Jump to content
IGNORED

Robert: Don't satisfy wife sexually to show her who's boss


Hisey

Recommended Posts

In following the comments, I'm waiting for Robert to issue one of his stern warnings to Tom...something like "You're about to be on a short leash, my friend..." Because Tom is actually sounding like a rational and decent man - a man who knows his Bible. Robert is not going to tolerate this for long.

Seems like Tom has a wonderful marriage and actually cherishes his wife and truly loves and leads sacrificially.

I need to clarify: the commenter I've called "Tom" is actually just "T." Not sure why I misread it each time. Just a PSA for those who might be looking for the mysterious Tom in the comments.

New Years Resolution: Work on reading comprehension....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 333
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I understand now. Sometimes Robert doesn't want to bother with pleasing Amanda. He doesn't want to bother waiting for her (fake) orgasm. If he is saying it's 20% of the time, probably means its more like 50%. Can't be bothered, just needs to get this done. . .

He just twists-and-turns this selfishness into something "godly" or "good."

I hate to provide TMI online. But the one guy I know would be sad and disappointed if he was the only one having fun. It would decrease his libido if this were the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But yes, everyone is getting hung up on just that one part, and forgetting BOTH the *context* and the *who*. But for those intending to cause trouble, that’s the only ground they can stand on because they know they are arguing something that is contrary to the Bible, which is the entire premise of this blog.

sez Amanda ...

Because apparently the Bible is all about withholding orgasms from women to get those bitchez in line.

What they're promoting feels both spiteful and manipulative. WHY does everything have to be a power play with these people? They've taken something joyful and pleasurable and perverted it beyond recognition. They should be ashamed of themselves for not only doing it to each other but for encouraging others to do it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANNNNNDDD...T wins this match!!

.....T. you seem like a good guy, with a good wife. God bless you. I mean you no ill will despite what i just wrote. But what you are telling folks is what the church has been telling guys for the last few decades and it only works part of the time. Go in peace but I don’t have any more time to give you so this will be my last reply to you and if I have another comment that resembles your last few it will be moderated. You’ve made your point. Readers can decide for themselves. God bless, Robert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANNNNNDDD...T wins this match!!

He is saying what T says isn't Biblical, but T is the only one quoting scripture. Where the fuck is the scripture backing up what Robert is suggesting???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is saying what T says isn't Biblical, but T is the only one quoting scripture. Where the fuck is the scripture backing up what Robert is suggesting???

There is none or Robert would have (incorrectly) quoted it by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is saying what T says isn't Biblical, but T is the only one quoting scripture. Where the fuck is the scripture backing up what Robert is suggesting???

he is too fucking dumb to understand the rules of debate and discussion. he doesn't realize the burden of proof is actually on him to prove his point in the first place, but then when proof is brought contrary to his point (which is not sourced) he simply counters and counters until he gives up. rob, if you're asking for sources to prove the counter-point being presented, you need to provide your own sources to back up your own stance. that's pretty fucking basic right there.

and robert, for all this talk about backing stuff up with scriptures, shouldn't you be providing the sources for all your ramblings? and even if you don't post them initially, shouldn't they be easy for you to access and post, say, if someone tries to bring up a contrary point? or could it be that you actually just don't give a shit, you think what you think and you say it's biblical even when it isn't and even when others can prove otherwise? hmmm, methinks this is actually the case, here.

go on, rob. prove teh ebil feminists of fj wrong. post all of your specific sources to back up each and every specific claim you make. prove us wrong. if you can. :twisted:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Boobert (in the comments), modern humans invented the female orgasm. How many orgasms did ancient women have, he asks? Well, Boobert, the term "hysteria" was coined about 2,000 years ago and a hysterical crisis was described as the result of a manual massage that was accompanied by moaning, convulsion-like movements and deep relaxation. After vibrators were invented, they were openly sold in the newspapers of the time, couched in polite terms, of course (much like the Hitachi Wand).

Basically, dude, just because you've never actually seen a female orgasm in the wild doesn't mean they aren't real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But long term for attraction and for you to remain dominate (remember the single most attractive thing to a woman)

Oh. I didn't realize I should have been attracted to my abuser.

