Jump to content
IGNORED

Bontragers - Obama is a communist like Stalin and Hitler!


Deleted07

Recommended Posts

Guest Anonymous

Then stop acting like you know what's best for our country.

Fine.

Just know your country sucks shit and that it will never be awesome, because of people like you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If what Emmie linked is your solution than that is not going to work here. At all. The rich, white, Christians would think nothing of lacing the meds of poor, non-white, non-Christian, non-straight people to kill them off. And the rich, white, straight Christians would probably be the ones in charge. There is a lot of hate and prejudice here, so there needs to be someone to make sure that that hate and prejudice doesn't run rampant.

If this is not your solution, then what is going to happen after the revolution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine.

Just know your country sucks shit and that it will never be awesome, because of people like you.

Big words from someone espousing a plan that has... no actual plan.

"Trust me, it will work" is not a plan, or I might have voted for Romney. :lol:

I'm still confused as to what makes Obama a fascist.

He isn't and Fundylyte knows it. That is why they keep changing the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine.

Just know your country sucks shit and that it will never be awesome, because of people like you.

You know absolutely nothing about me or what I think about my country. I also don't care what you think about my country.

Actually, I take that back. I'm so sorry that my country will never be "awesome." I always wanted my country to the the celebrity of countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous
If what Emmie linked is your solution than that is not going to work here. At all. The rich, white, Christians would think nothing of lacing the meds of poor, non-white, non-Christian, non-straight people to kill them off. And the rich, white, straight Christians would probably be the ones in charge. There is a lot of hate and prejudice here, so there needs to be someone to make sure that that hate and prejudice doesn't run rampant.

If this is not your solution, then what is going to happen after the revolution?

Anarchy will happen, then you will be free.

Freedom is good.

Read the FAQ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fundylyte, I am not going to read that bullshit. I started and it is such drivel. I am not sure why I would continue considering that it was obviously written by someone's idealistic pre-teen. I can practically hear the gum snaps and smell the patchouli.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anarchy will happen, then you will be free.

Freedom is good.

Read the FAQ.

I wasn't aware I was not free. Hey ho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous
Just know your country sucks shit and that it will never be awesome, because of people like you.

I just love this. Come on, guys, you need to work harder at being 'awesome'! :lol:

Edited: Damn words!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anarchy will happen, then you will be free.

Freedom is good.

Read the FAQ.[/quote

I tried, honest, but A) the site kept locking up my computer. B.)each link just takes you to more links.

So is your answer that we will all just be magically nice and help each other out if there is no government?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel oddly like I'm reading 1984.

I feel like I am reading another version of jericho and the whole private charities would just magically care for the poor and needy (even though they didn't in the past) if the government would just stop taking care of them idea that he spouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel oddly like I'm reading 1984.

I'm thinking more Sex Pistols circa 1976. Oh, to be 13 again!

I am an antichrist

I am an anarchist

Don't know what I want

But I know how to get it

I wanna destroy passersby

'Cause I wanna be Anarchy

No dog's body

Anarchy for the UK

It's coming sometime and maybe

I give a wrong time stop at traffic line

Your future dream is a sharpie's scheme

'Cause I wanna be Anarchy

In the city

How many ways to get what you want

I use the best

I use the rest

I use the N.M.E

I use Anarchy

'Cause I wanna be Anarchy

It's the only way to be

Is this the M.P.L.A or

Is this the U.D.A or

Is this the I.R.A

I thought it was the UK

Or just another country

Another council tenancy

I wanna be Anarchy

And I wanna be Anarchy

(Oh what a name)

And I wanna be anarchist

I get pissed, destroy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like I am reading another version of jericho and the whole private charities would just magically care for the poor and needy (even though they didn't in the past) if the government would just stop taking care of them idea that he spouts.

It sounds like libertarianism to me, with the added caveat that capitalism will magically not exist. Seriously, people who want no government infrastructure need to go live in a developing nation and then report back about how they like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that an actually anarchist society would look a lot like Somalia. Guess the United States just can't hope to be that "awesome."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous
Just know your country sucks shit and that it will never be awesome, because of people like you.

Last I checked, Sweden has not had a worker's revolution and does not operate on anarchist principles. Why don't you get to work on that? It seems silly for you to be wasting all of your time trolling here when workers are being oppressed right underneath your nose.

**ETA: I wanted to put some crap about Sweden not being awesome because of Fundylyte (whom I really do think is a dude, btw) but honestly while Sweden has its problems, I think they're doing a lot of things right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds nice in theory, but it doesn't work in reality. Which is why I said the non-facist plan she said she had had to be based in the reality that is America. It has to work with the type of people who live here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I checked, Sweden has not had a worker's revolution and does not operate on anarchist principles. Why don't you get to work on that? It seems silly for you to be wasting all of your time trolling here when workers are being oppressed right underneath your nose.

