Jump to content

FJ Reviews & Recaps

  • entries
    488
  • comments
    466
  • views
    84,455

Contributors to this blog

  • crazyforkate 304
  • Maggie Mae 97
  • jinjy2 35
  • MarblesMom 33
  • Curious 9
  • GolightlyGrrl 8
  • kunoichi66 2

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory: Chapters 7, 8, and 9


Maggie Mae

1,372 views

Chapter 7: Charlie's Birthday

Charlie's present is a bar of "Wonka's Whipple-Scrumptious Fudgemallow Delight" and I am not going to lie, it sounds delicious, and my opinion is based only on the name, because it is not described at all.  Charlie's entire family gathers to watch him unwrap this candy bar. They remind him that it's still a candy bar, that it has the same chance as any other candy bar. Finally they tell him to hurry up and get on with it before he's late for school. Charlie opens the bar up all the way to reveal...

a candy bar. 

Charlie tries to share the chocolate with his family, and they won't even dream of it. 

Chapter 8: Two More Golden Tickets Found 

The newspaper announced that two more more winners have been found. The third winner is "Miss Violet Beauregarde." Violet says that she "is a gum chewer, normally. But when she heard about the tickets, she switched to candy bars. Now she's back to gum." She also claims to have been chewing the same piece of gum for three months. She also criticizes her mother, talks about leaving gum on the elevator buttons, and has a frenemy named "Miss Cordelia Prinzmetel." 

The Grandmothers hate her. 

The fourth ticket is found by Mike Teavee. Mike Teavee is nine-years old, and so far the only child who was given an age. I could be wrong, but I don't think so. Mike Teavee can't stop watching TV and shooting off toy guns. The Grandmothers are appalled. Grandpa George helpfully points out that there is only one ticket left.  

Chapter 9: Grandpa Joe Takes a Gamble

The day after Violet and Mike are introduced, Charlie goes to see his grandparents. They are all sleeping, with the exception of Grandpa Joe. Grandpa Joe gives Charlie a 10-cent piece, and tells him to go get another Wonka bar. Charlie buys a "Wonka Nutty Crunch Surprise," which would not have been my choice. It is not a winner. This chapter is kind of a cute moment between Charlie and Grandpa Joe. 

 

One of the things I'm noticing on this reread is the lack of real details. I've read this book a LOT. And I've seen the movies. The kids aren't really given nationalities or ages. Slugworth is just a rival candy maker. Grandpa Joe doesn't explain why he has a ten-cent piece. If you had asked me last week, I would have sworn in a court of law that the Buckets had a TV they pushed into the Grandparent's room to watch the announcements on. But, no, they are just reading a newspaper. That makes sense, though, because it seems to be taking place in an unknown industrial city, sometime during the industrial revolution. 

  • Upvote 6

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

violynn

Posted

The movies seep into our consciousness and add details to the book that weren't there.  I watched my twins have a ridiculous argument over who gave Harry Potter gillyweed.  Dobby in the book, Neville, movie.  The Dobby proponent had read the book multiple times and viewed the movie once.  Her twin, the opposite.  What was strange is that the book twin doubted her version b/c Neville made more sense, as he was so up on herbology.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
HerNameIsBuffy

Posted

I always thought the fudgemallow delight sounded fabulous.  You can't go wrong with Marshmallow and chocolate.

i have a couple of peeps and some chocolate eggs left...maybe I should wonkafy them and make my own.

And who would chew gum for that long?  I hate the sound of gum chewing - if I wrote the book she's have been offed first.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Maggie Mae

Posted

46 minutes ago, violynn said:

The movies seep into our consciousness and add details to the book that weren't there.  I watched my twins have a ridiculous argument over who gave Harry Potter gillyweed.  Dobby in the book, Neville, movie.  The Dobby proponent had read the book multiple times and viewed the movie once.  Her twin, the opposite.  What was strange is that the book twin doubted her version b/c Neville made more sense, as he was so up on herbology.

TV/Movie/Book contamination is a real issue. Someone should start a foundation for the cure! (Just kidding, of course.) 

Didn't Moody give Neville the book about herbology in the hope that Neville would tell Harry, and when Harry was too proud or noble or whatever to ask his friends, Fake Moody had to get Dobby to do it? So they both were sort of right. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Maggie Mae

Posted

39 minutes ago, HerNameIsBuffy said:

I always thought the fudgemallow delight sounded fabulous.  You can't go wrong with Marshmallow and chocolate.

i have a couple of peeps and some chocolate eggs left...maybe I should wonkafy them and make my own.

And who would chew gum for that long?  I hate the sound of gum chewing - if I wrote the book she's have been offed first.

The gum chewing is gross, and she's obnoxious. I don't know if Mike Teavee is more obnoxious though or not. I find him to be plenty obnoxious in the film, and his mother... Ugh. But then again, Violet's father (in the movie) is a used car salesman. That's, like, code for "I'm a giant douche." Veruca is spoiled, but I'd have liked to have her hang around a bit more in the movie. At least she was entertaining. And Augustus was just boring. Charlie suffers from a lack of personality. But, I suppose as far as "bad" kids go, these five aren't the worst I've ever seen. I mean, their vices are just gluttony, spoiled, gum-chewing, and television. If we wrote it today, what would the exaggerations be? Creepy? Sadistic? Vain/Vapid with an instagram account? 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
HerNameIsBuffy

Posted

7 minutes ago, Maggie Mae said:

The gum chewing is gross, and she's obnoxious. I don't know if Mike Teavee is more obnoxious though or not. I find him to be plenty obnoxious in the film, and his mother... Ugh. But then again, Violet's father (in the movie) is a used car salesman. That's, like, code for "I'm a giant douche." Veruca is spoiled, but I'd have liked to have her hang around a bit more in the movie. At least she was entertaining. And Augustus was just boring. Charlie suffers from a lack of personality. But, I suppose as far as "bad" kids go, these five aren't the worst I've ever seen. I mean, their vices are just gluttony, spoiled, gum-chewing, and television. If we wrote it today, what would the exaggerations be? Creepy? Sadistic? Vain/Vapid with an instagram account? 

