Obama needs the slut vote.

[AtroposHeart]

http://cmd-n.org/2012/10/26/getting-out ... -out-vote/

Rumors of my demise are greatly exaggerated. Unfortunately, a hellacious confluence of events has kept me from being able to blog for the past few months, much of it centered around the stress of working at a severely dysfunctional firm. Thankfully, God willing I expect to rid myself of that little thorn in the flesh in the next few weeks.

But there is another rumor going around. The rumor is that we have an election coming up in a week and a half. And His Divine Highness the Lord Messiah Barack Obama appears to be making an all-out push for the slut vote.

The slut vote is of course crucially important to liberal politicians, as well as to the so-called “So-Con†politicians who are in fact the religious vanguard of the feminine imperative. Obama’s play for the slut vote is transparent.

Consider the legitimate political rape of one Todd Akin, Republican candidate for US Senate from Missouri. Akin made the factually accurate statement that it is very difficult biologically for a female to get pregnant as a result of rape, because the female body has ways of protecting itself. However, he made the mistake of using the (again factually correct) term “legitimate rape†to describe forcible rape.

The obvious point being that one of the popular ways for sluts to get cash, prizes, and empathy is to engage in consensual sex with many guys, and then accuse men of raping them. This is especially popular if the town slut ends up pregnant, and now has to engage in hamsterbatics to protect her reputation.

Consensual sex was never considered rape in English and American common law, until feminism came along. Now, a woman is at liberty to decide she was raped long after she consented to sexual intercourse, and she is free to legitimately ruin the life of any fellow whom she willingly invites into her bedchamber.

Todd Akin knows this, which is why he once sponsored a bill to change the legal definition of rape to cover only forcible rape. But that directly interferes with the desires of sluts everywhere to hamsterbate: They aren’t really sluts, you see. They were just raped by 40 different boyfriends on 30 different occasions (yes, you read that right).

To quote Austin Powers, “She’s the village bicycle. Everybody’s had a ride.†But now that her tires have gone flat and her seat is cracked and her rims are warped, she wants to claim she never actually consented to being ridden in the Tour de Pants.

And in feminist logic, a woman’s right to hamsterbate trumps the civil rights of an innocent man.

And a woman’s right to murder her child trumps the right of that child to live.

But lest you think this was the only attempt by Obama to get out the put-out vote, consider the left’s campaign to get women to vote with their “lady parts.†The problem with this, of course, is that when a hundred-millionaire powerful high-finance type with great hair showed his alpha teeth in the first debate, female voters started to do just that: Mitt apparently gives Julia the gina tingles. And now the slut vote is moving his way gender gap is closing.

Obama’s problem, of course, is that tingles are one of the most powerful forces in the universe. Tingles cannot be stopped by reason, by evidence, or by logic. And since Obama doesn’t even know what those three things are, his chance of regaining the slut vote are slim.

And Mitt Romney, for all his quirks, apparently comes across a bit like Pierce Brosnan as Thomas Crowne. Or at least, as someone as rich as Thomas Crowne, which he is. And social dominance being the turn-on that it is, you can’t get more dominant than taking the most powerful man in the world to the tool shed in nationally televised debate.

When hypergamy is casting the ballot, positions don’t matter. Or maybe, in Julia’s mind, they do.

Do I make you horny?

So Obama’s latest strategery is to conflate a slut voting for Obama or Romney with losing her virginity to either of said candidates. The problem with this is three-fold:

1) It is extremely crass and un-Presidential, which means Obama is further alienating the slut-hating male vote.

2) It is highly unlikely there are any virgins left of voting age who would consider Obama (except for fat chicks, but who wants the ignominy of winning the fat-chick vote?).

3) If you ask women whether they’d rather get nailed by a radical Marxist university lecturer whose wife apparently dominates him like Hulk Hogan, or a multi-millionaire baron of corporate finance who made the aforementioned lecturer his intellectual beyotch on live TV, well, Obama’s going to have to be resigned to cleaning house and baking cookies for Michelle for at least the next four years.