If Robert really wants to show he's in charge, get her off EVERY time she wants it. Otherwise it looks hit and miss, like sometimes there's luck, and sometimes there isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Boobert (in the comments), modern humans invented the female orgasm.

i didn't know we could invent bodily functions now. can we invent a way for a bladder to go empty itself in the toilet without waking me up in the middle of the night? plskthx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who really, really hopes that Amanda starts faking it 100% of the time, just to stick it to him? :stir-pot:

It's all just so incredibly manipulative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how transparent Robert is about the fact that he is going to have to moderate T's comments (since he clearly has no answer for him).

Moderate so Tom doesn't make him look more foolish than he already has. That is the manly way of dealing with things, obviously. Real men can't answer questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, he just posted another of T's comments, and then had Amanda reply. Hiding behind your wife's skirts, eh, Bob? :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is so much made up bullshit it is mind boggling so I'm going to play free association with his post and everyone's comments.

If 80 percent is so very whoop-de-do, am I to suppose that he only gets off (or stays hard or finishes in some way) 80 percent of the time he has sex and thinks that's fab?

Amen on 1 Corinthians.... deprivation is warned against.

Amen also to the women who wrote her husband would think he was falling down on the job if she only had one orgasm I'm not sure how L. Ron Cupboard proposes preventing all these wives from having orgasms.... some women are very orgasmic and since, as he says, not everyone has orgasms from PIV sex, some women get off long before the main event.

Any man who says women don't know what they want but he does is kidding himself and is a condescending dick.

If female orgasm was "invented" recently, then kudos to the inventor of the clit! How did they manage to graft them onto women en masse recently? Also, why would female genital mutilation be a thing if women enjoying sex was not a known thing.

For many women, CM, frustration doesn't make them want more sex, satisfaction does. The more orgasms a woman might have, the more she might want....we aren't the sex that is stereotyped as needing to rest up between orgasms.

And, while I've not yet shared Cabinetman's latest bit of wisdom with my husband, the last bit I shared about Ken or CM made Mr Salex roll his eyes and say "so they basically write porn for one another to read about sex, and bad wives and discipline... and other people's bad wives?" Which I had to admit was probably the case.

ET fix some poor sentences. Others may remain...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is so much made up bullshit it is mind boggling so I'm going to play free association with his post and everyone's comments.

If 80 percent is so very whoop-de-do, am I to suppose that he only gets off (or stays hard or finishes in some way) 80 percent of the time he has sex and thinks that's fab?

Amen on 1 Corinthians.... deprivation is warned against.

Amen also to the women who wrote her husband would think he was falling down on the job if she only had one orgasm I'm not sure how L. Ron Cupboard proposes preventing all these wives from having orgasms.... some women are very orgasmic and since, as he says, not everyone has orgasms from PIV sex, some women get off long before the main event.

Any man who says women don't know what they want but he does is kidding himself and is a condescending dick.

If female orgasm was "invented" recently, then kudos to the inventor of the clit! How did they manage to graft them onto women en masse recently? Also, why would female genital mutilation be a thing if women enjoying sex was not a known thing.

For many women, CM, frustration doesn't make them want more sex, satisfaction does. The more orgasms a woman might have, the more she might want....we aren't the sex that is stereotyped as needing to rest up between orgasms.

And, while I've not yet shared Cabinetman's latest bit of wisdom with my husband, the last bit I shared about Ken or CM made Mr Salex roll his eyes and say "so they basically write porn for one another to read about sex, and bad wives and discipline... and other people's bad wives?" Which I had to admit was probably the case.

ET fix some poor sentences. Others may remain...

This. I've had the uncomfortable feeling that CM has been sitting back all day watching this thread and...well, you know. :ew:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between watching this thread(and you know he is) and frantically trying to slap down people who dare to disagree with him Robert must not have gotten much done today.

Robert not being able to answer T's questions reminds me of Lori when she couldn't answer if she obeyed Ken out of love or obligation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. I've had the uncomfortable feeling that CM has been sitting back all day watching this thread and...well, you know. :ew:

I think he had a few goals in writing this post. First, to draw in comments. Clearly, that has worked; although he and Amanda account for half of them. Second, to cause discussion here on FJ. He's been a little neglected here lately. Again - goal met. Third, I think he was hoping to see a lot of "TMI" comments on his blog and here so that he could gain details of everyone's sex lives. He, like Ken, seems quite voyeuristic.

On another note - Just how are his readers supposed to know if a specific post isn't for them? They keep scolding their commenters by basically saying "You aren't even supposed to be reading today!!" Just wondering if there's a guide somewhere that lets us know who can read each day and who can't. :shifty:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between watching this thread(and you know he is) and frantically trying to slap down people who dare to disagree with him Robert must not have gotten much done today.

