Just the thing about how he used a rock in a hat to translate scripture but couldn't produce the same translation twice makes it totally obvious that he was just making it up as he went along. The religion can only survive through denial and willful ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they want to pretend that all the racism never happened?

Yes. That's exactly what the church does over and over again with pesky history and doctrine, and it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. That's exactly what the church does over and over again with pesky history and doctrine, and it works.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. That's exactly what the church does over and over again with pesky history and doctrine, and it works.

That's what they do, they want to pretend the racism never happened, as well as polygamy which is why they tend to bury their heads in the sand over the FLDS. Some of those who aren't FLDS, but practice polygamy are even related to other LDS members in Utah and nearby states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recent Status Updates

    • zee_four

      zee_four  »  onekidanddone

      I just saw your user pic and I love it! Yay Rhode Island!
      · 1 reply
    • Jinder Roles

      Jinder Roles

      If you’re looking for a new female rapper may I suggest Doechii. The girl is a genius
      · 3 replies
    • louisa05


      Business teacher discussing ethics in the room next door just told students taking a sick day for mental health reasons or “mild illness” is wrong. 🙄
      · 4 replies
    • SillyDillys


      I need Jill Rod to post something stupid right now. I don't want to give birth to Ms. Dilly after reading the description of the material that Josh downloaded
      · 3 replies
    • Cartmann99


      It's December and we still haven't had our first freeze of the season.

      In light of the issues with the electrical grid in Texas, perhaps I should make an appeal to Rufus to continue to keep us above freezing? 🤔
      · 2 replies
    • HerNameIsBuffy


      Advice needed from anyone with experience planning a Catholic wedding
      She's been engaged less than a week and I've got questions.
      Booking a church or venue is done way in advance so we're on that now.   
      Why do churches ask what the date is when they say specifically on the website that you can't set a date until discussing it with the coordinator?  Why can't they ask for a range? Since when have Catholic churches been such pains in the ass about being a member of that parish to get married there?  She's coming in from out of state for the wedding, she doesn't have a parish here.  I'm not religious and my local parish church is ugly.  My childhood parish waived this and said they could marry there, but it's not an ideal location and aesthetically it's fine but she'd prefer older and more cathedralesque if they do the church wedding.   My grandpa's old church is beautiful and she's in love with it....but they're the only one who hasn't gotten back to us.  (St. Hedwig's for anyone familiar with Chicago's Bucktown) Bribes still work, right?  In the old days you could slip the church a "donation" and they'd be a lot more lenient about weddings, annulments, and funerals for non-practicing Catholics.  How are we supposed to figure out the going rate for graft 2021?   I have no problem lying to the administrative staff and claiming to be a practicing Catholic if it helps, does that make me a sociopath?  Although I don't want to lie to a priest directly.  Can you be a sociopath with religious guilt? I've been married twice, both times to Catholics.  First wedding in a Baptist church and second in congregational or community something.  I did that because I suck at planning this kind of thing and fundy-lites will marry anyone with a 20 minute meet and greet, apparently.  I wanted to elope both times and was over ruled both times so I resentfully half-assed it so this is the first time I'm trying to help plan a wedding properly.  
      The church she wants will waive the bride and groom being members if one of their parents are.  I love my daughter so much, but if I have to start actually attending church to make this work I will expect her to pay for the increase in my wine and edible budget.  Member for at least four months.  Driving from the burbs into the city once a week timing it so I get there just in time to toss them an envelope with money I'd rather keep and skedaddle is something I'd rather avoid.
      I know lots of people think what I'm trying to do is awful.  That non-practicing Catholics shouldn't get married in the church, that it's a sin to try and game the system, etc.  That church shopping for the aesthetic is  a sacrilege or such.  I understand how people can feel that way, it's valid.  But people like that would disapprove of me for a million other reasons anyway, so I'm okay with that.
      This is how I'm rationalizing it. 
      I raised her Catholic and while not practicing as an adult she does believe in God, Jesus, giving a shout out to Mary and all that.  They are going to raise their kids Catholic in the sense of sending them to CCD so they have the religious ed and then they can make their own choices as adults.   I spent thousands of dollars on CCD over the years and two out of three of my kids don't know what an apostle is.  They owe me.   Being Catholic is as much a cultural thing as a religious choice and that's the only one we have.   You can't opt out of being Catholic, as my sister once learned when she went fundy-lite, due to the indelible mark of baptism so they keep you on the roster.  If you can't leave the church without a formal declaration then I there should be something in it for us.  One wedding and burial per Catholic no matter how lapsed seems fair to me. When my uncle died in the late 1950s the church wouldn't allow him to be buried in a Catholic cemetery so they put him in a secular one.  Several years later my dad made a sizable "donation" and voila, look who got exhumed and is now buried next to Grandma and Grandpa.  Wish he was here now to handle this.  
      · 16 replies
    • indianabones


      I have mice in my attic and need to figure out how to clean my dryer vent. Ah, the joys of home ownership!
      · 3 replies
    • Scrabblemaster


      When everything will go on as planned, I will marry Mr. S. at the end of the year. But honestly my optimism is fading away (Covid19 and one other fucking annoying issue, that is more likely to get the wedding rescheduled than Covid19) . I wanted to tell it here, just...well...because. You understand? 
      · 3 replies
    • PinkGreyBrown


      The world according to James Robert Duggar, patriarch: Keep sweet? Keep secrets.

      · 3 replies
    • 47of74


      Decided to go to one of my old MST3K standbys for tonight's entertainment.  Namely Angel's Revenge.
      · 0 replies
  • Recent Blog Entries

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.