**ETA: I wanted to put some crap about Sweden not being awesome because of Fundylyte (whom I really do think is a dude, btw) but honestly while Sweden has its problems, I think they're doing a lot of things right.

:clap:

I have to say that I do know that I will never be as awesome as Lissar. She is far more eloquent and thoughtful before posting than I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Awww, thank you pomology. :oops:

Really though I never seem to get myself together before I post, which is why ETAs are strewn in my wake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I checked, Sweden has not had a worker's revolution and does not operate on anarchist principles. Why don't you get to work on that? It seems silly for you to be wasting all of your time trolling here when workers are being oppressed right underneath your nose.

**ETA: I wanted to put some crap about Sweden not being awesome because of Fundylyte (whom I really do think is a dude, btw) but honestly while Sweden has its problems, I think they're doing a lot of things right.

One of them being to have the right to disagree. Which Fundylyte is exercising fully, while advocating an ideal which would remove this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe she just really knows nothing of America or human nature? The gun toting, Bible thumping, gay hating folks down the road would use their freedom to go shoot people, not give them healthcare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine.

Just know your country sucks shit and that it will never be awesome, because of people like you.

What do anarchists use for toilet paper after the means of production is destroyed? And what will you do for a living after they stop filming porn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I am about to start yanking my hair out and am most certainly going to need a bath, but I have to put in a small positive word for anarchists. They aren't all like Fundylyte. My dad believed in anarchy, and used the term. To him it meant that there was no "head" dictating, and that rational human beings should be able to do right by consensus, once you cleansed them of religion, racism, tribalism, etc, etc, etc. For the anarchists he spent some of his young adulthood around, you did not destroy the work of other people, and you certainly did not destroy production. It was basically "consensus communism". Of course, like Christianity, Communism, most religions in general, and most paths to enlightenment, it can be beautiful on paper and in individuals who act their convinctions, and a nightmare on par with Facism if they ever actually got what they wanted.

There are of course, people who identify as anarchists and want to bring down all of modern society. There are lots of schools of anarchism. But Fundylyte strikes me as what my dad used to call a "false flag". Someone who just likes destruction and chaos and uses the label anarchist, or even worse, someone who works for sinister political factions and gets paid to start trouble in the name of anarchists at public functions.

Good Lord, I can't believe I just wrote 2 paragraphs and did not use "anarchist" and "magical thinking dumbass" in the same sentence once. :roll: I need a bath, a drink, and to confess my sin to one of my Commie uncles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a lot of the so-called "libertarian" types who are more line anarchists and even admit it. To them, government is in and of itself violence. Of course there's only s military for defensive purposes (run by... Who? There's no government!) But no police force, because crime will just magically disappear. Education will be privatized, but cheap because there will be no government "interference." Everyone will have a job, even if they can't afford to feed themselves with whatever wages they earn. In that case, they can just hope for someone to come and give them money and food.

I really don't get their thinking. Anarchy will only work on a very small scale, and looks surprisingly like a very socialist direct democracy with no police force or laws. So if you're a victim of crime, shoot him, and if you don't, sucks to your ass-mar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anarchy is not a problem with the concept of law, but with hierarchy. It's untrue that in it's original though anarchy = lawlessness. It does not believe in a head of goverment or hierarchical structure. It's not suppose to be a law of the jungle arrangement.

I can only really speak to my dad's, and his was in the context of Greek culture. He an anarchists like him despised practices like showing more respect to the person of a priest, president, or king than you would a neighbor. In fact, they could have done without all those offices. They don't even believe in a concept of a "first citizen" like in communism. They also do not recognize a concept of "party discipline, any political party discipline. You used your conscience on a lot of matters and built consensus in others. Workplaces would be run by unions (union busting is a big no-no to the anarchists I was familiar with). I think you hit the nail on the head that their vision was of small, direct democracies, which would make large nation-states impossible. They aren't libertarians in that for example if their consensus was guns should not be legal for civilians, guns would not be legal. Unions run on a consensus model, they would be encouraged. Can't see libertarians buying into unions of all things.

Anarchy in the late 20th century began to be equated with lawlessness and destructions thanks to the actions of people using the anarchist label. Some are and some are not. If all those college students with too much money and not enough responsibilities (yes, rich white upper middle class kids, I'm talking to you) really understood the work involved to make theoretical governing with no hierarchy possible, they would find other ways to amuse themselves. If mommy and daddy didn't bail them out of jail for throwing bricks through a shop window, they'd think twice about doing it in the name of "anarchy".

It's actually a very attractive theory in theory. I honestly don't see how it could work on the ground given human nature. Some people are just assholes or worse criminals. Other people do not want to be involved in every aspect of the governance of daily life. Some people are just good at leadership and no matter what anarchists say, leadership is necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.