[shesinsane]

Consider the legitimate political rape of one Todd Akin, Republican candidate for US Senate from Missouri. Akin made the factually accurate statement that it is very difficult biologically for a female to get pregnant as a result of rape, because the female body has ways of protecting itself. However, he made the mistake of using the (again factually correct) term “legitimate rape†to describe forcible rape.

Shouldn't you be looking for a witch to burn?

The obvious point being that one of the popular ways for sluts to get cash, prizes, and empathy is to engage in consensual sex with many guys, and then accuse men of raping them. This is especially popular if the town slut ends up pregnant, and now has to engage in hamsterbatics to protect her reputation.

This is where the author should've quoted Roger "some women rape easy" Rivard.

So Obama’s latest strategery is to conflate a slut voting for Obama or Romney with losing her virginity to either of said candidates. The problem with this is three-fold:

Just because she likes being naked doesn't make Lena Dunham a slut.

1) It is extremely crass and un-Presidential, which means Obama is further alienating the slut-hating male vote.

There's what, maybe 100 American guys that fall into that category?

[Arete]

Being as I am unmarried and almost at the end of my child bearing potential, I feel I can speak for a lot of sluts everywhere: We would much rather be nailed by Barack than by Mitt. It's not. a. contest.

Carry on.

[lovefromgirl]

Who the fuck is this fuckhead? And please, please, is he single? Not because I'd want him -- because nobody should have that inflicted upon hir.

Akin made the factually accurate statement that it is very difficult biologically for a female to get pregnant as a result of rape, because the female body has ways of protecting itself.

Every time I hear this, I want to know exactly what those ways are. If you can't explain 'em, don't argue for their existence.

However, he made the mistake of using the (again factually correct) term “legitimate rape†to describe forcible rape.

...isn't rape forcible by definition? Sex minus consent equals forced sex, last I checked.

The obvious point being that one of the popular ways for sluts to get cash, prizes, and empathy is to engage in consensual sex with many guys, and then accuse men of raping them.

Obviously never been female, raped, or pregnant.

Now, a woman is at liberty to decide she was raped long after she consented to sexual intercourse, and she is free to legitimately ruin the life of any fellow whom she willingly invites into her bedchamber.

Define "willingly". Define "consented". What's between a rock and a hard place isn't consent or free will.

And a woman’s right to murder her child trumps the right of that child to live.

The right of a zygote, an embryo, or a fetus to live may actually trump mine. I could commit suicide due to utterly screwy brain chemistry during a pregnancy, which would take one more slut off the face of the earth, but the baby would die, too. Or I could do nothing about an ectopic and bleed out when it ruptures, ditto. Or... or... or. I can think of very few cases in which the mother's death is good for the baby's survival prospects.

But lest you think this was the only attempt by Obama to get out the put-out vote, consider the left’s campaign to get women to vote with their “lady parts.â€

No number of Kegels will allow me to control a pen that precisely with my vagina. Sorry.

The problem with this, of course, is that when a hundred-millionaire powerful high-finance type with great hair showed his alpha teeth in the first debate, female voters started to do just that: Mitt apparently gives Julia the gina tingles. And now the slut vote is moving his way gender gap is closing.

Who's Julia? I've missed something. -- But I assure you he didn't give all of us the "gina tingles". My libido correlates with my sovereignty over my own body. Funny, that.

Obama’s problem, of course, is that tingles are one of the most powerful forces in the universe. Tingles cannot be stopped by reason, by evidence, or by logic.

Sure they can. Reason: Mitt's a douche. Evidence: Provided whenever he opens his mouth. Logic: I would regret sleeping with a douche. Or voting for one, in this case.

And social dominance being the turn-on that it is, you can’t get more dominant than taking the most powerful man in the world to the tool shed in nationally televised debate.

There are several world leaders who would probably like a word with you re: "most powerful man in the world".

Do I make you horny?

No.

