Jump to content

The Random Eye

  • entries
    14
  • comments
    26
  • views
    4,930

Gawd, Guns, and Gore, or Yee-Haw!...'Murica! -- The Purge: Anarchy


EyeQueue

3,879 views

Spoiler warnings, natch.

Random thoughts about The Purge: Anarchy:

The-Purge-Anarchy-Second-Trailer-Next-Te

Aw, Hail Naw!

I liked this film more than the first installment, which followed an upper-class family ensconced in their high-tech, uber-fortified (or so they thought) McMansion on the night of The Purge. Check out this clip of their lockdown procedure here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbUTbqwKtEE.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with this franchise, The Purge is a high-concept near-future horror franchise which centers around an annual event called The Purge, a 12-hour period where all crime, including murder, is officially sanctioned by the new US government, styled as "The New Founding Fathers of America."  And, yeah. If you haven't guessed it already, these New Founding Fathers are way into Gawd, Guns, and Gore--not necessarily in that order. So, basically the films envision a near-future (they're set in the 2020s) right-wing takeover of the US.

The annual Purge was instituted after an economic collapse in the US, and by Constitutional Amendment allows citizens to "Release the Beast" and act out their most base impulses during this 12-hour period, and this supposedly benefits society by creating an extremely low crime rate for the rest of the year, and almost nil unemployment. Plus, several other benefits which remain a bit amorphous and should probably be better conceptualized by director/writer James DeMonaco to tighten things up. I hope he'll get right on that for the 3rd installment.

Fortunately, I can suspend my disbelief, since these types of near-future dystopias are so totally my jam.

Anyway, part 2 takes us from the tony protected neighborhoods of the privileged that was the focus of Part 1, to the every-man-for-himself free-for-all on the gritty streets of working-class and poor Los Angeles. As our window onto this world, the film follows two groups of people who are left shit out of luck and unprotected on the LA streets when The Purge starts. Fortunately for them, they hook up with one bad ass *shutyomouf* (and who is pretty hot IMHO) who ends up protecting them--although he's pretty unconvinced at first and finds these n00bs a huge burden. Plus, they're interfering with his whole reason for being out and ready to Purge (a sub-plot that isn't related to my main point in this entry, so I'm ignoring it).

Purge4.jpg

The guy on the left is Frank Grillo, who plays "Sergeant." He's pretty hot, and takes care of these four inexperienced and hapless people who are left out without protection during The Purge.

There are some predictable moments, and some twists. Overall, though, I think the film makes some relevant social commentary.

**America's gun culture: Duh. This is the huge no-brainer, and the film almost pretty much beats you over the head with this. Guns of all types and calibers permeate the film, and if you haven't already guessed, this is a super-violent flick, so be warned. I don't usually like violence for violence's sake, but I get that this is a dark satire and is purposefully over-the-top in its violent moments. Interestingly, the vast majority of the explicit/graphic violence is gun-related. For example, while you see a lot of people walking around with machetes, we don't see bodies being hacked up.

In fact, it's really interesting how the filmmakers prompt the expectation of the more exotic machete violence, and then subvert those expectations by focusing almost exclusively on the more mundane and real-life gun violence. And I think this is strategic, especially with the fairly recent Sandy Hook probably having been on the writer/director's radar during this movie's creation. There are a few stabbity-stab moments, but these scenes are always from a distance. Where the film lingers in close-up on violence, and savors the blood spatter is when the bullets start flying.

purge-anarchy-big-daddy-minigun.gif?w=66

The wet dream of frothing-at-the-mouth NRAers. Plus...'Murica!

In true dystopian fashion, The Purge: Anarchy takes the US's current obsession with guns, and the NRA's rhetoric of "Arm everyone to the teeth" out to their most extreme and logical conclusion: a society where one day a year, everyone just blasts the Hell out of each other. Uh...no thanks.

ThePurgeAnarchy_trailer.jpg

Big Dick Cheney Clone Guy Is Watching You!

**The rhetoric of the New Founding Fathers of America: Intertwines religion, violence, class/race antagonism, and patriotism in a simplistic way strategically designed to rile up the average working Joe or Jane--and it's mostly Joes who are out Purging. The messaging is very right-wing dog whistle-y, and unfortunately reminiscent of current sound bites that we're getting from GOP candidates such as Trump and Carson. It's amplified here to level eleventy, but it works as social commentary. And makes this film seem not that far displaced into the future or the improbable.

**The metaphor of the rich using up (literally, to death) the poor: Part of the ultimate goal is for population control of "undesireables," which means those who are perceived to be a drain on the social safety net. Meaning, of course, the poors and/or the browns/blacks/non-whites. One scene features an old African-American man with severe health problems, and who is too poor to afford his medicine, making himself a "martyr" to a rich uber-white family whose patriarch resembles Mitt Romney, complete with Blonde Stepford Wife and Shiny Kids with dazzling Chiclet smiles:

short-subjects_30.jpg

Things aren't going to go too well for Grandpa, sad to say. And it probably won't be quick, since the most difficult thing these folks are accustomed to cutting is the roasted lamb their cook presents them at Sunday dinner.

Oh, and being a "martyr" to such a family basically means they have a safe way to Purge behind their protected walls in exchange for transferring $100,000 into the surviving family's bank account (his family are in no way complicit and are devastated to find out he has made this decision).