Robert not being able to answer T's questions reminds me of Lori when she couldn't answer if she obeyed Ken out of love or obligation.

if we didn't have proof to the contrary, i would wonder if rob, lori, and ken are all the same person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we didn't have proof to the contrary, i would wonder if rob, lori, and ken are all the same person.

It's interesting that Ken hasn't weighed in on this. OR HAS HE.....? Some of those comments have a familiar ring to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amanda:

I don’t want my husband to respect me, I want my husband to love me.

Dear Amanda,

While it's clear that your husband doesn't respect you, you do not have to pretend that you never wanted to be respected in the first place. Also, love and respect and not mutually exclusive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T's most recent comment before it is deleted:

I do hope that when you have the time you can please explain how my teachings are “modernâ€. Strict biblical literalism with the husband living as a sacrificial servant just as Christ did is not popular today. No one wants to hear that the Bible means what it says. They want to hear that there are exceptions to the rules, that there are “get out of jail free†cards for husbands who don’t want to love their wives sacrificially. Living the sacrificial life is hard. It is extremely hard. So hard that the modern world wants to have nothing to do with it. Jesus was not “feminizedâ€, yet he acted like the most lowly servant. When I act as a humble servant to my wife I am also not “feminized.†It is frankly repulsive that you look at a man attempting to love his wife as Christ loved the church and who is striving to live like Christ as “feminized.†I am open to learning and accepting when I am wrong. If you can point out to me how loving sacrificially and acting like the lowliest servant like Christ did is “modern†and “feminized†I am open to accepting that I am not always right, But your replies must be firmly grounded in the literal word of God.

I realize you are busy, but truly hope you take the time to answer how a man purposely choosing to deny his wife a wanted orgasm is him fulfilling his marital duty. I asked twice and am still waiting on an answer. The lack of an answer on your part is puzzling to me. If you are so sure that your teachings are based on the Bible, I should have gotten a quick answer. Are you sure, Robert? My “agenda†is to focus on marriage advice being Biblically based. If you can’t show how that advice is not a violation of that verse, then you have a huge problem, not just with me, but with God.

If my wife refused sex, it would be devastating for me. But is that an excuse for me to violate the Bible and not love her with a sacrificial love? Is it an excuse for me to not fulfill my marital duty towards her every time she does desire sex? I do not believe so. THIS is what isn’t popular to say Robert. THIS is what is hard. I know because I see so many men, even Christian men, using their wife’s behavour as an excuse to not love and live a sacrificial love. Demanding and domineering is easy. Sacrificing is hard, and it troubles me that I see so many men teaching other men that the solution is to be less like the Christ who made Himself the most humble of servants and performed the lowliest chores and to be more like the worldly man who wants to be waited on hand and foot and who demands that he be served. Your teachings are the modern ones, Robert, not mine. Did Jesus model a life of being served or a life of being a servant?

The world’s way of solving marriage problems might work, but is it worth it? Is it worth not going to God’s way? A way that is a husband leading the home with a sacrificial love? A love modeled after Christ Himself?

I do have an agenda Robert, and that agenda is Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, sweetest name I know. Fills my every longing, keeps me singing as I go. Yes, even during those long periods where my wife was too sick for her to be able to enjoy sex, Jesus was there, and that hymn speaks the truth. Jesus can fill every longing if you just turn to Him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This bit from Robert's comment might be the funniest thing I've read on the internet...EVER!!

We have a post where men have been sexually oppressed and somehow in a post that offers women 3 times the amount of orgasms they currently get under the current teaching, they are still victims! They are the oppressed ones!

It reads like a commercial.

"Get your orgasms here ladies!! Now with THREE TIMES MORE than you were allowed in the past!! *some restrictions may apply*"

:dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amanda:

Dear Amanda,

While it's clear that your husband doesn't respect you, you do not have to pretend that you never wanted to be respected in the first place. Also, love and respect and not mutually exclusive.

also, amanda, love and respect from a partner go hand in hand. if a man does not respect you, he does not truly love you. please stop deluding yourself on this, you deserve so much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also some hairsplitting that men are to love their husbandswives and women to respect their husbands. Hence Lori can be in a good christian marriage without loving ken, just going through the motions of respecting him and his income. And CM can "love" his wife without respecting her enough to take her needs or wants into consideration.

The joys of Christian Marriage are a wonder to behold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.