3) If you ask women whether they’d rather get nailed by a radical Marxist university lecturer whose wife apparently dominates him like Hulk Hogan, or a multi-millionaire baron of corporate finance who made the aforementioned lecturer his intellectual beyotch on live TV, well, Obama’s going to have to be resigned to cleaning house and baking cookies for Michelle for at least the next four years.

Actually, I'd take the radical Marxist lecturer. He probably knows what a clitoris is.

[FlorenceHamilton]

This slut would bang Obama over Mittens any day of the week.

[AtroposHeart]

3) If you ask women whether they’d rather get nailed by a radical Marxist university lecturer whose wife apparently dominates him like Hulk Hogan, or a multi-millionaire baron of corporate finance who made the aforementioned lecturer his intellectual beyotch on live TV, well, Obama’s going to have to be resigned to cleaning house and baking cookies for Michelle for at least the next four years.

Actually, I'd take the radical Marxist lecturer. He probably knows what a clitoris is.

[Witsec7]

Being as I am unmarried and almost at the end of my child bearing potential, I feel I can speak for a lot of sluts everywhere: We would much rather be nailed by Barack than by Mitt. It's not. a. contest.

Carry on.

Amen.

[gustava]

Being as I am unmarried and almost at the end of my child bearing potential, I feel I can speak for a lot of sluts everywhere: We would much rather be nailed by Barack than by Mitt. It's not. a. contest.

Carry on.

I am with Obama in my hagdom.

[Guest Anonymous]

Amen.

I second that. Besides being more attractive, Mr. Obama has a bloodstream, which I doubt Mitt has been graced with.

[FundiesInMyFamily]

This slut has had a mad crush on Joe Biden for years. He's old enough to be my dad, but something about him makes me a little nutty.

[FlorenceHamilton]

This slut has had a mad crush on Joe Biden for years. He's old enough to be my dad, but something about him makes me a little nutty.

He has a great smile.

[2xx1xy1JD]

Wow, the whole blog is just a cesspool.

I just read the stuff and thought "no wonder you guys are all single/divorced". A bunch of real charmers there. I'm sure Jesus must be really proud.

[emmiedahl]

I am a recovering slut, but if I were single I would do Obama and/or Biden. But most especially Clinton. Either of the Clintons. I think I would have a hard time keeping my hands off Bill if I met him in person. I was removing garments without even thinking about it while watching his speech at the Democratic convention.

eta: Romney? Not if he were the last man on earth. There is not enough Purell on the globe to wash away that level of slime.

[FlorenceHamilton]

I have Clinton fantasies too.

[debrand]

How many men do you have to sleep with before your considered a slut? I had a friend with benefits once and I slept with my husband on the first date, so I guess I qualify.

I'd much rather sleep with Obama than Mitt. There isn't even a contest between the two.

I was a little surprised that CMD stands for Christian Men's Defense.

[Guest Anonymous]

President Obama got my vote, and Mr. Snarky's too. Heavens, does that make him a male slut? In second thought, he might be flattered.

[valsa]

I think I would have a hard time keeping my hands off Bill if I met him in person.

I think he's old enough to be my grandfather but I'd still hit that like the fist of an angry god.

[desertvixen]

Being as I am unmarried and almost at the end of my child bearing potential, I feel I can speak for a lot of sluts everywhere: We would much rather be nailed by Barack than by Mitt. It's not. a. contest.

Thirded!

[debrand]

These is idiotic.

slwerner says:

October 26, 2012 at 9:22 am

â€This matter of women not being easily impregnated via forced rape is a biological reality; and I believe it should be noted that the same physiological functioning – the role of the cervix in controlling access to sperm entering the fallopian tubes – is also an important consideration as to why cheating wives, unlike actual rape victims, are more likely to get pregnant by their illicit lover.

The terror of being brutally raped will prevent most victims from becoming deeply aroused (even though the physio-mechanical activity is basically the same), which, in turn, means that the cervix will not tend to dilate, and create a better opening though which sperm might pass.