So, also an indictment against the US healthcare system that passively kills those who can't afford its benefits.

**A quasi-Hunger Games/Hostel/The Running Man entertainment extravaganza where the rich pay poor Purgers to abduct people off the streets and haul them into an uptown auction where the highest bidder pays for the privilege to hunt and kill these hapless victims in a controlled area: More metaphorical commentary on the rich taking advantage of the poor, with a subtext that it's the poors's fault they are in that position. All propped up with a healthy dose of references to Gawd! and 'Murica.

thumb-02.jpg

Chauncy, dear, which pearls go best with blood spatter?

**Carmello and his fellow revolutionaries: A predominantly African-American group of anarchists/revolutionaries who protest against The Purge and try to get their fellow citizens to wake up to the fact that the NFFA is simply using frustrated disadvantaged people's anger against themselves as a convenient weapon to thin out their own numbers and make them a more compliant (and less costly) population. Shades of the current #blacklivesmatter movement? Black Panthers? The austerity movement to eliminate social programs and "the welfare state?"

c4spqemuunrvcfiaknhf.jpg

Viva la revolucion, motherfuckers!

Altogether, I enjoyed this film and felt that the social commentary, while sometimes blatant, was thoughtful and relevant. And the whole thing was wrapped up in a package of characters that I started to care about. I'm looking forward to Part 3, which will be a prequel and will take us back to events surrounding the very first Purge.

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

Walking Cat Bed

Posted

The most interesting thing I noticed is that the Rich People were shiny, happy, and smiling unless they were targets. It seems like one possible outcome of the fake-happy attitude that fundies like so much.

And, yes, Frank Gillo causes spontaneous purring. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Curious

Posted

Thanks for the review/recap.   I didn't care for the first movie very much, so have skipped the second one when it's been on the various movie channels.  This one actually sounds better than the first, so I think I'll give it a go next time it's on.

A prequel does sound interesting.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
EyeQueue

Posted

The most interesting thing I noticed is that the Rich People were shiny, happy, and smiling unless they were targets. It seems like one possible outcome of the fake-happy attitude that fundies like so much.

And, yes, Frank Gillo causes spontaneous purring. 

Good point! Yes--in most of the shots where they're showing the rich people, they are definitely Keeping Sweet!

Thanks for the review/recap.   I didn't care for the first movie very much, so have skipped the second one when it's been on the various movie channels.  This one actually sounds better than the first, so I think I'll give it a go next time it's on.

A prequel does sound interesting.

You are very welcome. This one, IMHO, did a way better job of exploring the various social ramifications that I think the writer/director was going for. And hopefully the prequel will continue in that vein.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Ozlsn

      Posted

      3 hours ago, Xan said:

      She could have actually had the kitchen designed so it would be easier to prep for meals and clean up afterwards.  I see nothing like that

      I don't think her mind goes to functionality because she's not using that space for much. She's all pretty! Shiny!! NEW!!

      3 hours ago, Xan said:

      She mentioned in a story yesterday that she had to clean some poopy diapers so the boys are nearly four and she still isn't toilet training them.  They will stay babies for a couple more years

      I would be getting that looked into (ie seeing a continence nurse), that's unusually late to be still in diapers, particularly with older siblings. If she can't see that that is a problem it's a bit of a worry.

    • MomKB

      Posted

      Ugh, she is constantly reminding everyone that they built the house themselves. 🙄

    • Mama Mia

      Posted (edited)

      2 hours ago, justmy2cents said:

      I think Joy is one of the siblings that was critical of Jill when she pulled away from the family the way she did, and they may not have much of a relationship right now. Don’t see any interaction on social media, though I know we don’t see everything. That would be a shame if that was the case, especially since Jill was there for Joy when Joy lost Annabelle. 

      Joy commented on the IG post. Saying she was heartbroken for them or similar. She comments occasionally, the usual “ how cute” about a kid pic or whatever.  All the married daughters seem supportive of each other.  I don’t think we can really judge off social media interaction, or even photos together. They are all busy, with lots of small children, and most of the events we get photos of are crowded with not everyone present necessarily in the picture. They may text or send each other funny memes or get together for coffee and we know nothing about it. 

      Edited by Mama Mia
      • Upvote 1
    • anachronistic

      Posted

      In Chelsea's Easter pictures George is wearing an outfit that I literally have never seen ever. It almost looks like weird plus fours. She is slowly inching him into pants I guess. Is Pentecostal fashion very big and blousy like what the older girls wear? It looks like the shape would be comfortable but the fabrics wouldn't be. I guess if you are aiming for a potato sack shape you need to add as much lace and ruffles and florals as possible to make sure that people know it is clothing. 

    • Giraffe

      Posted

      10 minutes ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

      If the kids all get a bath before bed and then put on their clothes for the next day, it’s not too gross. But I always had bed wetters so changing everything in the morning was a non negotiable. But if her kids don’t wet the bed, then I guess it’s not a huge deal.

      There's no way her kids are magically not bed wetters. They've probably just learned she doesn't give a shit so they grab an older sibling or their grandmother for help. No doubt Braggie has no clue what's going on with her kids over the course of a day. She's an aggressively incompetent parent. 

      Braggie strikes me as the type of parent who has this idea in her head of what her children do over the course of the day while her older children and her mother would be standing there wondering what strangers she's talking about. 



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.