Jump to content
IGNORED

Oh, the horrors of female suffrage!


AtroposHeart

Recommended Posts

Are you saying that Christian men dont vote with their emotions when they back candidates who are pro life cause they cant bear the thought of people aborting their babies, or against gay marriage because they are grossed out by the idea of two men having sex, or feel angry when politicians mention gun control because they want to own a gun.

When the voting is about controversial issues, everyone votes with their emotions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hell, apparently even women in Saudi Arabia are going to be able to vote come 2015.

Shit, this means Saudi Arabia will be too liberal for this SSM? Good grief!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was reading the comments, and many only believe land owners should vote. That is scary, not only do they want to disenfranchise women, but also the poor.

Only land-owning men get to vote? What century is this. It is bone-chilling that such thoughts exist in this time period

Might as well go back 100 years and only WHITE MALE LANDOWNERS can vote. It's just as crazy and offensive as the other ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well of that were the case john Schrader would not be voting. And politicians of every flavor would be handing out the minimum number of acres needed to vote out of public lands. How many of thes fundy families rent? Also how much land would qualify to get to vote. A house a few acres or a small farm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sunshinemary, you are seriously delusional if you think men as whole will always vote for what is in our best interests. I supposed though, it would be in your best interest because you consider yourself nothing more than a slave belonging to your husband.

She can't think that, not really - after all, men voted to allow women to vote! And according to her, that's not in anyone's best interest. So therefore men will not always vote for what is in (as Sunshinemary defines it) our best interest. Therefore men shouldn't be the only people permitted to vote. Which thank the FSM, they aren't! Sunshinemary, you just put yourself into a reasoning loop that you aren't going to be able to talk your way out of. :naughty:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What astounds me is that there are WOMEN who don't believe women should vote.

By the way, hypothetically, what would any of you do if you found out your husband/partner didn't think women should vote, but wasn't vocal about it.

This is why dating before marriage is so wonderful. Some people lie during the dating period but I think that paying attention to how they treat others and yourself can weed out some problems. I've had friends who are really impressed by flowers and other romantic gestures. Those are nice but say nothing about whether the individual will respect you. A person who doesn't think that a portion of the adult population shouldn't vote is not going to be respectful and probably has other problems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SSM's complete inablility to make rational, well thought out decisions most likely comes from her being a fundie, not a women. Look how many male fundies come in here and can't debate an issue because all of their decisions and life choices are based on only emotions, not reality or facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason why I oppose female suffrage is because women are much more emotional and are easily manipulated. Women are swayed by the sexual attractiveness of the candidate rather than his voting record.

So I suppose by bisexual inclinations explain why I voted to a hot lesbian like Tammy Baldwin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason why I oppose female suffrage is because women are much more emotional and are easily manipulated. Women are swayed by the sexual attractiveness of the candidate rather than his voting record. We also tend to be short-sighted. I have written an anecdote about this:

http://thewomanandthedragon.wordpress.c ... ed-states/

Men are more likely to take a long view of things and are generally less swayed by the sexual attractiveness of the candidate. At the time that the nineteenth amendment was passed by the senate, it was not particular popular with the common folk. Even as it was being ratified, most states passed it by rather narrow margins.

Women do not need the right to vote if our husbands and fathers have that right. They will not vote against our best interests and are likely to make better fiscal and social policy choices. Women generally tend toward socialism, which is always an eventual failure everywhere it is attempted.

I'm always surprised by the argument that men are less driven by emotions then women. In my experience, that isn't true, at all. Some people are driven more by emotions, some by logic but for most people, it depends on the occasion. Women's reactions are often termed emotional and yet men, who have similar reactions aren't considered emotional. For example, if a woman gets involved in a bad relationship, her emotions are the cause. If a man is in a bad relationship, his 'penis is controlling him.' A woman who is powerful and aggressive in business is a bitch. A man who acts the same way is considered a good businessman

Most very right wing conservative causes are based on emotion and not logic. There is nothing logical about denying a portion of the adult population the same marriage rates as other citizens or pretending that a mass of cells without a brain is the same as a newborn infant.

