Jump to content

In a fairytale world

  • entries
    47
  • comments
    165
  • views
    6,004

If it's syncopated rhythm...


OnceUponATime

887 views

Growing up I was only allowed to listen to 'wholesome Christian music'. It was a crazy rule really. One time I won a tape which wasn't by a Christian singer. My mother not only unwound it, but also cut the tape into pieces! Rules were rules you see. Except for one of my siblings, who was allowed to keep their The Real McCoy tape... I'm pretty sure that really didn't fit into Christian music, ymmv so I'll let you judge for yourself.

Spoiler

 

 

 

Listening to christian music wasn't all bad. I could freak out my mother by cranking up some Underoath, Pillar or Disciple. Plus I learned key gardening skills from Christian music:

The Lads (The Cactus Song) - Cacti and bonsai trees can live together in harmony. Apparently plants don't bitch fight as much as humans so generally they don't give a shit about who they are seated next to

Audio Adrenaline (The Houseplant Song) - Plants hate music with a beat. "If it's syncopated rhythm then your soul is gonna rot" Instead of pissing off your neighbors with music, go put your plants outside in the sun and go driving with your neighbors late at night.

Five Iron Frenzy (Dandelions) - Weeds can be a sign of love, yeah they're just flowers too

 

But personally I don't really believe in playing music to plants. I believe that letting plants listen to audiobooks is far superior. It will help stimulate their little brains way more than music will. ;)

  1. The carer of plants (aka the weeder) is less likely to dance on top of you if an audiobook is playing
  2. The carer is more likely to spend more time caring for you, because it is less boring
  3. Stories are awesome. If you are unsure of what your outside plants should hear while you weed them, I would suggest starting off with something like Tess of the d'Urbervilles by Thomas Hardy

 

I'll leave you with this song, which would have horrified my parents:

Spoiler

 

 

  • Upvote 3

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Myrtille

Posted

I only discovered audio books a few weeks ago and now I have two books to listen to. I'm going to observe my little plants to see if they like books better than music :)

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
OnceUponATime

Posted

16 minutes ago, Myrtille said:

I only discovered audio books a few weeks ago and now I have two books to listen to. I'm going to observe my little plants to see if they like books better than music :)

Audiobooks are great. I love them while I garden and do housework. I listened to this version of Tess: https://librivox.org/tess-of-the-durbervilles/ I love public domain so much :D

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Myrtille

Posted

Oh, thanks for the link! For the moment I use Audible as I had a promotion code for it, but I find it a tad expensive so I'll sure check Librivox :) .

I love Tess d'Urbervilles. I read it for the first time as a kid and I remember fighting with my sister over it (we wanted to read it at the same time). Mum thought it wasn't exactly age appropriate for us (we were 12 or something like that), but she never stopped us from reading whatever we wanted.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
OnceUponATime

Posted

23 minutes ago, Myrtille said:

but I find it a tad expensive so I'll sure check Librivox

Librivox is nice because everything is out of copyright restrictions and read by volunteers thus free. IIRC- most books narrated are also on Project Gutenburg (sp) in ebook form. I do recommend listening to a bit of the first chapter before downloading especially if the book is solo-read. Some narrators have not so nice voices ;) 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo?

Posted

" 'First of all,' he said, 'that's Wagner that you're playin', I've never heard of Petra, and isn't Megadeath all dead?' " 

Thanks for the flashback!

This one always annoyed my older sister:

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • QuiverFullofBooks

      Posted

      10 minutes ago, 4boysmum said:

      Vba3c births (vaginal birth after 3 c-sections) are not common in the USA, but my doctor and I are pretty confident that it was a good choice for my situation.

      Michelle Duggar is very pro-VBAC (having had C-sections with the two sets of twins) and it worked well for her.

      • Upvote 1
    • 4boysmum

      Posted

      I (not a medical professional, but have had 6 children and spent a fair amount of time chatting with OBs) was told that 3 c-sections is a tipping point where, after that, future pregnancies will have higher risk of placental complications.  I understood it as more scar tissue = less favorable places for a placenta to implant in subsequent pregnancies and if it attaches to scar tissue it can cause serious problems.  I know some other posters here work in the field so maybe you can explain it better.

      With that said, I have had 3 c-sections and nobody told me to avoid pregnancy after the last one.  When I did get pregnant again I was all set to have a 4th c-section and no one seemed terribly concerned other than they did look at placenta placement carefully on ultrasound and said it was fine.  If it had not been fine they said I would have been transferred to Boston (which is fortunately just 45 minutes away) as a higher risk patient.  If a woman gets pregnant the baby has to come out one way or another.  It's not like they can force it to stay in forever because you already used up your allowed 3 surgeries, and the doctor said she had operated on women having at least 5 c-sections.

      I did not have the 4th c-section.  I changed doctors and pushed hard for a chance to vbac.  I have gone the vba3c route twice now, in an excellent hospital in Boston with an amazing doctor.  Vba3c births (vaginal birth after 3 c-sections) are not common in the USA, but my doctor and I are pretty confident that it was a good choice for my situation.

      • Upvote 2
    • Dutch_girl

      Posted

      14 hours ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

       

      7524864B-7C71-445B-9D8F-412912B2C83F.jpeg

      No Abby, your children are not constantly running everywhere.. You on the other hand.. *cough* New York, Canada, Europe *cough*

      • Upvote 2
      • I Agree 1
    • JermajestyDuggar

      Posted

      12 hours ago, CaptainFunderpants said:

      So now we have track Brad Pitt in Nick Symmonds and fundie Brad Pitt in Christian Bowers.

      All three succeed in both being attractive AND really off-putting.

      Liz had a thing with Carver a few years ago (to the point that Carver was pictured sitting next to Marlin at several meals, Liz and Carver always had to have a sibling between them in photos, and Carver openly posted creeper pics of Liz on instagram), and IIRC it lasted months. No idea how that would add to the dynamic of her and Christian. It probably wouldn't matter.

      The other factor is it appears Marlin and Becky want their daughters to get married on the later side, which is why Carver and Liz likely didn't go anywhere... Liz is still only 21, while Chelsy and Allison were both on the later side of 26, which is another factor.

      I think they would be fine with her marrying earlier. But girls have to wait until some fundie guy is interested. Marlin pushed his boys to get married to the Bowers girls. But it was hard for him to push the girls because they have to sit and wait patiently for a Prince Charming to come along. 

      • Upvote 1
    • NachosFlandersStyle

      Posted

      That makes 5 new Mortons in 2024, by my count, and the year is young...

      Does anyone know if Rachel had her baby? Kressant posted an IG story recently with a baby, but didn't say whose.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.