Jump to content

Randumb Thoughts

  • entries
    132
  • comments
    821
  • views
    14,628

What If Eve had Eaten the Apple First?


crazydaffodil

866 views

So, you about the butterfly effect, how one action in time has a ripple effect on the next sequence of things in line and how it can impact the course of the future.  Well, just think about the impact there would have been if Eve had eaten the apple first in the Garden of Eden instead of Adam!  What kind of trickle-down effect would that have had?

For one, women would have an Eve's apple in their throats!  But beyond that, would the seeds for reproduction be reversed?  Men would have menstrual cycles and give birth through those tiny little penis openings?  :ETONNER:  :omg:

No man would be this calm! 

untitled.png.a8bc4f94293ec641cb8c59fc6f6

Would women dominate society the way males have through most of history?  Would men then have vagina envy?  We'd probably dress different, men would shave their legs and armpits, and women could spit and fondle themselves in public! 

 

imagesJ1G8I59Z.jpg.bf74712a651d1b9176893

Just sayin...

Spoiler
Spoiler

 

 

 

  • Upvote 2

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

OnceUponATime

Posted

Did you know that there are people who think that forbidden fruit may have been:

tree.jpg.f60a21a8a20d0ab0bef3bb8361a6002

But because you mentioned it, someone we talk about here wrote a blog post about the first sin of Adam. You should totally check it out, it isn't that long. ;)

 

ps. A lot of people do believe that Eve ate first based on the following

Quote

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was delightful to look at, and a tree to be desired in order to make one wise and insightful, she took some of its fruit and ate it; and she also gave some to her husband with her, and he ate.

or maybe it happened like this

adameve.jpg.fdcf69e3b3a0c03db4ae84f9d716

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
formergothardite

Posted

I have never heard it taught that Adam ate the fruit first, it was always Eve.

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Curious

Posted

4 hours ago, formergothardite said:

I have never heard it taught that Adam ate the fruit first, it was always Eve.

I have not read the bible is about a million years and was never great about remembering stuff even when I was a practicing catholic, so your comment made me go look it up because I thought it was the other way around, as well.

Trust a person raised gotherdite to know the bible ;)   You are correct:

Quote

The woman eats the fruit and gives some to the man

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
crazydaffodil

Posted

4 hours ago, formergothardite said:

I have never heard it taught that Adam ate the fruit first, it was always Eve.

You may very well be right.  I am not a theologian whatsoever, so I'm not claiming this as absolute truth.  It's not the point of the post though.  It's more about the roles of males and females in history since then.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
clueliss

Posted

How about - Hey Adam, it would be interesting if you had, say, owned your own shit, owned up to biting the apple Eve offered instead of trying to shift ALL blame on Eve.  

Then there is a different perspective if you think in terms of the following:  Apple = Knowledge.  So what Eve did was open up Knowledge an awareness.  (and the Bible says that it was the "Tree of Knowledge of Good & Evil"  (there was also a Tree of Life).  Then the serpent comes along, proves he was paying more attention to God than Adam or Eve and Eve demonstrates that she misheard God thinking that if she ate she would die.    

(I may have used that passage in working with older kids to demonstrate the need to pay attention to what the Bible really says and not just what they think it says or heard someone say it said).  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • dawn9476

      Posted

      People on Reddit think Joy wasn't there, which is understandable since she went through something similar. Going to something like that would probably just bring all that pain back up.

    • Fundyrunner

      Posted

      RE: number of c-sections - I've heard of women in Europe being told 2 only; my friend's parents argued that Americans do more and their doctor okayed four. Women in US 4 only. But have met women who have had 5 sections. Two women I know were told at their last c-section (3rd and 5th) that their uterus was at the point of rupture and advised them to not have any more pregnancies. My point is it's very individual and a doctors should consider individual circumstances.

    • waltraute

      Posted

      2 hours ago, Father Son Holy Goat said:

      One sister could be a crime of opportunity, but 4 sisters and a babysitter presumably multiple times each is a preference. 

      And considering the age of the youngest sister at the time? Yeah, that's not a crime of opportunity.

      • I Agree 1
    • Ozlsn

      Posted

      16 minutes ago, neuroticcat said:

      She talked about how the little children were taking bread from the pantry and putting it in there.

      That could be concerning.

      Look I know kids do weird things as part of games, and maybe I've been reading JRod too much but my first thought was that they are hungry and hiding food for later.

    • neuroticcat

      Posted

      4 hours ago, Ozlsn said:

      This I just don't get. Surely at least part of the point of it is storage? At the very least wouldn't you clean just to make sure you hadn't brought spiders or other insects in with you?? Betting at least part of the price difference was cleaning, restoring, polishing and insect-free guarantee!

      She talked about how the little children were taking bread from the pantry and putting it in there. So maybe it was clean when it came home but then the food got in it? 

      Unclear. I guess I don't get why if you recorded that you wouldn't pause, wipe it out, and rerecord? I would be embarrassed by that. 



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.