Not all cultures believe in a practice of innocence until guilt is proven, but I happen to find it the fairest way to judge a defendant.
Just like when everyone was convinced that OJ Simpson killed his ex-wife and her friend, the facts that were presented did not conclusively determine his guilt. Similarly, the "facts" presented here by some of the members have not proven a damn thing. The fact that people would dig into a person's personal life, based solely on not believing their words or behavior, is not only unfair, but disrespectful.
Who here is EXACTLY who they claim to be? The internet is a comfortable place to embellish the truth to the way we want to slant it. Thus, we can't expect that everything everyone says here is fact.
Most importantly, what is the crime committed here? They lied? No one has ever done that here! Noooooooo! But even if they did lie, so what? It's not against the FJ rules and it's not a crime unless it is in a court of law.
So leave it all the hell alone! Stop acting like a bunch of 2nd graders and stop the bickering over petty shit!
You know, the is a forum for snarking, so there's a sense of humor and understanding that not every word is concrete truth here. It comes with the territory.
Just sayin...
- 4
22 Comments
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now