Maybe a kid obsessed with their social media, video game addict, pageant kid, bully, obnoxious know it all, and Charlie would still be the ultimate Mary Sue.  Ever noble and pure of heart and deed.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
violynn

Posted

1 hour ago, Maggie Mae said:
1 hour ago, Maggie Mae said:

TV/Movie/Book contamination is a real issue. Someone should start a foundation for the cure! (Just kidding, of course.) 

Didn't Moody give Neville the book about herbology in the hope that Neville would tell Harry, and when Harry was too proud or noble or whatever to ask his friends, Fake Moody had to get Dobby to do it? So they both were sort of right. 

 

That is what I told them!  However it is twins, so one of them had to be the *most* correct.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
blessalessi

Posted

I am behind and haven't read the actual book chapters yet, but the memories are etched on my soul and I am breathing them in and out, right now. :)

The saved sixpence story is one of my favourite parts of the book. I love Grandpa Joe for doing that for Charlie. It could have gone on tobacco @HerNameIsBuffy but it went on love instead. 

RIP Grandpa Joe, I've got your back, down here!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
HerNameIsBuffy

Posted

Just now, blessalessi said:

I am behind and haven't read the actual book chapters yet, but the memories are etched on my soul and I am breathing them in and out, right now. :)

The saved sixpence story is one of my favourite parts of the book. I love Grandpa Joe for doing that for Charlie. It could have gone on tobacco @HerNameIsBuffy but it went on love instead. 

RIP Grandpa Joe, I've got your back, down here!

Hmmm...could have gone for some eggs to get the boy some much needed protein.

i know!  This is why I don't write fiction. :) 

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
blessalessi

Posted

On 01/04/2016 at 1:05 AM, Maggie Mae said:

TV/Movie/Book contamination is a real issue. Someone should start a foundation for the cure! (Just kidding, of course.) 

I've got this covered already. There's going to be a National No Admission To The Cinema Until You Present Your Book Report Day.  Also there will be new Google Tactic rules to ensure that you get at least 6 pages of literary links before any film, tv or promotional merchandise shows up in your browser. 

Every Child Counts!

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Antipatriarch

      Posted

      On 4/16/2024 at 1:34 PM, clueliss said:

      Bickle will be closing the organization's doors and opening a new, smaller organization.  (Because a name change will obscure the toxic, slimy ick no doubt)

      Another motivation was apparently to limit legal liability, but Julie Roys quotes Boz Tchividjian from GRACE:

      Quote

      Boz Tchividjian, an attorney who represents multiple Jane Does who’ve accused Bickle of clergy sexual abuse, told TRR that IHOPKC is in “fantasyland” if it thinks closing down and starting a new organization protects its assets from lawsuit. To try to do so would be “fraudulent,” Tchividjian said.

      In their latest communication they're telling their donors: We're not closing! We're just reorganizing. OK then. https://julieroys.com/embattled-ihopkc-still-asking-donations-denies-plans-close/

      • Thank You 1
    • Antipatriarch

      Posted

      4 hours ago, hoipolloi said:

      And an endorsement from America's favorite fake historian:

      I thought that was David Barton. 🤣

    • theotherelise

      Posted

      I worked at FCA headquarters in kansas city for a brief period of time. Our team was all encouraged to go on an after-work trip to the IHOP prayer room. I chose not to go and I was the only one. But the (now insane) church I grew up in had been tied to Bickle early on and I'd always had a negative impression of him based on some weird prophecy stuff that people called him out on in the 90s. That said, my childhood church ended up back with IHOP and hired tons of their "graduates." Thankfully my parents are out now.

      • Upvote 2
    • theotherelise

      Posted

      Maybe I've just spent too much of my life listening to driscoll non-ironically in my youth and then finding my way through deconstruction through ex-mormon youtube.... but it occurs to me that Driscoll's persistence that he's had visions about affairs and the like is strikingly similar to the Visions of Glory "Spencer." And once you make that connection, all of Driscoll's spiritual warfare nonsense and demon trials have the potential to be even more sinister.

      • Upvote 2
    • RulerOfTheQueensNavy

      Posted (edited)

      On 3/13/2024 at 11:57 AM, hoipolloi said:

      An excellent commentary on the rotting corpse of the SBC and those who are protecting it:

      They are doing a series on Pressler over at The Wartburg Watch.  Nothing really new there, but a pretty good summary if you're not caught up.  

      What a lot of people including Wartburg seem to be missing is that Paul Pressler caring what the SBC believed is just a smokescreen.  The reality is this, the SBC is the single largest evangelical voting block in the country.  The lay people involved in the SBC from the Council of National Policy (like Paul Pressler, or Rod Martin) will do whatever it takes to keep this block voting Republican.  They need to cover up abuse in church, not for the sake of the church, but because it could breakup a huge block that can be controlled right now.

      Edited by RulerOfTheQueensNavy
      Wanted to add thoughts.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.