However, when engaging in illicit affairs, women tend to become highly aroused (often much more so than what they experience regularly with their husbands), and thus the cervix tends to dilate. The response of the cervix to deep arousal is a fairly reliable mechanism by which women subconsciously influence which men (who they have sexual intercourse with, willingly or otherwise) are likely to impregnate them.

It’s certainly not a fool-proof means, as some (legitimate) rape victims do report becoming aroused (arousal having both physical as well as mental components). But, in situations wherein a woman (married, or with long-term partner) later reports that she has become pregnant due to having been raped, it should raise at least some suspicion – especially if she made no immediate outcry of rape (Of some more-recent notoriety, the son of the New York City Police commissioner, and TV show host Greg Kelly, found himself accused of rape after the women he picked up at a bar tried to explain her subsequent pregnancy to her boyfriend).

I doubt there is any systematic study which would show just how often this sort of rape-claim to account for a pregnancy happens, but it seems that it would not be terrible uncommon.

In as much as the Socialist Left and Gender Feminism are deeply intertwined, those on the political Left tend to benefit via issues that seem to be beneficial to promiscuous women, from the unapologetic sluts to the otherwise conservative Churchian cheating wives. Being tied to “services†for promiscuous women serves to gain such women’s votes for Leftists.

Just as a (perhaps) related aside, many years ago, when I was more of a mainline Churchian, I took a deeper interest in the whole abortion/pro-life debate. One thing I read was a report from the Guttmacher Institute which detailed some information about women who sought abortions. At the time (mid 80’s), I found it surprising that the report cited a significant number of married women who used abortion services (supposedly for family planning/family size). Some years later I was again surprised by the reaction of some supposedly conservative women to a proposal (I believe it was by Rick Santorum) to require the notification of husbands if married women sought abortions. Being somewhat slow, I had never grasped the true significance of the numbers of married women who’d had abortions until that moment when some “conservative†woman on Fox News was making the weak and specious argument that there might be women with violent husbands who would not want their wives aborting their children [intuitively, one quickly realizes that the reverse is much more likely, with abusive/controlling husbands demanding theirs wives abort}. It finally popped into my head that the real reason that wives would want to abort was more likely because they knew (or had reason to suspect) that the child was NOT their husbands (especially when it would be readily apparent).

Now, of course, no politician on the Left is ever going to put forth any measure that would, in any way, place limitations on a woman’s access to abortion services. Women are well aware of this, and any woman who has reason to believe that she might find herself in need of such a “service†is going to have to consider how her vote might affect her own access (or even that of her promiscuous friends).

It seems that female promiscuity is the perview of the political Left.

[Naga Viper]

Barack's not quite my type, but Michelle would be hard to say no to.

Biden, maybe once, though more just so I could try to get Beau's number after.

Ryan, yes. And then I'd out him afterward.

I'd tell Mitt to clean up first. Then while he's in the shower, I'd steal his wallet and run.

[doggie]

I think I found where the devil lives. he lives in these Neanderthals heads. What a bunch of hate filled woman hating stupid beyond measure hate filled pseudo Christians. Lets take up a fund to have them neutered with a rusty chainsaw.

[Flummoxed by fundies]

The tingles you say? Oh yeah I remember the tingles. I bet Mitt could give more than a few sluts a good tingle or two.

[Arete]

How many men do you have to sleep with before your considered a slut? I had a friend with benefits once and I slept with my husband on the first date, so I guess I qualify.

I'd much rather sleep with Obama than Mitt. There isn't even a contest between the two.

I was a little surprised that CMD stands for Christian Men's Defense.

I'm going to guess that any woman who had sex for the first time other than on her wedding night qualifies as a slut to these guys.

[valsa]

I'm going to guess that any woman who had sex for the first time other than on her wedding night qualifies as a slut to these guys.

I'd add "and/or has ever enjoyed sex at all".

[crazyforkate]

Thirded!

Three-way with him and Michelle, personally!

And I'd only boink Mittens or Ryan if I could somehow expose them. Haha.