As far as sexual attractiveness, most of the women on Fox News wear short skirts, have blonde hair and are positioned so the camera can almost see up their skirts. On that show, male reporters gushed about how attractive Sarah Palin was and I've heard talk show hosts like Limbaugh and Beck make disparaging comments about women's looks. I'm pretty certain that it is the men on the right who are more controlled by female candidates' appearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say you are law-abiding a mere sentence after you talked about possibly skirting immigration laws.

Correction. YOU are unable to step back from emotions. It's not a gender thing.

It's not a gender thing. And "low-IQ"citizens are still citizens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this has to be a troll.

Unfortunately she's for real. She's come by to do this same song and dance many times before on a blog that I read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately she's for real. She's come by to do this same song and dance many times before on a blog that I read.

Well hopefully she will dance herself back in here to explain why fundie men base their decisions on emotions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I suppose by bisexual inclinations explain why I voted to a hot lesbian like Tammy Baldwin?

Clearly, also why I voted for Jill Stein for president. It couldn't have had anything to do with the fact that she had the most compelling environmental policies of any candidate running.

It's a mystery, though, why I voted for Sen. Paul Wellstone back in the day. He's not my type at all. Oh, wait. It's not a mystery. It was his voting record.

Perhaps I'm a man? I'm sure SSM has a brilliant explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, what about women voting for female politicians? Are those women secretly lesbians? I think SSM forgot (or maybe she doesn't know, since politics are too much for her pretty little head) that there are women in office? And not just in the US, either, but all over the world GASP!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I as a woman will vote in every election I get a chance to vote in and my vote will go toward the most proggressive candiate.

I can understand your frustration, but I definitely dont condone doing this. Just because someone is progressive doesnt mean that they're good at their job. Plus, some progressive ideologies are just as terrifying as conservative ones.

I do my best to vote in every election as an informed voter. I make sure that I research all the candidates, what they've done, what they're planning to do, etc. I educate myself on all the measures. If I find a race/measure I don't care enough about to pick one or the other, I dont vote. I wont let my vote affect the outcome for those who really care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying that Christian men dont vote with their emotions when they back candidates who are pro life cause they cant bear the thought of people aborting their babies, or against gay marriage because they are grossed out by the idea of two men having sex, or feel angry when politicians mention gun control because they want to own a gun.

When the voting is about controversial issues, everyone votes with their emotions.

And I'm sure men supported Sarah Palin due to her keen political insight and her great ideas on policy, not because they thought she was a hot babe they wanted to fuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think she is so emotional she had to flounce instead of stay and face facts and reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might as well go back 100 years and only WHITE MALE LANDOWNERS can vote. It's just as crazy and offensive as the other ideas.

I am very much afraid that that is exactly where they want to go with this and that's why fundie families are so insistent upon their sons buying their houses outright before they get married. That way they can vote whilst us big city liberals, having mortgages and thus homes owned at least in part by the banks, would be disenfranchised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the blog is gone...

That really surprises me. sunshinemary is/was a long standing troll on Manboobz and nothing seemed to faze her over there. I wonder what finally caused her to delete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why why Why WHY WHY WHY is this still an issue in the 21st century?? :evil:

Because privilege makes people think they have economic power over others because of their male Christian and white is supposed to be the default in American society; so when non-defaults recieve rights, the less rich who are male Christian and white feel their rights are taken away in revenge for treating the non-defaults like shit throughout history. They (the American defaults) always want to stay on top and make believe they're in the same economic class 1 % because of their privieges that American patriarchal society has given them even though it's not true but merely propaganda that they patriarchy ascribes priveleged statuses to make them feel economically rich and more superior than others; and if somebody else shares their priviliges; they won't get to feel better about anybody else. That's just my theory, though. :think: Sorry if I didn't make any sense. :oops:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow talk about a complete flounce scarlett-flounces-out-o.gif I wonder what prompted this? Inevitably all MRaassholes don't make exceptions even for women who agree with them. They basically want a sexbot/maid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow talk about a complete flounce scarlett-flounces-out-o.gif I wonder what prompted this? Inevitably all MRaassholes don't make exceptions even for women who agree with them. They basically want a sexbot/maid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.